Family involvement and innovation in family enterprises

Kraśnicka, Teresa; Steinerowska-Streb, Izabella

doi:10.29119/1641-3466.2019.136.23

Artykuł - szczegóły

Tytuł artykułu

Family involvement and innovation in family enterprises

Autorzy

Kraśnicka Teresa , Steinerowska-Streb Izabella

Treść / Zawartość

Pełne teksty:

Pobierz

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.29119/1641-3466.2019.136.23

Warianty tytułu

Języki publikacji

Abstrakty

The impact of the family in the innovation of family businesses (FB) is a particularly important research issue that is explored in the literature on family entrepreneurship. The results of previous research conducted in the field are, however, ambiguous: some point to the positive impact of the family on innovation, and others see the contrary. The ambiguity of research results regarding the relationship between family involvement in a family business and the level of innovation of these firms justifies interest in investigating this topic. Thus, this paper aims at exploring the influence of the family on the implementation of innovations within family firms. In order to achieve the above research goal, research was carried out on a sample of 295 family businesses in Poland in 2018. Its findings indicate only one area where there are weak relationships between variables describing family involvement in the functioning of the firm and implemented innovations.

Słowa kluczowe

family involvement innovation family firm

zaangażowanie rodziny innowacje firma rodzinna

Wydawca

Wydawnictwo Politechniki Śląskiej

Czasopismo

Zeszyty Naukowe. Organizacja i Zarządzanie / Politechnika Śląska

Rocznik

2019

Tom

z. 136

Strony

289--303

Opis fizyczny

Bibliogr. 48 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Kraśnicka Teresa

teresa.krasnicka@ue.katowice.pl

University of Economics in Katowice, Katowice

autor

Steinerowska-Streb Izabella

streb@ue.katowice.pl

University of Economics in Katowice, Katowice

Bibliografia

1. Anderson, R.C., and Reeb, D.M. (2004). Board composition: Balancing family influence in S&P 500 firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49(2), 209-237. doi.org/10.2307/4131472.
2. Badanie firm rodzinnych (2016). PwC, Instytut Biznesu Rodzinnego. WWW.pwc.pl, 02.01.2018.
3. Barometr firm rodzinnych. Kierunek innowacje. Edycja siódma (2018). EFB European Family Businesses. KPMG. Available online https://assets.kpmg/content/dam/kpmg/pl/pdf/2019/01/pl-barometr-firm-rodzinnych-2018.pdf, 03.08.2019.
4. Barometr firm rodzinnych. Konsekwentnie do sukcesu, EFB, KPMG, Inicjatywa Firm Rodzinnych. Edycja 2016. http://www.firmyrodzinne.pl/download/pl-Barometr-firm-rodzinnych-2016.pdf, 03.04.2018.
5. Barometr firm rodzinnych. Optymistyczne naprzód. Edycja 2017. KPMG Poland. Available online https://assets.kpmg/content/dam/kpmg/pl/pdf/2018/01/pl-Barometr-firm-rodzinnych-2017.pdf, 03.08.2019.
6. Birkinshaw, J., Hamel, G., and Mol, M.J. (2008). Management innovation. Academy of Management Review, 33(4), 825-845. doi.org/10.5465/amr.2008.34421969.
7. biznesie rodzinnym głosem sukcesorów. Różne ścieżki, te same priorytety. (2018) PwC. Available online https://www.pwc.pl/pl/pdf/publikacje/2018/raport-nextgen-2018.pdf. Access date 03.08.2019.
8. Campopiano, G., and De Massis, A. (2015). Corporate social responsibility reporting: A content analysis in family and non-family firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 129(3), 511-534. doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2174-z.
9. Carnes, C.M., and Ireland, R.D. (2013). Familiness and innovation: Resource bundling as the missing link. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37(6), 1399-1419. doi.org/10.1111/etap.12073.
10. Chrisman, J.J., Chua, J.H., and Litz, R.A. (2004). Comparing the agency costs of family and non‐family firms: Conceptual issues and exploratory evidence. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28(4), 335-354. https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cluster=1490749449972057014&hl=pl&as_sdt=0,5.
11. Chrisman, J.J., Chua, J.H., De Massis, A., Frattini, F., and Wright, M. (2015). The ability and willingness paradox in family firm innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 32(3), 310-318. doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12207.
12. Chrisman, J.J., Kellermanns, F.W., Chan, K.C., and Liano, K. (2010). Intellectual foundations of current research in family business: An identification and review of 25 influential articles. Family Business Review, 23(1), 9-26. doi.org/10.1177/0894486509357920.
13. Classen, N., Carree, M., Van Gils, A., and Peters, B. (2014). Innovation in family and non-family SMEs: an exploratory analysis. Small Business Economics, 42(3), 595-609. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-013-9490-z.
14. Classen, N., Van Gils, A., Bammens, Y., and Carree, M. (2012). Accessing resources from innovation partners: The search breadth of family SMEs. Journal of Small Business Management, 50(2), 191-215. doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-627X.2012.00350.x.
15. Crossan, M.M., and Apaydin, M. (2010). A multi‐dimensional framework of organizational innovation: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Management Studies, 47(6), 1154-1191. doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00880.x.
16. Cyert, R.M., & March, J.G. (1963). A behavioral theory of the firm. 2(4), 169-187. Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
17. Damanpour, F. (2014). Footnotes to research on management innovation. Organization Studies, 35(9), 1265-1285. doi.org/10.1177/0170840614539312.
18. Daspit, J.J., Chrisman, J.J., Sharma, P., Pearson, A.W., and Long, R.G. (2017). A Strategic Management Perspective of the Family Firm: Past Trends, New Insights, and Future Directions. Journal of Managerial Issues, 29(1), 6-29.
19. De Massis, A., Frattini, F., and Lichtenthaler, U. (2013). Research on technological innovation in family firms: Present debates and future directions. Family Business Review, 26(1), 10-31. doi.org/10.1177/0894486512466258.
20. De Massis, A., Frattini, F., Pizzurno, E., and Cassia, L. (2015). Product innovation in family versus nonfamily firms: An exploratory analysis. Journal of Small Business Management, 53(1), 1-36. doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12068.
21. Diéguez-Soto, J., Manzaneque, M., and Rojo-Ramírez, A.A. (2016). Technological innovation inputs, outputs, and performance: The moderating role of family involvement in management. Family Business Review, 29(3), 327-346. doi.org/10.1177/0894486516646917.
22. Duran, P., Kammerlander, N., Van Essen, M., and Zellweger, T. (2016). Doing more with less: Innovation input and output in family firms. Academy of Management Journal, 59(4), 1224-1264. doi.org/10.5465/amj.2014.0424.
23. Działalność innowacyjna przedsiębiorstw w Polsce w latach 2015-2017 (2018). Warszawa: Główny Urząd Statystyczny. Available online https://stat.gov.pl/obszary-tematyczne/nauka-i-technika-spoleczenstwo-informacyjne/nauka-i-technika/dzialalnosc-innowacyjna-przedsiebiorstw-w-polsce-w-latach-2015-2017,14,5.html, 03.08.2019.
24. Eisenhardt, K.M. (1989). Agency theory: An assessment and review. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 57-74. doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4279003.
25. Fama, E.F., and Jensen, M.C. (1983). Agency problems and residual claims. The Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 327-349. doi.org/10.1086/467038.
26. Frank, H., Kessler, A., Rusch, T., Suess-Reyes, J., and Weismeier-Sammer, D. (2016). Capturing the famiiliness of family business: Development of the Family Influence Familiness Scale (FIFS). Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 3, 1-34. doi.org/10.1111/ etap.12229.
27. Fuetsch, E., and Suess-Reyes, J. (2017). Research on innovation in family businesses: are we building an ivory tower? Journal of Family Business Management, 7(1), 44-92. doi.org/10.1108/JFBM-02-2016-0003.
28. Hiebl, M.R. (2012). Risk aversion in family firms: what do we really know? The Journal of Risk Finance, 14(1), 49-70. doi.org/10.1108/15265941311288103.
29. Jaskiewicz, P., Combs, J.G., and Rau, S.B. (2015). Entrepreneurial legacy: Toward a theory of how some family firms nurture transgenerational entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 30(1), 29-49. doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2014.07.001.
30. Kellermanns, F.W., Eddleston, K.A., Sarathy, R., and Murphy, F. (2012). Innovativeness in family firms: A family influence perspective. Small Business Economics, 38(1), 85-101. doi.org/10.1007/s11187-010-9268-5.
31. Kotlar, J., and De Massis, A. (2013). Goal setting in family firms: Goal diversity, social interactions, and collective commitment to family‐centered goals. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37(6), 1263-1288. doi.org/10.1111/etap.12065.
32. Kraśnicka, T., Głód, W., and Wronka-Pośpiech, M. (2018). Management innovation, pro-innovation organisational culture and enterprise performance: testing the mediation effect. Review of Managerial Science, 12(3), 737-769. doi.org/10.1007/s11846-017-0229-0.
33. Kraśnicka, T., Ingram, T., and Głód, G. (2019). Rodzinność polskich przedsiębiorstw: stymulator czy przeszkoda innowacyjności? Przegląd Organizacji, 7, 22-31. DOI: 10.33141/po.2019.07.04.
34. Li, Z., and Daspit, J.J. (2016). Understanding family firm innovation heterogeneity: A typology of family governance and socioemotional wealth intentions. Journal of Family Business Management, 6(2), 103-121. doi.org/10.1108/JFBM-02-2015-0010.
35. Llach, J., & Nordqvist, M. (2010). Innovation in family and non-family businesses: A resource perspective. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Venturing, 2(3-4), 381-399.
36. Lwango, A., Coeurderoy, R., and Giménez Roche, G.A. (2017). Family influence and SME performance under conditions of firm size and age. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 24(3), 629-648. doi.org/10.1108/JSBED-11-2016-0174.
37. Matzler, K., Veider, V., Hautz, J., and Stadler, Ch. (2015). The Impact of Family Ownership, Management, and Governance on Innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 32(3), 319-333. doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12202.
38. Mitchell, R.K., Agle, B.R. and Wood, D.J. (1997), Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853-886. doi.org/10.5465/amr.1997.9711022105.
39. Muñoz-Bullón, F., and Sanchez-Bueno, M.J. (2011). The impact of family involvement on the R&D intensity of publicly traded firms. Family Business Review, 24(1), 62-70. doi.org/10.1177/0894486510396870.
40. Nordqvist, M., Sharma, P., and Chirico, F. (2014). Family firm heterogeneity and governance: A configuration approach. Journal of Small Business Management, 52(2), 192-209. doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12096.
41. Osiadacz, J. (2012). Innowacje w sektorze usług – przewodnik po systematyce oraz przykłady dobrych praktyk. Warszawa: PARP.
42. Oslo Manual (2018). Guidelines for collecting, reporting and using data on innovation. OECD, Eurostat. http://oe.cd/oslomanual, 03.06.2019.
43. Podręcznik Oslo (2008). Zasady gromadzenia i interpretacji danych dotyczących innowacji. OECD/Wspólnoty Europejskie 2005. Warszawa: PARP.
44. Skowrońska, A., Tarnawa, A. (Eds.) (2018). Raport o stanie sektora małych średnich przedsiębiorstw w Polsce. Warszawa: PARP, Grupa PFR.
45. Steeger, J.H., and Hoffmann, M. (2016). Innovation and family firms: ability and willingness and German SMEs. Journal of Family Business Management, 6(3), 251-269. doi.org/10.1108/JFBM-09-2015-0036.
46. Steinerowska-Streb, I. (2015). Bariery finansowe w działalności polskich przedsiębiorstw rodzinnych. Przedsiębiorczość i Zarządzanie, XVI, 7, II, 351-370.
47. Weismeier-Sammer, D., Frank, H., and von Schlippe, A. (2013). Untangling ‘Familiness’ A Literature Review and Directions for Future Research. The International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 14(3), 165-177. doi.org/10.5367/ijei.2013.0119.
48. Zalecenie z dnia 6 maja 2003 roku dotyczące definicji mikroprzedsiębiorstw oraz małych i średnich przedsiębiorstw, ujęte w ustawie z dnia 2 lipca 2004 o swobodzie działalności gospodarczej (2003). Załącznik 1, art. 2. Dziennik Urzędowy Unii Europejskiej, 20.5.2003, dokument nr C(2003) 1422.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa Nr 461252 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2020).

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.baztech-70431b38-c5ac-4bb2-81e8-e7db6863d610