Investigating the effect of the number of end-panel studs on the seismic properties of cold-formed light-steel shear-panel braces

• Autorzy: Tafti M. R. J. , Behnamfar F.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Detailed investigation of the effect of the number of end-panel studs on the seismic properties of light-steel shear-panel braces in cold-formed steel frames and in particular the associated response modification coefficients (R) factor, are presented in this paper. A total of 6 full-scale 1200×2400 mm specimens are considered, and the responses investigated under a standard cyclic loading regime. Of particular interest are the specimens’ maximum lateral load capacity and deformation behavior as well as a rational estimation of the seismic response modification factor. The study also looks at the failure modes of the system and investigates the main factors contributing to the ductile response of the tested shear-panel braces in order to suggest improvements so that braces respond plastically with a significant drift and without any risk of brittle failure, such as connection failure or stud buckling.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

cold-formed steel; light steel frame; shear-panel bracing; lateral performance; response modification factor

PL

stal formowana na zimno; rama stalowa lekka; usztywnienie na ścinanie; wytrzymałość boczna; współczynnik modyfikacji odpowiedzi

• Wydawca: Komitet Inżynierii Lądowej i Wodnej PAN ; Politechnika Warszawska, Wydział Inżynierii Lądowej
• Czasopismo: Archives of Civil Engineering
• Rocznik: 2013
• Tom: Vol. 59, nr 2
• Strony: 197--214
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 39 poz., il., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Tafti M. R. J.

• Islamic Azad University, Isfahan Science and Research Branch, Isfahan, Iran

autor

Behnamfar F.

• Islamic Azad University, Isfahan Science and Research Branch, Isfahan, Iran

Bibliografia

• 1. AISI, Standard for cold-formed steel framing - prescriptive method for one and two family dwellings 2001, American Iron and Steel Institute: Washington, D.C.
• 2. AISI, North American specification for the design of cold-formed steel structural members. 2001, American Iron and Steel Institute: Washington, D.C.
• 3. AISI, Standard for cold-formed steel framing - General provisions. 2004, American Iron and Steel Institute: Washington, D.C.
• 4. AISI, Standard for cold-formed steel framing - Header design. 2004, American Iron and Steel Institute: Washington, D.C.
• 5. AISI, Standard for cold-formed steel framing - Lateral design. 2004, American Iron and Steel Institute: Washington, D.C.
• 6. AISI, Standard for cold-formed steel framing - Wall stud design. 2004, American Iron and Steel Institute: Washington, D.C.
• 7. AISI, Standard for cold-formed steel framing - Truss design. 2004, American Iron and Steel Institute: Washington, D.C.
• 8. AISI, Design of cold-formed steel shear walls. 1998, Steel Framing Alliance.
• 9. AISI, Performance of cold-formed steel-framed shear walls: Alternative configurations Research report RP 02-7. 2002, REVISION 2006, Steel Framing Alliance: Washington, D.C.
• 10. AISI, Code of standard practice for cold-formed steel structural framing, Practice guide CF06-1. 2006, American Iron and Steel Institute: Washington, D.C.
• 11. ASCE7-05, ASCE 7-05 Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures. 2005, ASCE: USA.
• 12. FEMA-450, NEHRP recommended provisions for seismic regulations for new buildings and other structures – Part 1 Provisions. 2003, Building Seismic Safety Council: USA.
• 13. FEMA-P750, NEHRP recommended seismic provisions for new buildings and other structures. 2009, Building Seismic Safety Council: USA, Washington, D.C.
• 14. TI809-07, Design of cold-formed loadbearing steel systems and masonry veneer/steel stud walls. 1998, US Army Corps of Engineers, Engineering and Construction Division: Washington, D.C.
• 15. FEMA-302, NEHRP recommended provisions for seismic regulations for new buildings and other structures, in FEMA 302. 1998, Building Seismic Safety Council.
• 16. UBC, Uniform building code. 1997, International Conference of Building Officials: California, USA.
• 17. IBC, International building code. 2006, International Code Council.
• 18. AS1170.4, Structural design actions, Part 4: Earthquake actions in Australia. 2007, Standards Australia.
• 19. AS/NZS4600, Cold-formed steel structures, AS/NZS 4600. 2005, Australian Building Codes Board.
• 20. Serrette, R.L. (1997), “Additional Shear Wall Values for Light Weight Steel Framing.” Report No. LGSRG-1-97, Santa Clara University. Santa Clara, CA.
• 21. Kawai Y, Kanno R, Hanya K. (1997), “Cyclic Shear Resistance of Light-Gauge Steel Framed Walls”, Portland, OR, USA: ASCE, p. 433-7.
• 22. Berman J.W., Celik O.C., Bruneau M., (2005), “Comparing Hysteretic Behavior of Light-Gauge Steel Plate Shear Walls and Braced Frames”, Engineering Structures, 27:475-85.
• 23. ATC-24. (1992), “Guidelines for Cyclic Seismic Testing of Components of Steel Structures”, USA: Applied Technology Council, National Center for Earthquake Engineering Research.
• 24. Schafer B.W., and Hiriyur B. (2002), “Analysis of Sheathed Cold-Formed Steel Wall Studs”, Orlando, FL, United states: University of Missouri-Rolla, p. 501-13.
• 25. Fulop L.A. and Dubina D. (2004), “Performance of Wall-Stud Cold-Formed Shear Panels under Monotonic and Cyclic Loading - Part I: Experimental Research”, Thin-Walled Structures, 42:321-38.
• 26. FEMA-450, NEHRP recommended provisions for seismic regulations for new buildings and other structures - Part 2 commentary. 2003, Building Seismic Safety Council: USA.
• 27. Uang, C.M., Establishing R (or Rw) and Cd factors for building seismic provisions. Journal of Structural Engineering, 1991. 117(1): p. 19-28.
• 28. FEMA-356, Pre standard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings. 2000, AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CIVIL ENGINEERS: USA, Virginia.
• 29. Uang, C.M., Establishing R (or Rw) and Cd factors for building seismic provisions. Journal of Structural Engineering, 1991. 117(1): p. 19-28.
• 30. Park, R., Evaluation of ductility of structures and structural assemblages from laboratory testing. Bulletin of the New Zealand National Society for Earthquake Engineering, 1989. 22(3): p. 155-166.
• 31. Gad, E.F., et al., Earthquake ductility and overstrength in residential structures. Structural Engineering and Mechanics, 1999. 8(4): p. 361-382.
• 32. Maheri, M.R. and R. Akbari, Seismic behaviour factor, R, for steel X-braced and knee-braced RC buildings. Engineering Structures, 2003. 25(12): p. 1505-1513.
• 33. Kim, J. and H. Choi, Response modification factors of chevron-braced frames. Engineering Structures, 2005. 27(2): p. 285-300.
• 34. Newmark, N. and W. Hall, Earthquake spectra and design. 1982: Earthquake Engineering Research Inst. Berkeley, CA.
• 35. Serrette, R. and K. Ogunfunmi, Shear resistance of gypsum-sheathed light-gauge steel stud walls. Journal of structural engineering New York, N.Y., 1996. 122(4): p. 383-389.
• 36. US Army Corps of Engineers, TI 809-07, Technical Instructions, Design of Cold-Formed Loadbearing Steel Systems and Masonry Veneer/Steel Stud Walls. 1998: Washington, DC 20314-1000.
• 37. LabVIEW, LabVIEW SignalExpress. 2007, National Instruments Corporation: Austin, Texas.
• 38. E2126-07, A.-. Standard test methods for cyclic (reversed) load test for shear resistance of walls for buildings. 2007: USA. p. 13.
• 39. Gad, E.F., et al., Lateral performance of cold-formed steel-framed domestic structures. Engineering Structures, 1999. 21(1): p. 83-95.