Interpretation of gravity anomaly to delineate thrust faults locations at the northeastern part of India and its adjacent areas using source edge detection technique, tilt derivative and Cos(θ) analysis

Ghosh, Gopal K.

doi:10.1007/s11600-019-00345-8

Powiadomienia systemowe

Sesja wygasła!
Sesja wygasła!
Sesja wygasła!
Sesja wygasła!

Artykuł - szczegóły

Tytuł artykułu

Interpretation of gravity anomaly to delineate thrust faults locations at the northeastern part of India and its adjacent areas using source edge detection technique, tilt derivative and Cos(θ) analysis

Autorzy

Ghosh Gopal K.

Wybrane pełne teksty z tego czasopisma

https://www.springer.com/journal/11600

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.1007/s11600-019-00345-8

Warianty tytułu

Języki publikacji

Abstrakty

The Northeast India and its adjacent areas converge among the three diferent plates, viz. Eurasia, India and Sunda plates. The tectonic interaction of Northeast India and underlying dynamics of the Himalayas as well as the Indo-Burma Ranges might cause the Assam Syntaxis. The area of study is located between latitude 23°–28°N and longitude 88°–96°E and situated in one of the most seismically active tectonic provinces in the world with seismic zone-V. This area had demonstrated several thrust faults activities and tectonic evident accomplishments during the recent past. The complicated geotectonic setups inspirits various smaller magnitude earthquakes, and the current seismicity shows seismic activities are still enduring in the Shillong Plateau, Arakan-Yoma fold belt, Bengal Basin, Naga Hills, Mikir Hills, Upper–Lower Brahmaputra Valley and Mismi Hills of Himalayan foothills. It is imperative to obtain wide-ranging learning tectonic confguration, thrust faults delineation for improved geoscientifc study. Parts of the areas are extremely unreachable, and very limited thrust faults were marked by studying GIS map received from the various agencies and feld geological study. During the past studies, most of the prominent lineaments/thrusts are marked; however, many active and hidden thrust faults are still unidentifed. Seismic data can provide better information about the thrust faults locations, but due to small number of seismic data, the information is not adequate. In this paper, attempt has been made to study and reinterpret the available ground gravity data of northeastern parts of India for understanding thrust fault locations using various applications of gravity derivatives like analytical signal, horizontal gravity gradient, tilt derivative, horizontal tilt angle derivative and Cos(θ) analysis. Source edge detection technique has also been premeditated to categorize thrust fault locations. It is understandable that the low gravity is observed at Assam Valley which contributed sediment accumulations and higher gravity anomaly observed at Shillong Plateau and Bengal Basin containing denser formations. Bouguer gravity data is used after isostatic correction assuming Airy’s isostasy root depth model and frst-order trend removal using least square technique. The derived thrust fault locations from the present study are superimposed with the existing thrust-fault locations for correlation. Some additional thrust faults are narrated which are not previously mapped. It is also suggested that Brahmaputra Thrust, Dauki Fault, Naga Thrust, Disang Thrust and Kopili Fault have key responsibility for high seismicity and tectonic movement causing upliftment and depression that encouraged some anticlockwise rotation in the area.

Słowa kluczowe

Shillong plateau SED THDR tilt derivative TILT horizontal tilt angle TDX cos(θ) source edge detection total horizontal derivative

płaskowyż Shillong SED THDR pochodna pochylenia TILT poziomy kąt pochylenia TDX cos(θ)

Wydawca

Instytut Geofizyki PAN
Springer

Czasopismo

Acta Geophysica

Rocznik

2019

Tom

Vol. 67, no. 5

Strony

1277--1295

Opis fizyczny

Bibliogr. 75 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Ghosh Gopal K.

gk_ghosh@yahoo.com

Oil India Limited, Duliajan, Assam, India

Bibliografia

1. Alam M, Alam MM, Currey JR, Chowdhury MLR, Gani MR (2003) An overview of the sedimentary geology of the Bengal Basin relation to the regional tectonic framework and basin-fill history. Sediment Geol 155:179–208
2. Ambraseys N, Douglas J (2004) Magnitude calibration of north Indian N. earthquakes. Geophys J Int 159:165–206
3. Angelier J, Barua S (2009) Seismotectonics in Northeast India: a stress analysis of focal mechanism solutions of earthquakes and its kinematic implications. Geophys J Int 178(1):303–326. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2009.04107.x
4. Awasthi N, Ray JS, Singh AK, Band ST, Rai VK (2014) Provenance of the late quaternary sediments in the Andaman Sea: implications for monsoon variability and ocean circulation. Geochem Geophys Geosyst 15:3890–3906. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GC005462
5. Bansal BK, Verma M (2013) Science and technology based earthquake risk reduction strategies: the Indian scenario. Acta Geophys 61(4):808–821. https://doi.org/10.2478/s11600-013-0105-5
6. Barman P, Ray JD, Kumar A, Chowdhury JD, Mahanta K (2016) Estimation of present-day inter-seismic deformation in Kopili fault zone of north-east India using GPS measurements. Geomat Nat Hazards Risk 7:586–599. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2014.983187
7. Baruah S, Hazarika D (2008) A GIS based tectonic map of north-eastern India. Curr Sci 95(2):176–177
8. Bhattacharya PM, Mukhopadhyay S, Majumadar RK, Kayal JR (2008) 3-D seismic structure of the northeast India region and its implications for local and regional tectonics. J Asian Earth Sci 33(1–2):25–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2007.10.020
9. Bilham R, England P (2001) Plateau ‘pop up’ in the great, 1897, Assam earthquake. Nature 410:806–809
10. Biswas S, Grasemann B (2005) Quantitative morphotectonics of the southern Shillong Plateau (Bangladesh/India). Aust J Earth Sci 97:82–93
11. Bora DK, Baruah S (2012) Mapping the crustal thickness in Shillong–Mikir Hills Plateau and its adjoining region of northeastern India using Moho reflected waves. J Asian Earth Sci 48:83–92
12. Borah K, Bora DK, Goyal A, Kumar R (2016) Crustal structure beneath northeast India inferred from receiver function modeling. Phys Earth Planet Interiors 258:15–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pepi.2016.07.005
13. Chandra U (1984) Seismicity, earthquake mechanisms, and tectonics of Burma, 200–280N. Geophys J R Astron Soc 40:367–381
14. Cooper GRJ, Cowan DR (2006) Enhancing potential field data using filters based on the local phase. Comput Geosci 32:1585–1591
15. Coraggio F, Bernardelli P, Gabbriellini G (2012) Structural reconstruction using potential field data in hydrocarbon exploration. In: SEG Las Vegas 2012 annual meeting. https://doi.org/10.1190/segam2012-0983.1
16. Cordell L, Grauch VJS (1982) Mapping basement magnetization zones from aeromagnetic data in the San Juan Basin; New Mexico. In: Presented at the 52nd ann. internat. mtg., sot. explor. geophys. Dallas; abstracts and biographies. pp 246–247
17. Cordell L, Grauch VJS (1985) Mapping basement magnetization zones from aeromagnetic data in the San Juan Basin, New Mexico. In: Hinze WJ (ed) The utility of regional gravity and magnetic anomaly maps. Society of Exploration Geophysicists, Tulsa, pp 181–197. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.0931830346.ch16
18. Devi NR, Sarma KP (2010) Strain analysis and stratigraphic status of Nongkhya, Sumer and Mawmaram conglomerates of Shillong basin, Meghalaya, India. J Earth Syst Sci 119:161–174
19. Evans P (1964) The tectonic framework of Assam. J Geol Soc India 5:80–96
20. Evans P, Crompton W (1946) Geological factors in gravity interpretation by evidence from India and Burma. Q J Geol Soc Lond 102:211–249
21. Fairhead JD, Williams SE (2006) Evaluating normalized magnetic derivatives for structural mapping. SEG 2006 new orleans extended abstract
22. Fairhead D, Williams S, Salem AB (2007) Structural mapping from high resolution aeromagnetic data in Namibia using normalized derivatives. In: EGM 2007 international workshop, Italy, April 15–18
23. Fairhead JD, Salem A, Cascone L, Hammill M, Masterton S, Samson E (2011) New developments of the magnetic tilt-depth method to improve structural mapping of sedimentary basins. Geophys Prospect 59:1072–1086. https://doi.org/10.1111/gpr.2011.59.issue-6
24. Ferreira FJF, de Castro LG, Bongiolo ABS, de Souza J, Romeiro MAT (2013) Enhancement of the total horizontal gradient of magnetic anomalies using tilt derivatives: Part II—application to real data. In: 81st Annual international meeting. SEG, Expanded Abstracts, pp 887–891
25. Ghosh GK (2016a) Interpretation of gravity data using 3D euler deconvolution, tilt angle, horizontal tilt angle and source edge approximation of North-West Himalaya. J Acta Geophysica 64(4):1112–1138. https://doi.org/10.1515/acgeo-2016-0042. ISSN: 1895-6572, Print
26. Ghosh GK (2016b) Magnetic data interpretation for the source-edge locations in parts of the tectonically active transition zone of the Narmada-Son Lineament in Central India. Pure Appl Geophys 173(2):555–571, 1420–9136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-015-1082-1. ISSN 0033-4553, Print
27. Ghosh GK, Dasgupta R, Reddy BJ, Singh SN (2015) Gravity data interpretation across the Brahmaputra Thrust and Dauki Fault in the north-Eastern India. J Geophys 7(1):31–38. ISSN: 2230-9497, print
28. Grauch VJS, Hudson MN, Minor SA (2001) Aeromagnetic expression of faults that offset basin fill, Albuquerque basin, New Mexico. Geophysics 66:707–720
29. Gulatee BL (1956) Gravity data in India. Suv India Tech Pap 10:l–95
30. Harijan N, Sen AK, Sarkar S, Das JD, Kanungo DP (2003) Geomorphotectonics around the Sung valley carbonatite complex, Shillong plateau, NE India: remote sensing and GIS approach. J Geol Soc India 62(1):103–109
31. Kayal JR (2001) Microearthquake activity in some parts of the Himalaya and the tectonic model. Tectonophysics 339:331–351
32. Kayal JR, De R (1991) Microseismicity and tectonics in northeast India. Bull Seismol Soc Am 77:1718–1727
33. Kayal JR, Arefiev SS, Barua S, Hazarika D, Gogoi N, Kumar A, Chowdhury SN, Kalita S (2006) Shillong plateau earthquakes in northeast India region: complex tectonic model. Curr Sci 91:109–114
34. Kumar MR, Raju PS, Devi UE, Saul J, Ramesh DS (2004) Crustal structure variations in northeast India from converted phases. Geophys Res Lett 31:17605. https://doi.org/10.1029/2004gl020576
35. Lahti I, Karinen T (2010) Tilt derivative multiscale edges of magnetic data. Lead Edge 29:24–29. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.3284049
36. Marson I, Klingele EE (1993) Advantages of using the vertical gradient of gravity for 3-D interpretation. Geophysics 58(11):1588–1595
37. Mcclay KR, Bonora M (2001) Analog models of restraining stopovers in strike–slip fault systems. Am Assoc Pet Geol Bull 85:233–260
38. Miller HG, Singh V (1994) Potential field tilt—a new concept for location of potential field sources. J Appl Geophys 32:213–217
39. Mishra UK, Sen S (2001) Dinosaur bones from Meghalaya. Curr Sci 80:1053–1056
40. Mitra SK (1998) Structure, sulphide mineralization and age of the Shillong group of rocks, Meghalaya. In: Krishnan SK (ed) Centenary commemorative national seminar. 1–2 November, 1998, Calcutta, pp 118–119 (Abstract)
41. Mitra S, Pristley K, Bhattacharya A, Gaur VK (2005) Crustal structure and earthquake focal depths beneath northeastern India and southern Tibet. Geophys J Int 160:227–248
42. Mukhopadhyay M (1974) Relationship of gravity and seismicity to tectonics in Northeastern India. Unpubl. Ph.D. thesis, Indian School of Mines, Dhanbad
43. Nandy DR (2001) Geodynamics of Northeastern India and the adjoining region. ACB Publication, Calcutta, p 209
44. Nandy DR, Dasgupta S (1991) Seismotectonic domains of north-eastern India and adjacent areas. Phys Chem Earth 1:371–384
45. Nayak GK, Rao VK, Rambabu HV, Kayal JR (2008) Pop-up tectonics of the Shillong plateau in the great 1897 earthquake (Ms 8.7): insights from the gravity in conjunction with the recent seismological results. Tectonics 27:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006TC002027
46. Oldham T (1883) The Cachar earthquake of 10 January 1869. The Geological Survey of India Memoir, pp 1–88
47. Oldham RD (1899) Report of the great earthquake of 12th June. Mem Geol Surv India 46:257–276
48. Panda D, Kundu B, Santosh M (2018) Oblique convergence and strain partitioning in the outer deformation front of NE Himalaya. Sci Rep 8(1):10564. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-28774-3
49. Phillips JD (2000) Locating magnetic contacts: a comparison of the horizontal gradient, analytic signal, and local wavenumber methods. SEG expanded abstracts
50. Qureshy MN (1971) Relation of gravity to elevation and rejuvenation of blocks in India. J Geophys Res 76:545–557
51. Rajendran CP, Rajendran K, Daurah BP, Earnest A (2004) Interpreting the style of faulting and paleoseismicity associated with the Shillong, northeast India, and earthquake: implication for regional tectonism. Tectonics 23, TC4009. https://doi.org/10.1029/2003tc001605
52. Rajesekhar RP, Mishra DC (2008) Crustal structure of Bengal Basin and Shillong Plateau: extension of Eastern Ghat and Saatpura Mobile Belts to Himalayan fronts and seismotectonics. Gondwana Res. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2007.10.009
53. Rao NP, Kumar P, Tsukuda T, Ramesh DS (2006) The devastating Muzaffarbad earthquake of 8 October 2005: new insights into Himalayan seismicity and tectonics. Gondwana Res 9:365–378
54. Reid A (2007) Semi-automated methods of potential field interpretation—innovations, and recent and future developments. In: EGM 2007 international workshop. Capri, Italy, April 15–18, 2007
55. Robinson RAJ, Brezina CA, Parrish RR, Horstwood MSA, Oo NW, Bird MI, Thein M, Walters ASG, Oliver JH, Zaw K (2014) Large rivers and orogens: the evolution of the Yarlung Tsangpo-Irrawaddy system and the eastern Himalayan syntaxis. Gondwana Res 26:112–121
56. Salem A, Williams S, Fairhead JD, Ravat D, Smith R (2007) Tilt-depth method. A simple depth estimation method using first-order magnetic derivatives: SEG The Leading Edge 26(12):1502–1505
57. Salem A, Williams S, Fairhead JD, Smith R, Ravat DJ (2008) Interpretation of magnetic data using tilt-angle derivatives. Geophysics 73:L1–L10
58. Salem A, Williams S, Samson E, Fairhead D, Ravat D, Blakely RJ (2010) Sedimentary basins reconnaissance using the magnetic tilt-depth method. Explor Geophys 41:198–209
59. Schellart WP, Nieuwland DA (2003) 3D evolution of a pop-up structure above a double basement strike–slip fault: some insights from analogue modelling. In: Nieuwland DA (ed) New insights into structural interpretation and modelling. Geological Society Special Publications, London, pp 169–179. https://doi.org/10.1144/GSL.SP.2003.212.01.11
60. Seno T, Rehman HU (2011) When and why the continental crust is subducted: examples of Hindu Kush and Burma. Gondwana Res 19:327–333
61. Singh RK, Bhaumik P, Akhtari MDS, Singh HJ, Mayor S, Asthana M (2011) Gondwana sediments and their hydrocarbon prospectivity in Dhansiri Valley, Assam and Assam Arakan Basin—India. GEO-India, Greater Noida, New Delhi, India, January 12–14
62. Singh AP, Purnachandra NR, Ravi Kumar M, Hsieh MC, Zhao L (2017) Role of the Kopili fault in deformation tectonics of the Indo-Burmese arc inferred from the rupture process of the 3 January 2016 Mw 6.7 Imphal Earthquake. Bull Seismol Soc Am 107(2):1041–1047. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120160276
63. Tandon AN (1954) A study of Assam earthquake of August 1950 and its aftershocks. Indian J Meteorol Geophys 5:95–137
64. Tapponnier P, Peltzer G, Le Dain AY, Armijo R, Cobbold P (1982) Propagating extrusion tectonics in Asia: new insights from simple experiments with plasticine. Geology 10:611–616
65. Thurston JB, Brown RJ (1994) Automated source-edge location with a new variable pass-band horizontal-gradient operator. Geophysics 59:546–554
66. Thurston JB, Smith RS (1997) Automatic conversion of magnetic data to depth, dip, and susceptibility contrast using the SPI (TM) method. Geophysics 62:807–813
67. USGS Report (2015) The Himalayas: two continents collide. https://pubs.usgs.gov/publications/text/himalaya.html
68. Verduzco B, Fairhead JD, Green CM, Mackenzie C (2004) New insights into magnetic derivatives. Lead Edge 22:116–119. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1651454
69. Verma RK, Mukhopadhay M (1977) An analysis of the gravity field in north-eastern India. Tectonophysics 42:283–317
70. Wang W, Pan Y, Qiu Z (2009) A new edge recognition technology based on the normalized vertical derivative of the total horizontal derivative for potential field data. Appl Geophys 6(3):226–233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11770-009-0026-x
71. Wijns C, Perez C, Kowalczyk P (2005) Theta map: edge detection in magnetic data. Geophysics 70:L39–L43
72. Wikipedia (2019) Indian Plate (after https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indian_Plate)
73. Woollard GP (1962) Relation of gravity anomalies to surface elevation, crustal structure and geology. Univ Wise Geophys Polar Res Gen Rep 62–9:292
74. Worzel JL, Shurbet GL (1955) Gravity interpretations from standard oceanic and continental crustal sections. Geol Soc Am Spec Pap 62:87–100
75. Yadav RBS, Bormann P, Rastogi BK, Das MC, Chopra S (2009) A homogeneous and complete earthquake catalog for Northeast India and the adjoining region. Seismol Res Lett 80(4):609–627. https://doi.org/10

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa Nr 461252 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2020).

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.baztech-6f5b2fbf-e36a-4dab-b7fd-8ad58c154e84