Effects of sampling configurations of acoustic Doppler velocimeter (ADV) on turbulence measurements around large roughness elements

Golpira, Amir; Baki, Abul B. M.; Azimi, Amir H.

doi:10.1007/s11600-022-00769-9

Artykuł - szczegóły

Tytuł artykułu

Effects of sampling configurations of acoustic Doppler velocimeter (ADV) on turbulence measurements around large roughness elements

Autorzy

Golpira Amir , Baki Abul B. M. , Azimi Amir H.

Wybrane pełne teksty z tego czasopisma

https://www.springer.com/journal/11600

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.1007/s11600-022-00769-9

Warianty tytułu

Języki publikacji

Abstrakty

In this experimental study, the effects of sampling strategies on the acoustic Doppler velocimeter (ADV) measurements in clear water flow around a boulder, including the near-bed and boulder’s wake regions, were investigated. This study found that adjusting sampling volume heights and frequencies noticeably influenced the mean and turbulent flow characteristics, especially measurements of time-averaged velocity and the Reynolds shear stress near the bed. Increasing sampling frequency and reducing sampling volume size improve ADV quality parameters while it increased the noise variances. Generally, the recorded mean and turbulent flow parameters with the smallest sampling volume and the highest frequency showed the least sensitivity to applying a signal correlation filter. Assuming the normality of true velocity data, this study found that by keeping at least 70% of data, average signal correlation thresholds as low as 57% and 40% can be applied for filtering of measurements in the near-bed and boulder’s wake regions, respectively. These findings indicated that applying common strict signal correlation thresholds is not necessarily the best practice to filter velocity data in the near-bed and turbulent regions.

Słowa kluczowe

Acoustic Doppler velocimeter turbulence measurement Vectrino Doppler noise large roughness element ADV sampling strategy

przepływomierz dopplerowski akustyczny pomiar turbulencji Vectrino

Wydawca

Instytut Geofizyki PAN
Springer

Czasopismo

Acta Geophysica

Rocznik

2022

Tom

Vol. 70, no 5

Strony

2251--2267

Opis fizyczny

Bibliogr. 50 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Golpira Amir

Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Clarkson University, Potsdam, NY 13699, USA

autor

Baki Abul B. M.

abaki@clarkson.edu

Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Clarkson University, Potsdam, NY 13699, USA

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7694-6714

autor

Azimi Amir H.

Department of Civil Engineering, Lakehead University, Thunder Bay, ON P7B 5E1, Canada

Bibliografia

1. Baki ABM, Zhang W, Zhu DZ, Rajaratnam N (2016) Flow structures in the vicinity of a submerged boulder within a boulder array. J Hydraul Eng 143(5):04016104
2. Biron PM, Robson C, Lapointe MF, Gaskin SJ (2004) Comparing different methods of bed shear stress estimates in simple and complex flow fields. Earth Surf Processes Landforms 29(11):1403–1415
3. Blanckaert K, Lemmin U (2006) Means of noise reduction in acoustic turbulence measurements. J Hydraul Res 44(1):3–17
4. Buffin-Bélanger T, Roy AG (2005) 1 min in the life of a river: selecting the optimal record length for the measurement of turbulence in fluvial boundary layers. Geomorphology 68(1):77–94
5. Buffin-Bélanger T, Roy AG (1998) Effects of a pebble cluster on the turbulent structure of a depth-limited flow in a gravel-bed river. Geomorphology 25(3–4):249–267
6. Cea L, Puertas J, Pena L (2007) Velocity measurements on highly turbulent free surface flow using ADV. Exp Fluids 42(3):333–348
7. Chanson H, Trevethan M, Koch C (2007) Discussion of “turbulence measurements with acoustic doppler velocimeters” by Carlos M. García, Mariano I. Cantero, Yarko Niño, and Marcelo H. García. J Hydraulic Eng 133(11):1283–1286
8. Chmiel O, Baselt I, Malcherek A (2019) Applicability of acoustic concentration measurements in suspensions of artificial and natural sediments using an acoustic Doppler velocimeter. Acoustics 1(1):59–77
9. Clunie TM, Nikora VI, Coleman SE, Friedrich H, Melville BW (2007) Flow measurement using flying ADV probes. J Hydraul Eng 133(12):1345–1355
10. Dizabadi S, Hakim SS, Azimi AH (2020) Discharge characteristics and structure of flow in labyrinth weirs with a downstream pool. Flow Measurement Instrum 71:101683
11. Doroudian B, Bagherimiyab F, Lemmin U (2010) Improving the accuracy of four-receiver acoustic Doppler velocimeter (ADV) measurements in turbulent boundary layer flows. Limnol Oceanogr Methods 8(11):575–591
12. Fang HW, Liu Y, Stoesser T (2017) Influence of boulder concentration on turbulence and sediment transport in open-channel flow over submerged boulders. J Geophys Res Earth Surf 122(12):2392–2410
13. Finelli CM, Hart DD, Fonseca DM (1999) Evaluating the spatial resolution of an acoustic Doppler velocimeter and the consequences for measuring near-bed flows. Limnol Oceanogr 44(7):1793–1801
14. García CM, Cantero MI, Niño Y, García MH (2005) Turbulence measurements with acoustic Doppler velocimeters. J Hydraul Eng 131(12):1062–1073
15. Golpira A, Baki AB, Zhu DZ (2020) Higher-order velocity moments, turbulence scales and energy dissipation rate around a boulder in a rock-ramp fish passage. Sustainability 12(13):5385
16. Golpira A, Baki ABM, Zhu DZ (2021) Turbulent events around an intermediately submerged boulder under wake-interference flow regime. J Hydraul Eng 147(7):06021005
17. Goring DG, Nikora VI (2002) Despiking acoustic Doppler velocimeter data. J Hydraul Eng 128(1):117–126
18. Huang C, Qiao F, Ma H (2020) Noise reduction of acoustic Doppler velocimeter data based on Kalman filtering and autoregressive moving average models. Acta Oceanol Sin 39:1–8
19. Hurther D, Lemmin U (2001) A correction method for turbulence measurements with a 3D acoustic Doppler velocity profiler. J Atmos Oceanic Tech 18(3):446–458
20. Islam MR, Zhu DZ (2013) Kernel density-based algorithm for despiking ADV data. J Hydraul Eng 139(7):785–793
21. Kazemi M, Khorsandi B, Mydlarski L (2021) Effect of acoustic Doppler velocimeter sampling volume size on measurements of turbulence. J Atmos Oceanic Tech 38(2):259–268
22. Khorsandi B, Mydlarski L, Gaskin S (2012) Noise in turbulence measurements using acoustic Doppler velocimetry. J Hydraul Eng 138(10):829–838
23. Lacey RJ, Rennie CD (2012) Laboratory investigation of turbulent flow structure around a bed-mounted cube at multiple flow stages. J Hydraul Eng 138(1):71–84
24. Lacey RWJ, Roy AG (2008) Fine-scale characterization of the turbulent shear layer of an instream pebble cluster. J Hydraul Eng 134(7):925–936
25. Lama GFC, Errico A, Francalanci S, Solari L, Preti F, Chirico GB (2020) Evaluation of flow resistance models based on field experiments in a partly vegetated reclamation channel. Geosciences 10(2):47
26. Martin V, Fisher TSR, Millar RG, Quick MC (2002) ADV data analysis for turbulent flows: low correlation problem. Hydraulic Measurements Exp Methods 2002:1–10
27. McLelland SJ, Nicholas AP (2000) A new method for evaluating errors in high-frequency ADV measurements. Hydrol Process 14(2):351–366
28. Moeini M, Khorsandi B, Mydlarski L (2020) Effect of acoustic Doppler velocimetry sampling frequency on statistical measurements of turbulent axisymmetric jets. J Hydraul Eng 146(7):04020048
29. Montero VGG, Romagnoli M, García CM, Cantero MI, Scacchi G (2014) Optimization of ADV sampling strategies using DNS of turbulent flow. J Hydraul Res 52(6):862–869
30. Mori N, Suzuki T, Kakuno S (2007) Noise of acoustic Doppler velocimeter data in bubbly flows. J Eng Mech 133(1):122–125
31. Morris HM (1955) Flow in rough conduits. Trans ASME 120:373–398
32. Nikora VI, Goring DG (1998) ADV measurements of turbulence: can we improve their interpretation? J Hydraul Eng 124(6):630–634
33. Nikora N, Nikora V, O’Donoghue T (2013) Velocity profiles in vegetated open-channel flows: combined effects of multiple mechanisms. J Hydraul Eng 139(10):1021–1032
34. Nortek AS (2015) Comprehensive manual. Technical Report.
35. Papanicolaou AN, Kramer CM, Tsakiris AG, Stoesser T, Bomminayuni S, Chen Z (2012) Effects of a fully submerged boulder within a boulder array on the mean and turbulent flow fields: Implications to bedload transport. Acta Geophys 60(6):1502–1546
36. Parsheh M, Sotiropoulos F, Porté-Agel F (2010) Estimation of power spectra of acoustic-Doppler velocimetry data contaminated with intermittent spikes. J Hydraul Eng 136(6):368–378
37. Precht E, Janssen F, Huettel M (2006) Near-bottom performance of the acoustic Doppler velocimeter (ADV)—a comparative study. Aquat Ecol 40(4):481–492
38. Przyborowski Ł, Łoboda AM, Bialik RJ (2019) Effect of two distinct patches of Myriophyllum species on downstream turbulence in a natural river. Acta Geophys 67(3):987–997
39. Reungoat D, Chanson H, Keevil CE (2015) Field measurements of unsteady turbulence in a tidal bore: the Garonne River in October 2013. J Hydraul Res 53(3):291–301
40. Ruonan B, Liekai C, Xingkui W, Danxun L (2016) Comparison of ADV and PIV measurements in open channel flows. Proc Eng 154:995–1001
41. Salehi S, Esmaili K, Azimi AH (2019) Mean velocity and turbulent characteristics of flow over half-cycle cosine sharp-crested weirs. Flow Meas Instrum 66:99–110
42. Schalko I, Wohl E, Nepf HM (2021) Flow and wake characteristics associated with large wood to inform river restoration. Sci Rep 11(1):1–12
43. Smith HD, Foster DL (2005) Modeling of flow around a cylinder over a scoured bed. J Waterw Port Coast Ocean Eng 131(1):14–24
44. Strom KB, Papanicolaou AN (2007) ADV measurements around a cluster microform in a shallow mountain stream. J Hydraul Eng 133(12):1379–1389
45. Sukhodolov AN, Krick J, Sukhodolova TA, Cheng Z, Rhoads BL, Constantinescu GS (2017) Turbulent flow structure at a discordant river confluence: asymmetric jet dynamics with implications for channel morphology. J Geophys Res Earth Surf 122(6):1278–1293
46. Sulaiman MS, Sinnakaudan SK, Shukor MR (2013) Near bed turbulence measurement with acoustic Doppler velocimeter (ADV). KSCE J Civ Eng 17(6):1515–1528
47. Thomas RE, Schindfessel L, McLelland SJ, Creëlle S, De Mulder T (2017) Bias in mean velocities and noise in variances and covariances measured using a multistatic acoustic profiler: the Nortek Vectrino profiler. Measurement Sci Technol 28(7):075302
48. Voulgaris G, Trowbridge JH (1998) Evaluation of the acoustic Doppler velocimeter (ADV) for turbulence measurements. J Atmos Oceanic Tech 15(1):272–289
49. Wahl TL (2000) Analyzing ADV data using WinADV. Joint Conference on Water Resources Engineering and Water Resources Planning and Management, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
50. Wahl TL (2003) Discussion of “despiking acoustic Doppler velocimeter data” by Derek G. Goring and Vladimir I. Nikora. J Hydraulic Eng 129(6):484–487

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MEiN, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2022-2023).

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.baztech-6efa00e4-3acf-45f2-9122-e5235ef15637