Plant Diversity in a Constructed Wetland for Pollutant Parameter Processing on Leachate: A Review

Arliyani, Isni; Tangahu, Bieby Voijant; Mangkoedihardjo, Sarwoko

doi:10.12911/22998993/134041

Artykuł - szczegóły

Tytuł artykułu

Plant Diversity in a Constructed Wetland for Pollutant Parameter Processing on Leachate: A Review

Autorzy

Arliyani Isni , Tangahu Bieby Voijant , Mangkoedihardjo Sarwoko

Treść / Zawartość

Pełne teksty:

Pobierz

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.12911/22998993/134041

Warianty tytułu

Języki publikacji

Abstrakty

The leachate from landfill constitutes high pollutant. The high pollutant content impacts the public and ecosystem health surrounding the landfill site. Therefore, it is essential to process the leachate first before its disposal to water body. Landfill leachate processing can be carried out using three processes, i.e., physical-chemical, biological, and a combination of those. A constructed wetland is currently considered as an environmentally friendly technology to tackle water pollution and leachate. Another advantage of a constructed wetland is the low operational cost and natural maintenance, so it can be a solution related to the cost, technical, and operating system problems of conventional processing. This article aimed to discover the characteristic differences of landfill leachate, constructed wetland installation position, and types of plants used in the constructed wetland. This article was written using the literature reviews from experimental studies on water processing with the same parameter for leachate and leachate processing. The literature review result shows that landfill leachate processing depends on different leachate characteristics. The toxic quality of landfill leachate was found through a toxicity test. Leachate treated by the physical-chemical process contains toxic and non-biodegradable organic substances. Hence, the physical-chemical methods should be applied at the beginning of the process and coupled with the biological method at the end of the process to improve the treatment quality. A constructed wetland with diverse plants was found to be more effective in biomass distribution, less prone to seasonal variations, and had a more diverse microbe population than the constructed wetland with a single plant.

Słowa kluczowe

constructed wetland leachate landfill age installation site plant diversity phytotreatment

Wydawca

Polskie Towarzystwo Inżynierii Ekologicznej
Lublin University of Technology

Czasopismo

Journal of Ecological Engineering

Rocznik

2021

Tom

Vol. 22, nr 4

Strony

240--255

Opis fizyczny

Bibliogr. 136 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Arliyani Isni

isni.207014@mhs.its.ac.id

Department of Environmental Engineering, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember (ITS), Surabaya, 60111, Indonesia

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2716-9266

autor

Tangahu Bieby Voijant

Department of Environmental Engineering, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember (ITS), Surabaya, 60111, Indonesia

autor

Mangkoedihardjo Sarwoko

Department of Environmental Engineering, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember (ITS), Surabaya, 60111, Indonesia

Bibliografia

1. Abbas, A.A., Jingsong, G., Ping, L.Z., Ya, P.Y., Al-Rekabi, W.S., 2009. Review on landfill leachate treatments. Am. J. Appl. Sci. https://doi.org/10.3844/ajas.2009.672.684
2. Abou-Elela, S.I., Hellal, M.S., 2012. Municipal wastewater treatment using vertical flow constructed wetlands planted with Canna, Phragmites and Cyprus. Ecol. Eng. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2012.06.044
3. Agami, M., Reddy, K.R., 1990. Competition for space between Eichhornia crassipes (Mart.) Solms and Pistia stratiotes L. cultured in nutrient-enriched water. Aquat. Bot. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3770(90)90005-6
4. Akinbile, C.O., Yusoff, M.S., Ahmad Zuki, A.Z., 2012. Landfill leachate treatment using subsurface flow constructed wetland by Cyperus haspan. Waste Manag. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2012.03.002
5. Ali, Z., Mohammad, A., Riaz, Y., Quraishi, U.M., Malik, R.N., 2018. Treatment efficiency of a hybrid constructed wetland system for municipal wastewater and its suitability for crop irrigation. Int. J. Phytoremediation 20, 1152–1161.
6. Alvarez‐Vazquez, H., Jefferson, B., Judd, S.J., 2004. Membrane bioreactors vs conventional biological treatment of landfill leachate: a brief review. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. Int. Res. Process. Environ. Clean Technol. 79, 1043–1049.
7. Amon, J.P., Agrawal, A., Shelley, M.L., Opperman, B.C., Enright, M.P., Clemmer, N.D., Slusser, T., Lach, J., Sobolewski, T., Gruner, W., Entingh, A.C., 2007. Development of a wetland constructed for the treatment of groundwater contaminated by chlorinated ethenes. Ecol. Eng. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2007.01.008
8. Angaye, T.C.N., Seiyaboh, E.I., 2019. Ecotoxicological Assessment of Leachate From Municipal Solid Waste Dumpsites. J. Exp. Clin. Toxicol. 1, 31.
9. Appenroth, K.J., Krech, K., Keresztes, Á., Fischer, W., Koloczek, H., 2010. Effects of nickel on the chloroplasts of the duckweeds Spirodela polyrhiza and Lemna minor and their possible use in biomonitoring and phytoremediation. Chemosphere. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2009.11.007
10. Ayaz, S.Ç., Akça, L., 2001. Treatment of wastewater by natural systems. Environ. Int. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-4120(00)00099-4
11. Bachand, P.A.M., Horne, A.J., 1999. Denitrification in constructed free-water surface wetlands: II. Effects of vegetation and temperature. Ecol. Eng. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-8574(99)00017-8
12. Bakhshoodeh, R., Alavi, N., Oldham, C., Santos, R.M., Babaei, A.A., Vymazal, J., Paydary, P., 2020. Constructed wetlands for landfill leachate treatment: A review. Ecol. Eng. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2020.105725
13. Barlaz, M.A., Rooker, A.P., Kjeldsen, P., Gabr, M.A., Borden, R.C., 2002. Critical evaluation of factors required to terminate the postclosure monitoring period at solid waste landfills. Environ. Sci. Technol. https://doi.org/10.1021/es011245u
14. Belmont, M.A., Cantellano, E., Thompson, S., Williamson, M., Sánchez, A., Metcalfe, C.D., 2004. Treatment of domestic wastewater in a pilot-scale natural treatment system in central Mexico. Ecol. Eng. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2004.11.003
15. Belmont, M.A., Metcalfe, C.D., 2003. Feasibility of using ornamental plants (Zantedeschia aethiopica) in subsurface flow treatment wetlands to remove nitrogen, chemical oxygen demand and nonylphenol ethoxylate surfactants A laboratory-scale study. Ecol. Eng. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2003.10.003
16. Bhatt, A.H., Karanjekar, R. V., Altouqi, S., Sattler, M.L., Hossain, M.D.S., Chen, V.P., 2017. Estimating landfill leachate BOD and COD based on rainfall, ambient temperature, and waste composition: Exploration of a MARS statistical approach. Environ. Technol. Innov. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2017.03.003
17. Białowiec, A., Davies, L., Albuquerque, A., Randerson, P.F., 2012. The influence of plants on nitrogen removal from landfill leachate in discontinuous batch shallow constructed wetland with recirculating subsurface horizontal flow. Ecol. Eng. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2011.12.011
18. Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J.P.T., Rothstein, H.R., 2009. Introduction to Meta-Analysis, Introduction to Meta-Analysis. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470743386
19. Borglin, S.E., Hazen, T.C., Oldenburg, C.M., Zawislanski, P.T., 2004. Comparison of aerobic and anaerobic biotreatment of municipal solid waste. J. Air Waste Manag. Assoc. https://doi.org/10.1080/10473289.2004.10470951
20. Brisson, J., Chazarenc, F., 2009. Maximizing pollutant removal in constructed wetlands: Should we pay more attention to macrophyte species selection? Sci. Total Environ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.05.047
21. Brix, H., 1997. Do macrophytes play a role in constructed treatment wetlands?, in: Water Science and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0273-1223(97)00047-4
22. Çeçen, F., Çakıroğlu, D., 2001. Impact of landfill leachate on the co-treatment of domestic wastewater. Biotechnol. Lett. 23, 821–826.
23. Ciria, M.P., Solano, M.L., Soriano, P., 2005. Role of macrophyte Typha latifolia in a constructed wetland for wastewater treatment and assessment of its potential as a biomass fuel. Biosyst. Eng. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2005.08.007
24. Coleman, J., Hench, K., Garbutt, K., Sexstone, A., Bissonnette, G., Skousen, J., 2001. Treatment of domestic wastewater by three plant species in constructed wetlands. Water. Air. Soil Pollut. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010336703606
25. Costa, A.M., Alfaia, R.G. de S.M., Campos, J.C., 2019. Landfill leachate treatment in Brazil – An overview. J. Environ. Manage. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.11.006
26. Crocetti, E., 2016. Systematic Reviews With MetaAnalysis: Why, When, and How? Emerg. Adulthood 4, 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167696815617076
27. Cumming, G., 2014. The New Statistics: Why and How. Psychol. Sci. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613504966
28. Dajić, A., Mihajlović, M., Jovanović, M., Karanac, M., Stevanović, D., Jovanović, J., 2016. Landfill design: Need for improvement of water and soil protection requirements in EU Landfill Directive. Clean Technol. Environ. Policy. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-015-1046-2
29. Dallas, S., Ho, G., 2005. Subsurface flow reedbeds using alternative media for the treatment of domestic greywater in Monteverde, Costa Rica, Central America. Water Sci. Technol. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2005.0358
30. Denny, P., 1997. Implementation of constructed wetlands in developing countries, in: Water Science and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1016/ S0273-1223(97)00049-8
31. Ellis, P.D., 2009. The Essential Guide to Effect Sizes: An Introduction to Statistical Power, Meta-Analysis and the Interpretation of Research Results. Power.
32. Engelhardt, K.A.M., Ritchie, M.E., 2001. Effects of macrophyte species richness on wetland ecosystem functioning and services. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/35079573
33. Fadanelli, L.E.A., De Andrade Filho, A.G., Wiecheteck, G.K., Döll, M.M.R., 2019. Considerations on design and implementation parameters of domestic wastewater treatment by subsurface flow constructed wetlands. Eng. Sanit. e Ambient. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1413-41522019102334
34. Fang, Z., Cao, X., Li, Xuexiao, Wang, H., Li, Xianning, 2017. Electrode and azo dye decolorization performance in microbial-fuel-cell-coupled constructed wetlands with different electrode size during long-term wastewater treatment. Bioresour. Technol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.04.075
35. Fisher, J., Stratford, C.J., Buckton, S., 2009. Variation in nutrient removal in three wetland blocks in relation to vegetation composition, inflow nutrient concentration and hydraulic loading. Ecol. Eng. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2009.05.009
36. Fraser, L.H., Carty, S.M., Steer, D., 2004. A test of four plant species to reduce total nitrogen and total phosphorus from soil leachate in subsurface wetland microcosms. Bioresour. Technol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2003.11.023
37. Gagnon, V., Chazarenc, F., Kõiv, M., Brisson, J., 2012. Effect of plant species on water quality at the outlet of a sludge treatment wetland. Water Res. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2012.07.007
38. Gao, J., Oloibiri, V., Chys, M., Audenaert, W., Decostere, B., He, Y., Van Langenhove, H., Demeestere, K., Van Hulle, S.W.H., 2014. The present status of landfill leachate treatment and its development trend from a technological point of view. Rev. Environ. Sci. Biotechnol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11157-014-9349-z
39. Ge, Z., Feng, C., Wang, X., Zhang, J., 2016. Seasonal applicability of three vegetation constructed floating treatment wetlands for nutrient removal and harvesting strategy in urban stormwater retention ponds. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2016.05.007
40. Greenway, M., Woolley, A., 2001. Changes in plant biomass and nutrient removal over 3 years in a constructed wetland in Cairns, Australia, in: Water Science and Technology. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2001.0844
41. Hand, D.J., 2012. Understanding The New Statistics: Effect Sizes, Confidence Intervals, and MetaAnalysis by Geoff Cumming. Int. Stat. Rev. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-5823.2012.00187_26.x
42. Haukos, D.A., Johnson, L.A., Smith, L.M., McMurry, S.T., 2016. Effectiveness of vegetation buffers surrounding playa wetlands at contaminant and sediment amelioration. J. Environ. Manage. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.07.011
43. Headley, T.R., Davison, L., Huett, D.O., Müller, R., 2012. Evapotranspiration from subsurface horizontal flow wetlands planted with Phragmites australis in sub-tropical Australia. Water Res. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2011.10.042
44. Hueck-Van der Plas, E.H., Hueck, H.J., 1979. The prospective assessment of environmental effects of chemicals, in: Drug Design. Elsevier, pp. 311–354.
45. Huedo-Medina, T., Sanchez-Meca, J., Marin-Martinez, F., Botella, J., 2006. Assessing heterogeneity in metaanalysis: Q statistic or I2 index? Part of the Psychology Commons Recommended Citation. Psychol. Methods.
46. Idris, A., Inanc, B., Hassan, M.N., 2004. Overview of waste disposal and landfills/dumps in Asian countries. J. Mater. Cycles Waste Manag. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-004-0117-y
47. Iskander, S.M., Zhao, R., Pathak, A., Gupta, A., Pruden, A., Novak, J.T., He, Z., 2018. A review of landfill leachate induced ultraviolet quenching substances: Sources, characteristics, and treatment. Water Res. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2018.08.035
48. Jin, Y.H., Cai, L., Cheng, Z.S., Cheng, H., Deng, T., Fan, Y.P., Fang, C., Huang, D., Huang, L.Q., Huang, Q., Han, Y., Hu, B., Hu, F., Li, B.H., Li, Y.R., Liang, K., Lin, L.K., Luo, L.S., Ma, J., Ma, L.L., Peng, Z.Y., Pan, Y.B., Pan, Z.Y., Ren, X.Q., Sun, H.M., Wang, Y., Wang, Yun Yun, Weng, H., Wei, C.J., Wu, D.F., Xia, J., Xiong, Y., Xu, H.B., Yao, X.M., Yuan, Y.F., Ye, T.S., Zhang, X.C., Zhang, Y.W., Zhang, Y.G., Zhang, H.M., Zhao, Y., Zhao, M.J., Zi, H., Zeng, X.T., Wang, Yong Yan, Wang, X.H., 2020. A rapid advice guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) infected pneumonia (standard version). Mil. Med. Res. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40779-020-0233-6
49. Juliardi, A.R.N.R., Wiyanti, R.I., 2018. The test ability of fish Tawes to leachate garbage dump (TPA) Benowo, in: Journal of Physics: Conference Series. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/953/1/012223
50. Kadlec, R.H., Wallace, S.D., 2009. Treatment Wetlands, Second Edition, Treatment Wetlands, Second Edition. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420012514
51. Karathanasis, A.D., Potter, C.L., Coyne, M.S., 2003. Vegetation effects on fecal bacteria, BOD, and suspended solid removal in constructed wetlands treating domestic wastewater. Ecol. Eng. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-8574(03)00011-9
52. Karpiscak, M.M., Gerba, C.P., Watt, P.M., Foster, K.E., Falabi, J.A., 1996. Multi-species plant systems for wastewater quality improvements and habitat enhancement, in: Water Science and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1016/0273-1223(96)00424-6
53. Khan, S., Ahmad, I., Shah, M.T., Rehman, S., Khaliq, A., 2009. Use of constructed wetland for the removal of heavy metals from industrial wastewater. J. Environ. Manage. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.05.026
54. Kickuth, R., 1977. Degradation and incorporation of nutrients from rural wastewaters by plant rhizosphere under limnic conditions. Util. manure by L. spreading 335–343.
55. Kjeldsen, P., Barlaz, M.A., Rooker, A.P., Baun, A., Ledin, A., Christensen, T.H., 2002. Present and long-term composition of MSW landfill leachate: A review. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. https://doi.org/10.1080/10643380290813462
56. Klauck, C., Rodrigues, M., Silva, L., 2015. Evaluation of phytotoxicity of municipal landfill leachate before and after biological treatment. Brazilian J. Biol. https://doi.org/10.1590/1519-6984.1813
57. Knie, J.L.W., Lopes, E.W.B., 2004. Testes ecotoxicológicos: métodos, técnicas e aplicações.
58. Knight, R.L., Walton, W.E., O’Meara, G.F., Reisen, W.K., Wass, R., 2003. Strategies for effective mosquito control in constructed treatment wetlands. Ecol. Eng. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2003.11.001
59. Kulikowska, D., Klimiuk, E., 2008. The effect of landfill age on municipal leachate composition. Bioresour. Technol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2007.10.015
60. Kurniawan, T.A., Lo, W.H., Chan, G.Y.S., 2006. Physico-chemical treatments for removal of recalcitrant contaminants from landfill leachate. J. Hazard. Mater. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2005.08.010
61. Landis, W., Sofield, R., Yu, M.-H., Landis, W.G., 2003. Introduction to Environmental Toxicology: Impacts of Chemicals Upon Ecological Systems, Third Edition, CRC Press.
62. Li, Y., Zhu, G., Ng, W.J., Tan, S.K., 2014. A review on removing pharmaceutical contaminants from wastewater by constructed wetlands: Design, performance and mechanism. Sci. Total Environ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.09.018
63. Liang, M.Q., Zhang, C.F., Peng, C.L., Lai, Z.L., Chen, D.F., Chen, Z.H., 2011. Plant growth, community structure, and nutrient removal in monoculture and mixed constructed wetlands. Ecol. Eng. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2010.11.018
64. Luo, H., Zeng, Y., Cheng, Y., He, D., Pan, X., 2020. Recent advances in municipal landfill leachate: A review focusing on its characteristics, treatment, and toxicity assessment. Sci. Total Environ. 703, 135468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135468
65. Mangkoedihardjo, S., Samudro, G. 2014. Research strategy on kenaf for phytoremediation of organic matter and metals polluted soil. Advances in Environmental Biology, 8(17), 64-67.
66. Miao, L., Yang, G., Tao, T., Peng, Y., 2019. Recent advances in nitrogen removal from landfill leachate using biological treatments – A review. J. Environ. Manage. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.01.057
67. Moges, A., Beyene, A., Kelbessa, E., Mereta, S.T., Ambelu, A., 2016. Development of a multimetric plant-based index of biotic integrity for assessing the ecological state of forested, urban and agricultural natural wetlands of Jimma Highlands, Ethiopia. Ecol. Indic. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.06.057
68. Mohajeri, S., Aziz, H.A., Isa, M.H., Bashir, M.J.K., Mohajeri, L., Adlan, M.N., 2010. Influence of Fenton reagent oxidation on mineralization and decolorization of municipal landfill leachate. J. Environ. Sci. Heal. Part A Toxic/Hazardous Subst. Environ. Eng. https://doi.org/10.1080/10934521003648883
69. Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D.G., Altman, D., Antes, G., Atkins, D., Barbour, V., Barrowman, N., Berlin, J.A., Clark, J., Clarke, M., Cook, D., D’Amico, R., Deeks, J.J., Devereaux, P.J., Dickersin, K., Egger, M., Ernst, E., Gøtzsche, P.C., Grimshaw, J., Guyatt, G., Higgins, J., Ioannidis, J.P.A., Kleijnen, J., Lang, T., Magrini, N., McNamee, D., Moja, L., Mulrow, C., Napoli, M., Oxman, A., Pham, B., Rennie, D., Sampson, M., Schulz, K.F., Shekelle, P.G., Tovey, D., Tugwell, P., 2009. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
70. Mojiri, A., Aziz, H.A., Aziz, S.Q., 2013. Trends in Physical-Chemical Methods for Landfill Leachate Treatment. Int. J. Sci. Res. Environ. Sci. https://doi.org/10.12983/ijsres-2013-p016-025
71. Moshiri, G.A., Brix, H., 2020. Wastewater Treatment in Constructed Wetlands: System Design, Removal Processes, and Treatment Performance, in: Constructed Wetlands for Water Quality Improvement. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003069997-3
72. Mthembu, M., Odinga, C., Swalaha, F., Bux, F., 2013. Constructed wetlands: A future alternative wastewater treatment technology. African J. Biotechnol. https://doi.org/10.5897/ajb2013.12978
73. Naylor, S., Brisson, J., Labelle, M.A., Drizo, A., Comeau, Y., 2003. Treatment of freshwater fish farm effluent using constructed wetlands: The role of plants and substrate, in: Water Science and Technology. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2003.0324
74. Nguyen, X.C., Tran, T.C.P., Hoang, V.H., Nguyen, T.P., Chang, S.W., Nguyen, D.D., Guo, W., Kumar, A., La, D.D., Bach, Q.V., 2020. Combined biochar vertical flow and free-water surface constructed wetland system for dormitory sewage treatment and reuse. Sci. Total Environ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.136404
75. Nivala, J., Hoos, M.B., Cross, C., Wallace, S., Parkin, G., 2007. Treatment of landfill leachate using an aerated, horizontal subsurface-flow constructed wetland. Sci. Total Environ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2006.12.030
76. Organization, W.H., 2020. Health Topics. Coronavírus. Coronavirus symptoms. World Heal. Organ. 2020a. Disponível em https//www. who. int/healthtopics/coronavirus# tab=tab_3. Acesso em 7.
77. Pauliukonis, N., Schneider, R., 2001. Temporal patterns in evapotranspiration from lysimeters with three common wetland plant species in the eastern United States. Aquat. Bot. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3770(01)00168-1
78. Perdana, M.C., Sutanto, H.B., Prihatmo, G., 2018. Vertical Subsurface Flow (VSSF) constructed wetland for domestic wastewater treatment, in: IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/148/1/012025
79. Picard, C.R., Fraser, L.H., Steer, D., 2005. The interacting effects of temperature and plant community type on nutrient removal in wetland microcosms. Bioresour. Technol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2004.09.007
80. Purwanta, W., 2018. Tinjauan teknologi pengolahan leachate di tempat pembuangan akhir (TPA) sampah perkotaan. J. Air Indones. https://doi.org/10.29122/jai.v3i1.2318
81. Qiu, Z.C., Wang, M., Lai, W.L., He, F.H., Chen, Z.H., 2011. Plant growth and nutrient removal in constructed monoculture and mixed wetlands related to stubble attributes. Hydrobiologia. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-010-0530-2
82. Renou, S., Givaudan, J.G., Poulain, S., Dirassouyan, F., Moulin, P., 2008. Landfill leachate treatment: Review and opportunity. J. Hazard. Mater. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.09.077
83. Restrepo, J.J.B., 2013. Determinação da taxa de transferência de elementos-traço de resíduos sólidos urbanos para lixiviado.
84. Samudro, G., Mangkoedihardjo, S. 2020. Mixed plant operations for phytoremediation in polluted environments – A critical review. Journal of Phytology, 12, 99-103. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.25081/jp.2020.v12.6454
85. Samudro, H., Mangkoedihardjo, S., 2020. Greening the environment in living a new lifestyle in the COVID-19 era. Eurasian J. Biosci. 14, 3285–3290.
86. Samudro, H., Mangkoedihardjo, S. 2021. Indoor phytoremediation using decorative plants: An overview of application principles. Journal of Phytology, 13, 28-32. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.25081/jp.2021.v13.6866
87. Sandoval, L., Zamora-Castro, S.A., Vidal-Álvarez, M., Marín-Muñiz, J.L., 2019. Role of wetland plants and use of ornamental flowering plants in constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment: A review. Appl. Sci. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9040685
88. Sharma, G., Priya, Brighu, U., 2014. Performance Analysis of Vertical Up-flow Constructed Wetlands for Secondary Treated Effluent. APCBEE Procedia. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcbee.2014.10.026
89. Shelef, O., Gross, A., Rachmilevitch, S., 2013. Role of plants in a constructed wetland: current and new perspectives. Water 5, 405–419.
90. Sieben, E.J.J., Collins, N.B., Mtshali, H., Venter, C.E., 2016a. The vegetation of inland wetlands with salt-tolerant vegetation in South Africa: Description, classification and explanatory environmental factors. South African J. Bot. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajb.2015.11.004
91. Sieben, E.J.J., Nyambeni, T., Mtshali, H., Corry, F.T.J., Venter, C.E., MacKenzie, D.R., Matela, T.E., Pretorius, L., Kotze, D.C., 2016b. The herbaceous vegetation of subtropical freshwater wetlands in South Africa: Classification, description and explanatory environmental factors. South African J. Bot. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajb.2015.11.005
92. Siedel, K., 1973. Patent: System for purification of polluted water. Washingt. DC.
93. Singh V, M.A.K., 2009. Toxicity analysis and public health aspects of municipal landfill leachate: a case study of Okhla landfill, Delhi Vijaya Singh. Indian Inst. Technol. Delhi; Toxicity Anal. Public Heal. Asp. Munic., Delhi.
94. Sklarz, M.Y., Gross, A., Yakirevich, A., Soares, M.I.M., 2009. A recirculating vertical flow constructed wetland for the treatment of domestic wastewater. Desalination. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2008.09.002
95. Sohsalam, P., Sirianuntapiboon, S., 2008. Feasibility of using constructed wetland treatment for molasses wastewater treatment. Bioresour. Technol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2007.10.033
96. Stefanakis, A.I., 2020. Constructed wetlands for sustainable wastewater treatment in hot and arid climates: Opportunities, challenges and case studies in the Middle East. Water (Switzerland). https://doi.org/10.3390/W12061665
97. Stefanakis, A.I., 2015. Constructed wetlands: Description and benefits of an eco-tech water treatment system, in: Impact of Water Pollution on Human Health and Environmental Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-9559-7.ch012
98. Stefanakis, A.I., Akratos, C.S., Tsihrintzis, V.A., 2011. Effect of wastewater step-feeding on removal efficiency of pilot-scale horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetlands. Ecol. Eng. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2010.11.006
99. Stottmeister, U., Wießner, A., Kuschk, P., Kappelmeyer, U., Kästner, M., Bederski, O., Müller, R.A., Moormann, H., 2003. Effects of plants and microorganisms in constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment, in: Biotechnology Advances. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2003.08.010
100. Tanaka, N., Ng, W.J., Jinadasa, K.B.S.N., 2011. Wetlands for tropical applications: Wastewater treatment by constructed wetlands, Wetlands for Tropical Applications: Wastewater Treatment by Constructed Wetlands. https://doi.org/10.1142/P59
101. Tews, J., Brose, U., Grimm, V., Tielbörger, K., Wichmann, M.C., Schwager, M., Jeltsch, F., 2004. Animal species diversity driven by habitat heterogeneity/diversity: The importance of keystone structures. J. Biogeogr. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0305-0270.2003.00994.x
102. Thomas, D.J.L., Tyrrel, S.F., Smith, R., Farrow, S., 2009. Bioassays for the evaluation of landfill leachate toxicity. J. Toxicol. Environ. Heal. Part B Crit. Rev. https://doi.org/10.1080/10937400802545292
103. Touchette, B.W., Iannacone, L.R., Turner, G.E., Frank, A.R., 2007. Drought tolerance versus drought avoidance: A comparison of plant-water relations in herbaceous wetland plants subjected to water withdrawal and repletion. Wetlands. https://doi.org/10.1672/0277-5212(2007)27[656:DTVDAA]2.0.CO;2
104. Umi Raihana, A.R., Sharifah Norkhadijah, S.I., Emilia, Z.A., Praveena, S.M., 2014. Landfill leachate toxicity analysis with Orechromis mossambicus (Mozambique tilapia): a review. Int. J. Sci. Basic Appl. Res. 18, 198–216.
105. Van Doremalen, N., Bushmaker, T., Morris, D.H., Holbrook, M.G., Gamble, A., Williamson, B.N., Tamin, A., Harcourt, J.L., Thornburg, N.J., Gerber, S.I., Lloyd-Smith, J.O., De Wit, E., Munster, V.J., 2020. Aerosol and surface stability of SARSCoV-2 as compared with SARS-CoV-1. N. Engl. J. Med. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMc2004973
106. Vymazal, J., 2013. Emergent plants used in free water surface constructed wetlands: A review. Ecol. Eng. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2013.06.023
107. Vymazal, J., 2011a. Plants used in constructed wetlands with horizontal subsurface flow: A review. Hydrobiologia. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-011-0738-9
108. Vymazal, J., 2011b. Constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment: Five decades of experience. Environ. Sci. Technol. https://doi.org/10.1021/es101403q
109. Vymazal, J., 2007. Removal of nutrients in various types of constructed wetlands. Sci. Total Environ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2006.09.014
110. Vymazal, J., 2005. Horizontal sub-surface flow and hybrid constructed wetlands systems for wastewater treatment, in: Ecological Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2005.07.010
111. Vymazal, J., Kröpfelová, L., 2009. Removal of organics in constructed wetlands with horizontal sub-surface flow: A review of the field experience. Sci. Total Environ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.08.032
112. Walton, W.E., 2019. Constructed wetlands still produce mosquitoes. Proc. Pap. Mosq. Vector Control Assoc. Calif. Mon. 87, 1.
113. Wang, J., Chen, Y., Huang, J., Qiao, W., Zhang, W., Yang, Q., 2009. Comparison of genetic diversity between in-situ conserved and non-conserved Oryza rufipogon populations in China. Acta Agron. Sin. 35, 1474–1482.
114. Wang, X., Sun, C., Gao, S., Wang, L., Shuokui, H., 2001. Validation of germination rate and root elongation as indicator to assess phytotoxicity with Cucumis sativus. Chemosphere. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-6535(00)00520-8
115. Wetzel, P.R., Van Der Valk, A.G., 1998. Effects of nutrient and soil moisture on competition between Carex stricta, Phalaris arundinacea, and Typha latifolia. Plant Ecol. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009751703827
116. Wojciechowska, E., Gajewska, M., 2013. Partitioning of heavy metals in sub-surface flowtreatment wetlands receiving high-strength wastewater. Water Sci. Technol. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2013.283
117. Wong, M.H., 1989. Toxicity test of landfill leachate using Sarotherodon mossambicus (freshwater fish). Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. https://doi.org/10.1016/0147-6513(89)90033-X
118. Wu, F.Y., Chung, A.K.C., Tam, N.F.Y., Wong, M.H., 2012. Root exudates of wetland plants influenced by nutrient status and types of plant cultivation. Int. J. Phytoremediation. https://doi.org/10.1080/15226514.2011.604691
119. Wu, H., Zhang, J., Li, C., Fan, J., Zou, Y., 2013a. Mass balance study on phosphorus removal in constructed wetland microcosms treating polluted river water. Clean Soil, Air, Water. https://doi.org/10.1002/clen.201200408
120. Wu, H., Zhang, J., Wei, R., Liang, S., Li, C., Xie, H., 2013b. Nitrogen transformations and balance in constructed wetlands for slightly polluted river water treatment using different macrophytes. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-012-0996-8
121. Wu, H., Zhang, Jian, Li, P., Zhang, Jinyong, Xie, H., Zhang, B., 2011. Nutrient removal in constructed microcosm wetlands for treating polluted river water in northern China. Ecol. Eng. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2010.11.020
122. Xiong, Y., Peng, S., Luo, Y., Xu, J., Yang, S., 2015. A paddy eco-ditch and wetland system to reduce non-point source pollution from rice-based production system while maintaining water use efficiency. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-014-3697-7
123. Yalçuk, A., Ugurlu, A., 2020. Treatment of landfill leachate with laboratory scale vertical flow constructed wetlands: plant growth modeling. Int. J. Phytoremediation 22, 157–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/15226514.2019.1652562
124. Yan, H., Cousins, I.T., Zhang, C., Zhou, Q., 2015. Perfluoroalkyl acids in municipal landfill leachates from China: Occurrence, fate during leachate treatment and potential impact on groundwater. Sci. Total Environ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.03.111
125. Yari, S., Moshammer, H., Fallah Asadi, A., Mosavi jarrahi, A., 2020. Side effects of using disinfectants to fight COVID-19. Asian Pacific J. Environ. Cancer. https://doi.org/10.31557/apjec.2020.3.1.9-13
126. Yeh, T.Y., Chou, C.C., Pan, C.T., 2009. Heavy metal removal within pilot-scale constructed wetlands receiving river water contaminated by confined swine operations. Desalination. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2008.11.025
127. Zahui, F.M., Pétémanagnanouattara, J., Messou, A., Coulibaly, L., 2018. Original Research Article Original Research Article Open Access Nutrient Removal and Balance in Vertical-Flow Constructed Wetlands Planted With Different Forage Macrophytes for Domestic Wastewater Treatment 08, 21046–21055.
128. Žaltauskaitė, J., Čypaitė, A., 2008. Assessment of landfill leachate toxicity using higher plants. Environ. Res. Eng. Manag. 46.
129. Zanelato, R., Bonatto, I. da C., Restrepo, J.J.B., Puerari, R.C., Matias, W.G., de Castilhos Junior, A.B., 2019. Toxicity of leachates from pilot reactors simulating a landfill with different concentrations of AgNP. Eng. Sanit. e Ambient. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1413-4152201920180239
130. Zhang, C.B., Wang, J., Liu, W.L., Zhu, S.X., Ge, H.L., Chang, S.X., Chang, J., Ge, Y., 2010. Effects of plant diversity on microbial biomass and community metabolic profiles in a full-scale constructed wetland. Ecol. Eng. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2009.09.010
131. Zhang, Z., Rengel, Z., Meney, K., 2007a. Nutrient removal from simulated wastewater using Canna indica and Schoenoplectus validus in monoand mixed-culture in wetland microcosms. Water. Air. Soil Pollut. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-007-9359-3
132. Zhang, Z., Rengel, Z., Meney, K., 2007b. Growth and resource allocation of Canna indica and Schoenoplectus validus as affected by interspecific competition and nutrient availability. Hydrobiologia. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-007-0733-3
133. Zheng, Y., Wang, X., Dzakpasu, M., Zhao, Y., Ngo, H.H., Guo, W., Ge, Y., Xiong, J., 2016. Effects of interspecific competition on the growth of macrophytes and nutrient removal in constructed wetlands: A comparative assessment of free water surface and horizontal subsurface flow systems. Bioresour. Technol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.02.008
134. Zhu, H., Zhou, Q.W., Yan, B.X., Liang, Y.X., Yu, X.F., Gerchman, Y., Cheng, X.W., 2018. Influence of vegetation type and temperature on the performance of constructed wetlands for nutrient removal. Water Sci. Technol. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2017.556
135. Zurita, F., de Anda, J., Belmont, M.A., 2006. Performance of laboratory-scale wetlands planted with tropical ornamental plants to treat domestic wastewater. Water Qual. Res. J. Canada. https://doi.org/10.2166/wqrj.2006.044
136. Zurita, F., White, J.R., 2014. Comparative study of three two-Stage hybrid ecological wastewater treatment systems for producing high nutrient, reclaimed water for irrigation reuse in developing countries. Water (Switzerland). https://doi.org/10.3390/w6020213

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa Nr 461252 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2021).

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.baztech-6e98ecdd-00b4-4c16-b312-a291d84aff2d