Implementation of the fuzzy analytical hierarchy process method in the determination of fishery shipyard clusters in Indonesia, preliminary study

• Autorzy: Rizwan Thaib , Thaib Razali , Rizki Ayana

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.12913/22998624/195813

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

This research investigates the clustering of fishing shipyards in Aceh and identifies key locations based on fishery shipyard clusters using the fuzzy analytical hierarchy process (Fuzzy AHP). Fuzzy AHP, an advancement of the classic AHP method, requires establishing criteria before data processing. The criteria in this study include the area of fishing land, the number of fishing fleets, and the amount of capture fisheries production. The research evaluates several alternative loca-tions across districts and cities in Aceh, including North Aceh Regency, Lhokseumawe City, Bi-reuen Regency, Pidie Jaya Regency, Pidie Regency, Aceh Besar Regency, Banda Aceh City, Sabang City, West Aceh Regency, Nagan Raya Regency, South Aceh Regency, and Aceh Singkil Regency. Results indicate Aceh Singkil Regency has the highest priority (Cluster A), Bireuen Regency has medium priority (Cluster B), and Aceh Besar Regency or Sabang City has the lowest priority (Cluster C). The Fuzzy AHP method ensures realistic and accurate assessments by considering uncertainty and subjectivity in human judgment, providing valuable insights for developing es-sential shipyard locations in Aceh.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

fuzzy AHP; fuzzy analytical hierarchy process; fishery shipyard cluster; alternative location; fisheries production

• Wydawca: Lublin University of Technology ; Polish Society of Ecological Engineering (PTIE), Branch of PTIE in Lublin
• Czasopismo: Advances in Science and Technology. Research Journal
• Rocznik: 2025
• Tom: Vol. 19, no. 2
• Strony: 127--135
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 33 poz., fig., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Rizwan Thaib

• Department of Capture Fisheries, Marine and Fisheries Faculty, Universitas Syiah Kuala, Darussalam, Banda Aceh, Indonesia

autor

Thaib Razali

• Department Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Syiah Kuala, Darussalam, Banda Aceh, Indonesia

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7592-6559

autor

Rizki Ayana

• Fishing and Navigation Vessel Laboratory, Marine and Fisheries Faculty, Universitas Syiah Kuala, Darussalam, Banda Aceh, Indonesia

• https://orcid.org/0009-0007-9794-5666

Bibliografia

• 1. Badrus Zaman M, Siswantoro N, Nandiansyah R, Risk assessment in ship repair scheduling [Internet]. Rochester, NY; 2019 [cited 2024 Aug 5]. Available from: https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=3451263.
• 2. Rizwan T, Hikmah D, Muhammad M, Chaliluddin MA, Akhyar A, Thaib R. A study on the development of a fishing shipyard in Peukan Bada District, Aceh Besar using fishbone analysis: A short communication. Depik. 2022 Aug 22; 11(2): 246–51.
• 3. Türk A, Özkök M. Shipyard location selection based on fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS. J Intell Fuzzy Syst. 2020 Jan 1; 39(3): 4557–76.
• 4. Sahin B, Yazir D, Soylu A, Yip TL. Improved fuzzy AHP based game-theoretic model for shipyard selection. Ocean Eng. 2021 Aug 1; 233: 109060.
• 5. Cil I, Arisoy F, Kilinc H, Özgürbüz E, Cil AY. Fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS Hybrid Method for Indoor Positioning Technology Selection for Shipyards. In: 2021 5th International Symposium on Multidisciplinary Studies and Innovative Technologies (ISMSIT) [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2024 Aug 5]. p. 766–71. Available from: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/9604748.
• 6. Housel DTJ. Benchmarking Naval Shipbuilding with 3D Laser Scanning, Additive Manufacturing, and Collaborative Product Lifecycle Management. Public Policy.
• 7. Ju S, Sung S, Shen H, Jeong YK, Shin JG. System development for establishing shipyard mid-term production plans using backward process-centric simulation. Int J Nav Archit Ocean Eng. 2020 Jan 1; 12: 20–37.
• 8. Lai E, Yun F, Arokiam I, Joo J. Barriers affecting successful lean implementation in Singapore’s shipbuilding industry: A case study. Oper Supply Chain Manag Int J. 2020 Mar 12; 13(2): 166–75.
• 9. Sukisno, Singgih ML. Location selection analysis for new shipyard using integration of DEMA℡ and ANP: A Case Study (PT IKI). IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng. 2019 Aug; 598(1): 012109.
• 10. Rizwan T, Hikmah D, Muhammad M, Chaliluddin MA, Akhyar A, Thaib R. A study on the development of a fishing shipyard in Peukan Bada District, Aceh Besar using fishbone analysis: A short communication. Depik. 2022 Aug 22; 11(2): 246–51.
• 11. Rizwan T, Husaini H, Husin H, Akhyar A. Study on shipyard location and model development. Depik. 2022 Nov 16; 11(3): 288–94.
• 12. Rizwan T, Jalil Z, Akhyar -, Husaini -. Oceanographic factors as the indicators for shipyard industry development in kutaraja fishing port: a preliminary study. J Ecol Eng. 2021; 22(9): 237–45.
• 13. Ahmed F, Kilic K. Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process: A performance analysis of various algorithms. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 2019 May 1; 362: 110–28.
• 14. Wang Y, Xu L, Solangi YA. Strategic renewable energy resources selection for Pakistan: Based on SWOT-Fuzzy AHP approach. Sustain Cities Soc. 2020 Jan 1; 52: 101861.
• 15. Shaverdi M, Heshmati MR, Ramezani I. Application of Fuzzy AHP Approach for Financial Performance Evaluation of Iranian Petrochemical Sector. Procedia Comput Sci. 2014; 31: 995–1004.
• 16. Pan NF. Fuzzy AHP approach for selecting the suitable bridge construction method. Autom Constr. 2008 Nov 1; 17(8): 958–65.
• 17. Liu Y, Eckert CM, Earl C. A review of fuzzy AHP methods for decision-making with subjective judgments. Expert Syst Appl. 2020 Dec 15; 161: 113738.
• 18. Ganguly A, Kumar C. Evaluating supply chain resiliency strategies in the Indian pharmaceutical sector: A fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (F-AHP) approach. Int J Anal Hierarchy Process. 2019 Jul 31; 11(2): 153–80.
• 19. Sharma V, Sharma V, Karwasra K. A decision framework for green manufacturing indicators using fuzzy AHP - ELECTRE I: A case study of the steering system manufacturer. Int J Sustain Eng. 2021 Nov 2; 14(6): 1332–41.
• 20. Mittal VK, Sindhwani R, Shekhar H, Singh PL. Fuzzy AHP model for challenges to thermal power plant establishment in India. Int J Oper Res. 2019 Jan; 34(4): 562–81.
• 21. Ganguly K, Kumar G. Supply Chain Risk Assessment: A fuzzy AHP approach. Oper Supply Chain Manag Int J. 2019 Feb 3; 12(1): 1–13.
• 22. Suciadi Y. Pemilihan Dan Evaluasi Pemasok Pada P.T. New hope Jawa Timur dengan menggunakan metode fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. Calyptra. 2013 Mar 1; 2(1): 1–17.
• 23. Pratama P, Fadillah A. Study on development of shipyard type for supporting pioneer ship in Indonesia. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci. 2019 Oct; 339(1): 012045.
• 24. Guterres GG, Basuki M, Santosa PI. Studi kelayakan peningkatan kapasitas produksi galangan kapal tradisional di daerah pelabuhan Lospalos di Timor–Leste ditinjau dari aspek teknis dan ekonomis. Pros Semin Teknol Kebumian dan Kelaut Semit. 2020 Jul 29; 2(1): 183–7.
• 25. Anele KK. A study of the cabotage policy in Nigeria from the prisms of ship acquisition and shipbuilding. WMU J Marit Aff. 2018 Mar 1; 17(1): 91–117.
• 26. Warsilan W. Shipyard industrial development studies East Kalimantan. Mimb J Sos Dan Pembang. 2018 Dec 10; 34(2): 462–72.
• 27. Rizwan T, Chaliluddin MA, Rizki A, Thaib R, Akhyar A. The influence of the number of fishing fleets on the growth of fishery production in an effort to determine shipyard clusters using linear regression. BIO Web Conf. 2024; 87: 03034.
• 28. Xue L, Shi G, Dai D, Xu Y. Two-stage efficiency structure analysis model of shipbuilding based on driving factors: the case of Chinese shipyard. Open J Soc Sci. 2020 Feb 10; 8(2): 182–200.
• 29. Vakili SV, Ölçer AI, Schönborn A. Identification of Shipyard Priorities in a Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Environment through a Transdisciplinary Energy Management Framework: A Real Case Study for a Turkish Shipyard. J Mar Sci Eng. 2021 Oct; 9(10): 1132.
• 30. Ford D, Housel T. Increasing value and savings in shipbuilding with innovative technologies. Def Acquis Res J. 2020 Jul 1; 27(93): 240–63.
• 31. Bai W, Zhang L. How to finance for establishing hydrogen refueling stations in China? An analysis based on Fuzzy AHP and PROMETHEE. Int J Hydrog Energy. 2020 Dec 4; 45(59): 34354–70.
• 32. Tornyeviadzi HM, Neba FA, Mohammed H, Seidu R. Nodal vulnerability assessment of water distribution networks: An integrated Fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS approach. Int J Crit Infrastruct Prot. 2021 Sep 1; 34: 100434.
• 33. Hapsari MA, Subiyanto S. Fuzzy AHP based optimal design building-attached photovoltaic system for academic campus. Int J Photoenergy. 2020; 2020(1): 6508329.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa nr POPUL/SP/0154/2024/02 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki II" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki (2025).