PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Powiadomienia systemowe
  • Sesja wygasła!
  • Sesja wygasła!
  • Sesja wygasła!
  • Sesja wygasła!
Tytuł artykułu

GNSS antenna caused near-field interference effect in precise point positioning results

Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
Results of long-term static GNSS observation processing adjustment prove that the often assumed "averaging multipath effect due to extended observation periods" does not actually apply. It is instead visible a bias that falsifies the coordinate estimation. The comparisons between the height difference measured with a geometrical precise leveling and the height difference provided by GNSS clearly verify the impact of the near-field multipath effect. The aim of this paper is analysis the near-field interference effect with respect to the coordinate domain. We demonstrate that the way of antennas mounting during observation campaign (distance from nearest antennas) can cause visible changes in pseudo-kinematic precise point positioning results. GNSS measured height differences comparison revealed that bias of up to 3 mm can be noticed in Up component when some object (additional GNSS antenna) was placed in radiating near-field region of measuring antenna. Additionally, for both processing scenario (GPS and GPS/GLONASS) the scattering of results clearly increased when additional antenna crosses radiating near-field region of measuring antenna. It is especially true for big choke ring antennas. In short session (15, 30 min.) the standard deviation was about twice bigger in comparison to scenario without additional antenna. When we used typical surveying antennas (short near-field region radius) the effect is almost invisible. In this case it can be observed the standard deviation increase of about 20%. On the other hand we found that surveying antennas are generally characterized by lower accuracy than choke ring antennas. The standard deviation obtained on point with this type of antenna was bigger in all processing scenarios (in comparison to standard deviation obtained on point with choke ring antenna).
Słowa kluczowe
Rocznik
Strony
27--40
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 27 poz., rys., tab.
Twórcy
  • University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Institute of Geodesy, 10-719 Olsztyn, ul. Oczapowskiego 1
  • University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Institute of Geodesy, 10-719 Olsztyn, ul. Oczapowskiego 1
Bibliografia
  • Bakua M. (2012). An Approach to Reliable Rapid Static GNSS Surveying, Survey Review, 44(327), 265-271.
  • Balanis C. A. (2005). Antenna Theory. Third Edition. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
  • Bilich A., Larson K. M. (2007). Mapping the GPS multipath environment using the signal-tonoise ratio (SNR), Radio Sci., Vol. 42, RS6003, DOI: 10.1029/2007RS003652.
  • Bhuiyan M. Z. H., Lohan E. S. (2010). Advanced Multipath Mitigation Techniques for Satellite-Based Positioning Applications, International Journal of Navigation and Observation, ID 412393, DOI:10.1155/2010/412393.
  • Choy S., Bisnath S., Rizos Ch. (2016) Uncovering Common Misconceptions in GNSS Precise Point Positioning and its Future Prospect, International Federation of Surveyors, Article of the Month - September 2016.
  • Christopher J. C. Penina, A. (1998). Adaptive SNR-based carrier phase multipath mitigation technique, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems , 34(1), 264-276, January 1998.
  • Dawidowicz K. (2014). Analyzing the impact of different PCV calibration models on height determination using GPS/GLONASS observations from ASG-EUPOS network, Artificial Satellites, 49(4), 211-223.
  • Dilßner F., Seeber G. Wübbena G., Schmitz M. (2008). Impact of Near-Field Effects on the GNSS Position Solution, Proceedings ION GNSS-08, Savannah, Georgia.
  • Georgiadou Y., Kleusberg A. (1988). On carrier Signac signal multipath effects in relative GPS positioning, Manuscripta Geodaetica, 13, 172-179.
  • Granström C., Johansson J. (2007). Site Dependent Effects in High-Accuracy Applications of GNSS. Proceedings of the Symposium of the IAG Subcommission for Europe (EUREF), June 6-8, London.
  • Hasegawa, H., Yoshimura, T. (2003) Application of dual-frequecy GPS receiver for static surveying under tree canopy. Journal of Forest Research, Springer-Verlag, Tokyo Inc, 8(2), 103-110.
  • Kouba, J., Héroux, P. (2001). Precise Point Positioning using IGS orbit and clock products, GPS Solutions, 5(2), 12-28, DOI: 10.1007/PL00012883.
  • Krzan G., Dawidowicz K., Stępniak K., Świątek K. (2016). Determining normal heights with the use of Precise Point Positioning, Survey Review, on-line version available et: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full, DOI: 10.1080/00396265.2016.1164939.
  • Lesparre J. (2006). The impact of the antenna mounting on the phase centre variation. EUREF Symposium 2006, on-line version available et: http://www.euref.eu/symposia/2006Riga/05-03.pdf.
  • LinLin G. E., Han S., Rizos C. (2000). Multipath mitigation of continuous GPS measurements using an adaptive filter, GPS Solutions , 4( 2), 19-30.
  • Rizos C., Janssen V., Roberts C., Grinter T. (2012). Precise Point Positioning: Is the era of differential GNSS positioning drawing to an end?, In: FIG Working Week 2012, Rome, Italy.
  • Rougerie S., Carrié G., Vincent F., Ries l., Monnerat M. (2012). A New Multipath Mitigation Method for GNSS Receivers Based on an Antenna Array, International Journal of Navigation and Observation, ID 804732, DOI:10.1155/2012/804732.
  • Satirapod C., Khoonphool R., Rizos C. (2003). Multipath mitigation of permanent GPS stations using wavelets, International Symposium on GPS/GNSS, Tokyo, 2003.
  • Schaer S. (1999). Mapping and Predicting the Earth’s Ionosphere Using the Global Positioning System. Ph.D. dissertation., Astronomical Institute University of Bern, Bern 1999, 205 pages.
  • Yedukondalu, K., Sarma A. D., Satya Srinivas V. (2009). Multipath mitigation using LMS adaptive filtering for GPS applications, Applied Electromagnetics Conference (AEMC- 2009) , Kolkata, India, December 14-16, 2009.
  • Valbuena R., Mauro F., Rodríguez-Solano R., Manzanera J.A. (2010). Accuracy and precision of GPS receivers under forest canopies in a mountainous environment, S. J. Agr. Res. 8(4), 1047-1057.
  • Volk C. M., Levine J. (1994). Analytical estimation of carrier multipath bias on GPS position measurements, National Institute of standards and Technology Technical Notes, Note 1366, 68 pages.
  • Wanninger L., May. (2000). Carrier Phase Multipath Calibration of GPS Reference Stations, Proceedings of ION GPS 2000, Salt Lake City, UT.
  • Weill L. R. (1997). Conquering Multipath: The GPS Accuracy Battle, GPS World, April, 59- 66.
  • Wübbena G., Schmitz M., Boettcher G. (2006) Near-field Effects on GNSS Sites: Analysis using Absolute Robot Calibrations and Procedures to Determine Corrections, Proceedings of the IGS Workshop 2006: Perspectives and Visions for 2010 and beyond, May 8-12, ESOC, Darmstadt, Germany.
  • Wübbena G., Schmitz M., Matzke N. (2010). On GNSS in-situ station calibration of nearfield multipath, International Symposium on GNSS, Space-based and Ground-based Augmentation Systems and Applications, November 29-30, 2010, Brussels, Belgium.
  • Zumberge J. F., Heflin M. B., Jefferson D. C., Watkins M. M., Webb F. H. (1997). Precise Point Positioning for the efficient and robust analysis of GPS data from large networks, Journal of Geophysical Research, 102(B3), 5005-5017, DOI: 10.1029/96JB03860.
Uwagi
Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa Nr 461252 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2020).
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-6e51a87e-e532-419f-951f-945b9da4b3c7
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.