Content of Selected Heavy Metals In Ni-Contaminated Soil Following the Application of Halloysite and Zeolite

• Autorzy: Radziemska M. , Mazur Z.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.12911/22998993/63336

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Nickel has been listed as a priory control pollutant by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA). Compared with other methods, the combination of vegetation and the addition of mineral sorbents to heavy metal-contaminated soils can be readily applied on a large scale because of the simplicity of technology and low cost. Halloysite and zeolite, among others, can be used for this purpose. A greenhouse study was performed to evaluate the feasibility of using natural zeolite, as well as raw and modified halloysite for the remediation of simulated Ni-contaminated soil. The soil was spiked with five doses of nickel, i.e. 0 (control), 80, 160, 240 and 320 mg·Ni kg^-1·soil. The average accumulation of heavy metals in nickel-contaminated soil was found to follow the decreasing order of Ni>Zn>Cr>Cu>Pb. The highest reduction of Pb content was observed in soil samples taken from pots containing 80 and 160 mg·kg^-1 of Ni along with the addition of modified halloysite. The strongest effects were caused by natural zeolite, which significantly reduced the average content of chromium. Contamination at 320 mg Ni·kg^-1

Słowa kluczowe

EN

halloysite; nickel; soil contamination; zeolite

• Wydawca: Polskie Towarzystwo Inżynierii Ekologicznej ; Lublin University of Technology
• Czasopismo: Journal of Ecological Engineering
• Rocznik: 2016
• Tom: Vol. 17, nr 3
• Strony: 125--133
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 41 poz., tab., rys.

Twórcy

autor

Radziemska M.

• Warsaw University of Life Sciences-SGGW, Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Nowoursynowska 159, 02-776 Warsaw, Poland

autor

Mazur Z.

• University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Faculty of Environmental Management and Agriculture, Pl. Łódzki 4, 10-727 Olsztyn, Poland

Bibliografia

• 1. USEPA, Exposure Factors Handbook. US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC 1997, (EPA/600/P-95/002F a–c).
• 2. Sas W., Głuchowski A., Radziemska M., Dzięcioł J., Szymański A. 2015. Environmental and geotechnical assessment of the steel slags as a material for road structure. Materials, 8, 4857–4875.
• 3. Radziemska M., Fronczyk J. 2015. Level and contamination assessment of soil along an expressway in an ecologically valuable area, central Poland. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 12, 13372–13387.
• 4. Tuovinen H., Pohjolainen E.M., Lempinen J., Vesterbacka D., Read D., Solatie D., Lehto J. 2016. Behaviour of radionuclides during microbially-induced mining of nickel at Talvivaara, Eastern Finland. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 151, 105–113.
• 5. Gupta D.K., Chatterjee S., Datta S., Veer V., Walther C. 2014. Role of phosphate fertilizers in heavy metal uptake and detoxification of toxic metals. Chemosphere, 108, 134–144.
• 6. Huang C.L., Vause J., Ma H.W., Li Y., Yu C.P. 2014. Substance flow analysis for nickel in mainland China in 2009. Journal of Cleaner Production, 84, 450–458.
• 7. Kuziemska B., Kalembasa S., Wieremiej W. 2014. Distribution of nickel in fractions extracted with the BCR procedure from nickel-contaminated soil. Journal of Elementology, 19, 3, 697–708.
• 8. Wyszkowski M., Radziemska M. 2009. Effect of some substances on the content of selected components in soils contaminated with chromium. Ecological Chemistry and Engineering A, 18, 11, 1497–1504.
• 9. Belchinskaja L.I, Khodosova N.A., Stelnikova O.Y. 2009. Use of natural and modified nanoporous sorbents for clearing of air medium and sewage. Annals of Warsaw University of Life Sciences – SGGW, Forestry and Wood Technology, 68, 32–36.
• 10. Fronczyk J., Radziemska M., Jeznach J. 2014. Evaluation of diatomite and chalcedonite as reactive materials protecting groundwater In traffic infrastructure. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin, 23, 12b, 3331–3339.
• 11. Fronczyk J., Radziemska M., Mazur Z. 2015. Copper removal from contaminated groundwater using natural and engineered limestone sand in permeable reactive barriers. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin, 24, 1a, 228–234.
• 12. Guimarães L., Enyashin A.N., Seifert G., Duarte H.A. 2010. Structural, electronic, and mechanical properties of single-walled halloysite nanotube models. Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 114, 11358–11363.
• 13. Cavallaro G., Gianguzza A., Lazzara G., Milioto S., Piazzese D. 2013. Alginate gel beads filled with halloysite nanotubes. Applied Clay Science, 72, 132–137.
• 14. Liu M., Wu C., Jiao Y., Xiong S., Zhou C. 2013. Chitosan–halloysite nanotubes nanocomposite scaffolds for tissue engineering. Journal of materials chemistry, Materials for biology and medicine, 1, 2078–2089.
• 15. Radziemska M., Mazur Z., Jeznach J. 2013. Influence of applying halloysite and zeolite to soil contaminated with nickel on the content of selected elements in maize (Zea mays L.). Chemical Engineering Transactions, 32, 301–306.
• 16. Radziemska M., Mazur Z., Fronczyk J., Jeznach J. 2014. Effect of zeolite and halloysite on accumulation of trace elements in maize (Zea Mays L.) in nickel contaminated soil. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin, 23, 12a, 3140–3146.
• 17. Dong F., Wang J.A., Wang Y., Ren S. 2012. Synthesis and humidity controlling properties of halloysite/poly (sodium acrylate-acrylamide) composite. Journal of Materials Chemistry, 22, 11093–11100.
• 18. Pimraksa K., Chindaprasirt P., Huanjit T., Tang C., Sato T. 2013. Cement mortars hybridized with zeolite and zeolite like materials made of lignite bottom ash for heavy metal encapsulation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 41, 31–41.
• 19. Shi W., Shao H., Li H., Shao M., Du S. 2009. Progress in the remediation of hazardous heavy metal-polluted soils by natural zeolite. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 170, 1–6.
• 20. Silva B., Figueiredo H., Quintelas C., Neves I.C., Tavares T. 2008. Zeolites as supports for biorecovery od hexavalent chromium and trivalent chromium. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 116, 550–560.
• 21. APHA (American Public Health Association), Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. APHA, Washington, DC, 1995.
• 22. Klute A., Methods of soil analysis. Madison: American Society of Agronomy. Agronomy Monograph 9, 1996.
• 23. Mocek A., Drzymała S., Genesis. Analysis and Soil Classification. Poznan University of Life Sciences (in Polish) 2010.
• 24. Lityński T., Jurkowska H., Gorlach E. 1976. Chemical and agriculture analysis. PWN, Warszawa, 129–132 (in Polish).
• 25. Bai C., Reilly C.C., Wood B.W. 2006. Nickel deficiency disrupts metabolism of ureides, amino acids, and organic acids of young pecan foliage. Plant Physiology, 140, 433–443.
• 26. Izosimova A. 2005. Modelling the interaction between calcium and nickel in the soil-plant system. Germany, Published by Die Deutsche Bibliothek, 288, 99.
• 27. Li B., Zhang H., Ma Y., McLaughlin M.J. 2011. Influences of soil properties and leaching on nickel toxicity to barley root elongation. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 74, 459–466.
• 28. Wyszkowski M., Radziemska M. 2009. The effect of chromium content in soil on the concentration of some mineral elements in plants. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin, 18, 7, 1039–1045.
• 29. Putwattana N., Kruatrachue M., Kumsopac A., Pokethitiyook P. 2015. Evaluation of organic and inorganic amendments on maize growth and uptake of Cd and Zn from contaminated paddy soils. International Journal of Phytoremediation, 17, 2, 165–174.
• 30. Ye X., Kang S., Wang H., Li H., Zhang Y., Wang G., Zhao H. 2015. Modified natural diatomite and its enhanced immobilization of lead, copper and cadmium in simulated contaminated soils. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 289, 210–218.
• 31. Matusik J., Wścisło A. 2014. Enhanced heavy metal adsorption on functionalized nanotubular halloysite interlayer grafted with aminoalcohols. Applied Clay Science, 100, 50–59.
• 32. Cao X., Dermatas D., Xu X., Shen G. 2008. Immobilization of lead in shooting range soils by means of cement, quicklime, and phosphate amendments. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 15, 120–127.
• 33. Li P., Lin C., Cheng H., Duan X., Lei K. 2015. Contamination and health risks of soil heavy metals around a lead/zinc smelter in southwestern China. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 113, 391–399.
• 34. Domańska J., Badora A., Filipek T. 2015. The sensitivity of Brassica napus ssp. oleifera to cadmium (Cd) and lead (Pb) contamination at different pH of mineral and organic soils. Journal of Elementology, 20, 1, 59–71.
• 35. Kumpiene J., Trace element immobilization in soil using amendments. In: Hooda, P.S. (Ed.), Trace Element in Soils. Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester, UK 2010, pp. 353–380.
• 36. Shi W.Y., Shao H.B., Li H., Shao M.A., Du S. 2008. Co-remediation of the lead-polluted garden soil by exogenous natural zeolite and humic acids. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 167, 136–140.
• 37. Maleki A., Hayati B., Naghizadeh M., Joo S.W. 2015. Adsorption of hexavalent chromium by metal organic frameworks from aqueous solution. Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, 28, 211–216.
• 38. Querol X., Alastuey A., Moreno N., Alvarez-Ayuso E., Garcia-Sanchez A., Cama J. et al. 2006. Immobilization of heavy metals in polluted soils by the addition of zeolitic material synthesized from coal fly ash. Chemosphere, 171, 171–180.
• 39. Herwijnen R., Hutchings T.R., Ai-Tabbaa A., Moffat A.J., Johns M.L., Ouki S.K. 2007. Remediation of metal contaminated soil with mineral-amended composts. Environmental Pollution, 150, 347–354.
• 40. Liu H., Chen L., Ai Y., Yang X., Yu Y., Zuo Y., Fu G. 2009. Heavy metal contamination in soil alongside mountain railway in Sichuan, China. Environmental Monitoring Assessment, 152, 25–33.
• 41. Terzano R., Spagnuolo M., Medici L., Vekemans B., Vincze L., Janssens K., Ruggiero P. 2005. Copper stabilization by zeolite synthesis in polluted soils treated with coal fly ash. Environmental Science and Technology, 39, 6280–6287.

Uwagi

PL

Opracowanie ze środków MNiSW w ramach umowy 812/P-DUN/2016 na działalność upowszechniającą naukę.