Wpływ zrzutu wód kopalnianych z odkrywki węgla brunatnego na jakość wód rzecznych

• Autorzy: Staniszewski R. , Jusik S.

Warianty tytułu

EN

Impact of Mine Waters Discharge from Open-pit Lignite Mine on River Water Quality

• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

EN

Open cast mines can cause several modification of environment, as like decrease of groundwater level, soil modifications, noise, changes of river discharge and others. The year 2009 was the last year of mine waters discharge from Lubstów mine (Wielkopolska province) to Noteć River, which caused increase of river discharge for approximately 17%. The paper presents results of two years of studies on impact of mine waters from brown coal open-pit mine on lowland river. Most important water quality parameters like pH reaction, conductivity, sulphates and nutrients were analysed in all sites. Biological indication methods (MTR, IBMR, RI and others) based on aquatic plants (macrophytes, algae, mosses, liverworts) were used in studies to evaluate possible water quality changes below mine water discharge. Additionally, indices describing biological diversity (Shannon-Wiener W, Simpson D, uniformity J) were calculated using data from standard Mean Trophic Rank survey. In all three sites domination of several aquatic taxa was observed. Most frequent taxa were Elodea canadensis and Berula erecta. Other taxa often present in Noteć River were Spirodela plyrhiza, Sparganium emersum, Sparganium erectum, Mentha aquatica and Symphytum officinale. Results of studies were used for statistical analyses of Friedman ANOVA. Obtained data showed, that according to analysed water quality parameters as like, pH reaction, conductivity, total phosphorus, nitrates and others, changes of water quality were negligible. Results obtained using macrophyte indices for estimation of water trophy and ecological state confirmed results of chemical measurements. According to ANOVA, statistically significant relations were found for macrophyte biological diversity indices among surveyed river sites (χ2 = 8.40; p = 0.015). It was also confirmed by Kendall coefficient W = 0.84. The highest biological diversity was observed in site 1 situated above mine waters discharge and it was decreasing in sites 2 and 3. For the Shannon-Wiener (H’) index average coefficients were respectively 0.29 and 0.23, thus precise interpretation of these relation is difficult and to some extent could depend on other factors, eg. shading. Results of studies showed, that according to measured water quality parameters mine waters discharge from deep seated drainage did not caused significant changes of Noteć river water quality.

Słowa kluczowe

PL

wody kopalniane; jakość wód rzecznych; węgiel brunatny

EN

classification; macrophytes; water quality; river water quality

• Wydawca: Politechnika Koszalińska
• Czasopismo: Rocznik Ochrona Środowiska
• Rocznik: 2013
• Tom: Tom 15, cz. 3
• Strony: 2652--2665
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 22 poz., tab., rys.

Twórcy

autor

Staniszewski R.

• Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy, Poznań

autor

Jusik S.

• Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy, Poznań

Bibliografia

• 1. Dawson F.H., Newman J.R., Gravelle M.J., Rouen K.J., Henville P.: Assessment of the Trophic Status of Rivers using Macrophytes: Evaluation of the Mean Trophic Rank. R&D Technical Report E39, Environment Agency of England & Wales, Bristol, UK, p. 80 (1999).
• 2. Friedman M.: The use of ranks to avoid the assumption of normality implicit in the analysis of variance. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 32 (200), 675–701 (1937).
• 3. Haury J., Peltre M.-C., Trémolières M., Barbe J., Thiébaut G., Bernez I., Daniel H., Chatenet P., Haan-Archipof G., Muller S., Dutartre A., Laplace-Treyture C., Cazaubon A., Lambert-Servien E.: A new method to assess water trophy and organic pollution – the Macrophyte Biological Index for Rivers (IBMR): its application to different types of river and pollution. Developments in Hydrobiology 190, 153–158 (2006).
• 4. Holmes N.T.H., Newman J.R., Chadd S., Rouen K.J., Saint L., Dawson F.H.: Mean Trophic Rank: A users manual. R&D Technical Report E38, Environment Agency of England & Wales, Bristol, UK, p. 100 (1999).
• 5. Kendall M.G., Smith B.B.: The Problem of m Rankings. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics. 10 (3), 275–287 (1939).
• 6. Kopeć D., Dałkowski R., Urbaniak P.: Using macrophytes as trophic state indicators in upland river waters: a case study of the Czarna Maleniecka River. Oceanological and Hydrobiological Studies. 39(1), 119–126 (2010).
• 7. Kudelska D., Soszka H.: Przegląd stosowanych w różnych krajach sposobów oceny i klasyfikacji wód powierzchniowych. PIOŚ, Warszawa, 1–83 (1996).
• 8. Magurran A.E.: Ecological Diversity and its Measurement. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ: 179 (1988).
• 9. Rozporządzenie Ministra Środowiska z dnia 9 listopada 2011 r. w sprawie sposobu klasyfikacji stanu jednolitych części wód powierzchniowych oraz środowiskowych norm jakości dla substancji priorytetowych, Dziennik Ustaw Nr 257, Poz. 1545.
• 10. Schaumburg J., Schranz C., Foerster J., Gutowski A., Hofmann G., Meilinger P., Schneider S., Schmedtje U.: Ecological classification of macrophytes and phytobenthos for rivers in Germany according to the Water Framework Directive. Limnologica 34, 283–301 (2004).
• 11. Staniszewski R.: Estimation of river trophy in the Kujawskie Lakeland using Mean Trophic Rank and Chemical Index of Trophy. Roczniki AR Poznan 334, Botanika 4, 165–173 (2001).
• 12. Staniszewski R., Jusik S., Kupiec J.: Variability of taxonomic structure of aquatic macrophytes according to major modifications of lowland and upland rivers with different water trophy. Nauka Przyr. Technol. 6, 2, #22 (2012).
• 13. Staniszewski R., Szoszkiewicz K., Zbierska J., Leśny J., Jusik Sz., Clarke R.T.: Assessment of sources of uncertainty in macrophyte surveys and the consequences for river classification. Hydrobiologia 566, 235–246 (2006).
• 14. Szafrański Cz., Stachowski P., Kozaczyk P.: Stan aktualny i prognozy poprawy gospodarki wodnej gruntów na terenach pogórniczych. Rocznik Ochrona Środowiska (Annual Set the Environment Protection), 13, 485–510 (2010).
• 15. Szoszkiewicz J., Zbierska J., Dembek R., Szoszkiewicz K., Staniszewski R.: Zróżnicowanie fitosocjologiczne i wartość rolnicza zbiorowisk łąkowych z udziałem motylkowatych w świetle przeprowadzonych badań w rejonie Wielkopolski i Kujaw. Biuletyn Instytutu Hodowli i Aklimatyzacji Roślin Nr 225, 107–119 (2003).
• 16. Szoszkiewicz K., Karolewicz K., Ławniczak A., Dawson F.H.: An assessment of the MTR aquatic plant bioindication system for determining the trophic status of Polish rivers. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies 11, 421–427 (2002).
• 17. Szoszkiewicz K., Kayzer D., Staniszewski R., Dawson F.H.: Measures of central tendency of aquatic habitat parameters: application to river macrophyte communities. Polish Journal of Ecology, 58 (4): 693–706 (2010).
• 18. Szoszkiewicz K., Zbierska J., Ławniczak A.E., Jusik S., Szwabińska M.:. Makrofity w rzekach. W: Soszka H. (red) Ocena stanu ekologicznego wód zlewni rzeki Wel. Wytyczne do zintegrowanej oceny stanu ekologicznego rzek i jezior na potrzeby planów gospodarowania wodami w dorzeczu, Wydawnictwo IRŚ, Olsztyn, 2011.
• 19. Szoszkiewicz K., Zbierska J., Jusik S., Zgoła T.: Makrofitowa Metoda Oceny Rzek. Podręcznik metodyczny do oceny i klasyfikacji stanu ekologicznego wód płynących w oparciu o rośliny wodne. Bogucki Wydawnictwo Naukowe, Poznań, 2010.
• 20. Wachowiak G.: The upper Noteć River recharge from mine water of open pit mine Lubstów of the Konin Lignite Mine. Górnictwo Odkrywkowe, 1, 54–59 (2010).
• 21. Comité Europeén de Normalisation Water quality – Guidance standard for the surveying of aquatic macrophytes in running waters. Rep. CEN/TC230¬/WG2/TG3:N55, 2002.
• 22. Willby N., Pitt J.-A., Phillips G.: The Ecological Classification of UK Rivers Using Aquatic Macrophytes. UK Environment Agency Science Reports. Project SC010080 ⁄SR1. Environmental Agency, Bristol, 2009.