A study of macroeconomic and geopolitical influences and security risks in supply chains in times of disruptions

• Autorzy: Krykavskyy Yevhen , Shandrivska Olena , Pawłyszyn Irena

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.17270/J.LOG.2023.855

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Background: The effect of macroeconomic and geopolitical disturbances affects the safety of logistics chains in the environment of their operation. Determining the parameters of the security of the logistics chain in the period of disruption is considered an important economic problem due to the growing threats to the economic security of the country and, in particular, to the security of the logistics sector. Supply chains in Ukraine were initially disrupted due to the COVID pandemic and then the Russian invasion. These two major disruptions have had a significant impact on logistics in Ukraine, which is why this article aims to explore their impact on supply chain operations. Methods: The research comprises four main components: a bibliometric analysis employing the systematic literature review method, a statistical analysis of key macroeconomic indicators affecting the logistics sector in Ukraine and the global economy, survey research involving participants in supply chains, and a conclusion drawn from the analyses, addressing risks for the security of the supply chain environment. The bibliometric analysis aims to understand research trends and developments in the field, while the statistical analysis provides insights into economic factors impacting supply chains. The survey research offers valuable input from supply chain participants, contributing to a comprehensive understanding of their experiences. Finally, the conclusion draws implications from the analyses, identifying potential risks and proposing measures to enhance supply chain resilience and security. Results: The research results indicate that the disturbances analyzed not only affected the fluctuations of global GDP but also, with a certain delay, the global supply chains, indicating the deepening of differences in the logistics sector. Industries that rely on global logistics supply chains are found to be highly susceptible to changes in transformation flexibility and changes in the configuration of supply chain networks. It has been established that the consequences of the unrest in Ukraine have exacerbated the financial, humanitarian, food, energy, social, and value of life crisis. In terms of impact on the Ukrainian logistics sector, they have led, among others, to the weakening/breaking of logistic links, the lack of potential to fully use them during wartime, and the intensification of security threats. Conclusions: Among the logistics requirements, the safety and self-preservation function has become the most important. Therefore, an important task during wartime is to develop security mechanisms that ensure durability and efficiency, as well as operational and integrated supply chains with high adaptability to disruptions.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

COVID-19; war; disruption; macroeconomic indicators; geopolitics; recession; supply chains; risk; security

PL

COVID-19; wojna; wskaźniki makroekonomiczne; geopolityka; recesja; łańcuch dostaw; ryzyko; bezpieczeństwo

• Wydawca: Wyższa Szkoła Logistyki
• Czasopismo: LogForum
• Rocznik: 2023
• Tom: Vol. 19, no. 3
• Strony: 423--441
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 35 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Krykavskyy Yevhen

• Institute of Economics and Management, Lviv Polytechnic National University, Lviv, Ukraine
• Department of Finance and Logistics, Bielsko-Biala School of Finance and Law, Bielsko-Biała, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1847-586X

autor

Shandrivska Olena

• Institute of Economics and Management, Lviv Polytechnic National University, Lviv, Ukraine

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4335-2423

autor

Pawłyszyn Irena

• Faculty of Engineering Management, Institute of Logistics, Poznan University of Technology, Poznan, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5054-6314

Bibliografia

• 1. Aksoy C.G., Baur A., Flach L., Javorcik B., Smarzynska K., 2022, Reactions to supply chain disruptions: Evidence from German firms, EconPol Policy Brief, 45, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, Munich. Available online: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/273440%20 (26.07.2023)
• 2. Blanchard O., Dell’Ariccia G., Mauro P., 2010, Rethinking macroeconomic policy, IMF Staff Discussion Note SDN/10/03. Available online: https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/spn/2010/spn1003.pdf (accessed on 15.01.2023)
• 3. Caruana J., 2014, Financial regulation, complexity, and innovation, Speech at promontory annual lecture. Available online: https://www.bis.org/speeches/sp140604.htm (accessed on 15.01.2023)
• 4. Cerra V., Saxena S.C., 2017, IMF Working Paper. Booms, crises, and recoveries: A new paradigm of the business cycle and its policy implications. Available online: https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WP/Issues/2017/11/16/Booms-Crises-and-Recoveries-A-New-Paradigm-of-the-Business-Cycle-and-its-Policy-Implications-45368 (accessed on 15.01.2023).
• 5. Cerra V., Saxena S.C., 2018, The economic scars of crises and recessions. Available online: URL: https://blogs.imf.org/2018/03/21/the-economic-scars-of-crises-and-recessions (accessed on 15.08.2022)
• 6. Christopher M., Peck H., 2004, Building the resilient supply chain, International Journal of Logistics Management, 15(2), 1-14, https://www.doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/09574090410700275
• 7. Cousins P.D., Lamming R.C., Bowen F., 2004, The role of risk in environment-related supplier initiatives, International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 24(6), 554–565, https://www.doi.org/10.1108/01443570410538104
• 8. Craighead C.W., Blackhurst J., Rungtusanatham M.J., Handfield R.B., 2007, The severity of supply chain disruptions: Design characteristics and mitigation capabilities, Decision Sciences, 38(1), 131–156, https://www.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.2007.00151
• 9. Cui L., Yue S., Nghiem X.-H., Duan M., 2023, Exploring the risk and economic vulnerability of global energy supply chain interruption in the context of Russo-Ukrainian war, Resources Policy, 81, 103373, https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.103373
• 10. Funke M., Schularick M., Trebesch C., 2016, Going to extremes: Politics after financial crises, 1870–2014, European Economic Review, 88, 227-260, https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2016.03.006
• 11. Garvey M.D., Carnovale S., Yeniyurt S., 2015, An analytical framework for supply network risk propagation: A Bayesian network approach, European Journal of Operational Research, 243(2), 618–627, https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2014.10.034
• 12. Global Supply Chain Pressure Index. Available online: https://www.newyorkfed.org/research/policy/gscpi#/overview/ (accessed on 28.12.2022)
• 13. Gross domestic product (GDP) in Ukraine 2022. Available online: https://index.minfin.com.ua/ua/economy/gdp/ (accessed on 18.11.2022)
• 14. Guénette J.-D., Kenworthy P., Wheeler C., 2022, Implications of the War in Ukraine for the Global Economy, Washington, DC: World Bank, USA. Available online: https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/37372 (accessed on 26.07.2023)
• 15. Hashim M., Nazam M., Yao L., Baig S.A., Abrar M., Zia-ur-Rehman M., 2017, Application of multi-objective optimization based on genetic algorithm for sustainable strategic supplier selection under fuzzy environment, Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 10(2), 188, https://www.doi.org/10.3926/jiem.2078
• 16. Hendricks K.B., Singhal V.R., 2005, An empirical analysis of the effect of supply chain disruptions on long‐run stock price performance and equity risk of the firm, Production and Operations Management, 14(1), 35–52, https://www.doi.org/10.1111/j.1937-5956.2005.tb00008.x
• 17. Horbulin V.P., Kachynskyi, А.B., 2010, Strategic planning for solving national security problems, NISD, Kyiv, 5-288. Original – Горбулін В.П., Качинський А.Б., 2010, Стратегічне планування вирішення проблем національної безпеки, НІСД, Київ, 5-288.
• 18. Jagtap S., Trollman H., Trollman F., Garcia-Garcia G., Parra-López C., Duong L., Martindale W., Munekata P.E.S., Lorenzo J.M., Hdaifeh A., Hassoun A., Salonitis K., Afy-Shararah M., 2022, The Russia-Ukraine conflict: Its implications for the global food supply chains, Foods, 11, 2098, https://www.doi.org/10.3390/foods11142098
• 19. Lücker F., Seifert R.W., 2017, Building up resilience in a pharmaceutical supply chain through inventory, dual sourcing and agility capacity, Omega, 73, 114–124, https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2017.01.001
• 20. Mhatre T.N., Thakkar J.J., Maiti, J., 2017, Modelling critical risk factors for Indian construction project using interpretive ranking process (IRP) and system dynamics (SD), International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, 34(9), 1451–1473, https://www.doi.org/10.1108/IJQRM-09-2015-0140
• 21. Minfin. Available online: https://index.minfin.com.ua/ (accessed on 22.12.2022).
• 22. National Bank of Ukraine (NBU). Available online: https://bank.gov.ua/ (accessed on 07.10.2022)
• 23. Nepal B., Yadav O.P., 2015, Bayesian belief network-based framework for sourcing risk analysis during supplier selection, International Journal of Production Research, 53(20), 6114–6135, https://www.doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2015.1027011.
• 24. Nguyen M. N., Dinh T.V., Nguyen H.T, Phuoc M.H., Nguyen T.A., Le Dinh H.A., Nguyen T.T., Nguyen S.T.A., Luu Q.T., Vu Thi P.D., Le Thi H.T., 2022, Russia-Ukraine war and risks to global supply chains, International Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 7(7), 633–640.
• 25. Orel М.H., 2019, Theoretical foundations of state administration in the field of political security, Polihraf plius, Kyiv, 7-320. Original – Орел М.Г., 2019, Теоретичні основи державного управління у сфері політичної безпеки, Поліграф плюс, Київ, 7-320.
• 26. Paché G., 2022, The invasion of Ukraine by Russian troops: A violent shock for supply chains, Strategic Management Quarterly, 10(1), 1-8, https://www.doi.org/10.15640/smq.v10n1a1
• 27. Ropele T., Tagliabracci A., 2022, Perceived economic effects of the war in Ukraine: survey-based evidence from Italian firms, Applied Economics Letters, 1-6, https://www.doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2022.2131710
• 28. Samvedi A., Jain V., Chan F.T.S., 2012, An integrated approach for machine tool selection using fuzzy AHP and grey relational analysis, International Journal of Production Research, 50(12), 3211–3221, https://www.doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2011.560906
• 29. Sharma S. K., Bhat A., Kumar V., Agarwal A., 2017, Path analysis model for supply chain risk management, International Journal of Information Systems and Supply Chain Management, 10(2), 21-41, https://www.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-3909-4.ch021
• 30. State Statistics Service of Ukraine. Available online: http://www.ukrstat.gov.ua/ (accessed on 15.11.2022).
• 31. Svensson L.E.O., 2016, IMF Working Paper Institute. Cost-benefit analysis of leaning against the wind: Are costs larger also with less effective macroprudential policy. Available online: https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/2016/wp1603.pdf (accessed on 15.01.2023)
• 32. The World Bank Data – GDP (current US$). Available online: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.CD (accessed on 30.01.2023)
• 33. The World Bank – International LPI. Available online: https://lpi.worldbank.org/international (accessed on 06.10.2022)
• 34. Turner P., 2017, Leaning against the wind: the last financial crisis and (?) the next, unpublished materials of National Institute of Economics and Social Research, London.
• 35. Wu T., Blackhurst J., 2009, Managing supply chain risk and vulnerability: Tools and methods for supply chain decision makers, Springer, London, 9-230, https://www.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-634-2 1-488