Przegląd badań dotyczących predyktorów i efektów regeneracji po pracy w zakresie dobrostanu pracowników

• Autorzy: Mockałło Zofia

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.54215/BP.2025.1.1.Mockallo

Warianty tytułu

EN

A review of research on the predictors and effects of post-work recovery on employee well-being

• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

PL

W artykule dokonano przeglądu badań dotyczących problematyki regeneracji po pracy w kontekście jej predyktorów i efektów w zakresie dobrostanu osób pracujących. Zdefiniowano pojęcie regeneracji i przedstawiono psychologiczne podejście do procesu regeneracji, zaproponowane przez Sonnentag i Fritz. Opisano czynniki wpływające na procesy regeneracji pracowników, w tym czynniki indywidualne oraz cechy środowiska pracy, takie jak wymagania i zasoby pracy. Omówiono również efekty regeneracji w zakresie dobrostanu pracowników, np. ich nastroju, wigoru, dobrostanu psychicznego, zadowolenia z życia czy jakości snu. Przedstawiono implikacje.

EN

The aim of this article is to provide a comprehensive review of research on the subject of recovery from work, focusing on its predictors and effects on employee well-being. The concept of recovery is defined, and the psychological approach to the recovery process proposed by Sonnentag and Fritz is presented. Factors influencing employee recovery processes are described, including individual factors and work environment characteristics, such as job demands and resources. The effects of recovery on employee well-being are also discussed, including aspects such as mood, vigour, psychological well-being, life satisfaction, and sleep quality. Practical implications are presented, and directions for future research are formulated.

Słowa kluczowe

PL

regeneracja po pracy; dobrostan; wymagania pracy; zasoby pracy

EN

recovery from work; well-being; job demands; job resources

• Wydawca: Centralny Instytut Ochrony Pracy - Państwowy Instytut Badawczy
• Czasopismo: Bezpieczeństwo Pracy : nauka i praktyka
• Rocznik: 2025
• Tom: nr 1
• Strony: 12--17
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 28 poz., rys.

Twórcy

autor

Mockałło Zofia

• Centralny Instytut Ochrony Pracy - Państwowy Instytut Badawczy, ul. Czerniakowska 16, 00-701 Warszawa, Polska

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1756-9215

Bibliografia

• [1] SONNENTAG S., FRITZ C. Recovery from job stress: The stressor-detachment model as an integrative framework. Journal of Organizational Behavior. 2015, S1: S72-S103; doi: 10.1002/JOB.1924.
• [2] ZIJLSTRA F.R.H., SONNENTAG S. After work is done: Psychological perspectives on recovery from work. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology. 2006, 2: 129-138.
• [3] SONNENTAG S., FRITZ C. The Recovery Experience Questionnaire: Development and Validation of a Measure for Assessing Recuperation and Unwinding From Work. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology. 2007, 3: s. 204-221; doi: 10.1037/1076-8998.12.3.204.
• [4] SONNENTAG S. The recovery paradox: Portraying the complex interplay between job stressors, lack of recovery, and poor well-being. Research in Organizational Behavior. 2018, 38: 169-185.
• [5] MEIJMAN T.F., MULDER G. Psychological aspects of workload. [W:] P.J.D. Drenth, H. Thierry, C.J. de Wolff [eds.], Handbook of work and organizational: Work psychology. Psychology Press/ Erlbaum (UK), Taylor & Francis, 1998, s. 5-33.
• [6] HOBFOLL S.E. Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. American Psychologist. 1989, 3: 513-524; doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.44.3.513.
• [7] SONNENTAG S., CHENG B.H., PARKER S.L. Recovery from Work: Advancing the Field Toward the Future. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior. 2022, 9: 33–60; doi: 10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012420-091355.
• [8] SONNENTAG S. Recovery, work engagement, and proactive behavior: A new look at the interface between nonwork and work. Journal of Applied Psychology. 2003, 3: 518–528; doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.3.518.
• [9] SONNENTAG S. Work, recovery activities, and individual well-being: A diary study. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology. 2001, 3: 196-210; doi: 10.1037/1076-8998.6.3.196.
• [10] STEED L.B. et al. Leaving Work at Work: A Meta-Analysis on Employee Recovery From Work. Journal of Management. 2021, 4: 867-897; doi: 10.1177/0149206319864153.
• [11] BENNETT A.A., BAKKER A.B., FIELD J.G. Recovery from work-related effort: A meta-analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior. 2018, 3: 262-275; doi: 10.1002/job.2217.
• [12] CAVANAUGH M.A. et al. An empirical examination of self-reported work stress among US managers. Journal of Applied Psychology. 2000, 1: 65-74.
• [13] WENDSCHE J., LOHMANN-HAISLAH A. A meta-analysis on antecedents and outcomes of detachment from work. Frontiers in Psychology. 2017, 223407; doi: 10.3389/FPSYG.2016.02072/BIBTEX.
• [14] KINNUNEN U. et al. Job demands-resources model in the context of recovery: Testing recovery experiences as mediators. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology. 2011, 6: 805-832; doi: 10.1080/1359432X.2010.524411.
• [15] MEIER L.L., CHO E. Work stressors and partner social undermining: Comparing negative affect and psychological detachment as mechanisms. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology. 2019, 24: 359-372.
• [16] PARK Y., FRITZ C., JEX S. M. Relationships between work-home segmentation and psychological detachment from work: The role of communication technology use at home. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology. 2011, 4: 457-467; doi: 10.1037/a0023594.
• [17] HEADRICK L. et al. Recovery experiences for work and health outcomes: a meta-analysis and recovery-engagement-exhaustion model. Journal of Business and Psychology. 2023, 4: 821-864.
• [18] RAGSDALE J.M., HOOVER C.S., WOOD K. Investigating affective dispositions as moderators of relationships between weekend activities and recovery experiences. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology. 2016, 4: 734-750.
• [19] SONNENTAG S., ZIJLSTRA F.R.H. Job characteristics and off-job activities as predictors of need for recovery, well-being, and fatigue. Journal of Applied Psychology. 2006, 2: 330-350.
• [20] SONNENTAG S., NATTER E. Flight attendants’ daily recovery from work: Is there no place like home? International Journal of Stress Management. 2004, 4: 366–391; doi: 10.1037/1072-5245.11.4.366.
• [21] ROOK J.W., ZIJLSTRA F.R.H. The contribution of various types of activities to recovery. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology. 2006, 2: 218-240; doi: 10.1080/13594320500513962.
• [22] FISHMAN I., NG R., BELLUGI U. Do extraverts process social stimuli differently from introverts? Cognitive Neuroscience. 2011, 2: s. 67–73. [23] FURNHAM A. Personality and activity preference. British Journal of Social Psychology. 1981, 1: 57-68.
• [24] DEMEROUTI E. et al. Daily recovery from work-related effort during non-work time. [W:] S. Sonnentag, P.L. Perrewé, D.C. Ganster [eds.], Current perspectives on job-stress recovery. JAI Press/Emerald Group Publishing, 2009, s. 85-123; doi: 10.1108/S1479-3555(2009)0000007006.
• [25] OERLEMANS W.G.M., BAKKER A.B., DEMEROUTI E. How feeling happy during off-job activities helps successful recovery from work: A day reconstruction study. Work & Stress. 2014, 2: 198-216.
• [26] NEWMAN D.B., TAY L., DIENER E. Leisure and subjective well-being: A model of psychological mechanisms as mediating factors. Journal of Happiness Studies: An Interdisciplinary Forum on Subjective Well-Being. 2014, 3: 555-578; doi: 10.1007/s10902-013-9435-x.
• [27] SIANOJA M. et al. Recovery during lunch breaks: Testing long-term relations with energy levels at work. Scandinavian Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology. 2016, 1: 1-12.
• [28] BOSCH C., SONNENTAG S., PINCK A.S. What makes for a good break? A diary study on recovery experiences during lunch break. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology. 2018, 1: 134-157.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa nr POPUL/SP/0154/2024/02 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki II" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki (2025).