Generative Artificial Intelligence in the teaching activities of academic teachers and students

• Autorzy: Romaniuk Milosz Wawrzyniec , Łukasiewicz-Wieleba Joanna

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.24425/ijet.2024.152092

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The study aimed to learn about the experiences and opinions of students and academic teachers regarding the use of artificial intelligence in higher education. The question was answered to what extent and in what way do students and academic teachers of APS use AI in their studies and work? A diagnostic survey method was used, and original survey questionnaires were used. The study involved 58 academic teachers and 139 students. A significant number of academic teachers do not use artificial intelligence, and some of them express open disapproval of its use in education. These concerns include the negative impact of AI on the teaching process and the risks associated with verifying knowledge. A small number of lecturers use AI mainly to search for or create teaching materials. They use AI to prepare lesson plans, generate images, or make classes more attractive. In turn, some of them fear that AI may encourage students to abuse technology in the educational process. Most students declare that they do not use AI, and some are afraid of its inaccuracy and the possibility of making mistakes. Of the students who use AI, they mainly use it to search for information, simplify and correct their work, and create new materials. There is a clear discrepancy between the needs and goals of lecturers and students in the context of AI use. Lecturers perceive AI as a tool to support teaching, but with concerns about its ethical and practical application, while students treat AI as a tool to facilitate everyday learning tasks. The results suggest the need to implement training on the ethical use of AI and its full potential for both lecturers and students to prepare them for the upcoming technological changes in education.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

artificial intelligence; AI in teaching and learning; higher education; academic teachers; students

• Wydawca: Polish Academy of Sciences, Committee of Electronics and Telecommunication
• Czasopismo: International Journal of Electronics and Telecommunications
• Rocznik: 2024
• Tom: Vol. 70, No. 4
• Strony: 1043--1048
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 43 poz., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Romaniuk Milosz Wawrzyniec

• The Maria Grzegorzewska University

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1009-8940

autor

Łukasiewicz-Wieleba Joanna

• The Maria Grzegorzewska University

• https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2215-1208

Bibliografia

• [1] J. Fazlagić, "Projektowanie edukacji wobec wyzwań sztucznej inteligencji," Kwartalnik edukacyjny 1-2(108-109), pp. 33-39 , 2022. [2] M. Keskin and İ. Saralar-Aras, "Empowering Middle School Minds: Harnessing Artificial Intelligence for Innovative Mathematics Education," in Current Academic Studies in Technology and Education 2023, Istanbul, ISRES Publishing, 2023.
• [3] S. Russell and N. Peter, Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach, Hoboken, NJ, USA: Pearson Education, Inc., 2016.
• [4] O. Fink and J. Weissenberg, "Top 10 Emerging Technologies of 2023," World Economic Forum, 2023.
• [5] T. B. Brown, B. Mann, N. Ryder, M. Subbiah and J. Kaplan, "Language Models are Few-Shot Learners," arXiv preprint, p. 2005.14165, 2020.
• [6] R. Bommasani, D. A. Hudson, E. Adeli, R. Altman and S. Arora, "On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Models," arXiv preprint, p. 2108.07258, 2021.
• [7] H. Touvron, T. Lavril, G. Izacard, X. Martinet and M.-A. Lachaux, "LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Models," arXiv preprint, p. 2302.13971, 2023.
• [8] K. Pelletier, M. McCormack, J. Reeves, J. Robert, N. Arbino, w. Al-Freih, C. Dickson-Deane, C. Guevara, L. Koster, M. Sanchez-Mendiola, L. Skallerup Bessette and J. Stine, "2022 EDUCAUSE Horizon Report Teaching and Learning Edition," EDUC22, Boulder, CO, 2022.
• [9] UNESCO, "Global Education Monitoring Report Summary 2023: Technology in education: A tool on whose terms?," UNESCO, Paris, 2023.
• [10] M. Burns, "Technology in Education: Background Paper for 2023 Global Education Monitoring Report," UNESCO, 2021.
• [11] B. Williamson, Big Data in Education. The Digital Future of Learning, Policy and Practice, Los Angeles-London-New Delhi: Sage, 2017.
• [12] D. Siemieniecka, "Technologie w edukacji 4.0," Przegląd Badań Edukacyjnych 34, p. 227-250. http://dx.doi.org/10.12775/PBE.2021.027 , 2021.
• [13] J. Bryant, C. Heitz, S. Saurabh and D. Wagle, How artificial intelligence will impact K12 teachers, New York: McKinsey & Company, 2020.
• [14] L. Floridi, J. Cowls, M. Beltrametti, R. Chatila and P. Chazerand, "AI4People—An Ethical Framework for a Good AI Society: Opportunities, Risks, Principles, and Recommendations," Minds and Machines, vol. 28, pp. 689-707, 2018.
• [15] A. Jobin, M. Ienca and E. Vayena, "The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines," Nature Machine Intelligence, vol. 1, pp. 389-399, 2019.
• [16] UNESCO, AI and education: guidance for policy-makers, Paris: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, 2021.
• [17] L. Strannegard, "Generatywna sztuczna inteligencja - zagrożenie czy szansa dla uczelni?," Krytyka Prawa, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 15-18, 2023.
• [18] A. Jungherr, "Using ChatGPT and Other Large Language Model (LLM) Applications for Academic Paper Assignments," SocArXiv Papers, p. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/d84q6 , 2023.
• [19] M. W. Romaniuk and J. Łukasiewicz-Wieleba, "Zdalna edukacja kryzysowa w APS w okresie pandemii COVID-19. Proces egzaminowania w trybie zdalnym i stacjonarnym - porównanie, "Warszawa, 2021. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.18440.55045
• [20] M. W. Romaniuk and J. Łukasiewicz-Wieleba, "Remote and Stationary Examinations in the Opinion of Students," International Journal of Electronics and Telecommunications, vol. 68, no. 1, pp. 69-75, 2022. https://doi.org/10.24425/ijet.2022.139850
• [21] M. W. Romaniuk and J. Łukasiewicz-Wieleba, "Academic Lecturers Towards the Students' Examining. Similarities and Differences of Stationary and Remote Exams in the Pandemic Era," International Journal of Electronics and Telecommunications, vol. 68, no. 1, pp. 63-68, 2022. https://doi.org/10.24425/ijet.2022.139849
• [22] M. W. Romaniuk and J. Łukasiewicz-Wieleba, "Challenges of administering university examinations remotely during the COVID-19 pandemic," E-Mentor, vol. 90, no. 3, pp. 22-31, 2021. https://doi.org/10.15219/em90.1519
• [23] K. Holstein, B. M. McLaren and V. Aleven, "Designing for Complementarity: Teacher and Student Needs for Orchestration Support in AI-Enhanced Classrooms," in Artificial Intelligence in Education: 20th International Conference, AIED 2019, Chicago, IL, 2019.
• [24] K. Holstein and V. Aleven, "Designing for human-AI complementarity in K-12 education," AI Magazine, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 239-248, 2022.
• [25] R. Luckin, W. Holmes, M. Griffiths and L. B. Forcier, Intelligence Unleashed. An argument for AI in Education., London: Pearson, 2016.
• [26] C. Fadel, W. Holmes and M. Bialik, Artificial Intelligence In Education: Promises and Implications for Teaching and Learning, Center for Curriculum Redesign, 2019.
• [27] O. Zawacki-Richter, V. I. Marín, M. Bond and F. Gouverneur, "Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education - where are the educators?," International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, vol. 16, p. 39, 2019.
• [28] M. Firat, "How Chat GPT Can Transform Autodidactic Experiences and Open Education?," OSF Preprints, p. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/9ge8m 2023
• [29] S. Hopcan, E. Polat, M. E. Ozturk and L. Ozturk, "Artificial intelligence in special education: a systematic review," Interactive Learning Environments, vol. 31, no. 10, pp. 7335-7353, 2023.
• [30] S. Kuruliszwili, "Sztuczna inteligencja. Nowe wyzwanie edukacyjne," Problemy Opiekuńczo-Wychowawcze 10, pp. 28-40. DOI:10.5604/01.3001.0015.6653, 2021.
• [31] K. I. Raszyd, A. Wesołowska and K. Tomaszewska, "Sztuczna Inteligencja w nauce - jak studenci wykorzystują AI w edukacji wyższej," Akademia Zarządzania, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 373-400, 2024.
• [32] T. Wang and E. C. Cheng, "Towards a tripartite research agenda: A scoping review of artificial intelligence in education research," in Artificial intelligence in education: Emerging technologies, models and applications, Springer, 2022, pp. 3-24. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-7527-0_1
• [33] M. W. Romaniuk and J. Łukasiewicz-Wieleba, "Information technologies in higher education teaching in the opinions of academic teachers," International Journal of Electronics and Telecommunications, vol. 70, no. 3, pp. 772-779, 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.24425/ijet.2024.149608
• [34] M. W. Romaniuk and J. Łukasiewicz-Wieleba, "Information technology in teaching and learning process at higher education institutions in students’ opinions," International Journal of Electronics and Telecommunications, vol. 70, no. 3, pp. 767-772, 2024. https://doi.org/10.24425/ijet.2024.149531
• [35] M. A. Cardona, R. J. Rodriguez and K. Ishmael, "Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Teaching and Learning," Office of Educational Technology, Washington, 2023.
• [36] H. S. Lin, "The Stanford Emerging Technology Review 2023. A Report on Ten Key Technologies and Their Policy Implications," Stanford University, Stanford, California, 2023.
• [37] M. Porwoł, "Czy sztuczna inteligencja zmienia sposób myślenia o plagiacie w kontekście rzetelności akademickiej?," Eunomia - Rozwój Zrównoważony, vol. 104, no. 1, pp. 57-69, 2023.
• [38] S. Laato, B. Morschheuser, J. Hamari and J. Björne, "AI-Assisted Learning with ChatGPT and Large Language Models: Implications for Higher Education," in EEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT), Orem, UT, USA. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICALT58122.2023.00072 , 2023.
• [39] M. W. Romaniuk, A. Szarfenberg, I. Pawłowska and K. Choszczyk, "Doctoral Theses in the Digital Age - ICT use by Social Sciences PhD Students of The Maria Grzegorzewska University," International Journal of Electronics and Telecommunications, vol. 70, no. 1, pp. 199-204, 2024. https://doi.org/10.24425/ijet.2024.149531
• [40] S. Zahidi, "The Future of Jobs Report 2023," World Economic Forum, https://www.weforum.org/publications/the-future-of-jobs-report-2023/in-full/ , 2023.
• [41] A. Franczyk and A. Rajchel, "Postawy studentów wobec ChatGPT w edukacji," Horyzonty Wychowania 23(65), pp. 89-101. https://doi.org/10.35765/hw.2024.2365.10, 2024.
• [42] P. Cabała, K. Kwiatkowska, K. Woźniak and M. Zakrzewska, "Opinie studentów wobec możliwości i ograniczeń wykorzystania systemu ChatGPT," e-mentor, vol. 102, no. 5, pp. 48-56, 2023.
• [43] "Serwis Rzeczpospolitej Polskiej," 15 03 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.gov.pl/web/cyfryzacja/przelomowe-przepisy-dotyczace-sztucznej-inteligencji--parlament-europejski-przyjal-rozporzadzenie

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa nr POPUL/SP/0154/2024/02 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki II" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki (2025).