An open source framework for the storage and reuse of industrial knowledge through the integrationof PLM and MES

• Autorzy: Bruno Giulia , Faveto Alberto , Traini Emiliano

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.24425/mper.2020.133729

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Today, the changes in market requirements and the technological advancements are influencing the product development process. Customers demand a product of high quality and fast delivery at a low price, while simultaneously expecting that the product meet their individual needs and requirements. For companies characterized by a highly customized production, it is essential to reduce the trial-and-errors cycles to design new products and process. In such situation most of the company’s knowledge relies on the lessons learnt by operators in years of work experience, and their ability to reuse this knowledge to face new problems. In order to develop unique product and complex processes in short time, it is mandatory to reuse the acquired information in the most efficient way. Several commercial software applications are already available for product lifecycle management (PLM) and manufacturing execution system (MES). However, these two applications are scarcely integrated, thus preventing an efficient and pervasive collection of data and the consequent creation of useful information. The aim of this paper is to develop a framework able to structure and relate information from design and execution of processes, especially the ones related to anomalies and critical situations occurring at the shop floor, in order to reduce the time for finalizing a new product. The framework has been developed by exploiting open source systems, such as ARAS PLM and PostgreSQL. A case study has been developed for a car prototyping company to illustrate the potentiality of the proposed solution.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Industry 4.0; PLM; MES; knowledge management; ARAS; PostgreSQL

• Wydawca: Production Engineering Committee of the Polish Academy of Sciences ; Polish Association for Production Management
• Czasopismo: Management and Production Engineering Review
• Rocznik: 2020
• Tom: Vol. 11, No. 2
• Strony: 62--73
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 39 poz., rys., tab., wykr.

Twórcy

autor

Bruno Giulia

• Politecnico di Torino Department of Management and Production Engineering Corso Duca degli Abruzzi 24, 10129 Torino, Italy

autor

Faveto Alberto

• Department of Management and Production Engineering, Politecnico di Torino, Italy

autor

Traini Emiliano

• Department of Management and Production Engineering, Politecnico di Torino, Italy

Bibliografia

• [1] Muffatto M., Roveda M., Developing product platforms: analysis of the development process, Technovation, 20, 11, 617–630, 2000.
• [2] Wortmann J.C., Muntslag D.R., Timmermans P.J.M., Customer-driven manufacturing, Chapman & Hall, London, UK, 1997.
• [3] Tu Y., Production planning and control in a virtual one-of-a-kind production company, Computers in Industry, 34, 3, 271–283, 1997.
• [4] Dean P.R., Tu Y.L., Xue D., An information system for one-of-a-kind production, International Journal of Production Research, 47, 4, 1071–1087, 2009.
• [5] Koren Y., Gu X., Guo W., Reconfigurable manufacturing systems: Principles, design, and future trends, Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering, 13, 121–138, 2018.
• [6] Gola A., Reliability analysis of reconfigurable manufacturing system structures using computer simulation methods, Maintenance and Reliability, 21, 90– 102, 2019.
• [7] WangG.X., HuangS.H., YanY., DuJ.J., Reconfiguration schemes evaluation based on preference ranking of key characteristics of reconfigurable manufacturing systems, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 89, 2231–2249, 2017.
• [8] Vaida S., Ambad P., Bhosle S., Industry 4.0 – A Glimpse, Procedia Manufacturing, 20, 233–238, 2018.
• [9] Bruno G., Antonelli D., Korf R., Zimmermann N., Exploitation of a semantic platform to store and reuse PLM knowledge, IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, 438, pp. 5966, 2014.
• [10] Bruno G., Taurino T., Villa A., An approach to support SMEs in manufacturing knowledge organization, Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 29, 6, 1379–1392, 2018.
• [11] Chungoora N., Young R., Gunendran G., Palmer C., Usman Z., Anjum N., Cutting-Decelle A., Harding J., Case K., A model-driven ontology approach for manufacturing interoperability and knowledge sharing, Computers in Industry, 64, 4, 392–401, 2013.
• [12] David M., Rowe F., What does PLMS (product lifecycle management systems) manage: Data or documents? Complementarity and contingency for SMEs, Computers in Industry, 2015.
• [13] EfthymiouK., SipsasK., MourtzisD., Chryssolouris G., On knowledge reuse for manu-facturing systems design and planning: A semantic technology approach, CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology, 8, 1–11, 2015.
• [14] Igba J., Alemzadeh K., Gibbons P.M., Henningsen K., A framework for optimizing product performance through feedback and reuse of in-service experience, Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 2015.
• [15] Bruno G., Traini E., Lombardi F., A knowledgebased system for collecting and integrating production information, 20th IFIP Working Conference on Virtual Enterprises, PRO-VE 2019, Turin, Italy, 2019.
• [16] Bruno G., Korf R., Lentes J., Zimmermann N., Efficient management of product lifecycle information through a semantic platform, International Journal of Product Lifecycle Management, 9, 1, 45–64, 2016.
• [17] Elgamma A., Papazoglou M., Krämer B., Constantinescu C., Design for customization: a new paradigm for product-service system development, Procedia CIRP, 64, 345–350, 2017.
• [18] Ebrahimi A.H., Johansson P.E.C., Bengtsson K., Åkesson K., Managing product and production variety – a language workbench approach, Procedia CIRP, 17, 338–344, 2014.
• [19] Petrucciani M., Marangi L., Agosta M., Stevanella M., A Platform for Product-Service Design and Manufacturing Intelligence, [in:] Cattaneo L., Terzi S. [Eds], Models, Methods and Tools for Product Service Design. SpringerBriefs in Applied Sciences and Technology, Springer, 2019.
• [20] Ming X.G., Yan J.Q., Lu W.F. et al., Mass production of tooling product families via modular feature-based design to manufacturing collaboration in PLM, J Intell Manuf, 18: 185, 2007.
• [21] Pouchard L., Ivezic N., Schlenoff C., Ontology engineering for distributed collaboration in manufacturing, Proceedings of the AIS2000 conference, 2000.
• [22] Joshi S., ERP-MES-PLM integration-making information technology strategy compliment business strategy, IADIS International Conference on Information System 2009, Barcelona, Spain, 2009.
• [23] Ben Khedher A., Henry S., Bouras A., Integration between MES and Product Lifecycle Management, IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (ETFA’11), Toulouse, France, 2011.
• [24] ISA-95, Enterprise Control System Integration, http://www.isa-95.com/, 2000.
• [25] D’Antonio G., Sauza B.J., Chiabert P., Lombardi F., PLM-MES integration to support collaborative design,InternationalConferenceonEngineeringDesign, Milan, Italy, 2015.
• [26] D’antonio G., Bedolla J., Genta G., Ruffa S., Barbato G., Chiabert P., Pasquettaz G., PLM-MES integration: a case study in automotive manufacturing, 12th IFIP International Conference on Product Lifecyle Management (PLM), Doha, Qatar, 2015.
• [27] D’Antonio G., Macheda L., Bedolla J.S., Chiabert P., PLM-MES Integration to Support Industry 4.0, Springer International Publishing, 2017.
• [28] Moones E., Kermad L., Vosgien T., El Mouloudi D., PLM Standards Modelling for Enterprise interoperability: A Manufacturing Case Stady for ERP and MES Systems Integration Base on ISA-19, Enterprise Interoperability 6th International IFIP Working Conference, IWEI 2015, Nîmes, France, Proceedings, May 28–29, 2015.
• [29] Asmae A., Southail S., El Moukhtar Z., Hussein B., Using ontologies for the integration of information systems dedicated to product (CFAO, PLM...) and those of systems monitoring (ERP, MES.), IEEE, 2006.
• [30] Morel G., Contribution de l’automatisation et à l’ingénierie des systèmes intégrés de production, Habilitation à Diriger des Recherches de l’Université Henri Poincaré, 28, 1992.
• [31] Bruno G., Measuring product semantic similarity by exploiting a manufacturing process ontology, International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Systems Management (IESM’15), 1251–1257, 2015.
• [32] Fenves S.J., Foufou S., Bock C.E., Bouillon N., Sriram R.D., CPM2: A revised core product model for representing design information, Internal report nistir no. 7185, National Institute od Standards and Technology (NIST), 2004.
• [33] Jin J., Fox M.S., Bilgic T., A requirement ontology for engineering design, Concurrent Engineering: Research and Applications, 4, 4, 279–291, 1996.
• [34] Borgo S., Leitaõ P., Foundations for a core ontology of manufacturing, IntegratedSeries in Information Systems, 14, 1, 751–775, 2007.
• [35] Moutarlier P., Geneste L., Grabot B., Tapas: a modular framework to support reuse in scheduling soft ware development, Production Planning and Control, 11, 7, 648–659, 2000.
• [36] Hammond B., Merge replication in Microsoft’s SQL server 7.0, Proceedings of the 1999 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data, 527, 1999.
• [37] Alemanni M., Grimaldi A., Tornincasa S., Vezzetti E., Key performance indicators for PLM benefits evaluation: The AlcatelAlenia Space case study, Computer in Industry, 59, 833–841, 2008.
• [38] Tomovic C.L., Ncube L.B., Walton A., Grieves M., Development of product lifecycle management metrics: measuring the impact of PLM, International Journal of Manufacturing Technology and Management, 19, 3–4, 167–179 2010.
• [39] Stark J., Product Lifecycle Management, Vol. 1, 21st Century Paradigm for Product Realisation, p. 9, 2015.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa Nr 461252 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2021).