Country-Specific Determinants of Intra-Industry Trade in Clothing and Footwear between Poland and European Union Countries

• Autorzy: Łapińska Justyna , Kądzielawski Grzegorz , Dziuba Radosław

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.5604/01.3001.0013.1816

Warianty tytułu

PL

Determinanty wymiany wewnątrzgałęziowej w handlu odzieżą i obuwiem między Polską a krajami Unii Europejskiej

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The present study investigated the country-specific determinants of intra-industry trade between Poland and its European Union trading partners in clothing and footwear during the time period 2004-2017. The econometric model for panel data was used to identify the factors determining bilateral intra-industry trade with EU countries. The research findings show that the size of the trading partners’ economies has a positive impact on the development of intra-industry trade in clothing and footwear. The size of the country, measured by the size of its GDP, is equated with the size of the market and the possibilities of selling differentiated products in it. The geographical distance separating the trading countries turned out to be a factor limiting the development of intra-industry trade. An unfavourable effect on the intensity of intra-industry trade is also the degree of imbalance in trade between trade partners. The study confirmed that the direction of the impact of all determinants of intra-industry trade identified is consistent with the predictions of the theory.

PL

Celem artykułu była identyfikacja czynników (oddziałujących na szczeblu kraju) determinujących handel wewnątrzgałęziowy produktami przemysłu odzieżowego i obuwniczego, w wymianie handlowej Polski z krajami Unii Europejskiej, w latach 2004-2017. Do identyfikacji determinant handlu wewnątrzgałęziowego wykorzystano model ekonometryczny dla danych panelowych. Z przeprowadzonych badań wynika, że pozytywny wpływ na rozwój wymiany wewnątrzgałęziowej w handlu odzieżą i obuwiem ma wielkość gospodarek partnerów handlowych. Wielkość kraju mierzona rozmiarami jego PKB jest utożsamiana z rozmiarami rynku i możliwościami sprzedaży na nim produktów zróżnicowanych. Czynnikiem ograniczającym rozwój wymiany wewnątrzgałęziowej okazała się odległość geograficzna, jaka dzieli handlujące kraje. Niekorzystny wpływ na intensywność wymiany wewnątrzgałęziowej ma również stopień niezrównoważenia obrotów handlowych pomiędzy partnerami handlowymi. Badanie potwierdziło, że kierunek wpływu wszystkich zidentyfikowanych determinant handlu wewnątrzgałęziowego jest zgodny z przewidywaniami teorii.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

intra-industry trade; clothing; footwear; Poland; European Union; panel data

PL

handel wewnątrzgałęziowy; odzież; obuwie; Polska; Unia Europejska; panel danych

• Wydawca: Sieć Badawcza Łukasiewicz - Łódzki Instytut Technologiczny
• Czasopismo: Fibres & Textiles in Eastern Europe
• Rocznik: 2019
• Tom: Vol. 27, no. 4 (136)
• Strony: 23--28
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 50 poz., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Łapińska Justyna

• Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Faculty of Economic Sciences and Management ul. Gagarina 13A, 87-100 Toruń, Poland

autor

Kądzielawski Grzegorz

• WSB University, ul. Cieplaka 1C, 41-300 Dąbrowa Górnicza, Poland

autor

Dziuba Radosław

• University of Lodz, Faculty of Economy and Sociology, Department of World Economy and European Integration, Łódź, Poland

Bibliografia

• 1. Wysokińska Z. Intra-Industry Trade between Selected Central and Eastern European Countries (Poland, the Czech Republic, Hungary, Slovakia and Slovenia) and the China Area: The Position of Textiles and Clothing. FIBRES & TEXTILES in Eastern Europe 2010; 18, 5(82): 8-10.
• 2. Cieślik A, Wincenciak L. Intra-industry trade in differentiated and homogenous commodities: Brander and Krugman models unified. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy 2018; 13(1): 29-53.
• 3. Szczepaniak I. Comparative advantages in Polish export to the European Union - food products vs selected groups of non-food products. OeconomiaCopernicana 2018; 9(2): 287-308.
• 4. Vitunskiene V, Serva E. Shifts in Lithuania’s agri-food industry export competitiveness: a comparative analysis versus high- and medium-high technology manufacturing industries. Oeconomia Copernicana 2015; 6(1): 7-31.
• 5. Dziuba R, Jabłońska M, Sulak K, Ławińska K. Textile Sector of the Visegrad Group Countries in Trade with the European Union. FIBRES & TEXTILES in Eastern Europe. 2018; 26, 6(132): 24-29. DOI: 10.5604/01.3001.0012.5160.
• 6. Karaalp HS, Yilmaz ND. Assessment of Trends in the Comparative Advantage and Competitiveness of the Turkish Textile and Clothing Industry in the Enlarged EU Market. FIBRES & TEXTILES in Eastern Europe 2012; 20, 3(92): 8-12.
• 7. Grandys E, Grandys A. Polish Foreign Trade in Clothing Products. FIBRES & TEXTILES in Eastern Europe 2014; 22, 6(108): 28-32.
• 8. Marks A. Intra-Industry Trade and Adjustment Costs in the Australian Textile, Clothing and Footwear and Motor Vehicle Industries: A Comparative Case Study Approach, Economic Papers 2009; 28, 4: 323-336.
• 9. Yilmaz ND, Karaalp-Orhan HS. Comparative Advantage of Textiles and Clothing: Evidence for Top Exporters in Eastern Europe. FIBRES & TEXTILES in Eastern Europe 2015; 23, 6(114): 8-13. DOI: 10.5604/12303666.1167411.
• 10. Czarny E. Teoria i praktyka handlu wewnątrzgałęziowego. Warszawa: Oficyna Wydawnicza Szkoły Głównej Handlowej. 2002.
• 11. Gurler Z, Erdal G, Erdal H, et al. The Effects of Free Trade Agreement on Intra-Industry Trade (A Case Study of Textile Sector in Turkey). Journal of Applied Sciences 2006; 6(5): 1204-1208.
• 12. Havrila P. Gunawardana, Australia’s Bilateral Intra-industry trade in Textiles and Clothing 2006; 11: 2-24.
• 13. Zhang Z, Li C. Country-Specific Factors and the Pattern of Intra-Industry Trade in China’s Manufacturing. Journal of International Development 2006; 18: 1137-1149.
• 14. Onogwu GO. Regional Characteristics Effects on Intra-Industry Trade in Residues and Wastes from Food Mill Industry. Journal of Agriculture and Sustainability 2013; 3(1): 108-121.
• 15. Schmitt N, Yo Z. Economies of Scale and the volume of intra-industry trade. Economics Letters 2001; 74 (1): 127-132.
• 16. Meluzín T,Zinecker M. Reasons for IPO Implementation: Empirical Evidence from the Polish Capital Market. Engineering Economics 2014;25(3): 294-301.
• 17. Meluzín T, Pietrzak MB, Balcerzak AP, et al. Rumours Related to Political Instability and their Impact on IPOs: The Use of Qualitative Modelling with Incomplete Knowledge. Polish Journal of Management Studies 2017; 16(2): 171-187.
• 18. Kim T, Oh K-Y. Country Size, Income Level and Intra-Industry Trade. Applied Economics 2001; 33(3): 401-406.
• 19. Hummels D, Levinsohn J. Monopolistic Competition and International Trade: Reconsidering the Evidence. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 1995; 110(3): 799- 836.
• 20. Okubo T. Intra-Industry Trade, Reconsidered: The Role of Technology Transfer and Foreign Direct Investment. The World Economy 2007; 30(12): 1855-1876.
• 21. Bergstrand J. The Heckscher-Ohlin-Samuelson Model, the Linder hypothesis and the determinants of bilateral intra-industry trade. The Economic Journal 1990;100: 1216- 1229.
• 22. Dalgin M. Intra- vs. Inter- Industry Trade: Do Country Differences Matter? International Research Journal of Finance and Economics 2010;56: 29-41.
• 23. Phang HT, Jeong Y J. An empirical analysis of intra industry trade in manufactures between Korea and ASEAN. Journal of Economic Studies 2014; 41(6): 833-848.
• 24. Thorpe M, Zhang Z. Study of the Measurement and Determinants of Intra-Industry Trade in East Asia. Asian Economic Journal 2005; 19(2): 231-247.
• 25. Łapińska J. Determinants of Intra-industry Trade in Agricultural and Food Products between Poland and EU Countries. Danube: Law and Economics Review 2014; 5(3): 159-172.
• 26. Linder SB. An Essay on Trade and Transformation, Stockholm, John Wiley & Sons Ltd. 1961.
• 27. Wysokińska Z. Dynamiczne współzależności wymiany handlowej krajów Europy Środkowej i Wschodniej w świetle teorii integracji i wymiany międzynarodowej. Uniwersytet Łódzki. Łódź, 1995.
• 28. Globerman S, Dean JW. Recent Trends in Intra-Industry Trade and Their Implications for Future Trade Liberalization. WeltwirtschaftlichesArchiv 1990; 126(1): 25-49.
• 29. Sharma K. Horizontal and vertical intra-industry trade in Australian manufacturing: does trade liberalization have any impact? Applied Economics 2004; 36: 1723-1730.
• 30. Wakasugi R. Vertical Intra-Industry Trade and Economic Integration in East Asia. Asian Economic Papers 2007; 6(1): 26-39.
• 31. Łapińska J. The economic integration as a determinant of intra-industry trade: the case of Poland. Scientific Papers of the University of Pardubice 2015; 22(33): 77-87.
• 32. Cieślik A. Nowa teoria handlu zagranicznego w świetle badań empirycznych. Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN. Warszawa, 2000.
• 33. Ekanayake E. Determinants of Intra-Industry Trade: The Case of Mexico. The International Trade Journal 2001; 15(1): 89-112.
• 34. Czarny E. Teoria i praktyka handlu wewnątrzgałęziowego. Warszawa: Oficyna Wydawnicza Szkoły Głównej Handlowej. 2002.
• 35. Byun JJ, Lee S-H. Horizontal and Vertical Intra-Industry Trade: New Evidence from Korea, 1991-1999. Global Economy Journal 2005; 5(1): 1-29.
• 36. Łapińska J. Determinant factors of intra-industry trade: the case of Poland and its European Union trading partners. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy 2016; 11(2): 251-264.
• 37. Leitão NC. Intra-industry trade in the agriculture sector: The experience of United States. African Journal of Agricultural Research 2011; 6(1): 186-190.
• 38. Xing Y. Foreign direct investment and China’s bilateral intra-industry trade with Japan and the US. Journal of Asian Economics 2007; 18(4): 685-700.
• 39. Ambroziak Ł. FDI and Intra-industry Trade in the Automotive Industry in the New EU Member States. International Journal of Management and Economics 2016; 52(1): 23- 42.
• 40. Damoska Sekuloska J. Causality between foreign direct investment in the automotive sector and export performance of Macedonian economy. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy 2018; 13(3): 427-443.
• 41. Nazarczuk J, Krajewska A. Local determinants of foreign direct investment in Poland: the role of relative distance. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy 2018; 13(1): 73-88.
• 42. Grubel HG, Lloyd PJ. Intra-Industry Trade: The Theory and Measurement of International Trade in Differentiated Products. Macmillan. London, 1975.
• 43. Eurostat Database. EU trade since 1988 by SITC. (accessed 27.12.2018). Available from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/data/database.
• 44. Centre D’Etudes Prospectives et D’InformationsInternationalesGeoDist Database. (accessed 14.12.2018). Available from http://www.cepii.fr/cepii/en/bdd_modele/bdd.asp.
• 45. Osińska M. (ed.), Ekonometria współczesna. Wydawnictwo „Dom Organizatora“. Toruń, 2007.
• 46. Pietrzak M B, Łapińska J. Determinants of the European Union's trade: evidence from a panel estimation of the gravity model. E&M Ekonomie a Management 2015; 18(1): 18-27.
• 47. Dziuba R., Jabłońska M. Competitiveness of the Textile Sector of Croatia in Trade with the European Union. FIBRES & TEXTILES in Eastern Europe 2017; 25, 6(126): 14-18. DOI: 10.5604/01.3001.0010.5361.
• 48. Amiti M. New Trade Theories and Industrial Location in the EU: A Survey of Evidence, Oxford Review of Economic Policy 1998; 14(2): 45-53.
• 49. Ławińska K, Serweta W, Gendaszewska D. Applications of Bamboo Textiles in Individualised Children’s Footwear. FIBRES & TEXTILES in Eastern Europe 2018; 26, 5(131): 87-92. DOI: 10.5604/01.3001.0012.2537.
• 50. Ławińska K, Serweta W, Modrzewski R. Qualitative evaluation of the possible application of collagen fibres: composite materials with mineral fillers as insoles for healthy footwear. FIBRES & TEXTILES in Eastern Europe 2018; 26, 5(131): 81-85. DOI: 10.5604/01.3001.0012.2536.

Uwagi

PL

Opracowanie rekordu w ramach umowy 509/P-DUN/2018 ze środków MNiSW przeznaczonych na działalność upowszechniającą naukę (2019).