Determinants of the expenditure side of environmental federalism – panel data research on countries in Europe

• Autorzy: Galiński Piotr

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.34659/eis.2023.86.3.601

Warianty tytułu

PL

Determinanty strony wydatkowej federalizmu środowiskowego – badanie danych panelowych dotyczących krajów Europy

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The purpose of the article is to examine the influence of financial, socio-economic, and environmental degradation factors on the expenditure scope of environmental federalism. The panel data models were estimated based on 26 European countries for the period between 2007 and 2020. The research hypothesis of the article posits that the sound fiscal position of the local government and the financial sustainability stemming from it deepens the expenditure side of environmental federalism, especially when considering the population and its structure, the size of the economy, population, and the pollution generated by it. The article reveals that local government avoidance of both deficits and excessive indebtedness ends up promoting a higher scope of expenditure side of environmental federalism. In addition, in European countries, the significance of expenditures on environmental protection visible in local budgets is increased for smaller economies that are less environmentally degraded.

PL

Celem artykułu jest zbadanie wpływu czynników finansowych, społeczno-ekonomicznych i tych dotyczących degradacji środowiska na zakres strony wydatkowej federalizmu środowiskowego. Oszacowano modele panelowe dotyczące 26 krajów Europy dla lat 2007-2020. W artykule sformułowano hipotezę badawczą mówiącą o tym, że stabilna sytuacja fiskalna samorządu terytorialnego i wynikająca z niej stabilność finansowa pogłębia stronę wydatkową federalizmu środowiskowego, szczególnie biorąc pod uwagę wielkość populacji i jej strukturę, wielkość gospodarki i emitowane tam zanieczyszczenia. W artykule ukazano, że unikanie przez samorządy terytorialne deficytów budżetowych i wzrostu zadłużenia przyczynia się do poszerzenia zakresu strony wydatkowej federalizmu środowiskowego. Ponadto, w krajach Europy znaczenie wydatków samorządu terytorialnego na ochronę środowiska jest zwiększane w mniejszych gospodarkach, które charakteryzują się niższą degradacją środowiska.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

expenditures; environmental protection; environmental federalism; local government; Europe

PL

wydatki; ochrona środowiska; federalizm ekologiczny; samorząd; Europa

• Wydawca: Fundacja Ekonomistów Środowiska i Zasobów Naturalnych
• Czasopismo: Economics and Environment
• Rocznik: 2023
• Tom: No. 3
• Strony: 63--88
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 90 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Galiński Piotr

• University of Gdańsk, Armii Krajowej Street 101, 81-824 Sopot, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9407-4515

Bibliografia

• Abbott, A., & Jones, P. (2022). The cyclicality of government environmental expenditure: political pressure in economic upturns and in recessions. Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy, 12(2), 209-228. https://doi.org/10.1080/21606544.2022.2110162
• Ansori, A., Nasir, N., Diantimala, Y., & Abdullah, S. (2021). The Role of Revenues in Reducing Local Government Fiscal Distress: An Empirical Study in Indonesia. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 8(6), 597-607. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2021.vol8.no6.0597
• Assetto, V. J., Hajba, E., & Mumme, S. P. (2003). Democratization, decentralization, and local environmental policy capacity: Hungary and Mexico. The Social Science Journal, 40, 249-268. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0362-3319(03)00007-7
• Banzhaf, H. S., & Chupp, B. A. (2012). Fiscal federalism and interjurisdictional externalities: new results and an application to US Air pollution. Journal of Public Economics, 96(5-6), 449-464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2012.01.001
• Barak, D., & Tunç, A. (2022). How Do Environmental Protection Expenditures Affect Health Status? Evidence from Panel Quantile Regression. Kafkas University Journal of Economics and Administrative Sciences Faculty – KAÜİİBFD, 13(26), 1036- 1068. https://doi.org/10.36543/kauiibfd.2022.043
• Barrell, A., Dobrzanski, P., Bobowski, S., Siuda, K., & Chmielowiec, S. (2021). Efficiency of Environmental Protection Expenditures in EU Countries. Energies, 14(24), 1-37. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14248443
• Beke-Trivunac, J., Jovanovic, L., Radosavljevic, Ž., & Radosavljevic, M. (2014). An overview of environmental policies of local government organizations in the Republic of Serbia. Management of Environmental Quality, 25(3), 263-272. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-11-2013-0119
• Bellot, N. J. M., Selvab, L. M., & Menéndez, L. G. (2017). Determinants of sub-central European government debt. The Spanish Review of Financial Economics, 15(2), 52-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.srfe.2017.04.001
• Björk, O., Palm, V., Steinbach, N., Lone, Ø., Kolshus, K., Pedersen, O. G., Krarup, S., Kolttola, L., & Lindblom, A. (2016). Making the environment count – Nordic accounts and indicators for analysing and integrating environment and economy. Copenhagen: Nordic Council of Ministers.
• Bojanic, A. N. (2020). The empirical evidence on the determinants of fiscal decentralization. Revista Finanzas y Política Económica, 12(1), 271-302. https://doi.org/10.14718/revfinanzpolitecon.v12.n1.2020.2656
• Broniewicz, E. (2007). Application of the environmental protection expenditure account. Management of Environmental Quality, 18(3), 298-308. https://doi.org/10.1108/14777830710731752
• Broniewicz, E. (2011). Environmental Protection Expenditure in European Union. In E. Broniewicz (Ed.), Environmental Management in Practice (pp. 21-36). Rijeka: InTech.
• Broniewicz, E. (2018). Expenditure on resource management in EU countries. Economics and Environment, 66(3), 40-49. https://www.ekonomiaisrodowisko.pl/journal/article/view/136
• Brooks, C. (2019). Introductory Econometrics for Finance. Fourth Edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Brzozowska, A., Łukomska-Szarek, J., & Imiołczyk-Sepczuk, J. (2022). Environmental, social and economic determinants of sustainable development in the process of managing municipalities illustrated using the example of the lesser Poland voivodeship. Economics and Environment, 81(2), 258-290. https://doi.org/10.34659/eis.2022.81.2.456
• Butler, H. N., & Macey, J. R. (1996). Using Federalism to Improve Environmental Policy. Washington, D.C.: The AEI Press.
• Cai, H., Tong, Z., Xu, S., Chen, S., Zhu, P., & Liu, W. (2022). Fiscal Decentralization, Government Behavior, and Environmental Pollution: Evidence from China. Frontiers of Environmental Science, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.901079
• Cottrell, A., & Lucchetti, R. (2023, February 15). Gretl User’s Guide. Gnu Regression. Econometrics and Time-series Library. https://gretl.sourceforge.net/gretl-help/ gretl-guide.pdf
• Cumberland, J. H. (1980). Efficiency and Equity in Interregional Environmental Management. Review of Regional Studies, 10(2), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.52324/001c.9944
• Das, P. (2019). Econometrics in Theory and Practice. Analysis of Cross Section, Time Series and Panel Data with Stata 15.1. Singapore: Springer.
• De Mello, L., & Jalles, T. J. (2022). Decentralisation and the environment: Survey-based and cross-country evidence. REM Working Paper Series, 0215, 1-29. https://ideas.repec.org/p/ise/remwps/wp02152022.html
• Deb, P., Norton, E. C., & Manning Willard, G. (2017). Health Econometrics Using Stata. College Station: Stata Press Publication.
• Delgado, F. J. (2021). On the Determinants of Fiscal Decentralization: Evidence From the EU. Amfiteatru Economic, 23(56), 206-220. http://dx.doi.org/10.24818/EA/2021/56/206
• Donkor, M., Kong, Y., Manu, E. K., Ntarmah, A. H., & Appiah-Twum, F. (2022). Economic Growth and Environmental Quality: Analysis of Government Expenditure and the Causal Effect. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(17), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191710629
• Dormann, C. F., Elith, J., Bacher, S., Buchmann, C., Carl, G., Carré, G., Marquéz, J. R. G., Gruber, B., Lafourcade, B., Leitão, P. J., Münkemüller, T., McClean, C., Osborne, P. E., Reineking, B., Schröder, B., Skidmore, A. K., Zurell, D., & Lautenbach, S. (2013). Collinearity: a review of methods to deal with it and a simulation study evaluating their performance. Ecography, 36(1), 27-46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.2012.07348.x
• Dougherty, S., & Montes Nebreda, A. (2022). Going global, locally? Decentralized environmental expenditure and air quality. 4Public Sector Economics, 6(4), 489-503. https://doi.org/10.3326/pse.46.4.3
• Dougherty, S., & Montes, A. (2023). Consolidated expenditure by government function: an extension of the Fiscal Decentralisation database. https://www.oecd.org/tax/federalism/fiscal-decentralisation-database/expenditure-by-function-note.pdf
• Dziekański, P. (2020). Differentiation of the financial standing of the municipalities of Świętokrzyskie voivodeship in the aspect of their financial independence. Optimum. Economic Studies, 3(101), 41-55. https://doi.org/10.15290/oes.2020.03. 101.04
• Fahmi, F. Z., Koster, S., & van Dijk, J. (2016). The location of creative industries in a developing country: The case of Indonesia. Cities, 59, 66-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2016.06.005
• Fisch, J. (2018). The Case for Effective Environmental Politics: Federalist or Unitary State? Comparing the Cases of Canada, the United States of America, and the People’s Republic of China. University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform, 51(4), 777-807. https://doi.org/10.36646/mjlr.51.4.case
• Galiński, P. (2022). Importance of the Size of Local Government in Avoiding the Fiscal Distress – Empirical Evidence on Communes in Poland. Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Skłodowska, sectio H – Oeconomia, 56(5). http://dx.doi.org/10.17951/h.2022.56.5.101-113
• Gallo, J. L., & Ndiaye, Y. (2021). Environmental expenditure interactions among OECD countries, 1995–2017. Economic Modelling, 94, 244-255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2020.10.006
• Gholipour, H. F., & Farzanegan, M. R. (2018). Institutions and the effectiveness of expenditures on environmental protection: evidence from Middle Eastern countries. Constitutional Political Economy, 29, 20-39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10602-017-9246-x
• Gruber, J. (2016). Public Finance and Public Policy. New York: Worth Publishers.
• Gruszczyński, M. (2020). Financial Microeconometrics. A Research Methodology in Corporate Finance and Accounting. Cham: Springer.
• Gu, Z., Tian, C., Zheng, Z., & Zhang, S. (2022). Favorable Fiscal Self-Sufficiency Enables Local Governments to Better Improve the Environmental Governance – Evidence from China’s Lower-Pollution Areas. Sustainability, 14, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142316202
• Guo, S., Wen, L., Wu, Y., Yue, X., & Fan, G. (2020). Fiscal Decentralization and Local Environmental Pollution in China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17228661
• Gupta, S., Keen, M., Clements, B., Fletcher, K., de Mello, L., & Mani, M. (2002). Fiscal Dimensions of Sustainable Development. Washington, D.C.: International Monetary Fund.
• Halásková, M., & Halásková, R. (2014). Impacts of Decentralization on the Local Government Expenditures and Public Services in the EU Countries. Lex Localis – Journal of Local Self-Government, 12(3), 623-642. https://doi.org/10.4335/13.3. 595-613(2015)
• Halkos, G., & Paizanos, E. A. (2014). Exploring the Effect of Economic Growth and Government Expenditure on the Environment. MPRA Paper, 56084, 1-21.
• Hallett, A. H. (2017). Fiscal autonomy vs. fiscal federalism in the euro zone. Economia Politica, 34, 179-188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40888-017-0066-2
• Hatmanu, M., Cautisanu, C. & Iacobuta, A. O. (2022). On the relationships between CO2 emissions and their determinants in Romania and Bulgaria. An ARDL approach. Applied Economics, 54(22), 2582-2595. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2021.1998328
• Hawkins, D. (2014). Biomeasurement: A Student’s Guide to Biostatistics. Third edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Hill, R. C., Griffiths, W. E., & Lim, G. C. (2011). Principles of Econometrics. Fourth Edition. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.
• Hoffmann, J. P. (2022). Linear Regression Models: Applications in R. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
• Hu, H., Chen, D., Chang, C.-P., & Chu, Y. (2021). The Political Economy of Environmental Consequences: A Review of the Empirical Literature. Journal of Economic Surveys, 35(1), 250-306. https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12396
• Hu, Z. (2022). Would central government’s direct supervisions enhance local environmental qualities? Evidence from China. International Studies of Economics, 17, 261-275. https://doi.org/10.1002/ise3.14
• International Monetary Fund (IMF). https://data.imf.org/
• Jha, P. C. (2015). Theory of fiscal federalism: an analysis. Journal of Social and Economic Development, 17(2), 241-259. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40847-015- 0009-0
• Kashnitsky, I., De Beer, J., & Van Wissen, L. (2021). Unequally ageing regions of Europe: Exploring the role of urbanization. Population Studies, 75(2), 221-237. https://doi.org/10.1080/00324728.2020.1788130
• Kitchen, H., McMillan, M., & Shah, A. (2019). Local Public Finance and Economics. An International Perspective. Cham: Springer.
• Köppl-Turyna, M., Kula, G., Balmas, A., & Waclawska, K. (2015). The effects of fiscal autonomy on the size of public sector and the strength of political budget cycles in local expenditure. MPRA Paper, 64202, 1-24.
• Le, H. P., & Ozturk, I. (2020). The impacts of globalization, financial development, government expenditures, and institutional quality on CO2 emissions in the presence of environmental Kuznets curve. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27, 22680-22697. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-08812-2
• List, J. A., & Sturm, D. M. (2006). How Elections Matter: Theory and Evidence from Environmental Policy. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 121(4), 1249-1281. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/121.4.1249
• Majeed, M. T., & Ozturk I. (2020). Environmental degradation and population health outcomes: a global panel data analysis. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27, 15901-15911. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-08167-8
• Malinowski, M. (2022). Financial Situation of Local Government Units as a Determinant of the Standards of Living for the Polish Population. Energies, 15, 1-24. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15155448
• Martell, C. R., Moldogaziev, T. T., & Espinosa, S. (2021). Information Resolution and Subnational Capital Markets. New York: Oxford University Press.
• Mattina, T., & Gunnarsson, V. (2007). Budget Rigidity and Expenditure Efficiency in Slovenia. IMF Working Paper, 131, 1-29. https://doi.org/10.5089/9781451866 957.001
• McKinney, J. B. (2004). Effective Financial Management in Public and Nonprofit Agencies. London: Praeger.
• Mesjasz-Lech, A. (2017, February 17). Environmental Protection Expenditures and Effects of Environmental Governance of Sustainable Development in Manufacture Enterprise. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Management, Enterprise and Benchmarking, Óbuda, Hungary, 244-257. https://ideas.repec.org/h/pkk/meb017/244-257.html
• Millimet, D. L. (2014). Environmental Federalism: A Survey of the Empirical Literature. Case Western Reserve Law Review, 64(4), 1669-1757.
• Monnin, P. (2015). The Impact of Interest Rates on Electricity Production Costs. https://www.cepweb.org/wp-content/uploads/CEP_DN_Interest_Rates_Energy_Prices. pdf
• Nath, S., & Madhoo, Y. N. (2022). Vanishing Borders of Urban Local Finance. Global Developments with Illustrations from Indian Federation. Singapore: Springer.
• Oates, W. E. (1997). On Environmental Federalism. Virginia Law Review, 83(7), 1321- 1329. https://doi.org/10.2307/1073759
• Oates, W. E. (1999). An Essay on Fiscal Federalism. Journal of Economic Literature, 37(3), 1120-1149. http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/jel.37.3.1120
• Oates, W. E. (2008). On the Evolution of Fiscal Federalism: Theory and Institutions. National Tax Journal, 61(2), 313-334. https://doi.org/10.17310/ntj.2008.2.08
• OECD. (2020). Measuring Green Finance Flows in Kazakhstan, Green Finance and Investment. https://doi.org/10.1787/3ef6618c-en
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). https://stats. oecd.org/
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). https://www. oecd.org/tax/federalism/fiscal-decentralisation-database/
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). https://data. oecd.org/interest/long-term-interest-rates.htm
• Ogrodnik, K. (2017). The application of the PROMETHEE method in evaluation of sustainable development of the selected cities in Poland. Economics and Environment, 62(3), 19-36. https://www.ekonomiaisrodowisko.pl/journal/article/view/315
• Peszko, G. (2002). Good Practices of Public Environmental Expenditure Management in Transition Economies. Paris: OECD Environment Directorate. https://www.oecd.org/environment/outreach/2080960.pdf
• Phillips, J. F., & Strickland, P. J. (2016). Initial Evidence on the Association between Local Government Fiscal Distress and Environmental Protection Programs. Issues in Social and Environmental Accounting, 10(3), 45-62.
• Postula, M., & Radecka-Moroz, K. (2020). Fiscal policy instruments in environmental protection. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 84, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2020.106435
• Qi, Z., Yang, S., Feng, D., & Wang, W. (2022). The impact of local government debt on urban environmental pollution and its mechanism: Evidence from China. PLoS ONE, 17(3), e0263796. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0263796
• Reddy, C. M., & Balasubramanyam, P. (2021). Multicollinearity in Econometric Models. Guntur: KY Publications.
• Rokicki, T., Ochnio, L., Koszela, G., Żak, A., Szczepaniuk, E. K., Szczepaniuk, H., Michalski, K., & Perkowska, A. (2019). Public Expenditure on Environmental Protection in the European Union Countries. Rocznik Ochrona Środowiska, 21(1), 364-377. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/353169201_Public_expenditure_ on_environmental_protection_in_the_European_Union_countries
• Sanz, I., & Velázquez, F. J. (2003). Fiscal illusion, fiscal consolidation and government expenditure composition in the OECD: a dynamic panel data approach. European Economy Group Working Papers, 21, 1-67. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/5010602_Fiscal_illusion_fiscal_consolidation_and_government_expenditure_composition_in_the_OECD_A_dynamic_panel_data_approach
• Satoła, Ł., Standar, A., & Kozera, A. (2019). Financial Autonomy of Local Government Units: Evidence from Polish Rural Municipalities. Lex Localis – Journal of Local Self-Government, 17(2), 319-336. https://doi.org/10.4335/17.2.321-342(2019)
• Sigman, H. (2014). Decentralization and Environmental Quality: An International Analysis of Water Pollution Levels and Variation. Land Economics, 90(1), 114- 130. https://doi.org/10.3368/le.90.1.114
• Soukopova, J., & Bakos, E. (2010). Assessing the efficiency of municipal expenditures regarding environmental protection. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, 131, 107-119. https://www.witpress.com/elibrary/wit-transactionson-ecology-and-the-environment/131/20910
• Steurer, R., & Clar, C. (2015). Is decentralisation always good for climate change mitigation? How federalism has complicated the greening of building policies in Austria. Policy Sciences, 48, 85-107. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-014-9206-5
• Tang, Z. (2022). Local Government Debt, Financial Circle, and Sustainable Economic Development. Sustainability, 14, 1-29. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141911967
• Teets, J. C., Gao, M., Wysocki, M., & Ye, W. (2021). The impact of environmental federalism: An analysis of watershed eco-compensation policy design in China. Environmental Policy and Governance, 31(6), 580-591. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1968
• Uryszek, T. (2018). Fiscal Sustainability of Local Governments in the Visegrad Group Countries. Entrepreneurial Business & Economics Review, 6(3), 59-71. https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2018.060304
• Wekulom, A. (2021). The Effect of Gross Domestic Product on Environmental Expenditures. https://smartech.gatech.edu/bitstream/handle/1853/65548/ECON%20 3161%20Final%20Paper%20Submission%20AW.pdf?sequence=1
• World Bank. https://databank.worldbank.org/
• Wójtowicz, K. A., Szołno-Koguc, J. M., & Braun, J. (2022). The Role of Public Spending in CO2 Emissions Reduction in Polish Regions: An LMDI Decomposition Approach. Energies, 15(3), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15010103
• Xu, F., Tian, M., Yang, J., & Xu, G. (2020). Does Environmental Inspection Led by the Central Government Improve the Air Quality in China? The Moderating Role of Public Engagement. Sustainability, 12(8), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.3390/su120 83316
• Zeraibi, A., Balsalobre-Lorente, D., & Shehzad, K. (2021). Testing the Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypotheses in Chinese Provinces: A Nexus between Regional Government Expenditures and Environmental Quality. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(18), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18189667

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2024).