Monitoring and identification of DP operators behavioural traits and common errors during simulator training

• Autorzy: Bogachenko Y. , Pipchenko O.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.12716/1001.15.02.09

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The article presents factors influencing decision making by Dynamic Positioning Operator (DPO) and statistics of the DPOs behaviour in an emergency situation. Considering that supply operation is performed by a DP vessel at a distance comparable to its width of the hull to the installation, unit, or another vessel, the thruster failure may lead to a rapidly developing incident such as collision, pollution, or human injuries. Based on the IMO guidelines on formal safety assessment authors suggested a risk model of platform supply operation in dynamic positioning mode. It is shown that different approaches shall be applied for rule-making and active decision support applications. While rulemaking can be mainly based on retrospective incident-based data, decision support shall be developed on the basis of the dynamic state of the system. Therefore, it is necessary to understand the nature of the human element in the specific operation to build up proper technological and organizational barriers to prevent the forthcoming critical error.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Maritime Education and Training; Dynamic Positioning; simulator training; Dynamic Positioning Operator; IMO Guidelines

• Wydawca: Faculty of Navigation, Gdynia Maritime University
• Czasopismo: TransNav : International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation
• Rocznik: 2021
• Tom: Vol. 15 No. 2
• Strony: 337--342
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 15 poz., rys.

Twórcy

autor

Bogachenko Y.

• Lerus Training Center, Odessa, Ukraine

autor

Pipchenko O.

• National University "Odessa Maritime Academy", Odessa, Ukraine

Bibliografia

• 1. Bogachenko, Y.: DP Concept: Principles of Dynamic Positioning. Seredniak T. K., Dnipro (2020).
• 2. DP Operations Guidance: Marine Technology Society (2012).
• 3. Dynamic Positioning Station Keeping Review: Incidents and events reported for 2016 (DPSI 27). (2017).
• 4. Dynamic Positioning Station Keeping Review: Incidents and events reported for 2017 (DPSI 28). (2018).
• 5. Dynamic Positioning Station Keeping Review: Incidents and events reported for 2018 (DPSI 29). (2019).
• 6. Dynamic Positioning Station Keeping Review: Incidents and events reported for 2019 (DPSI 29). (2020).
• 7. Dynamic Positioning Station Keeping Review: Incidents and events reported for 2020 (DPSI 30). (2021).
• 8. Guidelines for vessels and units with dynamic positioning (DP) systems: (2017).
• 9. Hauff, K.S.: Analysis of Loss of Position Incidents for Dynamically Operated Vessels. Department of Marine Technology, NTNU (2014).
• 10. Herdzik, J.: Dynamic Positioning Systems during emergency or unexpected situations. Journal of KONES Powertrain and Transport. 20, 3, 153–159 (2013).
• 11. International Maritime Organisation: IMO MSCMEPC.2/Circ.12/Rev.2 Revised Guidelines for Formal Safety Assessment (FSA) for Use in IMO Rule-Making Process. (2018).
• 12. Investigation of collision between Sjoborg supply ship and Statfjord A on 7 June 2019: Petroleum Safety Authority, Stavanger (2019).
• 13. Øvergård, K.I., Sorensen, L.J., Nazir, S., Martinsen, T.J.: Critical incidents during dynamic positioning: operators’ situation awareness and decision-making in maritime operations. null. 16, 4, 366–387 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1080/1463922X.2014.1001007.
• 14. Pipchenko, O.: Monitoring and identification of errors during training on navigation simulators. Collection of Scientific Papers of Admiral Makarov National University of Shipbuilding. 3–11 (2020). https://doi.org/10.15589/znp2020.2(480).1.
• 15. Pipchenko, O., Tsymbal, M., Shevchenko, V.: Recommendations for Training of Crews Working on Diesel-Electric Vessels Equipped with Azimuth Thrusters. TransNav, the International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation. 12, 3, 567–571 (2018). https://doi.org/10.12716/1001.12.03.17.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa Nr 461252 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2021).