Tytuł artykułu
Autorzy
Treść / Zawartość
Pełne teksty:
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Identyfikacja i segmentacja kryteriów społecznych i środowiskowych w ramach analizy wielokryterialnej wyboru wariantów inwestycji infrastrukturalnych w transporcie drogowym
Języki publikacji
Abstrakty
Studies show that road investments generate both positive and negative socio-economic and environmental impacts. Social effects include improved accessibility, safety, and reduced inequality, but may also lead to increased accident rates and health concerns. A key challenge in multi-criteria analysis is the accurate identification and classification of social and environmental factors. Methods such as literature reviews, surveys, interviews, and cost-benefit analyses are used to assess these impacts and support decision-making, for example, through social impact assessments. This paper explores the difficulties in categorising various criteria as social or environmental and the implications of these classifications for evaluation processes. The authors propose a revised set of social and environmental standards for multi-criteria assessment of road investment options and examine how reclassifying certain criteria affects their relevance and validity. The study contributes to improving evaluation frameworks for infrastructure planning and supports more informed, socially aware investment decisions.
Badania przeprowadzone w różnych krajach wskazują, że inwestycje drogowe mają zarówno pozytywne, jak i negatywne skutki społeczno-ekonomiczne oraz środowiskowe. Celem artykułu jest analiza wyzwań związanych z klasyfikacją czynników społecznych i środowiskowych w kontekście analiz wielokryterialnych dotyczących inwestycji drogowych. W badaniu na podstawie przeglądu literatury i badań własnych zaproponowano nowe zestawy kryteriów społecznych i środowiskowych, które znacząco różnią się od pierwotnych, oraz wykazano potrzebę zmiany klasyfikacji niektórych kryteriów. Przeprowadzona analiza dowodzi, że sposób klasyfikacji wpływa na ocenę i wybór wariantów inwestycyjnych. Wartość dodana pracy polega na przedstawieniu zmodyfikowanego podejścia do oceny społeczno-środowiskowej, które może znaleźć zastosowanie w praktyce planowania infrastruktury transportowej.
Czasopismo
Rocznik
Tom
Strony
art. no. 1237
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 40 poz., tab., wykr.
Twórcy
autor
- University of Gdańsk, Poland, Armii Krajowej Street 119/121, 81-824 Sopot, Poland
autor
- University of Gdańsk, Poland
autor
- Bialystok University of Technology, Poland
autor
- Gdańsk University of Technology, Poland
autor
- Rzeszów University of Technology, Poland
autor
- University of Gdańsk, Poland
autor
- Gdańsk University of Technology, Poland
autor
- Bialystok University of Technology, Poland
autor
- Bialystok University of Technology, Poland
autor
- Bialystok University of Technology, Poland
autor
- Rzeszów University of Technology, Poland
autor
- University of Gdańsk, Poland
Bibliografia
- Act from 3 October 2008. Act on providing information on the environment and its protection, public participation in environmental protection and environmental impact assessment. Journal of Laws No. 199, item 1227. https://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/DocDetails.xsp?id=wdu20081991227 (in Polish).
- Adewumi, A. A. (2022). Reviewing the Challenges of Achieving Sustainable Road Infrastructure in Developing Nations. International Journal of Modern Engineering Research, 12(10), 9-15. https://ijmer.com/papers/Vol12_issue10/B12100915.pdf
- Anciaes, P. R., Paul James, M., & Heywood, C. (2017). Social impacts of road traffic: perceptions and priorities of local residents. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 35(2), 172-183. https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2016.1269464
- Australian Government. (2021). Guide to economic appraisal: Technical guide of the Assessment Framework. https://www.infrastructureaustralia.gov.au/sites/default/files/2021-07/Assessment%20Framework%202021%20Guide%20to%20economic%20appraisal.pdf
- Bąk, M., Borkowski, P., Grzelec, K., & Tłoczyński, D. (2024). KM1.3 Badania ankietowe z interesariuszami indywidualnymi i instytucjonalnymi. Raport projektu INROAD-WAP Wzorcowa metoda oceny inwestycji drogowej na etapie STEŚ uwzględniająca zasady zrównoważonego rozwoju w całym cyklu życia drogi. Wspólne Przedsięwzięcie pn. Rozwój Innowacji Drogowych – ID, RID-II/0019/2022 (in Polish).
- Behzadian, M., Kazemzadeh, R. B., Albadvi, A., & Aghdasi, M. (2010). PROMETHEE: A comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications. European Journal of Operational Research, 200(1), 198-215. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EJOR.2009.01.021
- Behzadian, M., Khanmohammadi Otaghsara, S., Yazdani, M., & Ignatius, J. (2012). A state-of the-art survey of TOPSIS applications. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(17), 13051-13069. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ESWA.2012.05.056
- Bhusal, B., Dahal, R. D., & Dahal, R. K. (2023). Problems in Road Construction at Local Level. Nepal Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 6(1), 147-157. https://doi.org/10.3126/NJMR.V6I1.54360
- Blanquart, C., Chen, C.-L., De Ureña, J. M., Delaplace, M., Gastineau, P., Koning, M., Liedtke, G., Pagliara, F., & Yoshino, N. (2020). Policy Brief the Wider Economic Impacts of Transportation. https://www.global-solutions-initiative.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/T20_TF3_PB12.pdf
- Boardman, A. E., Greenberg, D. H., Vining, A. R., & Weimer, D. L. (2017). Cost-benefit analysis: concepts and practice. Cambrifge: Cambridge University Press.
- Broniewicz, E., & Ogrodnik, K. (2020). Multi-criteria analysis of transport infrastructure projects. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 83, 102351. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TRD.2020.102351
- Broniewicz, E., & Ogrodnik, K. (2021). A Comparative Evaluation of Multi-Criteria Analysis Methods for Sustainable Transport. Energies, 14(16), 5100. https://doi.org/10.3390/EN14165100
- Broniewicz, E. & Ogrodnik, K. (2025). Application Potential of MCDM/MCDA Methods in Transport - Literature Review and Case Study. Sustainability, 17, 7671. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17177671
- De Rus, G., Socorro, M. P., Valido, J., & Campos, J. (2022). Cost-benefit analysis of transport projects: theoretical framework and practical rules. Transport Policy, 123, 25-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2022.04.008
- De Wit, A., & Over, E. (2024). Social Cost Benefit Analysis – a powerful tool for decision making. European Journal of Public Health, 34(Supplement_3). https://doi.org/10.1093/EURPUB/CKAE144.406
- Department for Transport. (2018). Transport Analysis Guidance: The Transport Appraisal Process. https://www.gov.uk/transport-analysis-guidance-tag
- Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy, Pub. L. No. 32000L0060, 327 OJ L (2000). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32000L0060
- Directive 2002/49/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 June 2002 relating to the assessment and management of environmental noise - Declaration by the Commission in the Conciliation Committee on the Directive relating to the assessment and management of environmental noise, Pub. L. No. 32002L0049, 189 OJ L (2002). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2002/49/oj
- Directive 2009/147/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 November 2009 on the conservation of wild birds, Pub. L. No. 32009L0147, 20 OJ L (2009). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32009L0147
- Directive 2011/92/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 2011 on the assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment (codification), Pub. L. No. 32011L0092, 26 OJ L (2011). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32011L0092
- GDDKiA. (2008). Podręcznik dobrych praktyk wykonywania opracowań środowiskowych dla dróg krajowych. Kraków: GDDKiA. (in Polish).
- Ghassabian, A., Titus, A. R., Conderino, S., Azan, A., Weinberger, R., & Thorpe, L. E. (2024). Beyond traffic jam alleviation: evaluating the health and health equity impacts of New York City’s congestion pricing plan. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 78(5), 273-276. https://doi.org/10.1136/JECH-2023-221639
- Gouett, M., Hu, T., Israelson-Kurland, R., Mukherjee, M., & Leach, N. (2020). Social Impacts and the Practice of Direct Infrastructure Investment. Full Report. https://www.guggenheiminvestments.com/GuggenheimInvestments/media/PDF/Tufts-Full-Report.pdf
- Hosford, K., Firth, C., Brauer, M., & Winters, M. (2021). The effects of road pricing on transportation and health equity: A scoping review. Transport Reviews, 41(6), 766-787. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2021.1898488
- IAIA. (2024). Social Impact Assessment. https://iaia.org/social-impact-assessment/
- IDCJ. (2003). Impact Assessment of Transport Infrastructure Projects In Northern Vietnam – Final Report. https://www.jica.go.jp/english/our_work/evaluation/oda_loan/post/2003/pdf/1-03_full.pdf
- Kahangirwe, P., & Vanclay, F. (2024). Social impacts arising from road infrastructure projects in Sub-Saharan Africa: better management of social issues is needed in road construction, upgrading and rehabilitation. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 42(4), 309-322. https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2024.2385877
- Kyriacou, A. P., Muinelo-Gallo, L., & Roca-Sagalés, O. (2019). The efficiency of transport infrastructure investment and the role of government quality: An empirical analysis. Transport Policy, 74, 93-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2018.11.017
- Lucas, K., Philips, I., & Verlinghieri, E. (2022). A mixed methods approach to the social assessment of transport infrastructure projects. Transportation, 49, 271-291. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-021-10176-6
- Manggat, I., Md Zain, R., & Jamaluddin, Z. (2018). The Impact of Infrastructure Development on Rural Communities: A Literature Review. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 8, 637-648. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v8-i1/3837
- Navarro-Moreno, J., Calvo-Poyo, F., & de Oña, J. (2023). Investment in roads and traffic safety: linked to economic development? A European comparison. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(3), 6275-6297. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-22567-y
- Promethee Methods. (2024). Visual PROMETHEE. https://bertrand.mareschal.web.ulb.be/PG2024/visual-promethee.html
- RID II. (2025). Wzorcowa metoda oceny inwestycji drogowej na etapie STEŚ uwzględniająca zasady zrównoważonego rozwoju w całym cyklu życia drogi. Wspólne Przedsięwzięcie pn. Rozwój Innowacji Drogowych – ID, RID-II/0019/2022. (in Polish).
- Sipahi, S., & Timor, M. (2010). The analytic hierarchy process and analytic network process: an overview of applications. Management Decision, 48(5), 775-808. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251741011043920
- Tini, N. H., Zaly, S. M., & Sultan, Z. (2018). Impact of road transportation network on socio-economic well-being : An overview of global perspective. International Journal of Scientific Research in Science Engineering and Technology, 4(9), 282-296. https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/4cb4a099-30b0-34b0-ba56-a1b0ec8e7995/?utm_source=desktop&utm_medium=1.19.8&utm_campaign=open_catalog&userDocumentId=%7B715e6828-1b15-4d6c-aca0-a3500eeff694%7D
- Treviño-Lozano, L. (2022). Framing Social Sustainability in Infrastructure Theory and Practice: A Review of Two Road Projects in Mexico from a Business and Human Rights Lens. Sustainability, 14(4), 2369. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14042369
- UNEP. (2020). Guidelines for Social Life Cycle Assessment of Products and Organisations 2020. https://www.lifecycleinitiative.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Guidelines-for-Social-Life-Cycle-Assessment-of-Products-and-Organizations-2020-22.1.21sml.pdf
- Vanclay, F. (2003). International principles for social impact assessment. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 21(1), 5-12. https://doi.org/10.3152/147154603781766491
- Wijnen, W., & Stipdonk, H. (2016). Social costs of road crashes: An international analysis. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 94, 97-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2016.05.005
- Zamojska, A., & Próchniak, J. (2017). Measuring the Social Impact of Infrastructure Projects: The Case of Gdańsk International Fair Co. Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, 13(4), 25-42. https://doi.org/10.7341/20171342
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-6a48d947-a981-4e0c-99c1-d232b2730ef5
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.