Selected socioeconomic factors co-occurring with high fertility rate in the OECD countries

• Autorzy: Murkowski Radosław

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.37190/ord210305

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

This article presents the results of examining selected factors co-occurring with high fertility rates in developed countries. Selected OECD countries at a similar stage of demographic development have been subjected to analysis. Employing cluster analysis, the selected developed countries have also been identified according to the type of adopted family policy. It has been found that the developed countries which spend more on the family policy concerning GDP are generally characterised by higher fertility rates than those which spend less. In the light of those findings, the family-policy expenditures which allow women to reconcile professional work with raising children turned out to be particularly important. The fertility rate has also been found to correlate with labour market rates, with the level of women’s professional activity in particular. Moreover, in the developed countries the relatively high fertility rate is accompanied by low rates of young people who do not work or attend school and are not in vocational training, as well as a high rate of extramarital births.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

family policy; total fertility rate; employment ratio of women; public social expenditure; family

• Wydawca: Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Wrocławskiej
• Czasopismo: Operations Research and Decisions
• Rocznik: 2021
• Tom: Vol. 31, No. 3
• Strony: 89--108
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 43 poz., rys.

Twórcy

autor

Murkowski Radosław

• Department of Business Activity and Economic Policy, Poznań University of Economics and Business, al. Niepodległości 10, 61-875 Poznań, Poland

Bibliografia

• [1] KIRK D., Demographic transition theory, Pop. Studies, 1996, 50, (3), 361–387.
• [2] BALBO N.,BILLARI F.B., MILLS M., Fertility in advanced Societies: A Review of Research, Eur. J. Pop., 2013, 29 (1), 1–38.
• [3] NEELS K., Temporal variation in unemployment rates and their association with tempo and quantum of fertility: Some evidence for Belgium, France and the Netherlands, The Annual Meeting of the Population Association of America, Dallas 2010.
• [4] EASTERLIN R.A., The conflict between aspirations and resources, Pop. Dev. Rev., 1976, 2 (3), 417–425.
• [5] NEYER G., Family policies and low fertility in Western Europe, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research (MPIDR Working Paper), Rostock 2003.
• [6] HOEM J.M., The impact of public policies on European fertility, Ch. 8. Overview, Dem. Res. Spec. Coll., 2008, 7 (19), 249–260.
• [7] KALWIJ A., The impact of family policy expenditure on fertility in Western Europe, Demography, 2010, 47 (2), 503–519.
• [8] MAYER K.U., Whose lives? How history, societies, and institutions define and shape life courses, Res. Human Dev., 2004, 1 (3), 161–187.
• [9] LUCI-GREULICH A., THÉVENON O., Does economic advancement “cause” a re-increase in Fertility? An empirical analysis for OECD countries (1960–2007), Eur. J. Pop., 2014, 30 (2), 187–221.
• [10] HILGEMAN C.,BUTTS C., Women’s employment and fertility: A welfare regime paradox, Soc. Sci. Res., 2009, 38, 103–117.
• [11] ANDERSSON G., RØNSEN M., KNUDSEN L.B., LAPPEGÅRD T., NEYER G., SKREDE K., TESCHNER K., VIKAT A., Cohort fertility patterns in the Nordic countries, Dem. Res., 2009, 20 (4), 313–352.
• [12] MAÎTRE B., NOLAN B., WHELAN C.T., Welfare regimes and household income packaging in the European Union, J. Eur. Soc. Pol., 2005, 15 (2), 157–171.
• [13] RITAKALLIO V.-M., BRADSHAW J., Family poverty in the European Union, [In:] J. Bradshaw, A. Hatland (Eds.), Social Policy, Family Change and Employment in Comparative Perspective, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham 2006.
• [14] FAGNANI J., MATH M., Family packages in 11 European countries: Multiple approaches, [In:] A. Leira, C. Saraceno (Eds.), Childhood: Changing Contexts, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley 2008, 55–78.
• [15] ORSAL D.D.K., GOLDSTEIN J.R., The increasing importance of economic conditions for fertility, MPIDR Working Paper WP 2010-014, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock 2010.
• [16] BENJAMIN K., Men, women, and low fertility. Analysis across time and country, unpublished Working Paper, University of North Carolina, 2001.
• [17] SUNDSTRÖM M., STAFFORD F., Female Labor Force Participation, Fertility and Public Policy, Stockholm Research Reports in Demography, Stockholm 1991, 63.
• [18] APPS P.F., REES R., Fertility, Female Labor Supply and Public Policy, IZA Discussion Paper No. 409, 2001.
• [19] MATYSIAK A., VIGNOLI D., Fertility and women’s employment. A meta-analysis, Eur. J. Popul., 2008, 24 (4), 363–384.
• [20] RINDFUSS R.R., BREWSTER K.L., Childrearing and Fertility, Pop. Dev. Rev., 1996, 22, 258–289.
• [21] BILLARI F.C., KOHLER H.P., Patterns of low and lowest-low fertility in Europe, Pop. Studies, 2004, 58 (2), 161–176.
• [22] ENGELHARDT H., KÖGEL T., PRSKAWETZ A., On the changing correlation between fertility and female employment over space and time, Eur. J. Popul., 2004, 20, 35–62.
• [23] HOBSON B., OLÁH L.S., Birthstrikes? Agency and capabilities in the reconciliation of employment and family, J. Mar. Fam. Rev., 2006, 39, 197–227.
• [24] THÉVENON O., GAUTHIER A., Family policies in developed countries. A “fertility booster” with side effects, Comm., Work and Fam., 2011, 14 (2), 197–216.
• [25] ALDEROTTI G., VIGNOLI D.,BACCINI M., MATYSIAK A., Employment instability and fertility in Europe: A meta-analysis, Demography, 2021, 58 (3), 871–900.
• [26] VIGNOLI D., GUETTO R., BAZZANI G., PIRANI E., MINELLO A., A reflection on economic uncertainty and fertility in Europe. The narrative framework, Genus, 2020, 76 (1).
• [27] ILYINA A., LEE J., PETROVA I., SCOTT A., European Department, Demographic Headwinds in Central and Eastern Europe, International Monetary Fund, Washington 2019, 19/12.
• [28] KRAFT D., Israel booms with babies as developed world’s birth rates plummet. Here’s why, The Christian Science Monitor, Mass, Boston 2018.
• [29] ZIMMERMAN L.S., Policy, social policy, and family policy: Concepts, concerns, and analytic tools author(s), J. Marr. Fam., 1979, 41 (3), 487–495.
• [30] THÉVENON O., Family Policies in OECD countries: A comparative analysis, Pop. Dev. Rev., 2011, 37 (2), 57–87.
• [31] NEYER G., Family policies and low fertility in Western Europe, J. Pop. Soc. Sec., 2003, 1, 46–93.
• [32] HANTRAIS L., Family policy matters: Responding to family change in Europe, Policy Press, London 2004.
• [33] OECD, Doing Better for Families, OECD Publishing, Paris 2011.
• [34] BJÖRKLUND A., Does family policy affect fertility? Lessons from Sweden, J. Popul. Econ., 2006, 19, 3–24.
• [35] MCDONALD P., MOYLE H., Why do English-speaking countries have relatively high fertility?, J. Popul. Res., 2010, 27 (4), 247–273.
• [36] BLAU F., KAHN L., Female labour supply: Why is the US falling behind? IZA Discussion Paper, 2013, 7140.
• [37] JAUMOTTE F., Female labour force participation: Past trends and main determinants in OECD countries, Economics Department Working Paper, OECD, Paris 2003, 376.
• [38] MATYSIAK A., VIGNOLI D., SOBOTKA T., The great recession and fertility in Europe: A sub-national analysis, Vienna Institute of Demography Working Papers, 2018, 2.
• [39] KAA V., Europe’s second demographic transition, Popul. Bull., 1987, 42 (1), 1–59.
• [40] SMITH R.D., Marital fertility patterns and nonmarital birth ratios: an integrated approach, Genus, 2019, 75 (9).
• [41] ELOUNDOU‐ENYEGUE P., GIROUX S., TENIKUE M., African transitions and fertility inequality: A demographic Kuznets hypothesis, Popul. Dev. Rev., 2017, 43 (1), 59–83.
• [42] BULATAO R.A., Values and disvalues of children in successive childbearing decisions, Demography, 1981, 18, 1–25.
• [43] CASTLES F.G., 2003, The world turned upside down: Below replacement fertility, changing preferences and family-friendly public policy in 21 OECD countries, J. Eur. Soc. Pol., 2003, 13 (3), 209–227.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa Nr 461252 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2021).