Dynamic planning approach of facility layout from industry perspectives: A systematic literature review

Isnaini, Wildanul; Masruroh, Nur Aini; Dharma, IGB Budi

doi:10.30657/pea.2025.31.3

Artykuł - szczegóły

Tytuł artykułu

Dynamic planning approach of facility layout from industry perspectives: A systematic literature review

Autorzy

Isnaini Wildanul , Masruroh Nur Aini , Dharma IGB Budi

Treść / Zawartość

Pełne teksty:

Pobierz

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.30657/pea.2025.31.3

Warianty tytułu

Języki publikacji

Abstrakty

A general classification of facility layout criteria, including the planning approach, material handling configuration, department area, layout generation approach, metaheuristic approach, and layout evaluation approach has been achieved through numerous reviews of facility layout. Based on dynamic planning approach research, the companies and industries as significant users of the facility layout, necessitate a more detailed and exhaustive review of the layout optimization (re-layout) strategy. However, that review remains incomplete. This paper aims to fill the gap between the industry's practical needs and existing research on dynamic planning facility layout by conducting a literature review to identify various facility layout criteria and factors categorized by industry layout type, providing companies with clearer guidance for their layout decisions. A reference that provides a comprehensive analysis of the relevant characteristics, methods, and factors in determining layout types will be helpful to decision-makers as a strategy in facility layout. This literature review analyzed 44 articles from the Scopus database between 2014 and 2024. These articles were selected through a screening process from 1278 articles using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) method which has proven effective in obtaining key articles on specific research topics. The results of this review present a classification of facility layout criteria based on layout type in industries complemented by the development of a checklist as an initial screening tool for the industry to optimize the layout. Further, it enhances the theoretical advancement of the dynamic planning approach by identifying areas for future investigation.

Słowa kluczowe

dynamic planning approach robust facility layout layout type literature review industry

dynamiczne podejście do planowania solidny układ obiektu typ układu przegląd literatury branża

Wydawca

Oficyna Wydawnicza Stowarzyszenia Menedżerów Jakości i Produkcji

Czasopismo

Production Engineering Archives

Rocznik

2025

Tom

Vol. 31, Iss. 1

Strony

27--40

Opis fizyczny

Bibliogr. 91 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Isnaini Wildanul

wildanulisnaini@mail.ugm.ac.id

Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Grafika Street No. 2 Yogyakarta 55281, Indonesia
Department of Industrial Engineering, Universitas PGRI Madiun, Auri Street No. 14-15 Madiun East Java 55292, Indonesia

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3788-4260

autor

Masruroh Nur Aini

aini@ugm.ac.id

Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Grafika Street No. 2 Yogyakarta 55281, Indonesia

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0171-7620

autor

Dharma IGB Budi

budi.dharma@ugm.ac.id

Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Grafika Street No. 2 Yogyakarta 55281, Indonesia

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0002-4729

Bibliografia

1. Adeyeri, M.K., Ayodeji, S.P., 2022. Comparative analysis of static and dynamic facility layouts design using the modeling of plantain flour as case study. Prod. Eng. Arch. 28, 12–20. DOI: 10.30657/pea.2022.28.02
2. Adeyeri, M.K., Ayodeji, S.P., Adeleye, A., 2021. Modelling of Facility Layout Improvement and Breakeven Point Forecast for Plantain Flour Production. Int. J. Integr. Eng. 13, 1–6. DOI: 10.30880/ijie.2021.13.01.001
3. Ahmadi-Javid, A., Ardestani-Jaafari, A., 2021. The unequal area facility layout problem with shortest single-loop AGV path: how material handling method matters. Int. J. Prod. Res. 59, 2352–2374. DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2020.1733124
4. Al-Zubaidi, S.Q.D., Fantoni, G., Failli, F., 2021. Analysis of drivers for solving facility layout problems: Literature review. J. Ind. Inf. Integr. 21, 100187. DOI: 10.1016/j.jii.2020.100187
5. Annamalai, S., Vinoth, K., Bagathsingh, N., 2020. Analysis of lean manufacturing layout in a textile industry. Mater. Today Proc. 33, 3486– 3490. DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.05.409
6. Arifin, H., 2020. Penerapan Metode Analisis Beban Kerja untuk Meningkatkan Produktivitas di Bagian Case Assy Up di PT. Yamaha Indonesia. Teknoin 26, 83–95. DOI: 10.20885/teknoin.vol26.iss2.art1
7. Azadeh, A., Motevali Haghighi, S., Asadzadeh, S.M., 2014. A novel algorithm for layout optimization of injection process with random demands and sequence dependent setup times. J. Manuf. Syst. 33, 287– 302. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmsy.2013.12.008
8. Azimi, P., Soofi, P., 2017. An ANN-based optimization model for facility layout problem using simulation technique. Sci. Iran. 24, 364–377. DOI: 10.24200/sci.2017.4040
9. Baykasoğlu, A., Nabil N.Z. Gindy, 2001. A simulated annealing algorithm for dynamic layout problem. Comput. Oper. Res. 28, 1403–1426.
10. Benjaafar, S., Sunderesh S, H., Shahrukh A, I., 2002. Next generation factory layouts: Research challenges and recent progress. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 130, 556.
11. Besbes, M., Affonso, R.C., Zolghadri, M., Masmoudi, F., Haddar, M., 2017. Multi-criteria decision making for the selection of a performant manual workshop layout: a case study. IFAC-PapersOnLine 50, 12404–12409. DOI: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2017.08.2424
12. Bozorgi, N., Abedzadeh, M., Zeinali, M., 2015. Tabu search heuristic for efficiency of dynamic facility layout problem. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 77, 689–703. DOI: 10.1007/s00170-014-6460-9
13. Brunoro Ahumada, C., Quddus, N., Mannan, M.S., 2018. A method for facility layout optimisation including stochastic risk assessment. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 117, 616–628. DOI: 10.1016/j.psep.2018.06.004
14. de Lira-Flores, J.A., López-Molina, A., Gutiérrez-Antonio, C., VázquezRomán, R., 2019. Optimal plant layout considering the safety instrumented system design for hazardous equipment. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 124, 97–120. DOI: 10.1016/j.psep.2019.01.021
15. Derakhshan Asl, A., Wong, K.Y., 2017. Solving unequal-area static and dynamic facility layout problems using modified particle swarm optimization. J. Intell. Manuf. 28, 1317–1336. DOI: 10.1007/s10845- 015-1053-5
16. Drira, A., Pierreval, H., Hajri-Gabouj, S., 2007. Facility layout problems: A survey. Annu. Rev. Control 31, 255–267. DOI: 10.1016/j.arcontrol.2007.04.001
17. Duan, S., Kang, L., 2022. An Enhanced Multiobjective Double Row Layout Model considering the Machine Breakdowns. Comput. Intell. Neurosci. 2022. DOI: 10.1155/2022/6289609
18. Emami, S., Ali S, N., 2013. Managing a new multi-objective model for the dynamic facility layout problem. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 68, 2215– 2228
19. Erik, A., Kuvvetli, Y., 2021. Integration of material handling devices assignment and facility layout problems. J. Manuf. Syst. 58, 59–74. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmsy.2020.11.015
20. Esmikhani, S., Kazemipoor, H., Sobhani, F.M., Molana, S.M.H., 2022. Solving fuzzy robust facility layout problem equipped with cranes using MPS algorithm and modified NSGA-II. Expert Syst. Appl. 210, 118402. DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2022.118402
21. Ferreira, W. de P., Armellini, F., De Santa-Eulalia, L.A., 2020. Simulation in industry 4.0: A state-of-the-art review. Comput. Ind. Eng. 149, 106868. DOI: 10.1016/j.cie.2020.106868
22. Flores-Siguenza, P., Siguenza-Guzman, Lorena Lema, F., Tigre, F., Vanegas, P., Aviles-González, J., 2022. A Systematic Literature Review of Facility Layout Problems and Resilience Factors in the Industry. pp. 252–264.
23. Garbie, I., 2014. Performance analysis and measurement of reconfigurable manufacturing systems. J. Manuf. Technol. Manag. 25, 934–957. DOI: 10.1108/JMTM-07-2011-0070
24. Ghosh, T., Doloi, B., Dan, P.K., 2016. Applying soft-computing techniques in solving dynamic multi-objective layout problems in cellular manufacturing system. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 86, 237–257. DOI: 10.1007/s00170-015-8070-6
25. Golmohammadi, A.-M., Honarvar, M., Hosseini-Nasab, H., TavakkoliMOghaddam, R., 2018. Machine Reliability in a Dynamic Cellular Manufacturing System: A Comprehensive Approach to a Cell Layout Problem. Int. J. Ind. Eng. Prod. Res. 29, 175–196. DOI: 10.22068/ijiepr.29.2.175
26. Golmohammadi, A.M., Honarvar, M., Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, R., HosseiniNasab, H., 2021a. A novel cell layout problem with reliability and stochastic failures. Int. J. Supply Oper. Manag. 8, 165–175. DOI: 10.22034/IJSOM.2021.2.4
27. Golmohammadi, A.M., Rasay, H., Akhoundpour Amiri, Z., Solgi, M., Balajeh, N., 2021b. Soft Computing Methodology to Optimize the Integrated Dynamic Models of Cellular Manufacturing Systems in a Robust Environment. Math. Probl. Eng. 2021. DOI: 10.1155/2021/3040391
28. Gong, J., Zhang, Z., Liu, J., Guan, C., Liu, S., 2021. Hybrid algorithm of harmony search for dynamic parallel row ordering problem. J. Manuf. Syst. 58, 159–175. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmsy.2020.11.014
29. Guan, C., Zhang, Z., Zhu, L., Liu, S., 2022. Mathematical formulation and a hybrid evolution algorithm for solving an extended row facility layout problem of a dynamic manufacturing system. Robot. Comput. Integr. Manuf. 78, 102379. DOI: 10.1016/j.rcim.2022.102379
30. Halawa, F., Madathil, S.C., Gittler, A., Khasawneh, M.T., 2020. Advancing evidence-based healthcare facility design: a systematic literature review. Health Care Manag. Sci. 23, 453–480. DOI: 10.1007/s10729-020-09506- 4
31. Heragu, S.S., 2006. Facilities Design Second Edition, 2nd ed. iUniverse, Bloomington, Indiana
32. Hosseini-Nasab, H., Fereidouni, S., Fatemi Ghomi, S.M.T., Fakhrzad, M.B., 2018. Classification of facility layout problems: a review study. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 94, 957–977. DOI: 10.1007/s00170-017-0895-8
33. Hunagund, I.B., Pillai, V.M., Kempaiah, U.N., 2022. A survey on discrete space and continuous space facility layout problems. J. Facil. Manag. 20, 235. DOI: 10.1108/JFM-02-2021-0019
34. Hunagund, I.B., Pillai, V.M., Kempaiah, U.N., 2020. Design of robust layout for unequal area dynamic facility layout problems with flexible bays structure. J. Facil. Manag. 18, 361–392. DOI: 10.1108/JFM-04-2020- 0028
35. Hunagund, I.B., Pillai, V.M., Kempaiah, U.N., 2018. A simulated annealing algorithm for unequal area dynamic facility layout problems with flexible bay structure. Int. J. Ind. Eng. Comput. 9, 307–330. DOI: 10.5267/j.ijiec.2017.8.004
36. Izadinia, N., Eshghi, K., 2016. A robust mathematical model and ACO solution for multi-floor discrete layout problem with uncertain locations and demands. Comput. Ind. Eng. 96, 237–248. DOI: 10.1016/j.cie.2016.02.026
37. Izadinia, N., Eshghi, K., Salmani, M.H., 2014. A robust model for multi-floor layout problem. Comput. Ind. Eng. 78, 127–134. DOI: 10.1016/j.cie.2014.09.023
38. Khajemahalle, L., Emami, S., Keshteli, R.N., 2021. A hybrid nested partitions and simulated annealing algorithm for dynamic facility layout problem: A robust optimization approach. INFOR 59, 74–101. DOI: 10.1080/03155986.2020.1788328
39. Kheirkhah, A., Navidi, H., Messi Bidgoli, M., 2015. Dynamic Facility Layout Problem: A New Bilevel Formulation and Some Metaheuristic Solution Methods. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag. 62, 396–410. DOI: 10.1109/TEM.2015.2437195
40. Kheirkhah, A.S., Bidgoli, M.M., 2016. Dynamic facility layout problem under competitive environment: a new formulation and some meta-heuristic solution methods. Prod. Eng. 10, 615–632. DOI: 10.1007/s11740-016- 0703-6
41. Kokkas, A., Vosniakos, G.C., 2019. An Augmented Reality approach to factory layout design embedding operation simulation. Int. J. Interact. Des. Manuf. 13, 1061–1071. DOI: 10.1007/s12008-019-00567-6
42. Kovács, G., Kot, S., 2017. Facility layout redesign for efficiency improvement and cost reduction. J. Appl. Math. Comput. Mech. 16, 63– 74. DOI: 10.17512/jamcm.2017.1.06
43. Kulturel-Konak, S., 2007. Approaches to uncertainties in facility layout problems: Perspectives at the beginning of the 21st Century. J. Intell. Manuf. 18, 273–284. DOI: 10.1007/s10845-007-0020-1
44. Lamba, K., Kumar, R., Mishra, S., Rajput, S., 2020. Sustainable dynamic cellular facility layout: a solution approach using simulated annealingbased meta-heuristic. Ann. Oper. Res. 290, 5–26. DOI: 10.1007/s10479- 019-03340-w
45. Lan, S., Zhao, J., 2010. Facilities layout optimization method combining human factors and SLP. Proc. - 3rd Int. Conf. Inf. Manag. Innov. Manag. Ind. Eng. ICIII 2010 1, 608–611. DOI: 10.1109/ICIII.2010.151
46. Li, Jinying, Tan, X., Li, Jinchao, 2018. Research on Dynamic Facility Layout Problem of Manufacturing Unit Considering Human Factors. Math. Probl. Eng. 2018. DOI: 10.1155/2018/6040561
47. Mohammadi, M., Forghani, K., 2016. Designing cellular manufacturing systems considering S-shaped layout. Comput. Ind. Eng. 98, 221–236. DOI: 10.1016/j.cie.2016.05.041
48. Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D.G., Group, P., 2009. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 6.
49. Moslemipour, G., 2018. A hybrid CS-SA intelligent approach to solve uncertain dynamic facility layout problems considering dependency of demands. J. Ind. Eng. Int. 14, 429–442. DOI: 10.1007/s40092-017-0222- x
50. Moslemipour, G., Lee, T.S., Loong, Y.T., 2017. Performance Analysis of Intelligent Robust Facility Layout Design. Chinese J. Mech. Eng. (English Ed. 30, 407–418. DOI: 10.1007/s10033-017-0073-9
51. Moslemipour, G., Lee, T.S., Rilling, D., 2012. A review of intelligent approaches for designing dynamic and robust layouts in flexible manufacturing systems. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 60, 11–27. DOI: 10.1007/s00170-011-3614-x
52. Murcia, N., Cardin, O., Mohafid, A., Senkel, M.P., 2021. Health-related parameters for evaluation methodologies of human operators in industry: A systematic literature review. Sustain. 13. DOI: 10.3390/su132313387
53. Neghabi, H., Eshghi, K., Salmani, M.H., 2014. A new model for robust facility layout problem. Inf. Sci. (Ny). 278, 498–509. DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2014.03.067
54. Nematian, J., 2014. A robust single row facility layout problem with fuzzy random variables. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 72, 255–267. DOI: 10.1007/s00170-013-5564-y
55. Nenzhelele, T., Trimble, J.A., Swanepoel, J.A., Kanakana-Katumba, M.G., 2023. MCDM Model for Evaluating and Selecting the Optimal Facility Layout Design: A Case Study on Railcar Manufacturing. Processes 11. DOI: 10.3390/pr11030869
56. Palubeckis, G., Ostreika, A., Platužienė, J., 2022. A Variable Neighborhood Search Approach for the Dynamic Single Row Facility Layout Problem. Mathematics 10. DOI: 10.3390/math10132174
57. Pattanaik, L.N., Sharma, B.P., 2009. Implementing lean manufacturing with cellular layout: A case study. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 42, 772–779. DOI: 10.1007/s00170-008-1629-8
58. Pérez-Gosende, P., Mula, J., Diaz-Madroñero, M., 2023a. A conceptual framework for multi-objective facility layout planning by a bottom-up approach. Int. J. Prod. Manag. Eng. 11, 1–16. DOI: 10.4995/ijpme.2023.19006
59. Pérez-Gosende, P., Mula, J., Díaz-Madroñero, M., 2023b. A bottom-up multiobjective optimisation approach to dynamic facility layout planning. Int. J. Prod. Res. DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2023.2168308
60. Pérez-Gosende, P., Mula, J., Díaz-Madroñero, M., 2020. Overview of dynamic facility layout planning as a sustainability strategy. Sustain. 12, 13–15. DOI: 10.3390/su12198277
61. Pourhassan, M.R., Raissi, S., 2017. An integrated simulation-based optimization technique for multi-objective dynamic facility layout problem. J. Ind. Inf. Integr. 8, 49–58. DOI: 10.1016/j.jii.2017.06.001
62. Pournaderi, N., Ghezavati, V.R., Mozafari, M., 2019. Developing a mathematical model for the dynamic facility layout problem considering material handling system and optimizing it using cloud theory-based simulated annealing algorithm. SN Appl. Sci. 1, 1–17. DOI: 10.1007/s42452-019-0865-x
63. Pourvaziri, H., Pierreval, H., Marian, H., 2021. Integrating facility layout design and aisle structure in manufacturing systems: Formulation and exact solution. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 290, 499–513. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2020.08.012
64. Qin, W., Huang, G.Q., 2009. A two-level genetic algorithm for scheduling in assembly islands with fixed-position layouts. Glob. Perspect. Compet. Enterp. Econ. Ecol. - Proc. 16th ISPE Int. Conf. Concurr. Eng. 17–28. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-84882-762-2_2
65. Raghavan, V.A., Yoon, S., Srihari, K., 2014. Lean transformation in a high mix low volume electronics assembly environment. Int. J. Lean Six Sigma 5, 342–360. DOI: 10.1108/IJLSS-07-2013-0042
66. Riaño, H.B., Escobar, J.W., Linfati, R., Ortiz-Araya, V., 2022. Disciplinary Categorization of the Cattle Supply Chain—A Review and Bibliometric Analysis. Sustain. 14. DOI: 10.3390/su142114275
67. Rifai, A.P., Windras Mara, S.T., Ridho, H., Norcahyo, R., 2022. The double row layout problem with safety consideration: a two-stage variable neighborhood search approach. J. Ind. Prod. Eng. 39, 181–195. DOI: 10.1080/21681015.2021.1968964
68. Sakhaii, M., Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, R., Bagheri, M., Vatani, B., 2013. A robust optimization approach for an integrated dynamic cellular manufacturing system and production planning with unreliable machines. Appl. Math. Model. 40, 169–191. DOI: 10.1016/j.apm.2015.05.005
69. Salimpour, S., Pourvaziri, H., Azab, A., 2021. Semi-robust layout design for cellular manufacturing in a dynamic environment. Comput. Oper. Res. 133, 105367. DOI: 10.1016/j.cor.2021.105367
70. Seyed, M.G., Rahmani, D., Moslemipour, G., 2020. Routing flexibility for unequal-area stochastic dynamic facility layout problem in flexible manufacturing systems. Int. J. Ind. Eng. Prod. Res. 31, 269–285. DOI: 10.22068/ijiepr.31.2.269
71. Sotamba, L.M., Peña, M., Siguenza-Guzma, L., 2024. Driver Analysis to Solve Dynamic Facility Layout Problems: A Literature Review, in: Flexible Automation and Intelligent Manufacturing: Establishing Bridges for More Sustainable Manufacturing Systems. pp. 242–249.
72. Stephens, M.P., Meyers, F.E., 2013. Manufacturing Facilities Design and Material Handling. Purdue University Press.
73. Suhardi, B., Juwita, E., Astuti, R.D., 2019. Facility layout improvement in sewing department with Systematic Layout planning and ergonomics approach. Cogent Eng. 6. DOI: 10.1080/23311916.2019.1597412
74. Sule, D.R., 1988. Manufacturing Facilities Location, Planning, and Design. PWS, United States USA.
75. Sun, X., Lai, L.F., Chou, P., Chen, L.R., Wu, C.C., 2018. On GPU implementation of the island model genetic algorithm for solving the unequal area facility layout problem. Appl. Sci. 8. DOI: 10.3390/app8091604
76. Targhi, N.S., Sabzehparvar, M., Ebrahimnezhad, S., 2019. A Mathematical Model for Robust Facility Layout Problem in 3D Space with Possibility of Floors. Proc. 2019 15th Iran Int. Ind. Eng. Conf. IIIEC 2019 158–164. DOI: 10.1109/IIIEC.2019.8720721
77. Tarigan, U., Sinulingga, S., Sutarman, Sembiring, M.T., 2019. Development of Multi-Objective Models in Zone-Based Dynamic Layout: Literature Review. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 505. DOI: 10.1088/1757- 899X/505/1/012130
78. Tayal, A., Solanki, A., Singh, S.P., 2020. Integrated frame work for identifying sustainable manufacturing layouts based on big data, machine learning, meta-heuristic and data envelopment analysis. Sustain. Cities Soc. 62, 102383. DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102383
79. Templier, M., Paré, G., 2015. A framework for guiding and evaluating literature reviews. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 37, 112–137. DOI: 10.17705/1cais.03706
80. Ulutas, B., Islier, A.A., 2015. Dynamic facility layout problem in footwear industry. J. Manuf. Syst. 36, 55–61. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmsy.2015.03.004
81. Vieira, E.S., Gomes, J.A.N.F., 2009. A comparison of Scopus and Web of science for a typical university. Scientometrics 81, 587–600. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-009-2178-0
82. Vitayasak, S., Pongcharoen, P., 2018. Performance improvement of Teaching-Learning-Based Optimisation for robust machine layout design. Expert Syst. Appl. 98, 129–152. DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2018.01.005
83. Vitayasak, S., Pongcharoen, P., Hicks, C., 2017. A tool for solving stochastic dynamic facility layout problems with stochastic demand using either a Genetic Algorithm or modified Backtracking Search Algorithm. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 190, 146–157. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.03.019
84. Wan, X., Zuo, X.Q., Zhao, X.C., 2021. A surrogate model-based hybrid approach for stochastic robust double row layout problem. Mathematics 9. DOI: 10.3390/math9151711
85. Wei, X., Yuan, S., Ye, Y., 2019. Optimizing facility layout planning for reconfigurable manufacturing system based on chaos genetic algorithm. Prod. Manuf. Res. 7, 109–124. DOI: 10.1080/21693277.2019.1602486
86. Wohlin, C., Mendes, E., Felizardo, K.R., Kalinowski, M., 2020. Guidelines for the search strategy to update systematic literature reviews in softwareengineering. Inf. Softw. Technol. 127, 106366. DOI: 10.1016/j.infsof.2020.106366
87. Xiao, Y., Zhang, Y., Kulturel-Konak, S., Konak, A., Xu, Y., Zhou, S., 2021. The aperiodic facility layout problem with time-varying demands and an optimal master-slave solution approach. Int. J. Prod. Res. 59, 5216–5235. DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2020.1775909
88. Zha, S., Guo, Y., Huang, S., Wang, F., Huang, X., 2017. Robust Facility Layout Design under Uncertain Product Demands. Procedia CIRP 63, 354–359. DOI: 10.1016/j.procir.2017.03.079
89. Zhang, Z., Gong, J., Liu, J., Chen, F., 2022a. A fast two-stage hybrid metaheuristic algorithm for robust corridor allocation problem. Adv. Eng. Informatics 53, 101700. DOI: 10.1016/j.aei.2022.101700
90. Zhang, Z., Gong, J., Liu, J., Chen, F., 2022b. A fast two-stage hybrid metaheuristic algorithm for robust corridor allocation problem. Adv. Eng. Informatics 53, 101700. DOI: 10.1016/j.aei.2022.101700
91. Zhu, J., Liu, W., 2020. A tale of two databases: the use of Web of Science and Scopus in academic papers. Scientometrics 123, 321–335. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-020-03387-8

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa nr POPUL/SP/0154/2024/02 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki II" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki (2025).

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.baztech-69e1e724-a290-4bdc-947a-7973f74bbcd5