PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

The critical trait of digital entrepreneur: mixed methods research

Treść / Zawartość
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
Pioneers of the digital era have invented a different business model and expanded the existence of the digital economy, and the digital entrepreneurship is the beginning of this digital revolution. To explore the key characteristics of digital entrepreneurs, this study is divided into two stages. The first stage conducted a literature review and case study to construct the characteristic elements of the entrepreneurship into a model of digital entrepreneurs. In the second stage, the relative weights of the key characteristics of digital entrepreneurs are understood through an analysis of the AHP questionnaire results. The results show that autonomy and selfdiscipline are keys among the main dimensions of the key characteristics of digital entrepreneurs' entrepreneurship; the secondary dimension of "action power" is key in the main dimension of "autonomy and self-discipline"; the secondary dimension of "business networks" is key in the main dimension of "social capital"; the secondary dimension of "insight" is key in the main dimension of "innovation and breakthrough"; the secondary dimension of "communication ability" is key in the main dimension of "leadership communication".
Twórcy
  • The Department of International Business, Chang Jung Christian University, Tainan, Taiwan
autor
  • The Ph.D. Program in Business and Operations Management, College of Management, Chang Jung Christian University, Tainan, Taiwan
autor
  • Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital Tainan Branch, Tainan, Taiwan
Bibliografia
  • [1] European Commission, Digital Transformation of European Industry and Enterprises - A report of the Strategic Policy Forum on Digital Entrepreneurship, (2015). https://digital-europe-website-v1.s3.fr-par.scw.cloud/uploads/2019/01/Final report Strategic Policy Forum.pdf.
  • [2] K. Lyytinen, Y. Yoo, R.J. Boland, Digital product innovation within four classes of innovation networks, Inf. Syst. J. 26 (2016) 47–75. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12093.
  • [3] S. Nambisan, Digital Entrepreneurship: Toward a Digital Technology Perspective of Entrepreneurship, Entrep. Theory Pract. 41 (2017) 1029–1055. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12254.
  • [4] S. Nambisan, K. Lyytinen, A. Majchrzak, M. Song, Digital Innovation Management: Reinventing Innovation Management Research in a Digital World, MIS Q. 41 (2017) 223–238. https://doi.org/10.25300/misq/2017/41:1.03.
  • [5] H. Zaheer, Y. Breyer, J. Dumay, Digital entrepreneurship: An interdisciplinary structured literature review and research agenda, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change. 148 (2019) 119735. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119735.
  • [6] M. Ardolino, M. Rapaccini, N. Saccani, P. Gaiardelli, G. Crespi, C. Ruggeri, The role of digital technologies for the service transformation of industrial companies, Int. J. Prod. Res. 56 (2018) 2116–2132. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2017.1324224.
  • [7] B. Hinings, T. Gegenhuber, R. Greenwood, Digital innovation and transformation: An institutional perspective, Inf. Organ. 28 (2018) 52–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2018.02.004.
  • [8] M. Luz Martín-Peña, E. Díaz-Garrido, J.M. Sánchez-López, The digitalization and servitization of manufacturing: A review on digital business models, Strateg. Chang. 27 (2018) 91–99. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsc.2184.
  • [9] L. Satalkina, G. Steiner, Digital entrepreneurship and its role in innovation systems: A systematic literature review as a basis for future research avenues for sustainable transitions, Sustain. 12 (2020) 2764. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12072764.
  • [10] F. Vendrell-Herrero, O.F. Bustinza, G. Parry, N. Georgantzis, Servitization, digitization and supply chain interdependency, Ind. Mark. Manag. 60 (2017) 69–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2016.06.013.
  • [11] E. Davidson, E. Vaast, Digital Entrepreneurship and Its Sociomaterial Enactment, in: 2010 43rd Hawaii Int. Conf. Syst. Sci., IEEE, 2010: pp. 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2010.150.
  • [12] Guthrie, The digital factory: a hands-on learning projectdigital entrepreneurship, J. Entrep. Educ. 17 (2014) 115–133.
  • [13] S. Kraus, C. Palmer, N. Kailer, F.L. Kallinger, J. Spitzer, Digital entrepreneurship, Int. J. Entrep. Behav. Res. ahead-of-p (2018) 353–375. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-06-2018-0425.
  • [14] N. Hair, L.R. Wetsch, C.E. Hull, V. Perotti, Y.T.C. Hung, Market orientation in digital entrepreneurship: Advantages and challenges in a web 2.0 networked world, Int. J. Innov. Technol. Manag. 9 (2012) 1250045. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219877012500459.
  • [15] C.E. Hull, Y.T.C. Hung, N. Hair, V. Perotti, R. Demartino, Taking advantage of digital opportunities: A typology of digital entrepreneurship, Int. J. Netw. Virtual Organ. 4 (2007) 290–303. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJNVO.2007.015166.
  • [16] T. Le Dinh, M.C. Vu, A. Ayayi, Towards a living lab for promoting the digital entrepreneurship process, Int. J. Entrep. 22 (2018) 1–17.
  • [17] C. Richter, S. Kraus, A. Brem, S. Durst, C. Giselbrecht, Digital entrepreneurship: Innovative business models for the sharing economy, Creat. Innov. Manag. 26 (2017) 300–310. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12227.
  • [18] F. Sussan, Z.J. Acs, The digital entrepreneurial ecosystem, Small Bus. Econ. 49 (2017) 55–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-017-9867-5.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-6964eb72-87dc-4e79-8691-3d1f95d90abf
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.