Predicting prevalence of noise annoyance using the CTL method

• Autorzy: Gjestland Truls

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.21008/j.0860-6897.2024.3.04

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Dose-response functions that attempt to relate the prevalence of a consequential degree of transportation noise-induced annoyance to long term cumulative noise exposure levels have typically been derived by descriptive statistical methods. These methods are not based on understanding of the effects of noise on people, but only on the correlation between predictor and predicted variables. They have no explanatory value to aid understanding of the relationship between exposure and annoyance and offer little guidance for research intended to improve the accuracy and precision of predictions. In this paper a first-principles alternative to descriptive analysis is described which requires fewer assumptions than regression analysis, suggests further research that can lead to genuine understanding of community-level effects of transportation noise, and yields average dosage-response relationships that agree closely with modern, source-specific curve fits.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

noise annoyance; exposure-response functions; CTL method; communicative language teaching

PL

uciążliwość hałasowa; funkcje ekspozycji-reakcji; metoda CTL; komunikacyjne nauczanie języka

• Wydawca: Poznan University of Technology. Institute of Applied Mechanics
• Czasopismo: Vibrations in Physical Systems
• Rocznik: 2024
• Tom: Vol. 35, nr 3
• Strony: art. no. 2024304
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliiogr. 11 poz., wykr.

Twórcy

autor

Gjestland Truls

• SINTEF Digital, SINTEF, P.O. Box 4760 Torgarden, NO-7465 Trondheim, Norway

Bibliografia

• 1. S. Fidell, T. Schultz, D.M. Green; A theoretical interpretation of the prevalence rate of noise‐induced annoyance in residential populations; J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 1988, 84, 2109-2113
• 2. D.M. Green, S. Fidell; Variability in the criterion for reporting annoyance in community noise surveys; J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 1991, 89, 234-243
• 3. ISO 1996-1:2016; Acoustics - Description, Assessment and Measurement of Environmental Noise - Part 1, 2016
• 4. H.M.E. Miedema, H. Vos; Exposure-response relationships for transportation noise; J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 1998, 104, 3432-3445
• 5. S. Fidell, V. Mestre, P. Schomer, B. Berry, T. Gjestland, M. Vallet, T. Reid; A first-principles model for estimating the prevalence of annoyance with aircraft noise exposure; J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 2011, 130, 791-806
• 6. P. Schomer, V. Mestre, S. Fidell, B. Berry, T. Gjestland, M. Vallet, T. Reid; Role of community tolerance level (CTL) in predicting the prevalence of the annoyance of road and rail noise; J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 2012, 131, 2772-2786
• 7. R. Bassarab, B. Sharp, B. Robinette; An Updated Catalog of 628 Social Surveys of Residents’ Reaction to Environmental Noise (1943-2008); Wyle Laboratories, 2009, WR 09-18
• 8. Environmental noise guidelines for the European region; World Health Organization, 2018
• 9. T. Gjestland; A Systematic Review of the Basis for WHO’s New Recommendation for Limiting Aircraft Noise Annoyance; Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 2018, 15(12), 2717
• 10. R. Guski, D. Schreckenberg, R. Schuemer, M. Brink, S.A. Stansfeld; Comment on Gjestland, T. A Systematic Review of the Basis for WHO’s New Recommendation for Limiting Aircraft Noise Annoyance; Int. J. Env. Res. Pub. Health, 2018, 15, 2717
• 11. T. Gjestland, S. Fidell, V. Mestre, P. Schomer; A theory-based approach to predicting the prevalence of annoyance due to transportation noise; Internoise 2011, Osaka, Japan