PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Powiadomienia systemowe
  • Sesja wygasła!
  • Sesja wygasła!
Tytuł artykułu

The Effects of Co-ordinating Postures With Shoulder and Elbow Flexion Angles on Maximum Grip Strength and Upper-Limb Muscle Activity in Standing and Sitting Postures

Autorzy
Treść / Zawartość
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
Eighteen co-ordination postures with shoulder flexion angles (0°, 45° and 90°) and elbow flexion angles (0°, 45° and 90°) in standing and sitting positions were evaluated to identify the effects of co-ordination postures on maximum grip strength and muscle activities of the upper limb in this study. Thirty-nine subjects were recruited and their maximum grip strengths were measured. According to the analysis of grip strength, grip strength was shown to be stronger in a standing posture (297.4 N) than in a sitting posture (274.6 N). In addition, grip strength (293.8 N) at 90° shoulder flexion angle was significantly higher than that at 0° and 45°shoulder angles. There was no statistically significant difference in grip strength from the effects of elbow angles in this study. The results of muscle activities for all muscle groups showed a similar trend with the results of grip strength associated with shoulder angles.
Rocznik
Strony
595--606
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 31 poz., rys., tab., wykr.
Twórcy
autor
  • Department of Industrial Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon, Korea
Bibliografia
  • 1. Fraser C, Benten, J. A study of adult hand strength. Br J Occup Ther. 1983;10:296–9.
  • 2. Lunde BK, Brewer WD, Garcia PA. Grip strength of college women. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1972;53(10):491–3.
  • 3. Pearson R, Mackinnon MJ, Meek AP, Myers DB, Palmer DG. Diurnal and sequential grip function in normal subjects and effects of temperature change and exercise of the forearm on grip function in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and in normal controls. Scand J Rheumatol. 1982;11(2):113–8.
  • 4. Pheasant ST. Sex differences in strength: Some observations on their variability. Appl Ergon. 1983;14(3):205–11.
  • 5. Pearson MB, Bassey EJ, Bendall MJ. Muscle strength and anthropometric indices in elderly men and women. Age Ageing. 1985;14(1):49–54.
  • 6. Fess EE, Morgen C. Clinical assessment recommendations. Indianapolis, IN, USA: American Society of Hand Therapists; 1981.
  • 7. Mathiowetz V, Rennels C, Donahue L. Effect of elbow position on grip and key pinch strength. J Hand Surg Am. 1985;10(5):694–7.
  • 8. Desrosiers J, Bravo G, Hébert R, Mercier L. Impact of elbow position on hand grip strength of elderly men. J Hand Ther. 1995;8(1):27–30.
  • 9. Ng GYF, Fan ACC. Does elbow position affect strength and reproducibility of power grip measurements? Physiotherapy. 2001;87(2):68–72.
  • 10. Roman-Liu D, Tokarski T. EMG of arm and forearm muscles activities with regard to handgrip force in relation to upper limb location. Acta of Bioengineering and Biomechanics. 2002;4(2):33–48.
  • 11. Balogun JA, Akomolafe CT, Amusa LO. Grip Strength: Effects of testing posture and elbow position. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1991;72(5):280–3.
  • 12. Kuzala EA, Michael CV. The relationship between elbow position and grip strength. Am J Occup Ther. 1992;46(6):509–12.
  • 13. Su CY, Lin JH, Chien TH, Cheng KF, Sung YT. Grip strength: relationship to shoulder position in normal subjects. Gaoxiong Yi Xue Ke Xue Za Zhi. 1993;9(7):385–91.
  • 14. Kattel BP, Fredericks TK, Fernandez JE, Lee DC. The effect of upper-extremity posture on maximum grip strength. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics. 1996;18(5–6): 423–9.
  • 15. Lee DC, Jang GP. An analysis of grip strength for Korea adults. Journal of the Ergonomics Society of Korea. 1997;16:73–83.
  • 16. Espana-Romero V, Ortega FB, Vicente-Rodriguez G, Artero EG, Rey JP, Ruiz JR. Elbow position affects handgrip strength in adolescents: validity and reliability of JAMAR, DynEX, and TKK dynamometers. J Strength Cond Res. 2010;24(1):272–7.
  • 17. Chu M, Hwang BD. Changes of the hand grip strength according to shoulder joint angle. Journal of Korean Society of Physical Therapy. 1998;10:77–86.
  • 18. Su CY, Lin JH, Chien TH, Cheng KF, Sung YT. Grip strength in different positions of elbow and shoulder. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994;75(7):812–5.
  • 19. Mandalidis D, Brien MO. Relationship between hand-grip isometric strength and isokinetic moment data of the shoulder stabilisers. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2010;14(1):19–26.
  • 20. Kim TS, Park YK, Park YH, Bae SS. The effect of grip strength with testing posture and flexion degree of elbow. Journal of Korean Society of Physical Therapy. 1995;7:43–9.
  • 21. Teraoka T, Studies on the peculiarity of grip strength in relation to body position and aging. Kobe J Med Sci. 1979;25(1):1–17.
  • 22. Kang SJ, Kim YS, Park SJ, Yang JY, Jung JW. The Effects of flexion degree of shoulder joint on the grip strength in sitting and standing posture. Journal of Physical Therapy in Hanlyo University. 2009;4:61–7.
  • 23. Waldo B. Grip strength testing. National Strength and Conditioning Association Journal. 1996;18(5):32–5.
  • 24. Landin D, Myers J, Thompson M, Castle R, Porter J. The role of the biceps brachii in shoulder elevation. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2008;18(2):270–5.
  • 25. Kronberg M, Nemeth G, Broström L. Muscle activity and coordination in the normal shoulder. An electromyographic study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990;(257):76–85.
  • 26. Sporrong H, Palmerud G, Herberts P. Hand grip increases shoulder muscle activity, An EMG analysis with static hand contractions in 9 subjects. Acta Orthop Scand. 1996;67(5):485–90.
  • 27. Kendall FP, McCreary EK, Provance PG, Rodgers MM, Romani WA. Muscles: testing and function with posture and pain. 5th ed. Baltimore, MD, USA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. 2005.
  • 28. Kumar AJS, Parmare V, Ahmed S, Kar S, Harper WM. A study of grip endurance and strength in different elbow positions. J Orthop Traumatol. 2008;9(4):209–11.
  • 29. Berger RA. Applied exercise physiology. Philadelphia, PA, USA: Lea & Febiger; 1982.
  • 30. Åstrand PO, Rodahl K. Textbook of work physiology. 2nd ed. New York, NY, USA: McGraw Hill; 1977.
  • 31. Lamb DR. Physiology of exercise: responses and adaptations. 2nd ed. New York NY, USA: MacMillan; 1984.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-69136d5c-2302-4889-a150-d8f057f1d2bc
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.