Charakterystyka i występowanie cybutryny i terbutryny w wodach i ściekach

• Autorzy: Kułakowski P.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.7862/rb.2015.110

Warianty tytułu

EN

Characteristics and occurrence of cibutrine and terbutrine in water and wastewater

• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

PL

W wyniku wdrożenia dyrektywy 2013/39/UE lista substancji priorytetowych uległa rozszerzeniu o 15 nowych związków, w tym biocydy cybutrynę i terbutrynę. Rozszerzony został tym samym zakres substancji, których monitoring musi być obowiązkowo prowadzony przez kraje członkowskie UE. Związki te nie były dotychczas w Polsce objęte zakresem monitoringu wód, stąd uznano za celowe dokonanie przeglądu literaturowego informacji związanych z charakterystyką, zastosowaniem i występowaniem wymienionych substancji w środowisku wodnym w innych krajach. Oba wymienione związki należą do grupy triazyn. Są inhibitorami fotosyntezy. Mimo restrykcji nałożonych na ich stosowanie nadal są wykrywane w środowisku wodnym. Wskazano na przykłady występowania obu związków w wodach powierzchniowych lądowych i w wodach portowych. Zwrócono uwagę na możliwość szerokiego występowania obu związków w Polsce ze względu na ich stosowanie jako dodatków do materiałów elewacji budynków i pokryć dachów.

EN

According to directive 2013/39/EU list of priority substances was expanded with 15 new compounds, including biocides cibutrine and terbutrine. This way the range of substances obligatory monitored in water environment in EU countries will include new compounds. Cibutrine and terbutrine were not covered by state monitoring in Poland, therefore it is reasonable to review and collect literature informations on characteristics, application and presence of these substances in surface water environment in other countries. Both of these substances belong to triazine group and are the photosynthesis inhibitors. Besides of restrictions placed on their application in are still determined in water environment. The examples of this presence in inland surface waters and port waters were indicated. The possibility of wide presence of both compounds in Polish waters was indicated because of their application in buildings façades and roof coverings.

Słowa kluczowe

PL

wody powierzchniowe; zanieczyszczenie wód; biocyd; algicyd; herbicyd; terbutryna; charakterystyka; występowanie; cybutryna; środek przeciwporostowy

EN

surface water; water pollution; biocide; algaecide; herbicide; antifouling agent; cibutrine; terbutryne; characteristics; occurence

• Wydawca: Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Rzeszowskiej
• Czasopismo: Czasopismo Inżynierii Lądowej, Środowiska i Architektury / Journal of Civil Engineering, Environment and Architecture
• Rocznik: 2015
• Tom: z. 62, nr 3/I
• Strony: 253--262
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 35 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Kułakowski P.

• Politechnika Krakowska

Bibliografia

• [1] Biselli S., Beste K., Huhnerfuss H., Fent K.: Concentrations of the antifouling compound Irgarol 1051 and of organotins in water and sediment of the German North and Baltic Sea Marinas. Marine Pollution Bulletin vol. 40, 2000, pp. 233– 243.
• [2] Bohmont B.: The New Pesticide Users Guide. B & K Enterprises. Fort Collins, CO, 1981.
• [3] Bowman J.C., Readman J.W., Zhou J.L: Seasonal variability in the concentrations of Irgarol 1051 in Brighton Marina, UK; including the impact of dredging. Marine Pollution Bulletin, vol. 46, 2003, pp. 444–451.
• [4] Buma A.G.J.: Impact of the antifouling agent Irgarol 1051 on marine phytoplankton species. Journal of Sea Research vol. 61, 2009. pp.133–139.
• [5] Burkhardt M., Zuleeg S., Vonbank R., Simmler H., Lamani X., Bester K., Boller M.: Biocides in Facades Runoff and Storm Water of Urban Areas. 11th International Conference on Urban Drainage, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK, 2008.
• [6] Burkhardt M., Zuleeg S., Vonbank R., Schmid P., Hean S., Lamani X., Bester K., Boller M.: Leaching of biocides from façades materials to urban storm water runoff. Water Science and Technology vol. 63 no. 9, 2011, pp. 1974 – 1982.
• [7] Burkhardt M., Zuleeg S., Vonbank R., Bester K., Carmeliet J., Boller M., Wangler T.: Leaching of biocides from façades under natural weather condition. Environmental Science and and Technology vol. 66 no. 10, 2012, pp. 5497-5503.
• [8] Dahl B., Blanck H.: Toxic effects of the antifouling agent Irgarol 1051 on the periphyton communities in coastal water microcosms. Marine Pollution Bulletin vol. 32, 1996, pp. 342–350.
• [9] Dziennik Urzędowy Unii Europejskiej, L 226/1, 24.8.2013.
• [10] Gatidou G., Thomaidis M.S., Zhou J.L.: Fate of Irgarol 1051, diuron and their main metabolites in two UK marine systems after restrictions in antifouling paints. Environment International vol. 33, 2007, pp. 70–77.
• [11] Gough M.A., Fothergill J., Hendrie J.D.: A survey of southern England coastal waters for the s-triazine antifouling compound Irgarol 1051. Marine Pollution Bulletin vol. 28, 1994, pp. 613–620.
• [12] Hall Jr. L.W., Anderson R.D., Ailstock M.S.: Chronic Toxicity of Irgarol 1051 to Submerged Aquatic Macrophytes. Final Report, University of Maryland, Wye, Research and Education Center, Queenstown, MD, 1999.
• [13] Hall Jr. L.W., Killen W.D., Anderson R.D., Balcomb R., Gardinalli P.: Ecological risk of Irgarol 1051 and its major metabolite in coastal California marinas and reference areas. Marine Pollution Bulletin vol. 58, 2009, pp 702 –710.
• [14] Hoberg J.R.: Irgarol 1051 – Toxicity to a Marine Green Algae, Chlorococum sp., Report No. 98-2-7259, Springborn Laboratories, Inc., Wareham, MA., 1998a.
• [15] Hoberg J.R.: Irgarol 1051 – Toxicity to a Golden Brown Algae, Isochrysis galbana. Report No. 98-2-2761, Springborn Springborn Laboratories, Inc., Wareham, MA, 1998b.
• [16] Hughes H.J., Alexander M.M.: The Toxicity of Irgarol 1051 to Navicula pelliculosa. Study ID B267-582-3, Malcolm Pirnie, Inc., Tarrytown, NY, 1993.
• [17] Mohr S. et al.: Environmental concentrations and effects of Irgarol®. 4th SESSS, Brussels, SETAC Europe special Science Symposium 2011.
• [18] Muir D.C.: Determination of terbutryn and its degradation products in water sediments, aquatic plants, and fish. J. Agr. Food Chem. 28, 1980, pp. 714–719.
• [19] Nystrom B. Becker-Van Slooten K., Berard A., Grandjean D., Druart J-C., Leboulange C.: Toxic effects of Irgarol on phytoplankton and macrophytes in Lake Geneva, Water Research vol. 36 no. 8, 2002, pp. 2020–2028.
• [20] Ormad M.P., Miguel N., Claver A., Matesanz J.M., Ovelleiro J.L.: Pesticides removal in the process of drinking water production. Chemosphere vol. 71, 2008, pp. 97–106.
• [21] Quednow K., Puttmann W.: Monitoring terbutryn pollution in small rivers of Hesse, Germany. Journal of Environment Monitoring vol.12, 2007, pp. 1337–1343.
• [22] Readman J.W.: Antifouling herbicides - a threat to the marine environment. Marine Pollution Bulletin vol. 32, 1996, pp. 320–321.
• [23] Rufli H.: Report on the Algae Growth Inhibition Test with TK 13079. Project No. 874224, Ciba-Geigy Ltd., Basel, Switzerland 1988.
• [24] Sargent C.J., Bowman J.C., Zhou J.L.: Levels of the antifoulant Irgarol 1051 in the Conwy Marina, North Wales. Chemosphere vol. 41, 2000, pp. 1755–1760.
• [25] Scarlett A., Donkin M.E., Fileman T.W., Donkin P.: Occurrence of the marine antifouling agent Irgarol 1051 within the Plymouth Sound locality: implications for the green macroalga Enteromorpha intestinalis. Marine Pollution Bulletin vol. 34,1997, pp. 645–651.
• [26] Schoknecht U., Gruycheva J., Mathies H., Bergmann H., Burkhardt M.: Leaching of biocides used in façade coatings under laboratory test condition. Environmental Science and Technology vol. 43 no. 24, 2009, pp. 9321-9328.
• [27] Steen R.J.C., Leonards P.E.G., Binkman U.A.Th., Cofina W.P.: Ultratrace level determination of the antifouling agent Irgarol 1051 by gas chromatography with tandem mass spectrometric detection. Journal of Chromatography A vol. 766 no. 1 - 2, 1997, pp. 153–158.
• [28] The Agrochemicals Handbook, Third Edition. Royal Society of Chemistry Information Systems, Unwin Brothers Ltd., Surrey, England, 1994.
• [29] Thomas K.V., Fileman T.W., Readman J.W., Waldock M.J.: Antifouling paint booster biocides in the UK coastal environment and potential risks of biological effects. Marine Pollution Bulletin vol. 42, 2001, pp. 677–688.
• [30] Tolosa I., Readman J.W., Blaevoet A., Ghilini S., Bartocci J., Horvat M.: Contamination of Mediterranean (Cote d’Azur) coastal waters by organotins and Irgarol 1051 used in antifouling paints. Marine Pollution Bulletin vol. 32, 1996, pp. 335–341.
• [31] Urbanowicz J.: Występowanie chwastów w ziemniaku i metody ich zwalczania na terenie Polski. Biuletyn IHAR, nr 232, 2004, 185 – 191.
• [32] U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Fact Sheet Number 104: Terbutryn. U.S. EPA. Washington, DC, 1994.
• [33] Velisek J., Sudova E., Machova J., Svobodova.: Effects of subhronic exposure to terbutryn in common carp (Cyprinuscarpio L.), Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, vol. 73, 2010, pp. 384–390.
• [34] Vorkamp K.: New priority substances of the European Water Framework Directive: biocides, pesticides and brominated flame retardants in the aquatic environment of Denmark. Science of the Total Environment, vol. 470 – 471, 2014, pp. 459 – 468.
• [35] Zhou J.L., Fileman T.W., Evans S,. Donkin P., Fauzi R., Mantoura C., Rowland S.J.: Seasonal distributions of the dissolved pesticides and polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons in the Humber estuary and Humber coastal zone. Marine Pollution Bulletin vol. 32 no. 8 - 9, 1996, pp. 599–608.