Activity of Society 5.0 on social media vs self-esteem. Empirical study based on Instagram

• Autorzy: Gwiaździński Emilian , Olejniczak Aneta

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.29119/1641-3466.2023.173.14

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Purpose: The purpose of the article is to attempt to identify the relation between social media activity and self-esteem. Design/methodology/approach: To achieve the purpose of the article, the study was carried out in the form of an online survey technique supported by an online questionnaire, created in the Microsoft Forms environment, on a sample of 300 individuals who possessed the characteristics of representatives of society 5.0. Findings: The conducted study indicated that there is a significant negative correlation of low strength between self-esteem measured by the RSES scale and activity on the Instagram app. In addition, we found that self-esteem depends on gender (men have significantly higher levels of self-esteem than women), while activity on the Instagram app depends on gender (women spend significantly more time on the Instagram app than men) and age. Research limitations/implications: The limitations of the survey conducted are the nonrandom sampling of individuals and the size of the study sample, which make it impossible to relate the results to the general population as a whole. In addition, the study was conducted taking into account only one social network, which was Instagram. This type of study makes it impossible to relate the results to the general population of various sites, or even social media. Future research should focus on taking into account the differences in activity between the available social networks, and should also take into account other determinants that may affect it in some direct or indirect way. Practical implications: The study conducted can be useful for brands communicating with users and promoting their products via social media. Companies can pay attention to the differences in the use of Instagram by young users and, based on this knowledge, create and then publish advertising content on the said platform. Social implications: The results of the study can make social media users - both viewers and creators - aware that showing an ideal life on the Instagram platform, can decrease the selfesteem of the recipients of these messages. Having this kind of information, it is worth considering whether online activity significantly alters behavior and lowers well-being, and whether the actions of creators are carried out in a sustainable manner. Originality/value: While most of the studies covering the topic covered focus on the Facebook platform or social media in general, this article focuses on the Instagram platform.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

marketing; society 5.0; social media; Instagram; self-esteem

PL

marketing; społeczeństwo 5.0; media społecznościowe; Instagram; poczucie własnej wartości

• Wydawca: Wydawnictwo Politechniki Śląskiej
• Czasopismo: Zeszyty Naukowe. Organizacja i Zarządzanie / Politechnika Śląska
• Rocznik: 2023
• Tom: z. 173
• Strony: 211--226
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 59 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Gwiaździński Emilian

• University of Lodz, Faculty of Management, Department of Marketing, Chair of Marketing Research

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7125-9955

autor

Olejniczak Aneta

• University of Lodz, Faculty of Management, Department of Marketing, Chair of Fundamentals of Marketing;

• https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9928-2308

Bibliografia

• 1. Acar, I.H., Avcilar, G., Bostanci, S. (2020). The roles of adolescents’ emotional problems and social media addiction on their self-esteem. Current Psychology, 41, 6838-6847, doi: 10.1007/s12144-020-01174-5.
• 2. Alfailakawi, Y. (2018). What Do Selfies Say about Young Kuwaitis? Media Watch, 9(2), 167-181, doi: 10.15655/mw/2018/v9i2/49388.
• 3. Alshawaf, E., Wen, L. (2015). Understanding digital reputation on Instagram: A case study of social media mavens. Proceedings of the 2nd European conference on social media ECSM, 19-27.
• 4. Antonietti, C., Camerini, A.L., Marciano, L. (2020). The impact of self-esteem, family and peer cohesion on social appearance anxiety in adolescence: examination of the mediating role of coping. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 25(1), 1089-1102, doi: 10.1080/02673843.2020.1858888.
• 5. Berndt, T.J. (2002). Friendship quality and social development. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 7-10, doi: 10.1111/1467-8721.00157.
• 6. Błachnio, A., Przepiorka, A., Rudnicka, P. (2016). Narcissism and self-esteem as predictors of dimensions of Facebook use. Personality and Individual Differences, 90, 296-301, doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2015.11.018.
• 7. Calp, M.H., Bütüner, R. Society 5.0: Effective technology for a smart society. Artificial Intelligence and Industry 4.0, 175-194, doi: 10.1016/B978-0-323-88468-6.00006-1.
• 8. Casaló, L.V., Flavián, C., Ibánez-Sánchez, S. (2021). Be creative, my friend! Engaging users on Instagram by promoting positive emotions. Journal of Business Research, 130, 416-425, doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.02.014.
• 9. Center, P.R. (2017). Social media fact sheet. Washington, DC, USA: Pew Research Center.
• 10. Cingel, D.P., Carter, M.C., Krause, H.V. (2022). Social media and self-esteem. Current Opinion in Psychology, 45, 1-6, doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2022.101304.
• 11. Cortez, M.M. (2021). Influence of gender, cultural traits, and self-esteem on Filipino millennials’ frequent selfie-posting behaviour. International Journal of Interdisciplinary Social and Community Studies, 16(2), 27-47, doi: 10.18848/2324-7576/CGP/V16I02/27-47.
• 12. DataReportal (2022). Digital 2022 Global Digital Overview, https://datareportal.com/ reports/digital-2022-global-overview-report.
• 13. Digital Poland (2020). Technologia w służbie społeczeństwu. Czy Polacy zostaną społeczeństwem 5.0? (Report, No. II). Warszawa: Fundacja Digital Poland.
• 14. Ellison, N.B., Steinfield, C., Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of Facebook “friends:” Social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of computer-mediated communication, 12(4), 1143-1168, doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00367.x.
• 15. Eękisu, M., Hoęoglu, R., Rasmussen, K. (2017). An investigation of the relationship between Facebook usage, Big Five, self-esteem and narcissism. Computers in Human Behavior, 69, 294-301, doi: 10.10.16/j.chb.2016.12.036.
• 16. Faraon, M., Kaipainen, M. (2014). Much more to it: The relation between Facebook usage and self-esteem. Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE 15th International Conference on Information Reuse and Integration (IEEE IRI 2014), 87-92.
• 17. Feijoo, B., López-Martínez, A., Núhez-Gómez, P. (2022). Body and diet as sales pitches: Spanish teenagers’ perceptions about influencers’ impact on ideal physical appearance. El Profesional de la Información, 31(4), 1-12, doi: 10.3145/epi.2022.jul.12.
• 18. Gregor, B., Kalinska-Kula, M. (2016). Market intelligence-a conceptual approach. Zeszyty Naukowe Szkoły Głównej Gospodarstwa Wiejskiego w Warszawie. Polityki Europejskie, Finanse i Marketing, 15(64), 42-54.
• 19. Grover, P., Kar, A.K., Dwivedi, Y. (2022). The evolution of social media influence -A literature review and research agenda. International Journal ofInformation Management Data Insights, 2(2), 1-13, doi: 10.1016/j.jjimei.2022.100116.
• 20. Hellwig, Z. (1968). Zastosowanie metody taksonomicznej do typologicznego podziału krajów ze względu na poziom ich rozwoju oraz zasoby i strukturę wykwalifikowanych kadr. Przegląd statystyczny, 4(1968), 307-326.
• 21. Ho, H., Shin, W., Lwin, M.O. (2019). Social networking site use and materialistic values among youth: The safeguarding role of the parent-child relationship and self-regulation. Communication Research, 46(8), 1119-1144, doi: 10.1177/0093650216683775.
• 22. Hong, S., Jahng, M.R., Lee, N., Wise, K.R. (2020). Do you filter who you are? Excessive self-presentation, social cues, and user evaluations of Instagram selfies. Computers in Human Behavior, 104, 1-6, doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2019.106159.
• 23. Huang, S., Wang, B., Li, X., Zheng, P., Mourtzis, D., Wang, L. (2022). Industry 5.0 and Society 5.0—Comparison, complementation and co-evolution. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 64, 424-428, doi: 10.1016/j.jmsy.2022.07.010.
• 24. IBM Institute for Business Value, National Retail Federation (2020). Research Insights. Meet the 2020 consumers driving change. Why brands must deliver on omnipresence, agility, and sustainability. New York: IBM.
• 25. Inquiry Market Research (2021). Zrównoważony rozwój w handlu i zachowania konsumenckie. Raport z badania ilościowego. Warszawa: Inquiry.
• 26. Jan, M., Soomro, S., Ahmad, N. (2017). Impact of social media on self-esteem. European Scientific Journal, 13(23), 329-341, doi: 10.19044/esj.2017.v13n23p329.
• 27. Jiang, S., Ngien, A. (2020). The effects of Instagram use, social comparison, and selfesteem on social anxiety: A survey study in Singapore. Social Media+ Society, 6(2), 1-10, doi: 10.1177/2056305120912488.
• 28. Jun, S.H. (2022). Why Do People Post Photos on Instagram? Sustainability, 14(19), 1-13, doi: 10.3390/su141912648.
• 29. Kalpidou, M., Costin, D., Morris, J. (2011). The relationship between Facebook and the well-being of undergraduate college students. CyberPsychology, behavior, and social networking, 14(4), 183-189, 10.1089/cyber.2010.0061.
• 30. Keles, B., McCrae, N., Grealish, A. (2020). A systematic review: the influence of social media on depression, anxiety and psychological distress in adolescents. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 25(1), 79-93, doi: 10.1080/02673843.2019.1590851.
• 31. Kim, M. (2020). Instagram selfie-posting and young women’s body dissatisfaction: Investigating the role of self-esteem and need for popularity. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 14(4), 1-15, doi: 10.5817/CP2020-4-4.
• 32. Kusumasondjaja, S. (2019). Exploring the role of visual aesthetics and presentation modality in luxury fashion brand communication on Instagram. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 24(1), 15-31, doi: 10.1108/JFMM-02-2019-0019.
• 33. Łaguna, M., Lachowicz-Tabaczek, K., Dzwonkowska, I. (2007). Skala samooceny SES Morrisa Rosenberga-polska adaptacja metody. Psychologia społeczna, 2(4), 164-176.
• 34. Łogwiniuk, A. (2011). Zastosowanie metod taksonomicznych w analizie porównawczej dostępu do infrastruktury ICT przez młodzież szkolną w Polsce. Ekonomia i Zarządzanie, 3(1), 7-23.
• 35. Marshall, T.C., Lefringhausen, K., Ferenczi, N. (2015). The Big Five, self-esteem, and narcissism as predictors of the topics people write about in Facebook status updates. Personality and Individual Differences, 85, 35-40, doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2015.04.039.
• 36. Mishod, F.W.B.M., Aziz, A.A., Mohamed, S. (2022). Women’s perception of selfconscious beauty obsession through online advertising. SEARCH Journal of Media and Communication Research, 29-41.
• 37. Nakanishi, H., Kitano, H. (2018). Society 5.0 Co-Creating The Future. Policy Proposals Industrial Technology. Keidanren (Japan Business Federation).
• 38. Pu, S., Yano, M. (2020). Market quality approach to IoT Data on blockchain big data. Blockchain and Crypt Currency, 21-40, doi: 10.1007/978-981-15-3376-1_2.
• 39. Pulkkinen, L., Nygren, H., Kokko, K. (2002). Successful development: childhood antecedents of adaptive psychosocial functioning in adulthood. Journal of Adult Development, 9, 251-265, doi: 10.1023/A:1020234926608.
• 40. Rahma, L.M.J., Setiasih, S. (2021). The impact of social media usage intensity on selfesteem: Survey on emerging adulthood of Instagram user. Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling, 8(1), 39-46, doi: 10.24042/kons.v8i1.8313.
• 41. Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the Adolescent Self-Image. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
• 42. Rozgonjuk, D., Sindermann, C., Elhai, J.D., Montag, C. (2020). Fear of Missing Out (FoMO) and social media’s impact on daily-life and productivity at work: Do WhatsApp, Facebook, Instagram, and Snapchat Use Disorders mediate that association? Addictive Behaviors, 110, 1-9, doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2020.106487.
• 43. Ryan, T., Chester, A., Reece, J., Xenos, S. (2014). The uses and abuses of Facebook: A review of Facebook addiction. Journal of behavioral addictions, 3(3), 133-148, doi: 10.1556/jba.3.2014.016.
• 44. Sá, M.J., Serpa, S., Ferreira, C.M. (2022). Citizen Science in the Promotion of Sustainability: The Importance of Smart Education for Smart Societies. Sustainability, 14(15), 1-22, doi: 10.3390/su14159356.
• 45. Shorter, P., Turner, K., Mueller-Coyne, J. (2022). Attachment Style's impact on loneliness and the motivations to use social media. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 7, 1-6, doi: 10.1016/j.chbr.2022.100212.
• 46. Sihan Huang, Baicun Wang, Xingyu Li Pai Zheng, Dimitris Mourtzis, Lihui Wang (2022). Industry 5.0 and Society 5.0—Comparison, complementation and co-evolution. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 64, 424-428, doi: 10.1016/j.msy.2022.07.010.
• 47. Smuts, H., Van der Merwe, A. (2022). Knowledge Management in Society 5.0: A Sustainability Perspective. Sustainability, 14(11), 1-27, doi: 10.3390/su14116878.
• 48. Statista (2022). Daily time spent on social networking by internet users worldwide from 2012 to 2022(in minutes). Retrieved from: https://www.statista.com/statistics/433871/ daily-social-media-usage-worldwide/.
• 49. Tabarés, R. (2022). Harnessing the power of Digital Social Platforms to shake up makers and manufacturing entrepreneurs towards a European Open Manufacturing ecosystem. Research and Innovation Action. Retrieved from: https://openmaker.eu/wp-content/ uploads/2018/02/D4.3-White-paper-version-1.0.pdf, 18 February 2022.
• 50. Tazghini, S., Siedlecki, K.L. (2013). A mixed method approach to examining Facebook use and its relationship to self-esteem. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), 827-832, doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2012.11.010.
• 51. Veldhuis, J., Alleva, J.M., Bij de Vaate, A.J., Keijer, M., Konijn, E.A. (2020). Me, my selfie, and I: The relations between selfie behaviors, body image, self-objectification, and self-esteem in young women. Psychology of Popular Media, 9(1), 3-13, doi: 10.1037/ppm0000206.
• 52. Verrier, D., Moujaes, M. (2020). Instagram Use, InstaMums, and Anxiety in Mothers of Young Children. Journal of Media Psychology, 33(2), 72-81, doi: 10.1027/1864-1105/a000282.
• 53. Vogel, E.A., Rose, J.P., Roberts, L.R., Eckles, K. (2014). Social comparison, social media, and self-esteem. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 3(4), 206-222, doi: 10.1037/ppm0000047.
• 54. Webster, T.E., Paquette, J. (2023). “My other hand”: The central role of smartphones and SNSs in Korean students’ lives and studies. Computers in Human Behavior, 138, 1-11, doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2022.107447.
• 55. Whelan, E., Islam, A.N., Brooks, S. (2020). Is boredom proneness related to social media overload and fatigue? A stress-strain-outcome approach. Internet Research, 30(3), 869887, doi: 10.11108/INTR-03-2019-0112.
• 56. Wigfield, A., Battle, A., Keller, L.B., Eccles, J.S. (2002). Sex differences in motivation, self-concept, career aspiration, and career choice: Implications for cognitive development. In: A. McGillicuddy-De Lisi (Ed.), The development of sex differences in cognition (pp. 93124). Westport, CT: Ablex Publishing.
• 57. Wiktorowicz, J., Grzelak, M.M., Grzeszkiewicz-Radulska, J. (2020). Analiza statystyczna z IBM SPSS Statistics. Łódź: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego.
• 58. Yang, H., Zhang, S. (2022). Social media affordances and fatigue: The role of privacy concerns, impression management concerns, and self-esteem. Technology in Society. doi: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.102142.
• 59. Zhang, Y., Trusov, M., Stephen, A.T., Jamal, Z. (2017). Online shopping and social media: friends or foes? Journal of Marketing, 81(6), 24-41, doi: 10.1509/jm.14.0344.