Comparative study on externally bonded heat‑treated jute and glass fiber reinforcement for repair of pre-cracked high performance concrete beams

Benaddache, Lysa; Belkadi, Ahmed Abderraouf; Kessal, Oussama; Berkouche, Amirouche; Noui, Ammar; Aggoun, Salima; Chiker, Tarek; Tayebi, Tahar

doi:10.1007/s43452-024-00899-5

Artykuł - szczegóły

Tytuł artykułu

Comparative study on externally bonded heat‑treated jute and glass fiber reinforcement for repair of pre-cracked high performance concrete beams

Autorzy

Benaddache Lysa , Belkadi Ahmed Abderraouf , Kessal Oussama , Berkouche Amirouche , Noui Ammar , Aggoun Salima , Chiker Tarek , Tayebi Tahar

Wybrane pełne teksty z tego czasopisma

http://www.springer.com/journal/43452

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.1007/s43452-024-00899-5

Warianty tytułu

Języki publikacji

Abstrakty

The adoption of natural fiber reinforced polymer (FRP) composites as an eco-friendly substitute for synthetic FRPs in structural strengthening applications is gaining substantial momentum. This study delves into the effectiveness of jute fabric reinforced epoxy composites in bolstering the flexural strength of impaired concrete beams. An array of variables, encompassing the number of fabric layers (ranging from 1 to 3), fiber heat treatment, externally bonded reinforcement (EBR) configuration (soffit vs. U-shape), and fiber type (jute vs. glass), underwent systematic scrutiny. The comprehensive analysis of 30 pre-cracked high-performance concrete beams yielded compelling findings. In particular, the application of heat-treated jute EBR, especially when employing two or three layers, resulted in significant increases in peak loads, translating to improvements ranging from 85 to 120% when compared to the control beam. This treatment significantly improves the bond between the fibers and the matrix, consequently enhancing the structural performance. Notably, jute composites can attain equivalent strengthening performance compared to glass FRP while offering substantial cost savings and significantly reducing carbon emissions, rendering them a more environmentally sustainable and economically viable choice.

Słowa kluczowe

concrete beam glass fiber reinforcement jute fiber heat treatment carbon footprint

belka żelbetowa włókno jutowe obróbka cieplna ślad węglowy

Wydawca

Springer
Wrocław University of Science and Technology

Czasopismo

Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering

Rocznik

2024

Tom

Vol. 24, no. 2

Strony

art. no. e82, 2024

Opis fizyczny

Bibliogr. 48 poz., rys., tab., wykr.

Twórcy

autor

Benaddache Lysa

LMSE Laboratory, Department of Civil Engineering, Mohamed Elbachir Elibrahimi University, Bordj Bou Arreridj, Algeria

autor

Belkadi Ahmed Abderraouf

LMSE Laboratory, Department of Civil Engineering, Mohamed Elbachir Elibrahimi University, Bordj Bou Arreridj, Algeria

autor

Kessal Oussama

LMSE Laboratory, Department of Civil Engineering, Mohamed Elbachir Elibrahimi University, Bordj Bou Arreridj, Algeria

autor

Berkouche Amirouche

LMSE Laboratory, Department of Civil Engineering, Mohamed Elbachir Elibrahimi University, Bordj Bou Arreridj, Algeria

autor

Noui Ammar

LMSE Laboratory, Department of Civil Engineering, Mohamed Elbachir Elibrahimi University, Bordj Bou Arreridj, Algeria

autor

Aggoun Salima

CY Cergy Paris Université, L2MGC, F‑95000 Cergy, France

autor

Chiker Tarek

CY Cergy Paris Université, L2MGC, F‑95000 Cergy, France
Higher School of Engineering for Construction Works, ESITC, Paris, France

autor

Tayebi Tahar

tahartayebi@gmail.com

Mechanical Engineering Department, Faculty of Sciences and Technology, University Mohamed El Bachir El Ibrahimi of Bordj Bou Arreridj, Bordj Bou Arreridj, Algeria

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5524-385X

Bibliografia

1. Shakir Abbood I, Aldeen Odaa Hasan Jasim SKFMA. Properties evaluation of fiber reinforced polymers and their constituent materials used in structures - a review. Mater Today Proc. 2021;43:1003-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.07.636.
2. Nwankwo CO, Mahachi J, Olukanni DO, Musonda I. Natural fibres and biopolymers in FRP composites for strengthening concrete structures: a mixed review. Constr Build Mater. 2023;363:129661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.129661.
3. Shah DU, Schubel PJ, Licence P, Clifford MJ. Hydroxyethyl-cellulose surface treatment of natural fibres: the new ‘twist’ in yarn preparation and optimization for composites applicability. J Mater Sci. 2012;47(6):2700-11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-011-6096-1.
4. Das S, La Rosa A, Goutianos S, Grammatikos S. Flax fibers, their composites and application. 2022;209-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-824528-6.00017-5.
5. Mahir FI, Keya KN, Sarker B, Nahiun KM, Khan RA. A brief review on natural fiber used as a replacement of synthetic fiber in polymer composites. Mater Eng Res. 2019;1(2):86-97. https://doi.org/10.25082/MER.2019.02.007.
6. Navaratnam S, Selvaranjan K, Jayasooriya D, Rajeev P, Sanjayan J. Applications of natural and synthetic fiber reinforced polymer in infrastructure: a suitability assessment. J Build Eng. 2023;66:105835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2023.105835.
7. Chlela R, Bigaud D, Riahi H, Quiertant M, Curtil L, Benzarti K. Durability and lifetime prediction of flax fiber reinforced polymer composites. In: Ilki A, Ispir M, Inci P, editors. 10th international conference on FRP composites in civil engineering. Lecture notes in civil engineering, vol. 198. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2022. p. 695-705. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-88166-5_60.
8. Duc F, Bourban PE, Plummer CJG, Mĺnson JAE. Damping of thermoset and thermoplastic flax fibre composites. Compos Part Appl Sci Manuf. 2014;64:115-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2014.04.016.
9. Ben Ameur M, El Mahi A, Rebiere JL, Beyaoui M, Abdennadher M, Haddar M. Bending fatigue behavior of flax and carbon fiber reinforced epoxy resin. In: Aifaoui N, Affi Z, Abbes MS, Walha L, Haddar M, Romdhane L, Benamara A, Chouchane M, Chaari F, editors. Design and modeling of mechanical systems-IV. Lecture notes in mechanical engineering. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2020. p. 567-75. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27146-6_61.
10. Di Luccio G, Michel L, Ferrier E, Martinelli E. Seismic retro-fitting of RC walls externally strengthened by flax-FRP strips. Compos Part B Eng. 2017;127:133-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.06.017.
11. Wang W, Mo Z, Zhang Y, Chouw N. Dynamic splitting tensile behaviour of concrete confined by natural flax and glass FRP. Polymers. 2022;14(20):4424. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14204424.
12. Wang W, Zhang X, Mo Z, Chouw N, Li Z, Xu Z-D. A comparative study of impact behaviour between natural flax and glass FRP confined concrete composites. Constr Build Mater. 2020;241:117997. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.117997.
13. Ferrier E, Michel L, Ngo MD. Experimental study on the shear behavior of RC beams reinforced by natural composite materials (flax fibers). Structures. 2021;33:637-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2021.03.027.
14. Yooprasertchai E, Wiwatrojanagul P, Pimanmas A. A use of natural sisal and jute fiber composites for seismic retrofitting of nonductile rectangular reinforced concrete columns. J Build Eng. 2022;52:104521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2022.104521.
15. Chen C, et al. Eco-friendly and mechanically reliable alternative to synthetic FRP in externally bonded strengthening of RC beams: natural FRP. Compos Struct. 2020;241:112081. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112081.
16. Abdulla A, Thaker R, Khazaal A. Toughness of timber beams strengthened with jute fibers. Tikrit J Eng Sci. 2020;27:94-112. https://doi.org/10.25130/tjes.27.3.11.
17. Lu T, Jiang M, Jiang Z, Hui D, Wang Z, Zhou Z. Effect of surface modification of bamboo cellulose fibers on mechanical properties of cellulose/epoxy composites. Compos Part B Eng. 2013;51:28-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.02.031.
18. Langhorst A, Ravandi M, Mielewski D, Banu M. Technical agave fiber tensile performance: the effects of fiber heat-treatment. Ind Crops Prod. 2021;171:113832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2021.113832.
19. Neto JSS, Lima RAA, Cavalcanti DKK, Souza JPB, Aguiar RAA, Banea MD. Effect of chemical treatment on the thermal properties of hybrid natural fiber-reinforced composites. J Appl Polym Sci. 2019;136(10):47154. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.47154.
20. Bamboo heat treatments and their effects on bamboo properties. Constr Build Mater. 2022; 331: 127320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.127320.
21. Cao Y, Chan F, Chui Y-H, Xiao H. Characterization of flax fibres modified by alkaline, enzyme, and steam-heat treatments. BioRes. 2012;7:4109-21.
22. Chang BP, Chan WH, Zamri MH, Md Akil H, Chuah HG. Investigating the effects of operational factors on wear properties of heat-treated pultruded Kenaf fiber-reinforced polyester composites using Taguchi method. J Nat Fibers. 2019;16(5):702-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/15440478.2018.1432001.
23. Mishra S, Parashar V. Experimental analysis of duo-fiber interaction on the tensile strength of surface-modified flax-kenaf-reinforced epoxy composite. Polym Bull. 2023;80:13159-79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00289-023-04708-6.
24. Azadeh A, Ghavami K, García JJ. The influence of heat on mechanical properties of Dendrocalamus giganteus bamboo. J Build Eng. 2021;43:102613. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102613.
25. Cui J, et al. Effects of thermal treatment on the mechanical properties of bamboo fiber bundles. Materials. 2023;16(3):1239. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16031239.
26. Voravutvityaruk T, Jirawattanasomkul T, Ueda T, Wuttiwannasak N, Poonsawat T. Behavior of concrete confined by jute natural fiber reinforced polymer with heat treatment. 2017.
27. Jirawattanasomkul T, Likitlersuang S, Wuttiwannasak N, Ueda T, Zhang D, Voravutvityaruk T. Effects of heat treatment on mechanical properties of jute fiber-reinforced polymer composites for concrete confinement. J Mater Civ Eng. 2020;32:04020363. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0003456.
28. Campana C, Leger R, Sonnier R, Ferry L, Ienny P. Effect of post curing temperature on mechanical properties of a flax fiber reinforced epoxy composite. Compos Part Appl Sci Manuf. 2018;107:171-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2017.12.029.
29. Carus M, de Beus N, Barth M. Carbon footprint and sustainability of different natural fibres for biocomposites and insulation material. Comprehensively. [En ligne]. 2019. Disponible sur: https://growinghempassociation.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/19-08-06-Study-Natural-Fibre-Sustainability-Carbon-Footprint-1.pdf.
30. Kolesov YuI, Kudryavtsev MYu, Mikhailenko NYu. Types and compositions of glass for production of continuous glass fiber (review). Glass Ceram. 2001;58(5):197-202. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012386814248.
31. Yoo D-Y, Banthia N. Size-dependent impact resistance of ultrahigh-performance fiber-reinforced concrete beams. Constr Build Mater. 2017;142:363-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.03.080.
32. Zhang Z, Shakoorioskooie M, Griffa M, Lura P, Angst U. A laboratory investigation of cutting damage to the steel-concrete interface. Cem Concr Res. 2020;138:106229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2020.106229.
33. Sen T, Paul A. Confining concrete with sisal and jute FRP as alternatives for CFRP and GFRP. Int J Sustain Built Environ. 2015;4(2):248-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsbe.2015.04.001.
34. Sreekumar PA, Thomas SP, Marc Saiter Joseph Unnikrishnan Thomas JKGS. Effect of fiber surface modification on the mechanical and water absorption characteristics of sisal/polyester composites fabricated by resin transfer molding. Compos Part Appl Sci Manuf. 2009;40(11):1777-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2009.08.013.
35. ASTM D 3039: Standard test method for tensile properties of polymer matrix composite materials.
36. Chen C, et al. Effect of transverse groove on bond behavior of FRP-concrete interface: experimental study, image analysis and design. Compos Part B Eng. 2019;161:205-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.10.072.
37. Lorenzis LD, Miller B, Nanni A. Bond of FRP laminates to concrete. ACI Mater J. 2001;98(3):256-64.
38. ASTM C78/C78M-18. Standard test method for flexural strength of concrete (using simple beam with third-point loading). West Conshohocken, USA: ASTM International; 2018. p. 1-5.
39. Salih YA, Sabeeh NN, Yass MF, Ahmed AS, Khudhurr ES. Concrete beams strengthened with jute fibers. Civ Eng J. 2019;5(4):767-76. https://doi.org/10.28991/cej-2019-03091286.
40. Sen T, Reddy HNJ. Pretreatment of woven jute FRP composite and its use in strengthening of reinforced concrete beams in flexure. Adv Mater Sci Eng. 2013;2013:e128158. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/128158.
41. Attari N, Amziane S, Chemrouk M. Flexural strengthening of concrete beams using CFRP, GFRP and hybrid FRP sheets. Constr Build Mater. 2012;37:746-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.07.052.
42. Chen W, Pham TM, Sichembe H, Chen L, Hao H. Experimental study of flexural behaviour of RC beams strengthened by longitudinal and U-shaped basalt FRP sheet. Compos Part B Eng. 2018;134:114-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.09.053.
43. Yuvaraj S, Chithra K, Nirmalkumar K, Jeyanth B. Performance evaluation of hybrid fibers strengthened reinforced concrete. Today Proc Mater. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2023.03.667.
44. Hong K-N, Cho C-G, Lee S-H, Park Y. Flexural behavior of RC members using externally bonded aluminum-glass fiber composite beams. Polymers. 2014;6:667-85. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym6030667.
45. Smith ST, Teng JG. FRP-strengthened RC beams. II: assessment of debonding strength models. Eng Struct. 2002;24:397-417. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(01)00106-7.
46. Amirhafizan MH, Yuhazri MY, Umarfaruq HM, Lau STW, Kamarul AM, Zulfikar AJ. Laminated jute and glass fibre reinforced composite for repairing concrete through wrapping technique. Int J Integr Eng. 2023;15:2023.
47. Wilhem G. Clasen (2023) Rapport du Marché de Jute pour janvier 2023. Natural fiber worldwid. [En ligne]. Disponible sur: https://www.wgc.de/media/pages/produkte/jute/b5792261d3-1675415945/fr_jute-marketreport_01.2023.pdf.
48. Glass fiber price in the United States-2023-charts and tables-indexbox. Consulté le: 6 Oct, 2023. [En ligne]. Disponible sur: https://www.indexbox.io/search/glass-fiber-price-the-united-states/.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa nr POPUL/SP/0154/2024/02 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki II" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki (2025).

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.baztech-683a95f5-1329-4e92-8a7c-778daf425718