Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
Abstrakty
Under the traditional control method, the dual three-phase permanent magnet synchronous motor (DTP–PMSM) has a harmonic plane with low impedance, and it can produce larger harmonic current. Model predictive control (MPC) has a simple control structure and a good dynamic performance. The MPC is usually used in a high-performance control system of multiphase motors. Aiming at the DTP–PMSM drive system, an improved MPC strategy based on the biplane virtual voltage vector is proposed in this paper. In the proposed biplane MPC scheme, the voltage vector of the α–β plane is virtual to 25 voltage vectors, while the voltage vector of the x–y plane is virtual to zero. At the same time, the voltage vector of the x–y plane is virtual to 25 voltage vectors, while the voltage vector of the α–β plane is virtual to zero. On this basis, the cost function of the biplane is evaluated. The operating time and reference voltage of each vector are calculated. The virtual voltage vector on the α–β plane is used for electromechanical energy conversion to generate the best electromagnetic torque and reduce torque ripple. The virtual voltage vector on the x–y plane is used to suppress the stator current harmonics and improve the efficiency of the DTP–PMSM. The simulation and experimental results demonstrate the superiority of the proposed biplane MPC.
Czasopismo
Rocznik
Tom
Strony
869--890
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 24 poz., tab., wykr., wz.
Twórcy
autor
- School of Electrical and Information, Zhenjiang College, 518 Chang Xiang xi road, Zhenjiang City, Jiangsu Province, China
autor
- School of Electrical and Information, Zhenjiang College, 518 Chang Xiang xi road, Zhenjiang City, Jiangsu Province, China
autor
- School of Electrical and Information Engineering, Jiangsu University, 301 Xuefu Road, Zhenjiang City, Jiangsu Province, Zhenjiang 212013, China
Bibliografia
- [1] Liao W., Lyu M., Huang S., Wen Y., Shoudao H., An Enhanced SVPWM Strategy Based on Vector Space Decomposition for Dual Three-Phase Machines Fed by Two DC-Source VSIs, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 36, no. 8, pp. 9312–9321 (2021), DOI: 10.1109/TPEL.2021.3052913.
- [2] Bu F., Yang Z., Gao Y., Speed Ripple Reduction of Direct-Drive PMSM Servo System at Low-Speed Operation Using Virtual Cogging Torque Control Method, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 68, iss. 1, pp. 160–174 (2020), DOI: 10.1109/TIE.2019.2962400.
- [3] Kolano K.J., Operation of a drive system using two independent PMSM motors in passenger lift door drives, Archives of Electrical Engineering, vol. 68, no. 2, pp. 47–62 (2019), DOI: 10.24425/ aee.2019.125979.
- [4] Huang L.S., Zhao W.X., Ji J.H., Xue R., Direct torque control of dual three-phase permanent magnet motor with improved steady-state performance, IEEE Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 355–367 (2022), DOI: 10.19595/j.cnki.1000-6753.tces.200839.
- [5] Hu Y.S., Li Y.G., Ma X.D., Li X.F., Huang S.D., Flux-Weakening Control of Dual Three-Phase PMSM Based on Vector Space Decomposition Control, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 36, no. 7, pp. 1428–1438 (2021), DOI: 10.1109/TPEL.2020.3044574.
- [6] Tang H.Y., Sha O., Yang Z.L., Xu D.Z., Deadbeat Two-vector model predictive current control for open-winding primary permanent-magnet linear motor, Journal of Vibroengineering, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 577–590 (2022), DOI: 10.21595/jve.2022.22248.
- [7] Omran A.S., Hamad M.S., Abdelgeliel M., An Adaptive Model Based on Data driven Approach for FCS-MPC Forming Converter in Microgrid, International Journal of Control, Automation, and Systems, vol. 21, no. 11, pp. 3777–3795 (2023), DOI: 10.1007/s12555-022-0928-4.
- [8] Gonçalves P.F.C., Cruz S.M.A., Mendes A.M.S., Bi-subspace predictive current control of sixphase PMSM drives based on virtual vectors with optimal amplitude, IET Electric Power Applications, vol. 13, no. 11, pp. 1672–1683 (2019), DOI: 10.1049/iet-epa.2019.0136.
- [9] Zheng W., Chen Y., Wang X., Fractional: Order Sliding Mode Control for Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor Speed Servo System via an Improved Disturbance Observer, International Journal of Control, Automation, and Systems, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 1143–1153 (2023), DOI: 10.1007/s12555-021- 0752-2.
- [10] Liu S.Y., Liu CH., Huang Y.C., Xiao Y., Direct Modulation Pattern Control for Dual Three-Phase PMSM Drive System, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 110–120 (2022), DOI: 10.1109/TIE.2021.3053880.
- [11] Wróbel K., Szabat K., Serkies P., Long-horizon model predictive control of induction motor drive, Archives of Electrical Engineering, vol. 68, no. 3, pp. 579–593 (2019), DOI: 10.24425/AEE.2019.129343.
- [12] Guo F., Yang T., Diab A.M., Yeoh S.S., Wheeler P., An Enhanced Virtual Space Vector Modulation Scheme of Three-Level NPC Converters for More Electric Aircraft Applications, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, vol. 57, no. 5, pp. 5239–5251 (2021), DOI: 10.1109/TIA.2021.3085798.
- [13] Bermudez M., Arahal M.R., Duran M.J., Gonzalez-Prieto I., Model Predictive Control of Six-Phase Electric Drives Including ARX Disturbance Estimator, in IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 68, no. 1, pp. 81–91 (2021), DOI: 10.1109/TIE.2019.2962477.
- [14] Prieto I.G., Duran M.J., Aciego J.J., Barrero F., Martin C., Model Predictive Control of Six-Phase Induction Motor Drives Using Virtual Voltage Vectors, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 27–37 (2018), DOI: 10.1109/TIE.2017.2714126.
- [15] Aciego J.J., Priet I.G.O., Duran M.J., Model Predictive Control Based on Dynamic Voltage Vectors for Six-Phase Induction Machines, IEEE Journal of Emerging and Selected Topics in Power Electronics, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 2710–2722 ( 2021), DOI: 10.1109/jestpe.2020.2977144.
- [16] Luo Y.X., Liu C.H., Elimination of Harmonic Currents Using a Reference Voltage Vector Based-Model Predictive Control for a Six-Phase PMSM Motor, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 34, no. 7, pp. 6960–6972 (2019), DOI: 10.1109/TPEL.2018.2874893.
- [17] Yu F., Liu X., Zhu Z.H., Mao J.F., An Improved Finite-Control-Set Model Predictive Flux Control for Asymmetrical Six-Phase PMSMs with a Novel Duty-Cycle Regulation Strategy, IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 1289–1299 (2021), DOI: 10.1109/TEC.2020.3031067.
- [18] Wang W., Liu C.H., Liu S., Zhao H., Model Predictive Torque Control for Dual Three-Phase PMSMs with Simplified Deadbeat Solution and Discrete Space-Vector Modulation, IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 1491–1499 (2021), DOI: 10.1109/TEC.2021.3052132.
- [19] Pandit J.K., Aware M., Nemade R., Yogesh T., Simplified Implementation of Synthetic Vectors for DTC of Asymmetric Six-Phase Induction Motor Drives, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 2306–2318 (2018), DOI: 10.1109/TIA.2018.2789858.
- [20] Luo Y.X., Liu C.H., Model Predictive Control for a Six-Phase PMSM Motor with a Reduced-Dimension Cost Function, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 67, no. 2, pp. 969–979 (2020), DOI: 10.1109/TIE.2019.2901636.
- [21] Luo Y.X., Liu C.H., Multi-Vector-Based Model Predictive Torque Control for a Six-Phase PMSM Motor with Fixed Switching Frequency, IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 1369–1379 (2019), DOI: 10.1109/TEC.2019.2917616.
- [22] Wang X.Q., Wang Z., He M.Z., Fault-Tolerant Control of Dual Three-Phase PMSM Drives with Minimized Copper Loss, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 36, no. 11, pp. 12938–12953 (2021), DOI: 10.1109/TPEL.2021.3076509.
- [23] Prieto I.G., Durán M.J., Bermúdez M., Barrero F., Martín C., Assessment of Virtual Voltage-Based Model Predictive Controllers in Six-Phase Drives Under Open-Phase Faults, IEEE Journal of Emerging and Selected Topics in Power Electronics, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 2634–2644 (2020), DOI: 10.1109/JESTPE.2019.2915666.
- [24] Yu F., Liu X., Zhu Z., An Improved Finite-Control-Set Model Predictive Flux Control for Asymmetrical Six-Phase PMSMs with a Novel Duty-Cycle Regulation Strategy, IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 1289–1299 (2021), DOI: 10.1109/TEC.2020.3031067.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-67ddb145-38c1-4875-a421-72c15521689d