PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

A GIS approach to seismic risk assessment with an application to mining-related seismicity in Johannesburg, South Africa

Wybrane pełne teksty z tego czasopisma
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
The majority of seismic activity in South Africa is related to extensive mining operations, usually in close proximity to densely populated areas where a relatively weak seismic event could cause damage. Despite a significant decrease in mining operations in the Witwatersrand area, the number of seismic events appears to be increasing and is attributed to the acid mine drainage problem. The increased seismicity is raising concern amongst disaster management centres and in the insurance industry. A better understanding is required of the vulnerability and the size of the potential loss of people and infrastructure in densely populated Johannesburg and its surrounding areas. Results of a deterministic seismic risk, vulnerability, and loss assessment are presented by making use of a geographic information system (GIS). The results illustrate the benefits of using GIS and contribute to a better understanding of the risk, which can assist in improving disaster preparedness.
Czasopismo
Rocznik
Strony
645--657
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 39 poz.
Twórcy
  • Department of Geography, Geoinformatics and Meteorology, Centre for Geoinformation Science, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa
autor
  • Department of Geology, University of Pretoria Natural Hazard Centre, Pretoria, South Africa
autor
  • Department of Geography, Geoinformatics and Meteorology, Centre for Geoinformation Science, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa
autor
  • Department of Geology, University of Pretoria Natural Hazard Centre, Pretoria, South Africa
Bibliografia
  • 1. Algermissen ST, Reinehart W, Dewey J, Steinbrugge KW, Lagorio HJ, Degenkolb HJ, Cluff LS, McClure FE, Scott S, Gordon RF (1972) A study of earthquake losses in the San Francisco Bay Area: data and analysis. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Washington
  • 2. Applied Technology Council (1985) ATC-13 Earthquake Damage Evaluation Data for California. Redwood City, CA
  • 3. ASCE/SEI Seismic Rehabilitation Standards Committee (2007) Seismic rehabilitation of existing buildings (ASCE/SEI 41-06). American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston
  • 4. Birch DJ (2013) Identifying instability in the rock mass caused by water ingress into abandoned mines. MSc Physics Dissertation, University of Pretoria, Pretoria
  • 5. Carder DS (1945) Seismic investigations in the Boulder Dam area, 1940–1944, and the influence of reservoir loading on local earthquake activity. Bull Seismol Soc Am 35(4):175–192
  • 6. Ciriannia F, Leonardia G, Scopelliti F (2008) A methodology for assessing the seismic vulnerability of highway systems. In: AIP conference proceedings, v1020 PART 1, Reggio Calabria
  • 7. Coetzee H, Hobbs PJ, Burgess JE, Thomas A, Keet M (2010) Mine water management in the Witwatersrand goldfields with special reference to acid mine drainage. Report to the Inter-Ministerial Committee on Acid Mine Drainage, Pretoria
  • 8. Davies N, Kijko A (2003) Seismic risk assessment: with an application to the South African insurance industry. S Afr Actuar J 3(1):1–28
  • 9. Du Plessis I, Liebenberg K, Smit A, Coetzee S, Kijko A (2015) Preliminary investigation into the cause of acid mine water induced seismicity in Johannesburg. S Afr J Geom 4(3):299–308
  • 10. Durrheim RJ (2006) The risks to miners, mines, and the public posed by large seismic events in the gold mining districts of South Africa. In: 3rd International seminar on deep and high stress mining, Quebec City, 2–4 Oct 2006, pp 1–14
  • 11. Esterhuyse S, Avenant M, Watson M, Redelinghuys N, Kijko A, Glazewski J, Plit LA, Kemp M, Smit A, Sokolic F, Vos AT, Reynolds D, Von Maltitz M, Van Tol J, Bragg C, Van Soelen B, Ouzman S (2014) Development of an interactive vulnerability map and monitoring framework to assess the potential environmental impact of unconventional oil and gas extraction by means of hydraulic fracturing. WRC Report No. 2149/1/14. ISBN 9781431205899
  • 12. FEMA 249 (1994) Assessment of the state-of-the-art earthquake loss estimation methodologies. Federal Emergency Management Agency, FEMA-249/June 1994. Earthq Hazard Reduct Ser 70:300
  • 13. Fenton CH, Adams J, Halchuk S (2006) Seismic hazards assessment for radioactive waste disposal sites in regions of low seismic activity. Geotech Geol Eng 24(3):579–592
  • 14. Frolova N, Larinov V, Bonnin J (2006) Expected damage and loss assessment in “Emergency” mode at global scale: analysis of uncertainties. In: 1st European conference on earthquake engineering and seismology, Geneva, Switzerland, 3–8 September 2006. Paper Number: 1264
  • 15. Goldbach O (2010) What is the Seismic Risk of Mine Flooding? In: Science real and relevant conference 2010, CSIR, Pretoria
  • 16. Grünthal G (1998) European Macroseismic Scale (EMS-98), CONSEIL DE L’EUROPE, Centre Européen de Géodynamique et de Séismologie, Vol 15, Luxemburg
  • 17. Keilis-Borok VI, Kronrod TL, Molchan GM (1984) Seismic risk for the largest cities of the world; intensity VIII or more. In: Geneva papers on risk and insurance, pp 255–270
  • 18. Kijko A (2011) Seismic hazard. In: Gupta H (ed) Encyclopedia of solid earth geophysics. Springer, Amsterdam, pp 1107–1121
  • 19. Kijko A, Retief SJP, Graham GI (2002) Seismic hazard and risk assessment for Tulbagh, South Africa: part I–assessment of seismic hazard. Nat Hazards 26(2):175–201
  • 20. Kijko A, Smit A, Van de Coolwijk N, Kilian Z (2012) Methodology for probable maximum loss calculation and potential implications of acid mine water for the South African general insurance industry. In: Presentation at Actuarial Society 2012 Convention, Cape Town, 16–17 Oct 2012
  • 21. Kijko A, Smit A, Van De Coolwijk N (2015) A scenario approach to estimate the maximum foreseeable loss for buildings due to an earthquake in Cape Town. S Afr Actuar J 15:1–30
  • 22. Kijko A, Smit A, Kahle B, Glazewski J (2016) Hydraulic fracturing, waste water pumping and seismicity. In: Glazewski J (ed) Proposed hydraulic fracturing in the Karoo: critical perspectives, Chap. 10. Juta and Co, Cape Town
  • 23. Lay T, Wallace TC (1995) Modern global seismology. International Geophysics, Volume 58, 1st edn, Academic Press, San Diego
  • 24. Malczewski J (1999) GIS and multicriteria decision analysis, 1st edn. Wiley, New York
  • 25. Mualchin L (2011) History of modern earthquake hazard mapping and assessment in california using a deterministic or scenario approach. Pure Appl Geophys 168(3–4):383–407
  • 26. Reitherman R (1985) A review of earthquake damage estimation methodologies. Earthq Spectr EERI 1:805–847
  • 27. Richter CF (1958) Elementary seismology. Freeman WH, San Francisco
  • 28. Rivas-Medina A, Gaspar-Escribano JM, Benito B, Bernabé MA (2013) The role of GIS in urban seismic risk studies: application to the city of Almería (southern Spain). Nat Hazard Earth Syst Sci 13(11):2717–2725
  • 29. Servi M (2004) Assessment of vulnerability to earthquake hazards using spatial multicriteria analysis: Odunpazari, Eskisehir Case Study. MSc dissertation in Geodetic and Geographic Information Technologies, Middle East Technical University, Ankara
  • 30. Sieberg A (1923) “Erdbebenkunde”, Jena, Ficher, August, modified and condensed; quoted from Wood and Neumann (1931)
  • 31. SkyScraperPage.com (2014a) Johannesburg Skyscraper Map. http://skyscraperpage.com/cities/maps/?cityID=755. Viewed 16 Sept 2014
  • 32. SkyscraperPage.com (2014b) Sandton Skyscraper Map. http://skyscraperpage.com/cities/maps/?cityID=1349. Viewed 16 Sept 2014
  • 33. Statistics South Africa (2013) Census 2011 sub-place areas [dataset], Pretoria, Statistics South Africa, Accessed 26 June 2013
  • 34. Steinbrugge KV (1982) Earthquakes, Volcanoes, And Tsunamis: An Anatomy Of Hazards. Skandia America Group, New York
  • 35. Van Aswegen G (2005) Routine seismic hazard assessment in some South African mines. In: Potvin Y, Hudyma M (eds) Proceedings of the 6th international symposium on rockburst and seismicity in mines. Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Nedlands, pp 435–444
  • 36. Van Westen CJ (2013) Remote sensing and GIS for natural hazards assessment and disaster risk management. In: Schroder JF, Bishop MP (eds), Treatise on geomorphology, Academic Press, Elsevier, San Diego, pp 259–298
  • 37. Whitman RV (1986) Earthquake loss estimation methodology. In: Vogel A, Brandes K (eds), Earthquake prognostics, hazard assessment, risk evaluation and damage prevention, Proceedings from the 2nd international seminar held in Berlin, 24–27 June 1986. Friedr. Vieweg & Son, Braunschweig/Wiesbaden, 1986, 259–278
  • 38. Wood HO, Neumann F (1931) Modified Mercalli intensity scale of 1931. Bull Seismol Soc Am 21(4):277–283
  • 39. Yuan Z (2003) Development of a GIS interface for seismic hazard assessment. MSc dissertation in Earth Resources and Environmental Geosciences, International Institute for Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation, Enschede
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-67cfe2d3-30ba-4075-b73a-8ad36ecf174d
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.