PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Powiadomienia systemowe
  • Sesja wygasła!
  • Sesja wygasła!
Tytuł artykułu

Situational student research projects management

Treść / Zawartość
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
Purpose: To propose a framework for choosing a project management approach for student research projects, taking into account the individual objectives of the advisor and the student, their personalities, the project type, and its environment. The proposed approach should increase the success rate of student research projects. Design/methodology/approach: Student research projects are characterized, and the relevant literature is reviewed. The theory concerning recent project management developments that could be potentially useful for student research projects is presented. A case study is analyzed. On the basis of the case study and the literature findings, a conceptual framework for the selection of a student research project management approach is proposed. Findings: It was found that student research projects, although apparently nonproblematic, need a conscious, individualized, situation-based selection of project management approach in order to assure a high success rate, according to the individual success understanding of project stakeholders. Research limitations/implications: The proposed framework is a conceptual one. It was developed on the basis of theory and under consideration of student research projects in one area and homogenous culture. Further research is needed to add new aspects to the approach, expand it to other research areas and cultures, and validate its usefulness in practice. Practical implications: Higher education institutions should promote project management knowledge among teachers and students, and conscious decision-making on the way student research projects will be performed. They should elaborate tailor-made frameworks for student research project management. Social implications: Student research projects, if managed improperly, may cause students and advisors dissatisfaction and stress. The approach we propose may, in the long term, increase the quality of life of students and advisors. Originality/value: The framework supporting the conscious selection of the way student research projects are managed, comprising recent developments in project management and taking into account the specific features and environment of each individual project, is an original contribution of the paper. It is addressed both to student project advisors and students themselves, as well as the managers of higher educational institutions.
Rocznik
Tom
Strony
451--466
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 29 poz.
Twórcy
  • Faculty of Management, Wroclaw University of Technology
  • Faculty of Management, Wroclaw University of Technology
Bibliografia
  • 1. Abuchar, A., Simansa, F. (2021). Design of an Agile Methodology oriented to the development of software in dissertation projects. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, Vol. 12, No. 12, pp. 4064-4074.
  • 2. Beauchamp, T.L., Bowie, N.E. (2001). Ethical Theory and Business. Prentice Hall: Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.
  • 3. Belling, S. (2020). Succeeding with Agile Hybrids. Berkeley, CA: Apress.
  • 4. Bizan, O. (2003). The determinants of success of R&D projects: Evidence from American 9 Israeli research alliances. Research policy, Vol. 32(9), pp. 1619-1640.
  • 5. Boehmand, B., Turner, R. (2005). Management Challenges to Implementing Agile Processes in Traditional Development Organizations. IEEE Software, vol. 22, no. 5,pp. 30-39.
  • 6. Brodtkorb, A.R. (28-29.03.2019). Agile Supervision of Bachelor, Master, and PhD. Theses. SINTEF Digital, Oslo Metropolitan University.
  • 7. Cooke-Davies, T. (2002). The 'real' success factors in projects. International Journal of Project Management, 20(3).
  • 8. Darrell, V., Baccarini, D. (2010). Demystifying the Folklore of the Accidental Project Manager in the Public Sector. Proj. Manag. J., vol. 41, pp. 56-63.
  • 9. Davis, K. (2014). Different stakeholder groups and their perceptions of project success. Int. J. Proj. Manag., vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 189-201.
  • 10. Dewi, D.A., Muniandy, M. (2014). The agility of agile methodology for teaching and learning activities. 8th Malaysian Software Engineering Conference, 978-1-4799-5439-1/14IEEE, INTI International University, pp. 255-259.
  • 11. Highsmith, J., Beck, K., Beedle, M., Bennekum, A. v., Cockburn, A., Cunningham, W., Thomas, D. (2001). Manifesto for Agile Software Development. Retrieved from: http://agilemanifesto.org/iso/en/manifesto.html, 20.10.2022.
  • 12. Jugdev, K., Müller, R. (2005). A retrospective look at our evolving understanding of project success. The Project Management Institute, Vol. 36, No. 4.
  • 13. Kerzner, H. (2013). Project management metrics, KPIs, and dashboards: a guide to measuring and monitoring project performance. New York: International Institute for Learning, Inc.
  • 14. Klaus-Rosińska, A. (2019). Sukces projektów badawczych i badawczo-rozwojowych w sektorze nauki. Wrocław: Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Wrocławskiej.
  • 15. Koutsikouri, D., Austin, S., Dainty, A. (2008). Critical Success Factors in Collaborative Multi-Disciplinary Design Projects. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 6/3.
  • 16. Lee, A. (2019). Successful Research Projects, A Guide for Postgraduates. Milton Park: Routlage.
  • 17. Lehamnn, O.F. (2016). An Introduction to a Typology of Projects. PM World Journal, Vol. V, Iss. XII.
  • 18. Levin, G., Rad, P.F. (2005). Metrics for project management: formalized approaches. Oakland: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
  • 19. Munns, A.K., Bjeirmi, B.F. (1996). The role of project management in achieving project success. International Journal of Project Management, pp. 81-87.
  • 20. Na czym polega Waterfall, czyli model kaskadowy? Retrieved from: https://global4net.com/ecommerce/na-czym-polega-waterfall-czyli-model-kaskadowy/, 21.10.2022.
  • 21. Pirro, L. (2019). How agile project management can work for your research. Nature. 10.1038/d41586-019-01184-9.
  • 22. Ray, N. (2016). Prioritize, plan, and maintain motivation with trello. The Agricultural Education Magazine, 88(6), 16.
  • 23. Reiff, J., Schlegel, D. (2022). Hybrid project management – a systematic literature review. International journal of information systems and project management, Vol. 10(2), pp.45-63.
  • 24. Rohman, M.A., Doloi, H., Heywood, C.A. (2015). Success Criteria of Toll Road Projects from a Community Societal Perspective. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 7/1.
  • 25. Sharp, J.A., Howard, K., Peters, J. (2017). The Management of a Student Research Project. Milton Park: Routlage.
  • 26. Tengberg, L. (2015). The agile approach with doctoral dissertation supervision. International Education Studies, 8(11), p. 139.
  • 27. The 2020 Scrum GuideTM. Retrieved from: https://scrumguides.org/scrum-guide.html, 21.10.2022.
  • 28. Turner, J.R., Cochrane, R.A. (1993). Goals-and-methods matrix: coping with projects with ill defined goals and/or methods of achieving them. International Journal of Project Management, vol. 11(2), pp. 93-102.
  • 29. Wateridge, J. (1998). How can IS/IT Projects be Measured for Success? International Journal of Project Management, 16/1.
Uwagi
Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2024).
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-6764c618-6fcd-42b5-8c6e-fd76d283c7fe
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.