Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Grupy docelowe marek detalicznych
Języki publikacji
Abstrakty
The literature emphasizes the growing significance of retail brands and differentiation of retail brands` strategies, also in terms of their target groups. Nevertheless, a few studies examine the strategic role of particular target groups of retail brands, especially on the Polish market. The purpose of this article is to answer the question: which consumers segments have the greatest significance as the target groups of retail brands for retail chains operating in Poland? The empirical research was conducted in an attempt to answer the question above. Data were collected through CATI survey of 143 randomly recruited retail chains operating in Poland. The findings indicate that target groups of retail brands considered as the strategic ones for retailers in Poland are diversified. They strongly vary in terms of economic, geographic, life style and demographic criteria for market segmentation. Amongst the most important target groups retailers mentioned: residents of large cities, high-quality oriented consumers, novelty- seekers and seniors.
W literaturze przedmiotu podkreśla się rosnące znaczenie marek detalistów, w tym marek sieci detalicznych oraz wskazuje się, że w ostatnich latach następuje znaczne zróżnicowanie strategii marek detalistów, w tym grup docelowych tych marek. Niewiele jest jednak badań dotyczących znaczenia grup docelowych w strategiach marek sieci detalicznych, zwłaszcza tych działających na polskim rynku. Celem artykułu jest więc odpowiedź na następujące pytanie badawcze: które grupy docelowe mają największe znaczenie jako segmenty docelowe marek dla działających w Polsce sieci detalicznych? W celu odpowiedzi na to pytanie przeprowadzono badania ilościowe metodą ankietową z zastosowaniem techniki CATI na próbie 143 losowo wybranych, działających w Polsce sieci detalicznych. W wyniku badań empirycznych potwierdzono, że segmenty docelowe produktów oznaczonych markami detalistów są zdywersyfikowane. Gestorzy badanych sieci detalicznych za istotne segmenty docelowe uznali konsumentów różniących się kryteriami ekonomicznymi, geograficznymi, stylu życia i demograficznymi. Wśród najważniejszych wskazali m.in. mieszkańców dużych miast, konsumentów zorientowanych na wysoką jakość, poszukujących nowości i osoby starsze.
Czasopismo
Rocznik
Tom
Strony
23--30
Opis fizyczny
Biblikogr. 47 poz., tab.
Twórcy
autor
- Warsaw School of Economics, Collegium of World Economy, Institute of International Management and Marketing
autor
- Warsaw School of Economics, Collegium of World Economy, Institute of International Management and Marketing
Bibliografia
- Ailawadi, K.L., Harlam, B. (2004). An Empirical Analysis of the Determinants of Retail Margins: The Role of Store-Brand Share. Journal of Marketing, 65(1), 147-165.
- Ailawadi, K.L., Neslin, S.A., Gedenk, K. (2001). Pursuing the value-conscious consumer: store brand versus national brand promotions. Journal of Marketing, 65(1), 71.
- Atkins, KG., Kim, J.-K. (2012). Smart shopping: conceptualization and measurement. International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management, 40(5), 360-375.
- Baltas, G. (2001). A combined segmentation and demand model for store brands. European Journal of Marketing, 57(10), 1510.
- Baltas, G. (1997). Determinants of store brand choice: a behavioral analysis. Journal of Product and Brand Management, 6(5), 315-324.
- Baltas, G., Doyle. P., Dyson, P. (1997)., A model of consumer choice for national vs private label brands. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 48(10), 988-995.
- Batra, R., Sinha, I. (2000). Consumer-Level Factors Moderating the Success of Private Label Brands. Journal of Retailing, 76(2), 175-191.
- Beldona, S., Wysong, S. (2007). Putting the „brand” back into store brands. Journal of 'Product and Brand Management, 4(16), 226-235.
- Burger, P.C., Scott, B. (1972). Can private brand buyers be identified? Journal of Marketing Research, 9(3), 219-221.
- Burton, S., Lichtenstein, D.R., Netemeyer, R.G., Garretson, J.A. (1998). A scale for measuring attitude toward private label products and an examination of its psychological and behavioral correlates. Academy of Marketing Science, 4(26), 293-306.
- Carpenter, J.M. (2005). Consumer shopping value for retail brands: measuring equity across consumer segments. Journal of Fashion and Management, 9(1), 43.
- Corstjens, M., Lai, R. (2000). Building Store Loyalty Through Store Brands. Journal of Marketing Research, 37(3), 281-291.
- Cuneo, A., Lopez, P., Y ague, M.J. (2010). Measuring private labels brand equity: a consumer perspective. European Journal of Marketing, 46(1/8), 952.
- Ducarozz, C., Vandenbulcke, V,, Lecron, F., Fouss, F. (2013). Consumer segmentation based on a collaborative recommendation system: application to mass retail company. Referat wygłoszony na: Conference of European Marketing Academy. Istanbul.
- Frank, R.E., Boyd, H.W. (1965). Are private brand prone grocery consumers really different? Journal of Advertising Research, 5(December), 27-35.
- Glynn, M.S., Chen, S. (2009). Consumer-factors moderating private label brand success: further empirical results. International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management, 57(11), 896-914.
- Gonzales, Mieres, C., Diaz Martin, A.M., Trespalacios Gutierrez, J.A (2006). Influence of perceived risk on store brand proneness. International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management, 54(10), 761-772.
- Grunert, K.G., Esbjerg, L., Bech-Larsen, T., Bruns, K., Juhl, H.J. (2006). Consumer preferences for retail brand architectures: results from a conjoint study. International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management, 34(8), 597-608.
- Hall, W.K. (1983). Survival Strategies in a Hostile Environment. W: R.G. Hamermesh (red.), Strategic Management. New York: John Wiley.
- Helms, M.M., Haynes, P.J., Cappel, S. D. (1992). Competitive Strategies and Business Performance within the Retailing Industry. International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management, 20(5), 3-14.
- Hoch, S.J., Banerji, S. (1993). When do private labels succeed? Sloan Management Review, 34(1), 57-67.
- Huang, H., Huddleston, P. (2009). Retailer premium own-brands: creating customer loyalty through own-brand product advantage. International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management, 57(11), 976.
- Kotler, P. (1999). Marketing. Analiza, planowanie, wdrażanie i kontrola. Warszawa: Felberg SJA.
- Kumar, N., Steenkamp, J.B.E.M., (2013). Strategia marek własnych. Warszawa: Oficyna Wolters Kluwer business.
- Laaksonen, H., Reynolds, J. (1994). Own brands in food retailing across Europe. Journal of Brand Management, 1(2), 37-46.
- Labrecque, L.I., vor dem Esche, J., Mathwick, C, Novak, T.P., Hofacker, C.F. (2013). Consumer power: evolution in the digital age. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 27(4), 257-267.
- Lawson, S. (2010). Transumers: motivation of non-ownership consumption. Advances in Consumer Research-North American Conference Proceedings, (37), 842-844.
- Miller, D., Friesen, P.H. (1986). Porter's (1980) Generic Strategies and Performance: An Empirical Examination with American Data. Part I: Testing Porter. Organization Studies, 7(3), 37-55.
- Miquel-Romero, M., Caplliure, E. M., Adame-Sanchez, C. (2014). Relationship marketing management: its importance in private label extension. Journal of Business Research, 67(5), 667.
- Miranda, M.J., Joshi, M. (2003). Australian Retailers Need to Engage with Private Labels to Achieve Competitive Difference. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 5(15), 34-47.
- Myers, J.G. (1967). Determinants of store brands attitude. Journal of Marketing Research, 4 (1), 73-81.
- Peter, J.P., Olson, J.C. (2010). Consumer behavior and marketing strategy. New York: Mc Graw-Hill.
- Rao, T. (1969). Are some consumers more prone to purchase private brands? Journal of Marketing Research, 57(November), 56-70.
- Rao, A.R., Monroe, K.B. (1989). The Effect of Price, Brand Name, and Store Name on Buyers Perceptions of Product Quality: An Integrative Review. Journal of Marketing Research, 26(August), 351-357.
- Richardson, P.S., Jain, A.K., Dick, A. (1996). Household store brand proneness: a framework. Journal of Retailing, 72(2), 159-185.
- Segal, M.N., Giacobbe, R.W., (1994). Market segmentation and competitive analysis for supermarket retailing. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 22(1), 38.
- Sethuraman, R., Gielens, K. (2014). Determinants of store brand share. Journal of Retailing, 90(2), 141-153.
- Shukla, P., Baneijee, M., Adidam, P.T. (2013). The moderating influence of socio-demographic factors on the relationship between customer psychographics and the attitude towards private label brands. Journal of Consumer Behaviour,12(3), 423.
- Sinha, I., Batra, R. (1999). The effect of consumer price consciousness on private label purchase. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 80(3), 237-251.
- Soberman, D.A., Parker, P.M. (2006). The economics of quality-equivalent store brands. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 25(2), 125-139.
- Sprott, D.E., Shimp, T.A. (2004). Using product sampling to augment the perceived quality of store brands. Journal of Retailing, 4(80), 305-315.
- Szymanski, D.M., Busch, P.S. (1987). Identifying the generics-prone consumer: a meta-analysis. Journal of Marketing Research, XXXIV (November), 425-131.
- Quelch, J.A., Harding, D. (1996). Brands versus private labels. Harvard Business Review, 74(1), 99-109.
- Vahie, A., Paswan, A. (2006). Private Label Brand Image: Its Relationship with Store Image and National Brand. International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management, 34(1), 67-84.
- Whelan, S., Davies, G. (2006). Profiling consumers of own brands and national brands using human personality. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 13(5), 393—402.
- Witek-Hajduk, M.K. (2001). Zarzqdzanie marką. Warszawa: Difin.
- Wright, P., Hotard, D., Kroll, M., Tanner, J. (1990). Rivalry among Firms: Evidence from the Apparel Industiy.W: B.V. Dean (red.), Strategic Management: Methods and Studies. New York: Elsevier Science Publishers.
Uwagi
Opracowanie ze środków MNiSW w ramach umowy 812/P-DUN/2016 na działalność upowszechniającą naukę.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-6748b793-ae72-429f-8efc-2f2495c7177a