Contracts’ Performance Measurement in Czech Construction Companies

• Autorzy: Trtílek Petr , Hanák Tomáš

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.2478/ceer-2021-0058

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Performance measurement of construction contracts belongs to the crucial activities enabling the improvement of processes in a construction company. The main aim of this paper is to evaluate and analyse performance management practices applied by contractors in the Czech construction sector. Original data were collected using a questionnaire survey and quantified through relative frequency of occurrence. These data have been supplemented by interviews with experts in the field in order to assess the importance of the individual criteria and other relevant performance aspects. The main findings illustrate differences in approach with respect to company size, as well as the most frequently used performance indicators and criteria. The study also focused on the performance measurement of subcontractors and the factors influencing contract success. The results show that large companies have already developed elaborate measurement systems and have sufficient staff for this purpose. Companies in the Micro&Small category show worse measurement performance, mainly due to the lack of qualified staff.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

performance measurement; construction company; criterion; measurement systems; efficiency

PL

pomiar wydajności; firma budowlana; kryteria efektywności; systemy pomiarowe; efektywność

• Wydawca: Oficyna Wydawnicza Uniwersytetu Zielonogórskiego
• Czasopismo: Civil and Environmental Engineering Reports
• Rocznik: 2021
• Tom: Vol. 31, no. 4
• Strony: 214--236
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 35 poz., tab., wykr.

Twórcy

autor

Trtílek Petr

• Brno University of Technology, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Brno, Czech Republic

autor

Hanák Tomáš

• Brno University of Technology, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Brno, Czech Republic

Bibliografia

• 1. Kagioglou, M, Cooper, R and Aouad, G 2001. Performance management in construction: a conceptual framework. Construction Management and Economics 19, 85-95.
• 2. Neely, A 1999.The performance measurement revolution: why now and what next? International Journal of Operations & Production Management 19, 205-228.
• 3. Yaghoobi, T and Haddadi, F 2016. Organizational performance measurement by a framework integrating BSC and AHP. International journal of productivity and performance management.
• 4. Niven, P 2005. Balanced scorecard diagnostics: Maintaining maximum performance: Maintaining maximum performance (John Wiley & Sons).
• 5. Noordin, N, Haron, S and Kassim, S 2017. Developing a comprehensive performance measurement system for waqf institutions. International Journal of Social Economics 44, 921-936.
• 6. Subramani, T, Lishitha, P and Kavitha, M 2014. Time Overrun and Cost Effectiveness in the Construction Industry. Journal of Engineering Research and Applications 4 (5),111-116.
• 7. Lehtola, M et al. 2008. The Effectiveness of Interventions for Preventing Injuries in the Construction Industry: A Systematic Review. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 35, 77-85.
• 8. Goel, A, Ganesh, L and Kaur, A 2019. Sustainability integration in the management of construction projects: A morphological analysis of over two decades. Journal of Cleaner Production 236, 117676.
• 9. Okoye, P 2021. Factors Influencing Clients’ Commitment to Sustainable Construction Practices. Planning 16, 39-48.
• 10. Meng, X 2012. The effect of relationship management on project performance in construction. International journal of project management 30, 188-198.
• 11. Ankrah, NA and Proverbs, D 2005. A framework for measuring construction project performance: overcoming key challenges of performance measurement. In 21st Annual ARCOM Conference 2, 959-969.
• 12. Liu, J, Love, P, Smith, J, Regan, M and Palaneeswaran, E 2015. Review of performance measurement: implications for public–private partnerships. Built Environment Project and Asset Management 5, 35-5.
• 13. Balatbat, M, Lin, C and Carmichael, D 2011. Management efficiency performance of construction businesses: Australian data. Engineering, construction and architectural management.
• 14. Ali, H, Al-Sulaihi, I and Al-Gahtani, K 2013. Indicators for measuring performance of building construction companies in Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Journal of King Saud University - Engineering Sciences 25, 125-134.
• 15. Marzouk, M and Gaid, E 2018. Assessing Egyptian construction projects performance using principal component analysis. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management 67, 1727-1744.
• 16. Othman, I, Shafiq, N and Nuruddin, M 2017. Time overrun in construction project. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. vol. 291 (IOP Publishing), p. 012016.
• 17. Wu, G, Liu, C, Zhao, X and Zuo, J 2017. Investigating the relationship between communication-conflict interaction and project success among construction project teams. International Journal of Project Management 35, 1466-1482.
• 18. Chia, A, Goh, M and Hum, S 2009. Performance measurement in supply chain entities: balanced scorecard perspective: balanced scorecard perspective. Benchmarking: An International Journal 16, 605-620.
• 19. Yu, I. et al. 2007. Comparable performance measurement system for construction companies. Journal of Management in Engineering 23, 131-139.
• 20. Peñaloza, G, Saurin, T and Formoso, C 2020. Monitoring complexity and resilience in construction projects: The contribution of safety performance measurement systems. Applied Ergonomics 82, 102978.
• 21. Mohammadi, A, Tavakolan, M and Khosravi, Y 2018. Factors influencing safety performance on construction projects: A review. Safety Science 109, 382-397.
• 22. Lingard, H , Wakefield, R and Cashin, P 2011. The development and testing of a hierarchical measure of project OHS performance.Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management.
• 23. Smallwood, J 2015. Optimising the elements of a construction health and safety (H&S) programme and audit system Procedia Engineering 123, 528-537.
• 24. Kang, H, Lee, Y and Kim, S 2016. Sustainable building assessment tool for project decision makers and its development process. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 58, 34-47.
• 25. Takim, R and Akintoye, A 2002. Performance indicators for successful construction project performance. 18th Annual ARCOM Conference vol. 2 pp. 545-555.
• 26. Halman, J and Voordijk, J 2012. Balanced framework for measuring performance of supply chains in house building. Journal of construction engineering and management 138, 1444-1450.
• 27. Chithambaranathan, P, Subramanian, N and Palaniappan, P 2015. An innovative framework for performance analysis of members of supply chains. Benchmarking: An International Journal 22, 309-334.
• 28. Love, P and Irani, Z 2003. A project management quality cost information system for the construction industry. Information & Management 40, 649-661.
• 29. Banawi, A and Bilec, M 2014. A framework to improve construction processes: Integrating Lean, Green and Six Sigma. International Journal of Construction Management 14, 45-55.
• 30. Cai, S, Ma, Z, Skibniewski, M and Bao, S 2019. Construction automation and robotics for high-rise buildings over the past decades: A comprehensive review. Advanced Engineering Informatics 42, 100989.
• 31. Yang, H et al. 2010. A critical review of performance measurement in construction. Journal of Facilities Management 8, 269-284.
• 32. Bassioni, HA et al. 2004. Performance measurement in construction. Journal of management in engineering 20, 42-50.
• 33. Robinson, HS et al. 2005. Business performance measurement practices in construction engineering organisations. Measuring Business Excellence.
• 34. Kucukvar, M and Tatari, O 2013. Towards a triple bottom-line sustainability assessment of the US construction industry. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 18(5), 958-972.
• 35. Hoang, DT, Igel, B and Laosirihongthong, T 2010. Total quality management (TQM) strategy and organisational characteristics: Evidence from a recent WTO member. Total quality management, 21(9), 931-951.