Moderating impact of complexity on process management of turnaround project

• Autorzy: Fabić Marco , Pavletić Duško , Valić Graciela Šterpin , Marković Maja

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.24425/mper.2019.131442

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Maintenance of process plants requires application of good maintenance practice due to a great level of complexity. From a plant maintenance point of view, the most significant activity is turnaround, an activity carried out through project task with long planning process period and very short execution period, which makes it one of the most complex projects of maintenance in general. It is exactly this kind of maintenance that is based on multidisciplinarity which has to be implemented through the system of quality management on all levels of maintenance management. This paper defines the most significant factors determining the process of turnaround projects quality management and its efficiency. Such relation is observed through moderating influence of complexity on process management efficiency in the turnaround project. The empirical research was conducted based on the survey of turnaround project participants in five refineries in Croatia, Italy, Slovakia and Hungary. For exploring the influence of research variables testing of the target relation is carried out by applying logistical regression. Research results confirm the significance of complexity as variable that significantly contributes to the project performance through the moderating influence on success of the project, as well as the influence of an efficient management on a plant turnaround project key results. Beside theoretical indications, practical implications that arise from this research study mainly refers to management process of the industrial plant maintenance project.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

maintenance management; turnaround; project quality; process management; complexity; key result

• Wydawca: Production Engineering Committee of the Polish Academy of Sciences ; Polish Association for Production Management
• Czasopismo: Management and Production Engineering Review
• Rocznik: 2019
• Tom: Vol. 10, No. 4
• Strony: 25--36
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 41 poz., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Fabić Marco

• Clinical Hospital Center of Rijeka, Krešimirova 42, 51000 Rijeka, Croatia

autor

Pavletić Duško

• University of Rijeka, Faculty of Engineering, Croatia

autor

Valić Graciela Šterpin

• University of Rijeka, Faculty of Engineering, Croatia

autor

Marković Maja

• University of Rijeka, Faculty of Engineering, Croatia

Bibliografia

• [1] Kerzner H., Project management: A systems approach to planning, scheduling, and controlling, Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2003.
• [2] Baccarini D., The logical framework method for defining project success, Project Management Journal, 30, 4, 25–32, 1999.
• [3] Miller R., Hobbs B., Governance regimes for large complex projects, Project Management Journal, 36, 3, 2005.
• [4] Bourne L., Avoiding the successful failure, Proceedings of the Project Management Institute Annual Seminars and Symposium (Hong Kong), Newton Square, PA: Project Management Institute, 2007.
• [5] Westerveld E., The project excellence model: linking success criteria and critical success factors, International Journal Of Project Management, 2I, 411–418, 2003.
• [6] Fabić M., Pavletić D., Jurković Z., Elementi složenosti projekata remonta rafinerija nafte, Održavanje i eksploatacija (MaintWorld – maintenance & asset management), 04/14, 2–6, 2014.
• [7] Fabić M., Pavletić D., Grčić-Fabić M., Differentiation of quality management approach in turnaround projects: an empirical research in oil refineries, 16th QMOD-ICQSS, Quality Management and Organizational Development Conference, Portorož, 2013.
• [8] Bryde D., Modelling project management performance, International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, 20, 2, 229–254, 2003.
• [9] Zulu S., Brown A., Quality of the project management process: an integrated approach, [in:] Khosrowshahi F. [Ed.], 20th Annual ARCOM Conference, 1–3 September 2004, Heriot Watt University, Association of Researchers in construction Management, 2, 1293–302, 2004.
• [10] Neely A., Kennerly M., Adams C., Performance measurement frameworks: a review, [in:] Neely A. [Ed.], Cambridge University Press, pp. 143–162, 2007.
• [11] Sandbrook M., Using the EFQM excellence model as a framework for improvement and change, Journal of Change Management, 2, 1, 83–90, 2001.
• [12] The European Foundation for Quality Management, Introducing Excellence, EFQM, 2003.
• [13] Kanji G.K., Tambi A.M., Business excellence in higher education, Chichester: Kingsham Press, 2002.
• [14] Dvir D., Raz T., Shenhar A., An empirical analysis of the relationship between project planning and project success, International Journal of Project Management, 21, 89–95, 2003.
• [15] Atkinson R., Project management: cost, time and quality, two best guesses and a phenomenon, its time to accept other success criteria, International Journal of Project Management, 17, 6, 337–342, 1999.
• [16] Cooke-Davies T., Cicmil S., Crawford L., Richardson K., We’re not in Kansas anymore, toto: mapping the strange landscape of complexity theory, and its relationship to project management, Project Management Journal, 38, 50–61, 2007.
• [17] Bryde D., Perceptions of the impact of project sponsorship practices on project success, International Journal of Project Management, 26, 8, 800–809, 2008.
• [18] Shenhar J., Dvir D., Reinventing project management, Harvard Bussines School Press, Boston, 2007.
• [19] Obiajunwa C.C., A framework for the evaluation of turnaround maintenance projects, Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, 18, 4, 368–383, 2012.
• [20] Duffuaa S., Ben Daya M., Turnaround maintenance in petrochemical industry: practices and suggested improvements, Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, 10, 3, 184–190, 2004.
• [21] Levitt J., Managing maintenance shutdowns and outages, Industrial Press Inc, New York, 2004.
• [22] Lenahan T., Turnaround, Shutdown and Outage Management, Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, 2006.
• [23] Fabić M., Pavletić D., Batelić J., Faktori vrednovanja uspješnosti projekata remonta rafinerija nafte, Održavanje 2014 – Udruženje “Društvo održavalaca u BiH”, Bosna and Hercegovina – Zenica, 2014.
• [24] Simon H.A., The architecture of complexity, Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 106, 467–482, 1962.
• [25] Williams T.M., The need for new paradigms for complex projects, International Journal of Project Management, 17, 269–273, 1999.
• [26] Baccarini D., The concept of project complexity – a review, International Journal of Project Management, 14, 4, 201–204, 1996.
• [27] Crawford L., Senior management perceptions of project management competence, International Journal of Project Management, 23, 7–16, 2005.
• [28] Turner J.R., Cochrane R.A., Goals-and-methods matrix: coping with projects with ill defined goals and/or methods of achieving them, International Journal of Project Management, 11, 93–102, 1993.
• [29] Remington K., Pollack J., Tools for complex projects, Gower Publishing, Ltd, 2007.
• [30] Cooke-Davies T., Project Success, [in:] Morris P.W.G., Pinto J.K. [Eds], The Wiley Guide to Managing Projects, Hoboken, N.J.: Wiley, 2004.
• [31] Kerzner H.D., Belak C., Managing complex projects, John Wiley & Sons, New Jersey, 2010.
• [32] Kahane A., Solving tough problems: an open way of talking, listening, and creating new realities, Berrett-Koehler Publishers, 2004.
• [33] Hass K.B., Managing complex project: a new model, Management Concepts, Inc., Vienna, 2009.
• [34] Girmscheid G., Brockmann C., The inherent complexity of large scale engineering projects, Project Perspective 2008: The annual publication of International Project Management Association, 2007.
• [35] Helm J., Remington K., Adaptive habitus – project managers perceptions of the role of the project sponsor’, Proceedings of EURAM Conference, Munich: TUT University, May 2005.
• [36] Crawford L., Morris P., Thomas J., Winter M., Practitioner development: From trained technicians to reflective practitioners, International Journal of Project Management, 24, 722–733, 2006.
• [37] Shenhar A., Strategic Project Leadershipr: Toward a strategic approach to project management, R&D Management, 34, 5, 569–578, 2004.
• [38] Ivory C., Alderman N., Can project management learn anything from studies of failure in complex systems?, Project Management Journal, 36, 3, 2005.
• [39] Woodward H., Beyond cost, schedule and performance: Project success as the customer sees it, Project Management Institute 2005 Global Congress (Singapore), Newton Square, PA: Project Management Institute, 2005.
• [40] Fabić M., Pavletić D., Soković M., Consideration of Factors in Turnaround Refinery (TAR) Project Management, International Journal: Advanced Quality, 01/16, 35–40, 2016.
• [41] Baron R., Kenny D., The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 6, 1173–1182, 1986.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa Nr 461252 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2020).