Management of innovation projects in the supply chains of automotive concerns

• Autorzy: Stawiarska Ewa Maria

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.29119/1899-6116.2021.56.5

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Introduction/background: The automotive sector is one of the most important industries for many industrialized countries. More than 20,000 parts per vehicle are sourced from suppliers from all over the world. Innovation projects in the automotive sector are the most complex and increasingly implemented in an open innovation model, i.e. with the participation of designers from multiple companies (R&D organizations, OEM, component suppliers, raw material suppliers). R&D projects driven by technology developments such as autonomous driving, electrification, in-car connectivity and multimodality are leading to a transformation of the industry (the largest since the invention of the car in 1885). The application of ITC (including the use of Industry 4.0 solutions like blockchain) means a new level of management of R&D projects carried out in an open model and control of the value creation chain throughout the product life cycle. Aim of the paper: The aim of the article was to introduce the concepts of inter-organizational innovation project management, project risk management, project management using ITC. Materials and methods: The research method used was: a systematic literature review. Results and conclusions: The article sought to confirm the thesis that automotive corporations are the forerunners of new solutions in the management of inter-organizational innovation projects.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

project management; R&D project; open innovation model

PL

zarządzanie projektami; projekt B+R; otwarty model innowacji

• Wydawca: Wydawnictwo Politechniki Śląskiej
• Czasopismo: Organizacja i Zarządzanie : kwartalnik naukowy
• Rocznik: 2021
• Tom: nr 4
• Strony: 61--81
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 74 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Stawiarska Ewa Maria

• Wydział Organizacji i Zarządzania, Politechnika Śląska

• https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1198-1134

Bibliografia

• 1. Aggeri, F., Segrestin, B. (2000). Comment concilier innovation et re´duction des de´ lais? Ge´ rer et Comprendre, 67, pp. 30-42.
• 2. Aloini, D., Farina, G., Lazzarotti, V., Pellegrini, L., Carayannis E., Messeni A., Petruzzelli S. (2017). Implementing open innovation: conceptual design of an integrated ICT platform. Journal of Knowledge Management,10.1108/JKM-11-2016-0517.
• 3. Asanuma, B. (1989). Manufacturer-supplier relationships in Japan and the concept of relation-specific skill. Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, 3(1), pp. 1-30.
• 4. Birou, L.M., Fawcett, S.E. (1994). Supplier involvement on integrated product development: a comparison of US and European practices. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 24(5), pp. 4-14.
• 5. Bogers, M., Zobel, A.-K., Afuah, A., Almirall, A., Brunswicker S. (2017). The Open Innovation Research Landscape: Established Perspectives and Emerging Themes Across Different Levels of Analysis. Forthcoming in Industry and Innovation, http://ssrn.com/abstract=2817865.
• 6. Brattström, A., Richtnér, A. (2013). Good cop-cad cop: trust, control and the lure of integration. Journal Production Innovation Management, 31(3), pp. 594-598.
• 7. Calvi, R., Le Dain, M.-A. (2004). Le partage de l’activite´ de conception entre un client et ses fournisseurs: quels modes de coordination adopter? Collaborative development between client and supplier: How to choose the suitable coordination process? Sous la direction de Thomas Froehlicher et Bj ¨orn Walliser In La me´tamorphose des organisations. Design organisationnel: cre´ er, innover, relier. L’Harmattan, pp. 79-93.
• 8. Carrillo, C., de la Rosa, J.L., Canals, A. (2007). Towards a Knowledge Economy. International Journal of Community Currency Research, 11, pp. 84-97.
• 9. Chatterjee, D., Pacini, C., Sambamurthy, V. (2002). The Shareholder-Wealth and Trading-Volume Effects of Information-Technology Infrastructure Investments. Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 19, No. 2, pp.7-42.
• 10. Chesbrough, H., Crowther, A.K. (2006). Beyond high tech: early adopters of open innovation in other industries. R&D Management, 36, 3. Center for Open Innovation, Haas School of Business, UC Berkeley, CA, USA, Analysis Group, Menlo Park, CA, USA, p. 233.
• 11. Clark, K.C., Fujimoto, T. (1991). Product Development Performance: Strategy, Organisation and Management in the Word Auto Industry. Harvard University Press.
• 12. Clegg, S.R., Pitsis, T.S., Rura-Polley, T., Marosszeky, M. (2002). Governmentality matters: designing an alliance culture of inter-organizational collaboration for managing projects. Organization Studies, Vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 317-337.
• 13. Cooper, R.G. (1979). The Dimensions of Industrial New Product Success and Failure. The Journal of Marketing, 43(3), pp. 93-103.
• 14. Crawford, L., Morris, P., Thomas, J., Winter, M. (2006). Practitioner development: from trained technicians to reflective practitioners. International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 24, no. 8, pp. 722-733.
• 15. Di Gangi, P., Wasko, M. (2009). Steal my idea! Organizational adoption of user innovations from a user innovation community: A case study of Dell Idea. Storm Decision Support Systems, Vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 303-312.
• 16. Dingsoyr, T., Neru, S., Balijepally, V., Moe, N. (2012). A decade of agile methodologies: Towards explaining agile software development. Journal of Systems and Software, Vol. 85, np. 6, pp. 1213-1221.
• 17. Dodgson, M., Gann, D., Salter, A. (2006). The role of technology in the transition to open innovation: coincidence Procter&Gamble. R&D Management, Vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 333-346.
• 18. Elfring, T., Baven, G. (1994). Outsourcing technical services: stages of development. Long Range Planning, 27(5), p. 51.
• 19. Emden, Z., Calantone, R.J., Droge, C. (2006). Collaborating for new product development: selecting the partner with the maximum potential to create value. Journal of Production Innovation Management, 23(3), pp. 330-341.
• 20. Eppinger, S.D. (2001). Innovation at the Speed of Information. Harvard Business Review, Vol. 79, no. 1, pp. 149-158.
• 21. Ericson, A., Kastensson, Å. (2011). Exploit and explore: two ways of categorizing innovation projects, international conference on engineering design. ICED 11 15-18 August 2011. Technical University of Denmark, p. 1-9.
• 22. Gladwel L., Blink, M. (2006). The Power of Thinking without Thinking. London, UK: Penguin.
• 23. Goffin, K., Mitchell, R. (2005). Innovation Management: Strategy and Implementation using the Pentathlon. Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 45-45.
• 24. Grabher, G. (2004). Learning in projects, remembering in networks? Communality, sociality and connectivity in project ecologies. European Urban and Regional Studies, Vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 103-123.
• 25. Green, S.G., Gavin, M.B., Aiman-Smith, L. (1995). Assessing a multidimensional measure of radical technological innovation. Engineering Management, IEEE Transactions on, Vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 203-214.
• 26. Hall, R., Andriani, P. (2003)., Managing knowledge associated with innovation. Journal of Business Research, vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 145-152.
• 27. Handfield, R.B., Ragatz, G.L., Petersen, K.L., Monczka, R.M. (1999). Involving suppliers in new product development. California Management Review, 42(1), pp. 59-82.
• 28. Hanisch, B., Wald, A. (2012). A Bibliometric View on the Use of Contingency Theory in Project Management Research. Project Management Journal, Vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 4-23.
• 29. Hippel, E., von Krogh, G. (2003). Open Source Software and the “Private-Collective” Innovation Model: Issues for Organization Science. Organization Science, Vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 209-213.
• 30. Huchzermeier, A., Loch, C.H. (2001)., Project Management Under Risk: Using the Real Options Approach to Evaluate Flexibility. R&D Management Science, Vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 85-101.
• 31. Kahan, A. (2017). Legal Protection: Liability and Immunity Arrangements of Central Banks. IMF Working Paper, WP 18/176, p. 10.
• 32. Kale, J., Dyer, P., Singh, H. (2001). How to Make Strategic Alliances Work. Sloan Management Review, 42(4), p. 3743.
• 33. Karbownik, A. (2017). Zarządzanie projektami w przedsiębiorstwie. Gliwice: Wydawnictwo Politechniki Śląskiej, p. 121.
• 34. Kisielnicki, J. (2016). Zarządzanie projektami badawczo-rozwojowymi - system komunikacji. Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu, nr 421, p. 242.
• 35. Koenig, M.E.D. (2012). What is KM? Knowledge Management Explained, May 4, http://www.kmworld.com/Articles/Editorial/What-Is-.../What-is-KM-Knowledge- Management-Explained-82405.
• 36. Koufteros, X.A., Cheng, T.C.E., Lai, K.-H. (2007). “Black-box” and “Gray-box” supplier integration in product development: antecedents, consequences and the moderating role of firm size. Journal of Operation Management, 25(4), pp. 847-870.
• 37. Lakemond, N., Berggren, C., Van Weele, A. (2006). Coordinating supplier involvement in product development projects: a differentiated coordination typology. R&D Management, 36(1), pp. 55-66.
• 38. Le Dain, M-A., Calvi, R., Cheriti, S. (2010). Developing an approach for design-or-buy- design decision-making. Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 16, pp. 77-87.
• 39. Lechler, T.G., Edington, B.H., Gao, T. (2009). Challenging Classic Project Management: Turning Project Uncertainties Into Business Opportunities. Project Management Journal, Vol. 43, no. 6, pp. 59-69.
• 40. Leimeister, J.M., Huber, M., Bretschneider, U., Krcmar, H. (2009). Leveraging Crowdsourcing: Activation-Supporting Components. IT-Based Ideas Competition, Vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 197-224.
• 41. Lewis, B. (2018). UK firm pilots using blockchain to help BMW source ethical cobalt. Retrieved from: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-mining-bmw-blockchain/, 8.01.2019.
• 42. Lewis, M.W., Welsh, M.A., Dehler, G.E., Green, S.G. (2002). Product development tensions: exploring contrasting styles of project management. Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 546-564.
• 43. Leybourne, S.A. (2006). Managing improvisation within change management: Lessons from UK financial services. The Service Industries Journal, Vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 73-95.
• 44. Lindermann, N., Valcárcel, S., Schaarschmidt, M., von Kortzfleisch, H. (2009). SME 2.0: Roadmap towards Web 2.0-Based Open Innovation in SME-Networks - A Case Study Based Research Framework. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, Vol. 301, p. 30.
• 45. Lusch, R.F., Nambisan, S. (2015). Service innovation: A service-dominant logic perspective. MIS Quarterly, 39(1), pp. 155-175.
• 46. Marion, T.J., Fikson, S.K. (2021). The Transformation of the Innovation Process. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 38(1), pp. 192-215.
• 47. Monczka, R., Handfield, R.B., Frayer, D., Ragatz, G.L., Scannell, T. (2000). New Product Development: Supplier Integration Strategies for Success. Milwaukee: ASQ Press.
• 48. Novak, S., Eppinger, S.D. (2001). Sourcing by design: product complexity and the supply chain. Management Science, 47(1), pp. 189-204.
• 49. Perminova, O., Gustafsson, M., Wikström, K. (2008). Defining uncertainty in projects - a new perspective. International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 73-79.
• 50. Petersen, K.J., Handfield, R.B., Ragatz, G.L. (2005). Supplier integration into new product development: coordinating product, process and supply chain design. Journal of Operation Management, 23(3), pp. 371-388.
• 51. Phillips, W., Lamming, R., Bessant, J., Noke, H. (2006). Discontinuous Innovation and Supply Relationships: Strategic Dalliances. R&D Management, Vol. 36, No. 4, pp. 451-461.
• 52. Pich, M.T., Loch, C.H., de Meyer, A. (2002). On uncertainty, ambiguity, and complexity in project management. Management Science, Vol. 48, no. 8, pp. 1008-1023.
• 53. Primo, M.A.M., Amundson, S.D. (2002). An exploratory study of the effects of supplier relationships on new product development. Journal of Operations Management, 20(1), pp. 33-52.
• 54. Quinn, J.B. (1992). Intelligence Enterprise. New York: Free Press.
• 55. Rothwell, R. (1992). Successful Industrial Innovation. Critical Factors for the 1990s. R&D Management, 22(3), pp. 221-40.
• 56. Servajean-Hilst, R. (2018). Shades of the innovation-purchasing function — the missing link of open innovation. International Journal of Innovation Management, Vol. 22, No. 1, p. 56.
• 57. Sharma, A., Gupta, A. (2012). Impact of organizational climate and demographics on project specific risks in context to Indian software industry. International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 176-187.
• 58. Söderlund, J., Maylor, H. (2012). Project management scholarship: Relevance, impact and five integrative challenges for business and management schools. International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 686-696.
• 59. Sorli, M., Stokic D. (2009). Innovating in Product/Process Development. London: Springer, p. 140, automotivelinux.org.
• 60. Souitaris, V. (2002). Technological Trajectories as Moderators of Firm-Level Determinants of Innovation. Research Policy, 31(6), pp. 877-98.
• 61. Stainer, A. (1997). Logistics ‐ a productivity and performance perspective. Supply Chain Manag., 2(2), pp. 53-62.
• 62. Sycz, P. (2012). Analiza funkcjonalności narzędzi „User feature” i „Power Copy” Programu CATIA w procesie automatyzacji procesu projektowego, praca inżynierska Elbląg: PWSZ w Elblągu.
• 63. Tapscott, D., Tapscott, A. (2016). Blockchain Revolution: How the Technology Behind Bitcoin is Changing Money, Business, and the World. Penguin Random House.
• 64. Thamhain, H. (2013). Managing Risks in Complex Projects. Project Management Journal, Vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 20-35.
• 65. Thomas, J., Mengel, T. (2008). Preparing project managers to deal with complexity - Advanced project management education. International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 304-315.
• 66. Van Echtelt, F.E.A., Wynstra, F., Van Weele, A.J., Duysters, G. (2008). Managing supplier involvement in new product development: a multiple-case study. Journal of Production Innovation Management, 25(2), pp. 180-201.
• 67. Veloso, F., Fixson, S. (2001). Make-buy decision in the auto industry: new perspectives on the role of the supplier as an innovator. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 67(3), pp. 239-257.
• 68. Wang, J., Lin, Y.I. (2009). An overlapping process model to assess schedule risk for new product development. Computers & Industrial Engineering, Vol. 57, no. 2, pp. 460-474.
• 69. Wheelwrigh, S., Clark, K. (1992). Revolutionizing Product Development: Quantum Leaps in Speed. Efficiency, and Quality. New York, NY: Free Press.
• 70. Whelan, E., Golden, W., Donnellan, B. (2013). Digitizing the social network R&D. Information Systems Journal, Vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 197-218.
• 71. Wynstra, F., Ten Pierick, E. (2000). Managing supplier involvement in new product development: a portfolio approach. European Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 6(1), pp. 49-57.
• 72. Wynstra, F., Van Weele, A., Weggemann, M. (2001). Managing supplier involvement in product development: three critical issues. European Management Journal, 19(2), pp. 157-167.
• 73. Wynstra, F., Ten Pierick, E. (2000). Managing supplier involvement in new product development: a portfolio approach. European Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 6(1), pp. 49-57.
• 74. Zwikael, O., Sadeh, A. (2007). Planning effort as an effective risk management tool. Journal of Operations Management, Vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 755-767.