PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

Feature engineering in property markets homogenous areas determination procedures

Treść / Zawartość
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
Real estate is one of the most important aspect of our life and play significant role in global economy. Sooner or later, everyone has contact with properties that are place for life, work, investment, relax. That is why properties are part of many decision-making systems related to valuation, taxes, land planning and sustainable development of the areas. Analysis related to property market are based on many assumptions such as property homogeneity determination. The following paper presents proposal of utilization of automated solutions based on robust geo-estimation that enables high efficacy of property submarkets identification. The study is to propose the optimal solutions for initial part of the homogenous market analyses such as feature engineering, that enables unbiassed identification of the homogenous areas (zones). In this case the following methods based on robust geo-estimation/geoprocessing will be used: Gauss filter, geocoding and reverse geocoding, tessellation model and entropy theory.
Czasopismo
Rocznik
Strony
57--71
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 50 poz.
Twórcy
  • University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Faculty of Geoengineering, Department of Spatial Analysis and Real Estate Market, Olsztyn, Poland
  • University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Faculty of Geoengineering, Department of Geodesy, Olsztyn, Poland
  • University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Faculty of Geoengineering, Department of Spatial Analysis and Real Estate Market, Olsztyn, Poland
  • University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Faculty of Geoengineering, Department of Spatial Analysis and Real Estate Market, Olsztyn, Poland
Bibliografia
  • 1. Bin O., Czajkowski J., Li J., Villarini G. (2017). Housing Market Fluctuations and the Implicit Price of Water Quality: Empirical Evidence from a South Florida Housing Market. Environmental and Resource Economics, vol. 68, pp. 319-341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-016-0020-8.
  • 2. Boeing G. (2019). Urban spatial order: street network orientation, configuration, and entropy. Applied Network Science, vol. 4, pp. 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41109-019-0189-1.
  • 3. Borst R.A. (2007). Discovering and applying location influence patterns in the mass valuation of domestic real property. Doctoral thesis, Ulster: University of Ulster.
  • 4. Borst R. (2012). A space-time model for computer assisted mass appraisal. Aestimum, pp. 535-545. https://doi.org/10.13128/Aestimum-13160.
  • 5. Cabral P., Augusto G., Tewolde M., Araya, Y. (2013). Entropy in urban systems. Entropy, vol. 15, no. 12, pp. 5223-5236, https://doi.org/10.3390/e15125223.
  • 6. Calka B. (2019). Estimating residential property values on the basis of clustering and geostatistics. Geosciences, vol. 9, pp. 1-14. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences9030143.
  • 7. Cellmer R., Kuryj J. (2011). Określanie stref o podobnej cenności gruntów z wykorzystaniem metod geostatystycznych (Defining the Land Value Zones with Use of Geostatistical Methods). Studia i Materiały Towarzystwa Naukowego Nieruchomości, vol. 19, pp. 7-19.
  • 8. Chen Z., Cho S.H., Poudyal N., Roberts R.K. (2009). Forecasting housing prices under different market segmentation assumptions. Urban Studies, vol. 46, pp. 167-187. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098008098641.
  • 9. Czembrowski P., Kronenberg J. (2016). Hedonic pricing and different urban green space types and sizes: Insights into the discussion on valuing ecosystem services. Landscape and Urban Planning, vol. 146, pp. 11-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.10.005.
  • 10. Del Giudice V., De Paola P. (2017). Spatial analysis of residential real estate rental market with geoadditive models, in: Studies in Systems, Decision and Control. Springer International Publishing, pp. 155-162. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3- 319-49746-4_8.
  • 11. Doszyń M. (2008). Statystyczno-ekonometryczna analiza skłonności ludzkich (Statistical-Econometric Analysis of Human Propensities). Rozprawy i Studia / Uniwersytet Szczeciński, no. 707, 151 pp.
  • 12. Eremeev S.V., Kuptsov K.V., Seltsova E.A. (2017). Algorithm for selecting homogeneous regions from a set of spatial objects, in: Proceedings of 2017 20th IEEE International Conference on Soft Computing and Measurements, SCM 2017. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., pp. 109-112. https://doi.org/10.1109/SCM.2017.7970511.
  • 13. Frigg R., Werndl C. (2011). Entropy: Aguide for the Perplexed. In: C. Beisbart, S. Hartmann (ed.), Probabilities in Physics. Oxford University Press, Oxford. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199577439.003.0005.
  • 14. Gabrielli L., Giuffrida S., Trovato M.R. (2017). Gaps and Overlaps of Urban Housing Sub- market: Hard Clustering and Fuzzy Clustering Approaches. In: S. Stanghellini, P. Morano, M. Bottero, A. Oppio (ed.), Appraisal: From Theory to Practice. Green Energy and Technology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49676-4_15.
  • 15. Gnat S. (2019a). Measurement of entropy in the assessment of homogeneity of areas valued with the Szczecin Algorithm of Real Estate Mass Appraisal. Journal of Economics & Management / University of Economics in Katowice, vol. 38, pp. 89-106. https://doi.org/10.22367/jem.2019.38.05.
  • 16. Gnat S. (2019b). The Impact of the Training Set Size on the Classification of Real Estate with an Increased Fiscal Burden. Real Estate Management and Valuation, vol. 27, pp. 53-62. https://doi.org/10.2478/remav-2019-0015.
  • 17. Goodman A.C., Thibodeau T.G. (1998). Housing Market Segmentation. Journal of Housing Economics, vol. 7, pp. 121-143. https://doi.org/10.1006/jhec.1998.0229.
  • 18. Guo Y., Agrawal S., Peeta S., Somenahalli S. (2016). Impacts of property accessibility and neighborhood built environment on single-unit and multiunit residential property values. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, vol. 2568, pp. 103-112. https://doi.org/10.3141/2568-15.
  • 19. Hendricks A. (2016). Christchurch, New Zealand: Proceedings. Copenhagen: International Federation of Surveyors (FIG) https://www.fig.net/resources/proceedings/fig_proceedings/index.asp (access: 05.09.2021).
  • 20. Islam K.S., Asami Y. (2009). Housing market segmentation: A review of Urban and Regional Development Studies, vol. 21, pp. 93-109. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-940X.2009.00161.x.
  • 21. Jenkins W. (1978). Policy Analysis: A Political and Organizational Perspective. Martin Robertson, London.
  • 22. Keskin B., Watkins C. (2017). Defining spatial housing submarkets: Exploring the case for expert delineated boundaries. Urban Studies, vol. 54, pp. 1446-1462. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098015620351.
  • 23. Klein M. (1970). Ludwig Boltzmann, Encyclopedia.
  • 24. Mach Ł. (2014). Próba budowy homogenicznych grup województw w obszarze lokalnych rynków nieruchomości mieszkaniowych (The attempt to create homogeneous groups of provinces in the residential real estate market). Metody Ilościowe w Badaniach Ekonomicznych, vol. 15, pp. 219-227.
  • 25. Manganelli B., De Paola P., Del Giudice V. (2016). Linear programming in a multi-criteria model for real estate appraisal, in: Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics). Springer Verlag, pp. 182-192. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42085-1_14.
  • 26. Manganelli B., Pontrandolfi P., Azzato A., Murgante B. (2014). Using geographically weighted regression for housing market segmentation. International Journal of Business Intelligence and Data Mining, vol. 9, pp. 161-177. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBIDM.2014.065100.
  • 27. Mei Y., Gao L., Zhang J., Wang J. (2020). Valuing urban air quality: a hedonic price analysis in Beijing, China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, vol. 27, pp. 1373-1385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-06874-5.
  • 28. Morano P., Manganelli B. (2014). Estimating the market value of the building sites for homogeneous areas. Advanced Materials Research, vol. 869-870, pp. 14-19. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.869-870.14.
  • 29. Morano P., Tajani F. (2016). Bare ownership of residential properties: Insights on two segments of the Italian market. International Journal of Housing Markets and Analysis, vol. 9, pp. 376-399. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJHMA-07-2015-0037.
  • 30. Morano P., Tajani F., Locurcio M. (2017). GIS application and econometric analysis for the verification of the financial feasibility of roof-top wind turbines in the city of Bari (Italy). Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 70, pp. 999-1010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.12.005.
  • 31. Pangallo M., Nadal J.P., Vignes A. (2019). Residential income segregation: A behavioral model of the housing market. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, vol. 159, pp. 15-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2019.01.010.
  • 32. Rabiei-Dastjerdi H., McArdle G., Matthews S.A., Keenan P. (2021). Gap analysis in decision support systems for real-estate in the era of the digital earth. International Journal of Digital Earth, vol. 14, pp. 121-138. https://doi.org/10.1080/17538947.2020.1808719.
  • 33. Rae A. (2015). Online Housing Search and the Geography of Submarkets. Housing Studies, vol. 30, pp. 453-472. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2014.974142.
  • 34. Renigier-Bilozor M., Janowski A., Walacik M. (2019). Geoscience methods in real estate market analyses subjectivity decrease. Geosciences, vol. 9, pp. 1-20. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences9030130.
  • 35. Renigier-Biłozor M., Janowski A., Walacik M., Chmielewska A. (2022). Modern challenges of property market analysis-homogeneous areas determination. Land Use Policy, vol. 119, pp. 106209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106209.
  • 36. Royuela V., Duque J.C. (2013). HouSI: Heuristic for delimitation of housing submarkets and price homogeneous areas. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, vol. 37, pp. 59-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2012.04.005.
  • 37. Salvati L., Ciommi M.T., Serra P., Chelli F.M. (2019). Exploring the spatial structure of housing prices under economic expansion and stagnation: The role of socio- demographic factors in metropolitan Rome, Italy. Land use policy, vol. 81, pp. 143-152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.10.030.
  • 38. Sawiłow E. (2009). Analiza wybranych metod modelowania wartości katastralnych nieruchomości (Analysis of selected methods of fixing cadastral value). Acta Scientiarum Polonorum. Geodesia et Descriptio Terrarum, vol.8, no. 2, pp. 27-38.
  • 39. Shannon C.E., Weaver W. (1964). The mathematical theory of communication. The Iniversity of Illinois Press, Urbana.
  • 40. Shen Y., Karimi K. (2017). The economic value of streets: mix-scale spatio-functional interaction and housing price patterns. Applied Geography, vol. 79, pp. 187-202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2016.12.012.
  • 41. Tajani F., Morano P., Locurcio M., Torre C.M. (2016). Data-driven techniques for mass appraisals. Applications to the residential market of the city of Bari (Italy). International Journal of Business Intelligence and Data Mining, vol. 11, pp. 109-129. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBIDM.2016.081604.
  • 42. Tysiąc P. (2020). Bringing bathymetry lidar to coastal zone assessment: A case study in the southern baltic. Remote Sensing, vol. 12, pp. 1-27. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12223740.
  • 43. Usman H., Lizam M., Adekunle M.U. (2020). Property price modelling, market segmentation and submarket classifications: A review. Real Estate Management and Valuation, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 24-35. https://doi.org/10.1515/remav-2020-0021.
  • 44. Warren C.M.J., Elliott P., Staines J. (2017). The impacts of historic districts on residential property land values in Australia. International Journal of Housing Markets and Analysis, vol. 10, pp. 66-80. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJHMA-02-2016-0015.
  • 45. Wu C., Sharma R. (2012). Housing submarket classification: The role of spatial contiguity. Applied Geography, vol. 32, pp. 746-756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2011.08.011.
  • 46. Wu C., Ye X., Ren F., Du Q. (2018). Modified Data-Driven Framework for Housing Market Segmentation. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, vol. 144, no. 4, pp. 04018036. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)up.1943-5444.0000473.
  • 47. Wu Y., Wei Y.D., Li H. (2020). Analyzing Spatial Heterogeneity of Housing Prices Using Large Datasets. Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy, vol. 13, pp. 223-256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12061-019-09301-x.
  • 48. Xiao Y. (2017). Hedonic Housing Price Theory Review, in: Springer Geography. Springer, pp. 11-40. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2762-8_2.
  • 49. Zheng S., Hu W., Wang R. (2016). How Much is a Good School Worth in Beijing? Identifying Price Premium with Paired Resale and Rental Data. The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, vol. 53, pp. 184-199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11146-015-9513-4.
  • 50. Źróbek S., Trojanek M., Źróbek-Sokolnik A., Trojanek R. (2015). The influence of environmental factors on property buyers’ choice of residential location in Poland. Journal of International Studies, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 163-173. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-8330.2015/8-3/13.
Uwagi
PL
Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MEiN, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2022-2023).
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-66ae137a-34c0-4aea-bd9b-a00151fccbe1
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.