Modeling a Set of Management Approaches for the Effective Operation of the Environmental Management System at the Business Entities

• Autorzy: Barabash Olena , Weigang Ganna , Dychko Alina , Zhelnovach Ganna , Belokon Karina

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.12912/27197050/141895

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The paper presented the results of research on the choice of management approaches to ensure the effective functioning of the environmental management system of business entities. New challenges contribute to the formation of a new system of approaches to decision-making. Implementation of environmental management systems is conducted in accordance with the requirements of the international standard ISO 14001: 2015. Effective EMS is based on a balanced choice of management approaches, the main objective of which is to ensure environmental performance at each stage of the EMS implementation. The clear control of indicators of environmental-organizational changes and environmental performance criteria of environmental management system requires the formation of a set of complementary management approaches that promote productive decision-making to reduce risks and prevent criticality of the environment. The result of the study is the development of an algorithm of the procedure for selecting effective management approaches. The formation of structural model of approaches in the process of implementation and functioning of the environmental management system has helped to identify the organizational activities that ensure the environmental safety of business entities. A thorough analysis of each stage of the development, implementation and operation of environmental management system enabled identifying a set of management approaches, forming a vector of environmental and organizational changes in the activities of business entities. Taking into account the developed algorithm of the procedure of selecting managerial approaches and the conceptual model of assessing managerial approaches to the effective functioning of the environmental management system, a structural model of applying managerial approaches at each stage of implementation and functioning of the EMS to improve the environmental safety of business entities was built. The study pertaining to the stages of structural model and application of QFD-methodology (Quality Function Deployment) allowed building a matrix diagram, which defines a vector of orientation of approaches, taking into account their complexity and materiality.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

structural modelling; environmental management system; operational efficiency; environmental safety; management approaches; environmental change; organizational change

• Wydawca: Lubelski Oddział Polskiego Towarzystwo Inżynierii Ekologicznej ; Lublin University of Technology ; WNGB Wydawnictwo Naukowe
• Czasopismo: Ecological Engineering & Environmental Technology
• Rocznik: 2021
• Tom: Vol. 22, iss. 6
• Strony: 1--10
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 22 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Barabash Olena

• National Transport University, Omelianovicha-Pavlenko Ave. 1, 01010, Kyiv, Ukraine

• https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5206-2922

autor

Weigang Ganna

• Banking University, 61, V. Chornovola Ave., 79020, Lviv, Ukraine

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2082-2322

autor

Dychko Alina

• National Technical University of Ukraine, Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute, Prosp. Peremohy, 37, 03056, Kyiv, Ukraine

• https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4632-3203

autor

Zhelnovach Ganna

• Kharkiv National Automobile and Highway University, 25, Yaroslava Mudrogo Str., 61002 Kharkiv, Ukraine

• https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5788-7843

autor

Belokon Karina

• Zaporizhzhia National University, Zhukovsky Str., 66, 69600, Zaporizhzhia, Ukraine

• https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2000-4052

Bibliografia

• 1. Díaz de Junguitu A., Allur E. 2019. The Adoption of Environmental Management Systems Based on ISO 14001, EMAS, and Alternative Models for SMEs: A Qualitative Empirical Study. Sustainability, 11(7015), 1–17.
• 2. Barabash O., Weigang G. 2020. Mathematical Modeling of the Summarizing Index for the Biosystems Status as a Tool to Control the Functioning of the Environmental Management System at Business Entities. Mathematical Modeling and Simulation of Systems (MODS’2020), 1265, 56−66.
• 3. Boiral O., Guillaumie L., Saizarbitoria I.H., Tene C.V.T. 2018. Adoption and outcomes of ISO 14001: A systematic review. Int. J. Manag. Rev., 20, 411–432.
• 4. Chiarini A. 2012. Designing an environmental sustainable supply chain through ISO 14001 standard. Manag. Environ. Qual. An Int. J., 24, 16–33.
• 5. Voinea C.L., Hoogenberg B.J., Fratostiteanu C., Hashmi H.B.A. 2020. The Relation between Environmental Management Systems and Environmental and Financial Performance in Emerging Economies. Sustainability, 12(5309), 1–21.
• 6. DSTU ISO 14001: 2015 Environmental management systems. Requirements and guidelines for use (ISO 14001: 2015, IDT). 2016. Kyiv, 37.
• 7. Feng T., Wang D. 2016. The influence of environmental management systems on financial performance: A moderated-mediation analysis. J. Bus. Ethics, 135, 265–278.
• 8. Kassinis G.I., Vafeas N. 2006. Stakeholder pressures and environmental performance. Acad. Manag. J., 49, 145–159.
• 9. Khoroshavin A.V. 2014. Analysis of the problems related to effective implementation of environmental management systems. Application of the process approach in environmental management. Scientific journal of NIU ITMO. Series: Economics and Environmental Management, 3, 614–624.
• 10. Kudryavtsev D.V., Grigoriev L.Y., Kubelsky M.V., Bobrikov S.A. 2018. Strategic alignment method for the activity of the organization based on the technology of quality functions development. Bulletin of St. Petersburg State University. Management., 17(4), 465–498.
• 11. Lukianova V., Trofymchuk O., Anpilova Y. 2020. Environmental Safety of Motor Transport Enterprises within the Urban Areas. Journal of Ecological Engineering, 21(4), 231–236.
• 12. Moneva J.M., Ortas E. 2010. Corporate environmental and financial performance: a multivariate approach. Ind. Manag. Data Syst., 110, 193–210.
• 13. Nadel S., Galliano D., Orozco L. 2016. Adoption of environmental management systems and organizational changes: the case of the French industrial firms. Journal of innovation economics and management, 21(3), 109–132.
• 14. Nawrocka D., Parker T.J. 2009. Finding the connection. Environmental management systems and environmental performance. J. Clean. Prod., 17, 601–607.
• 15. Phan T.N., Baird K. 2015. The comprehensiveness of environmental management systems. The influence of institutional pressures and the impact on environmental performance. J. Environ. Manag., 160, 45–56.
• 16. Qi G., Zeng S., Li X., Tam C. 2012. Role of internalization process in defining the relationship between ISO 14001certification and corporate environmental performance. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag., 19, 129–140.
• 17. Salim H.K., Padfield R., Hansen S.B., Mohamad S.E., Yuzir A., Syayuti K., Tham M.H., Papargyropoulou E. 2018. Global trends in Environmental management system and ISO14001 research. J. Clean. Prod., 170, 645–653.
• 18. Tanchuk O.A. 2016. Basic approaches to evaluating the effectiveness of public administration. Bulletin of NAPA. 2015, 3, 63–70.
• 19.Tourais P.C., Videira N. 2016. Why, how and what do organizations achieve with the implementation of environmental management Systems? – Lessons from a comprehensive review on the ecomanagement and audit scheme. Sustainability, 8(283), 1–25.
• 20. Trumpp C., Endrikat J., Zopf C., Guenther E. 2015. Definition, conceptualization, and measurement of corporate environmental performance: A critical examination of a multidimensional construct. J. Bus. Ethics, 126, 185–204.
• 21. Van Kranenburg H., Voinea C.L. 2017. Nonmarket strategies predictors for foreign firms. Scand. J. Manag., 33, 82–92.
• 22. Voinea C.L., Logger M., Rauf F., Roijakkers N. 2019. Drivers for Sustainable Business Models in Start-Ups. Multiple Case Studies. Sustainability, 11(24), 6884.