Niekonwencjonalne złoża gazu - ryzyko, niepewność, intuicja czy udokumentowana teoria, poprawnie uwarunkowane równania i potwierdzenie zdarzeniami z praktyki

• Autorzy: Matyasik I. , Jędrzejowska-Tyczkowska H.
• Języki publikacji: PL

Słowa kluczowe

PL

ocena złoża gazu; geochemia; gaz ziemny; analiza geologiczna

EN

gas field; geochemistry; natural gas; geological analysis

• Wydawca: Stowarzyszenie Naukowo-Techniczne Inżynierów i Techników Przemysłu Naftowego i Gazowniczego
• Czasopismo: Wiadomości Naftowe i Gazownicze
• Rocznik: 2010
• Tom: R. 13, Nr 7 (147)
• Strony: 4--13
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 26 poz., rys.

Twórcy

autor

Matyasik I.

• Instytut Nafty i Gazu w Krakowie - Państwowy Instytut Badawczy, Laboratorium Geochemii, ul. Lubicz 25 A, 31-503 Kraków

autor

Jędrzejowska-Tyczkowska H.

• Instytut Nafty i Gazu w Krakowie - Państwowy Instytut Badawczy, Zakład Sejsmiki, ul. Lubicz 25 A, 31-503 Kraków

Bibliografia

• 1. Berner U. and Faber E. 1996, „Empirical carbon isotope/maturity relationships for gases from algal kerogens and terrigenous organic matter based on dry open-system pyrolysis Proceedings of the 17th international meeting on Organic chemistry; Part III, Origin of natural gases; petroleum geochemistry impact of organic geochemistry on exploration; migration and expulsion of oil and gas”, Organic Geochemistry vol. 24, No. 10-11, pp. 947-955.
• 2. Bowker Kent A. 2003. „Development of the Barnett Shale Play Fort Worth Basin” West Texas Geological Society Bulletin 42 (6)4-11.
• 3. Chen Junhong, Fu Jiamo, Sheng Guoying, Liu Dehan and Zhang Jianjun 1996, „Diamondoid hydrocarbon ratios; novel maturity indices for highly mature crude oils”, Organic Geochemistry vol. 25, No. 3-4, pp. 179-190.
• 4. Claypool G.E., (1998), Kerogen conversion in fractured shale petroleum systems. AAPG Bulletin, vol. 82, No 13
• 5. Cohen Dave (2009) A shale gas boom? Published Jun 252009 by ASPO-USA,
• 6. Cooles G. P. Mackenzie A., Quigley S.(1986), Calculation of petroleum masses generated and expelled from source rocks. Advances in Organic Geochemistry vol. 10.pp.235-245
• 7.Curtis J.B. (2002), Fructured shale-gas systems: AAPG Bulletin v. 86, pp. 1921.1938
• 8.Jolly David, (2008) Europe starting search for shale gas, The New York Times, Published: Friday, August 22, 2008
• 9. Hill R.J., Jarvie D. M., Zumberge J., Henry M., Pollastro R.M., (2007), Oil and gas geochemistry and petroleum systems of the Fort Worth Basin. AAPG Bulletin,Vol.91 no4, pp.445-473
• 10. Hill R.J., Zhang E., Katz B.J., Tang Y (2007), Modelling of gas generation from the Barnet Shale Fort Worth Basin. Texas
• 11. Jarvie D.M., Hill R.J., Ruble T E., Pollastr R.M., (2007), Unconventional shale gas systems: The Mississippian Barnett Shale of north-central Texas as one model for thermogenic shale-gas assessment, AAPG Bulletin, vol. 9l, No4, pp. 475-50 1
• 12. Jarvie D.M., R.J. Hill R.M. Pollastro, D.A. Wawrek K.A. Bowker B.L. Claxton, M.H. Tonery (2003), Evaluation of unconventional natural gas prospects: The Barnet Shale fractured shale gas model (abs).21st IMOG, September 8-12 2003, Krakow, Poland, Book of Abstracts, Part II, p.3-4.
• 13. Jarvie D.M. (1991), Factors affecting Rock Eval derived kinetic parameters: Chemical Geology v.93, pp. 79-99
• 14. Jones R. W. (1984) Comparison of carbon ate and shale source rocks in Palacas, ed., Petroleum geochemistry and source rocks potential of carbonate rocks: AAPG Studies in Geology 18 p. 163-180
• 15. Marble W (2006), Attributes of a successful unconventional gas project: 8th Annual Unconventional Gas Conference Calgary 2006
• 16. Montgomery S.D., Jarvie K.A. Bowker R.M. Pollastro (2005) Missisipian Barnett Shale, Fort Worth Basin, north-central Texas: Gas shale play withmulyi-tcf potential; AAPG Bulletin, v. 89,p. 155-175
• 17. Pollastro R.M., (2007), Total petroleum system assessment of undiscovered resources in the giant Barnett Shale continous (unconventional) gas accumulation, Fort Worth Basin. Texas, AAPG Bulletin, v. 91, no 4, pp. 551-578
• 18. Poprawa P., Kiersnowski H. „Perspektywy poszukiwań złóż gazu ziemnego w skałach ilastych (shale gas) oraz gazu ziemnego zamkniętego (tight gas) w Polsce. Biuletyn Państwowego Instytutu Geologicznego 429, 145-152, 2008r
• 19. Ross D., J., K., Bustin R.M., 2007. „Shale gas potential of the lower Jurrasic Gordondale Member northwestern British Columbia, Canada” Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology Vol.95, No 1, p.51-75
• 20. Rodnguez MaizN, D.; R. Paul Philp (2009) Geochemical characterization of gases from the Barnett Shale, fort worth bas/n. Texas. AAPG Bulletin.
• 21. Rutkowski M. (2009) Wyciskanie gazu. Tygodnik Polityka, 24.02. 2009.
• 22. Sandvik E. l., W.A. Young, D.J. C (1992), Expulsion from hydrocarbon sources: The role of organic absorption: Advances in Organic Geochemistry 1991: Organic Geochemistry v.19, no 1-3, p. 77-87
• 23. Schmoker J. W, (2002), Resource assessment perspectives for unconventional gas system: AAPG Bulletin vol.86, p. 1993-1999
• 24. Schoell, M. 1983, „Genetic characterization of natural gases”, AAPG Bulletin, vol. 67, no. 12, pp. 2225-2238.
• 25. Tang Y, Jenden P.D., Nigrini A.,, Teeman S. C., (1996) Modelling early methane generation in coal: Energy and Fuels, v. 10, p.659-6
• 26. www.energy.gov.ab.ca. About Natural Gas, September 2009