Comparative morphological analysis of neomysis integer (leach, 1815) in 2006–2007 period

• Autorzy: Grzeszczyk-Kowalska A , Chojnacki J C , Raczyńska M , Raczyński M

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.5604/2081139X.1056036

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

This paper presents the results of a detailed comparative description of the morphological characters of N. integer obtained during eight research seasons in 2006–2007 period from the region stretching from Świnoujście to Darłowo. An attempt was made to assess the suitability of the studied characters for establishing to which populations individuals belong, to identify secondary sex traits and to detect differences in the body shape of these shrimp-like crustaceans. Most of the measurable characters in all of the samples discrimination analysis indicated the characters which differentiated the compared groups were telson length, lower abdomen width, exopodite uropod length, cephalothorax width below the carapace, cephalothorax width above the carapace and the height of fourth and fifth abdominal segment connections.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Neomysis integer; Pomeranian Bay; Baltic Sea; morphometry

• Wydawca: Polskie Towarzystwo Inżynierii Ekologicznej ; Lublin University of Technology
• Czasopismo: Journal of Ecological Engineering
• Rocznik: 2013
• Tom: Vol. 14, nr 3
• Strony: 31--43
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 35 poz., tab., rys.

Twórcy

autor

Grzeszczyk-Kowalska A

• Department of Marine Ecology and Environmental Protection, Faculty of Food Sciences and Fisheries, West Pomeranian University of Technology in Szczecin, Kazimierza Królewicza str. 4, 71-550 Szczecin, Poland

autor

Chojnacki J C

• Department of Marine Ecology and Environmental Protection, Faculty of Food Sciences and Fisheries, West Pomeranian University of Technology in Szczecin, Kazimierza Królewicza str. 4, 71-550 Szczecin, Poland

autor

Raczyńska M

• Department of Marine Ecology and Environmental Protection, Faculty of Food Sciences and Fisheries, West Pomeranian University of Technology in Szczecin, Kazimierza Królewicza str. 4, 71-550 Szczecin, Poland

autor

Raczyński M

• Department of Fisheries Management, Faculty of Food Sciences and Fisheries, West Pomeranian University of Technology in Szczecin, Kazimierza Królewicza str. 4, 71-550 Szczecin,Poland

Bibliografia

• 1. Chojnacki J.C. 1991. Population studies of Neomysis integer (Leach, 1815) from the marine coast of Wolin Island. Zesz. Nauk. AR w Szczecinie 143, 49-58.
• 2. De Giosa M., Czerniejewski P. 2010. Major axis approach to the statystical analysis of the growth of Chinese mitten crab (Eriocheir sinensis) in the Odra estuary (Poland). Oceanological and Hydrobiological Studies 40, 36-45.
• 3. Dynes J., Magnan P., Bernatchez L., Rodriguez M.A. 1999. Genetic and morphological variation between two forms of lacustrine brook charr, J. Fish Biol. 54, 955-972.
• 4. Fockedey N., Mees J. 1999. Feeding of the hyperbenthic mysid Neomysis integer in the maximum turbidity zone of the Elbe, Westerschelde and Gironde estuaries. J. Mar. Sys. 22, 207-228.
• 5. Gąsowska M. 1973. Comparative biometric studies of vendace (Coregonus albula (Linnaeus 1758)) (Pisces, Coregoninae) from Polish lakes and some adjacent countries, Roczn. Nauk Rol. H-1, 95, 41-51.
• 6. Grabda E. 1985. Zoology, invertebrates. PWN Warszawa: Volume II, part 1, 345 pp.
• 7. Jażdzewski K., Konopacka A., Grabowski M. 2005. Native and alien malacostracen crustacean along the polish Baltic Sea coast in the twentieth century. Oceanological and Hydrobiological Stud¬ies 34, 175-193.
• 8. Jerling H.L., Wooldridge T.H. 1995. Feeding of two mysid species on plankton in a temperate South African estuary. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 188, 243-259.
• 9. Kinnison M., Unwin M., Boustead N., Quinn T. 1998. Population – specific variation in body dimensions of adult chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) from New Zealand and their source population, 90 years after inroduction. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 55, 554-563.
• 10. Kossakowski J. 1967. Crayfish chelid growth. Polish Agricultural Annual 90, H, 423-432.
• 11. Kozikowska Z. 1961. Environmental impact on fish morphology and biology. Vendace, perch; selected elements. Ecology of Poland. 9, PAN, Warszawa, 542-678.
• 12. Köhn J., Jones M.B., Moffat A. 1992. Taxonomy, biology and Ecology of (Baltic) Mysids (Mysidacea: Crustacea). International Expert Conf. Hiddensee, Germany, 126 pp.
• 13. Lindén E., Lehtiniemi M. Viitasalo M. 2003. Predator avoidance behaviour of Baltic littoral mysids Neomysis integer and Praunus flexuosus. Marine Biology 143, 845-850.
• 14. Mańkowski W. 1955. Zooplankton Atlas. MIR, Gdynia. 51 pp.
• 15. Mauchline J. 1971. The biology of Neomysis integer. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K. 51, 347-354.
• 16. Mauchline J. 1980. The biology of mysids and euphausiids. In Blaxter J. H. S., F. S. Russel & M. Yonge (eds), Advances in Marine Biology (18). Academic press, London, 681 pp.
• 17. Mauchline J., Murano M. 1977. World list of Mysidacea, Crustacea. J Tokyo Univ Fish 64, 39-88.
• 18. Mc Even G., Johnson M., Folsom R. 1954. A statistical analysis of the Folsom plankton sample splitter, based upon test obserwations. Arch. Meteorol. Geophys. Bioklim. S.A.Meteorol. Goephys.,7, 502-527.
• 19. 19. Meland K. 2002 onwards. Mysidacea: Families, Subfamilies and Tribes. http://crustacea.net/.
• 20. Mees J., Abdulkerim Z., Hamerlynck O. 1994. Life history, growth and production of Neomysis integer in the Westerschelde estuary (SW Netherlands). Mar Ecol Prog Ser 109, 43-57.
• 21. Odum W.E., Heald E.J. 1972. Trophic analysis of an estuarine mangrove community. Bull. Mar. Sci. Gulf and Caribbean, 22, 671-738.
• 22. Reist J.D. 1986. An empirical evaluation of coefficients used in residual and allometric adjustment of size covariation. Can. J. Zool. 64, 1363-1368.
• 23. Remerie T., Bourgois T., Venreusel A. 2005. Morphological differentiation between geographically separated populations of Neomysis integer and Mesopodopsis slabberi (Crusstacea, Mysida). Hydrobiologia 549, 239-250.
• 24. Riddell B.E., Leggett W.C. 1981. Evidence of an adaptive basis for geographic variation in body morphology and time downstream migration of juvenile Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar), Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 38, 308-320.
• 25. Robinson B.W., Wilson D.S., Margosian A.S., Lotito P.T. 1993. Ecological and morphological differentiation of pumpkinseed sunfish in lakes without bluegill sunfish, Evolutionary Ecology 2, 451-466.
• 26. Rudstam L.G., Hansson S., Larsson U. 1986. Abundance, species composition andproduction of mysid shrimps in a coastal area of the Northern Baltic Proper Ophelia 4, 225-238.
• 27. Ruszczyc Z. 1981: Methodology for zootechnical experiments. PWRiL. Warszawa, 428 pp.
• 28. Shvetsova G., Shvetsov F., Hoziosky S. 1992. Distribution, abudance and annual production of Mysis mixta Lilljeborg in Eastern and Southeastern Baltic. ICES C.M. 1992/L, 24-29.
• 29. Sokal R. R., Rohlf F. J. 1998: Biometry. W.H. Freeman and Company, New York, 887 pp.
• 30. Swain P.D., Holtby L.B. 1989. Differences in morphology and behavior between juvenile Coho Salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch) rearing in a lake and in its tributary stream, Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 46, 1406-1414.
• 31. Swain D.P., Riddel B.E., Murray C.B. 1991. Mor¬phological differences between hatchery and wild populations of Coho Salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch): Environmental versus genetic origin. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 48, 1783-1791.
• 32. Szypuła J., Ostrowski J., Margoński P., Krajewska – Sołtys A. 1997. Food of Baltic herring and spratin the years 1995 – 1996 in light of the availability of components. Bull. Sea Fish. Inst., Gdynia, 2 (141), 61-72.
• 33. Tattersall W.M., Tattersall 0. S. 1951. The British Mysidacea. The Ray Society, London, 399-409.
• 34. Wiktor K. 1961. Observations of the biology of Neomysis vulgaris (Thompson 1928) in the Szczecin Lagoon and the Pomeranian Bay. Przegl. Zool. 5, 36-42.
• 35. Węsławski J.M. 1981. Observations of Neomysis integer (Thompson 1928) aggregation formation under natural conditions. Zesz. Nauk. Wydz. Biol. and Nauk o Ziem Uniw. Gdańskiego 8, 109-126.