Disinformation and Polarization in the Online Debate During the 2020 Presidential Election in Poland

• Autorzy: Domalewska Dorota

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.37105/sd.92

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The deliberate manipulation of public opinion, the spread of disinformation, and polarization are key social media threats that jeopardize national security. The purpose of this study is to analyze the impact of the content published by social bots and the polarization of the public debate on social media (Twitter, Facebook) during the presidential election campaign in Poland in 2020. This investigation takes the form of a quantitative study for which data was collected from the public domains of Facebook and Twitter (the corpus consisted of over three million posts, tweets and comments). The analysis was carried out using a decision algorithm developed in C# that operated on the basis of criteria that identified social bots. The level of polarization was investigated through sentiment analysis. During the analysis, we could not identify automated accounts that would generate traffic. This is a result of an integrated action addressing disinformation and the proliferation of bots that mobilized governments, cybersecurity and strategic communication communities, and media companies. The level of disinformation distributed via social media dropped and an increasing number of automated accounts were removed. Finally, the study shows that public discourse is not characterized by polarization and antagonistic political preferences. Neutral posts, tweets and comments dominate over extreme positive or negative opinions. Moreover, positive posts and tweets are more popular across social networking sites than neutral or negative ones. Finally, the implications of the study for information security are discussed.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

disinformation; polarization; fake news; social bots; Facebook; Twitter; information security; hybrid threats

PL

dezinformacja; polaryzacja; fałszywe wiadomości; boty społecznościowe; Facebook; Twitter; bezpieczeństwo informacji; zagrożenia hybrydowe

• Wydawca: Centrum Rzeczoznawstwa Budowlanego Sp. z o.o.
• Czasopismo: Safety & Defense
• Rocznik: 2021
• Tom: 1
• Strony: 14--24
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 30 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Domalewska Dorota

• War Studies University, Warsaw

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1788-1591

Bibliografia

• 1. Araźna, M. (2015). Conflicts of the 21st century based on multidimensional warfare - “hybrid warfare”, disinformation and manipulation. Security and Defence Quarterly, 8(3), 103–129. https://doi.org/10.5604/23008741.1189421
• 2. Baden, C., & David, Y. (2018). On resonance: a study of culture-dependent reinterpretations of extremist violence in Israeli media discourse. Media, Culture & Society, 40(4), 514–534. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443717734404
• 3. Bajarūnas, E. (2020). Addressing Hybrid Threats: Priorities for the EU in 2020 and Beyond. European View, 19(1), 62-70. https://doi.org/10.1177/1781685820912041
• 4. Benkler, Y., Faris, R., & Roberts, H. (2018). Network propaganda: Manipulation, disinformation, and radicalization in American politics. Oxford University Press.
• 5. Bessi, A., & Ferrara, E. (2016). Social bots distort the 2016 U.S. Presidential election online discussion. First Monday, 21(11). https://firstmonday.org/article/view/7090/5653
• 6. Brachten, F., Stieglitz, S., Hofeditz, L., Kloppenborg, K., & Reimann, A. (2017). Strategies and influence of social bots in a 2017 German state election – A case study on Twitter. https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1710/1710.07562.pdf
• 7. Carothers, T. & O’Donohue, A. (2019). Democracies divided. The global challenge of political polarization. Washington, D. C.: The Brookings Institution Press
• 8. Code of Practice on disinformation, (2019). https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/news/code-practice-disinformation%0D
• 9. Colliander, J. (2019). “This is fake news”: Investigating the role of conformity to other users’ views when commenting on and spreading disinformation in social media. Computers in Human Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.03.032
• 10. Domalewska, D., & Bielawski, R. (2019). Social bots as vehicles of spreading disinformation. Implications for state security. Soliman, K. S. (ed.) Vision 2025: Education Excellence and Management of Innovations through Sustainable Economic Competitive Advantage. Proceedings of the 34th International Business Information Management Association Conference (IBIMA), 3263-3270
• 11. Hawdon, J., Shyam, R., Leman, S., Bookhultz, S., & Mitra, T. (2020). Social media use, political polarization, and social capital: Is social media tearing the U.S. apart? In G. Meiselwitz (Ed.), Social computing and social media. Design, ethics, user behavior and social network analysis (pp. 243–260). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49570_17
• 12. Hegelich, S., & Janetzko, D. (2016). Are social bots on Twitter political actors? Empirical evidence from a Ukrainian social botnet. Proceedings of the Tenth International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 17–20. https://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/ICWSM/ICWSM16/paper/view/13015
• 13. Howard, P. N., & Kollanyi, B. (2016). Bots, #Strongerin, and #Brexit: Computational Propaganda During the UK-EU Referendum. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2798311
• 14. Hudgins, J., & Newcomb, A. (2017). Google, Facebook, Twitter and Russia: A timeline on the ’16 election. NBC. https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/google-facebook-twitter-russia-timeline-16-election-n816036
• 15. Ivančík, R., Jurčák, V. & Nečas, P. (2014). On some contemporary global security risks and challenges. Security and Defence Quarterly, 4(3), 34–49. https://doi.org/10.5604/23008741.1152548
• 16. Kaylor, B. (2019). Likes, retweets, and polarization. Review & Expositor, 116(2), 183–192. https://doi.org/10.1177/0034637319851508
• 17. Kligler-Vilenchik, N., Baden, C., & Yarchi, M. (2020). Interpretative Polarization across Platforms: How Political Disagreement Develops Over Time on Facebook, Twitter, and WhatsApp. Social Media + Society, 6(3), 205630512094439. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120944393
• 18. Klimburg, A. (2018). Trolling, hacking and the 2016 US presidential election. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-018-06942-9
• 19. Liedel, K. (2008). Bezpieczeństwo informacyjne jako element bezpieczeństwa narodowego, Bezpieczeństwo informacyjne jako element bezpieczeństwa narodowego. https://liedel.pl/?p=13
• 20. McCoy, J. & Somer, M. (eds) (2019). Polarizing Polities: A Global Threat to Democracy. Special Issue, The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 681(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716218818058
• 21. Monaghan, A. (2019). Dealing with the Russians. Cambridge: Polity Press
• 22. Mustonen-Ollila, E. B., Lehto, M., & Heikkonen, J. (2020). Components of defence strategies in society’s information environment: a case study based on the grounded theory. Security and Defence Quarterly, 28(1), 19–43. https://doi.org/10.35467/sdq/118186
• 23. Ratkiewicz, J., Conover, M. D., Meiss, M., Gonçalves, B., Flammini, A., & Menczer, F. (2011). Detecting and Tracking Political Abuse in Social Media. Proceedings of the Fifth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media. https://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/ICWSM/ICWSM11/paper/viewFile/2850/3274/
• 24. Sunstein, C. R. (2017). #Republic. Divided democracy in the age of social media. Princeton University Press
• 25. Świerszcz, K. (2017). Systemy informacyjne jako narzędzie bezpieczeństwa - ochrony i monitoringu centrów logistycznych. In J. Żylińska & I. Przychocka (Eds.), Nauki społeczne i ekonomiczne – węzłowe zagadnienia (pp. 509–523). UTH
• 26. Tworzecki, H. (2019). Poland: A Case of Top-Down Polarization. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 681(1), 97–119. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716218809322
• 27. Urych, I. (2013). Wartości wychowania a bezpieczeństwo młodego człowieka. Zeszyty Naukowe AON, 90(1), 227-241.
• 28. Węglińska, A. (2018). Astroturfing internetowy a zagrożenie bezpieczeństwa - protesty w obronie sądów w Polsce, boty i dezinformacja. Rocznik Bezpieczeństwa, 68–81
• 29. Woolley, S. C. (2016). Automating power: Social bot interference in global politics. First Monday, 21(4). https://firstmonday.org/article/view/6161/5300
• 30. Żakowska, M., & Domalewska, D. (2019). Factors determining polish parliamentarians’ tweets on migration: A case study of Poland. Politologicky Casopis, 2019(3). https://doi.org/10.5817/PC2019-3-200

Uwagi

PL

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa Nr 461252 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2021).