Flood prediction based on climatic signals using wavelet neural network

Linh, Nguyen Thi Thuy; Ruigar, Hossein; Golian, Saeed; Bawoke, Getnet Taye; Gupta, Vivek; Rahman, Khalil Ur; Sankaran, Adarsh; Pham, Quoc Bao

doi:10.1007/s11600-021-00620-7

Artykuł - szczegóły

Tytuł artykułu

Flood prediction based on climatic signals using wavelet neural network

Autorzy

Linh Nguyen Thi Thuy , Ruigar Hossein , Golian Saeed , Bawoke Getnet Taye , Gupta Vivek , Rahman Khalil Ur , Sankaran Adarsh , Pham Quoc Bao

Wybrane pełne teksty z tego czasopisma

https://www.springer.com/journal/11600

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.1007/s11600-021-00620-7

Warianty tytułu

Języki publikacji

Abstrakty

Large-scale climatic circulation modulates the weather patterns around the world. Understanding the teleconnections between large-scale circulation and local hydro-climatological variables has been a major thrust area of hydro-climatology research. The large-scale circulation is often quantifed in terms of sea surface temperature (SST) and sea-level pressure (SLP). In this paper, we investigate the potential of wavelet neural network (WNN) hybrid model to predict maximum monthly discharge of the Madarsoo watershed, North of Iran considering two large-scale climatic signals like SST and SLP as inputs. Error measures like root-mean-square error (RMSE), and mean absolute error along with the correlation measures like coefcient of correlation (R), and Nash–Sutclife coefcient (CNS) were used to quantify the performance of prediction of maximum monthly discharge of three diferent hydrometry stations of the watershed. In all the cases, the WNN hybrid machine learning model was found to be giving superior performance consistently against the standalone artifcial neural network (ANN) model and multiple linear regression model to predict the food discharges of March and August months. The prediction of food for August which is more devastating is found to be slightly better than the prediction of foods of March, in the stations served with smaller drainage area. The RMSE, R and CNS of Tamer hydrometry station in August were found to be 0.68, 0.996, and 0.99 m3 /s, respectively, for the test period by using WNN model against 1.55, 0.989 and 0.95 by ANN model. Moreover, when evaluated for predicting the maximum monthly discharge in March and August between 2012 and 2013, the wavelet-based neural networks performed remarkably well than the ANN.

Słowa kluczowe

large-scale climatic circulation sea surface temperature sea level pressure artificial neural network maximum discharge prediction

cyrkulacja klimatyczna na dużą skalę temperatura powierzchni morza ciśnienie na poziomie morza sztuczna sieć neuronowa

Wydawca

Instytut Geofizyki PAN
Springer

Czasopismo

Acta Geophysica

Rocznik

2021

Tom

Vol. 69, no. 4

Strony

1413--1426

Opis fizyczny

Bibliogr. 75 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Linh Nguyen Thi Thuy

Thuyloi University, 175 Tay Son, Dong Da, Hanoi, Vietnam

autor

Ruigar Hossein

Civil Engineering Department, Shahrood University of Technology, Shahrud, Iran

autor

Golian Saeed

Civil Engineering Department, Shahrood University of Technology, Shahrud, Iran
ICARUS, Department of Geography, Maynooth University, Maynooth, Ireland

autor

Bawoke Getnet Taye

Department of Geology, School of Earth Sciences, Bahir Dar University, P.O. Box 79, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia

autor

Gupta Vivek

Department of Hydrology, Indian Institute of Technology, Roorkee, India

autor

Rahman Khalil Ur

State Key Laboratory of Hydroscience and Engineering, Department of Hydraulic Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China

autor

Sankaran Adarsh

Department of Civil Engineering, TKM College of Engineering, Kollam 691005, India

autor

Pham Quoc Bao

phambaoquoc@tdmu.edu.vn

Institute of Applied Technology, Thu Dau Mot University, Thu Dau Mot City, Binh Duong Province, Vietnam

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0468-5962

Bibliografia

1. Adamowski J, Chan HF (2011) A wavelet neural network conjunction model for groundwater level forecasting. J Hydrol 407(1–4):28–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.06.013
2. Adamowski J, Chan HF, Prasher SO, Sharda VN (2012) Comparison of multivariate adaptive regression splines with coupled wavelet transform artificial neural networks for runoff forecasting in Himalayan micro-watersheds with limited data. J Hydroinfor 14(3):731–744
3. Adamowski J, Prokoph A, Adamowski K (2013) A spectral analysis based methodology to detect climatological influences on daily urban water demand. Math Geosci 45:49–68
4. Adarsh S, Janga Reddy M (2019a) Links between global climate teleconnections and indian monsoon rainfall. In: Venkataraman C, Mishra T, Ghosh S, Karmakar S (eds) Climate change signals and response. Springer, New York, pp 61–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0280-0
5. Adarsh S, Janga Reddy M (2019b) Multiscale characterization and prediction of reservoir inflows using MEMD-SLR coupled approach. J Hydrol Eng ASCE. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001732
6. Akansu AN, Serdijn WA, Selesnick IW (2010) Wavelet transforms in signal processing: a review of emerging applications. Phys Commun 3:1–18
7. Araghi A, Adamowski J, Nalley D, Malard J (2015) Using wavelet transforms to estimate surface temperature trends and dominant periodicities in Iran based on gridded reanalysis data. Atmos Res 155:52–72
8. Araghi A, Mousavi-Baygi M, Adamowski J, Martinez C (2017) Association between three prominent climatic teleconnections and precipitation in Iran using wavelet coherence. Int J Climatol 37(6):2809–2830
9. Baratti R, Cannas B, Fanni A, Pintus M, Sechi GM, Toreno N (2003) River discharge forecast for reservoir management through neural networks. Neurocomputing 55:421–437
10. Belayneh A, Adamowski J, Khalil B, Ozga-Zielinski B (2014) Long-term SPI drought forecasting in the Awash River Basin in Ethiopia using wavelet neural network and wavelet support vector regression models. J Hydrol 508:418–429
11. Berg N, Hall A, Capps SB, Hughes M (2013) El Niño-Southern Oscillation impacts on winter winds over Southern California. Clim Dyn 40:109–121
12. Bergström S (1991) Principles and confidence in hydrological modelling. Hydrol Res 22:123–136
13. Biasutti M, Held IM, Sobel AH, Giannini A (2008) SST forcings and Sahel rainfall variability in simulations of the twentieth and twenty-first centuries. J Climate 21:3471–3486
14. Chang FJ, Chiang Y-M, Chang L-C (2007) Multi-step-ahead neural networks for flood forecasting. Hydrol Sci J 52(1):114–130
15. Choubin B, Khalighi-Sigaroodi S, Malekian A, Kişi O (2016) Multiple linear regression, multi-layer perceptron network and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system for forecasting precipitation based on large-scale climate signals. Hydrol Sci J. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2014.966721
16. Coulibaly P, Anctil F, Bobée B (2000) Daily reservoir indischarge forecasting using artificial neural networks with stopped training approach. J Hydrol 230:244–257
17. Coulibaly P, Bobée B, Anctil F (2001) Improving extreme hydrologic events forecasting using a new criterion for artificial neural network selection. Hydrol Process 15(8):1533–1536
18. Daubechies I (1990) The wavelet transform time-frequency localization and signal analysis. IEEE Trans Inf Theory 36:961–1005
19. Dawson CW, Wilby R (1998) An artificial neural network approach to rainfall-runoff modeling. Hydrol Sci J 43(1):47–66
20. Dehghani M, Salehi S, Mosavi A, Nabipour N, Shamshirband S, Ghamisi P (2020) Spatial analysis of seasonal precipitation over Iran: co-variation with climate indices. ISPRS Int J Geo-Inf 9(2):73. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi9020073
21. Dibike YB, Solomatine DP (2001) River discharge forecasting using artificial neural networks. Phys Chem Earth Part B 26:1–7
22. Fallah-Ghalhary GH (2012) Rainfall prediction using teleconnection patterns through the application of artificial neural networks. Mod Climatol 1:362–386
23. Farokhnia A, Morid S, Byun HR (2010) Application of global SST and SLP data for drought forecasting on Tehran plain using data mining and ANFIS techniques. Theoret Appl Climatol 104:71–81
24. Gamiz-Fortis SR, Esteban-Parra MJ, Trigo RM, Castro-Diez Y (2010) Potential predictability of an Iberian river discharge based on its relationship with previos winter global SST. J Hydrol 385:143–149
25. Ghosh S, Mujumdar PP (2007) Nonparametric methods for modeling GCM and scenario uncertainty in drought assessment. Water Resour Res 43:W07405. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006WR005351
26. Gupta V, Jain MK (2020) Impact of ENSO, global warming, and land surface elevation on extreme precipitation in India. J Hydrol Engng 25(1):05019032
27. Gupta V, Jain MK (2021) Unravelling the teleconnections between ENSO and dry/wet conditions over India using nonlinear Granger causality. Atmos Res 247:105168
28. Gupta V, Singh V, Jain MK (2020) Assessment of precipitation extremes in India during the 21st century under SSP1-1.9 mitigation scenarios of CMIP6 GCMs. J Hydrol 590:125422
29. Haykin S (1994) Neural networks: a comprehensive foundation. MacMillan Publishing Company, New York
30. Hecht-Nielson R (1987). Kolmogorov's mapping neural network existence theorem. In: IEEE international conference on neural Net 3. IEEE Press, New York
31. Hsu KL, Gupta HV, Gao X, Sorooshian S, Imam B (2002) Self-organizing linear output map (SOLO): an artificial neural network suitable for hydrologic modeling and analysis. Water Resour Res 38(12):38–41
32. Jain A, Kumar AM (2007) Hybrid neural network models for hydrologic time series forecasting. Appl Soft Comput 7(2):585–592
33. Jiang X, Adeli H (2005) Dynamic wavelet neural network model for traffic flow forecasting. J Trans Eng 131(10):771–779
34. Kalra A, Miller WP, Lamb KW, Ahmad S, Piechota T (2012) Using large-scale climatic patterns for improving long lead time stream discharge forecasts for Gunnison and San Juan River Basins. Hydrol Process 27:1543–1559
35. Karthikeyan L, Nagesh Kumar D (2013) Predictability of non-stationary time series using wavelet and EMD based ARMA models. J Hydrol 502:103–119
36. Kim TW, Valdes JB (2003) Nonlinear model for drought forecasting based on a conjunction of wavelet transforms and neural network. J Hydrol Eng 8:319–328
37. Kisi O, Cigizoglu HK (2007) Comparison of different ANN techniques in river discharge prediction. Civil Eng Envrion Syst 24:211–231
38. Klemeš V (1986) Operational testing of hydrological simulation models. Hydrol Sci J 31:13–24
39. Kumar DN, Reddy MJ, Maity R (2007) Regional discharge forecasting using large scale climate teleconnections and artificial intelligence techniques. Int J Intell Syst 16:307–322
40. Maity R, Nagesh Kumar D (2008) Basin-scale stream-flow forecasting using the information of large-scale atmospheric circulation phenomena. Hydrol Process 22(5):643–650
41. Maity R, Nagesh Kumar D (2009) Hydroclimatic influence of large-scale circulation on the variability of reservoir inflow. Hydrol Process 23(6):934–942
42. Meidani E, Araghinejad S (2014) Long-lead stream discharge forecasting in the southwest of Iran by sea surface temperature of the mediterranean sea. J Hydrol Eng 1–10
43. Mizanur R, Rafiuddin MM (2013) Seasonal forecasting of Bangladesh summer monsoon rainfall using simple multiple regression model. J Earth Syst Sci 122:551–558
44. Mosavi A, Ozturk P, Chau KW (2018) Flood prediction using machine learning models: literature review. Water 10(11):1536. https://doi.org/10.3390/w10111536
45. Mukerji A, Chatterjee C, Raghuwanshi NS (2009) Flood forecasting using ANN, neuro-fuzzy, and neuro-GA models. J Hydrol Eng. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000040
46. Munoz-Diaz FS, Rodrigo FS (2006) Effects of the North Atlantic oscillation on the probability for climatic categories of local monthly discharge in Southern Spain. Int J Climatol 23:381–397
47. Nazemosadat MJ, Cordey I, Eslamian S (1995) The impact of the Persian Gulf Sea surface temperature on Iranian rainfall. In: Proceedings of the Iranian water resource management conference, Esfahan, Iran, pp 809–819
48. Nourani V, Alami MT, Aminfar MH (2009) A combined neural-wavelet model for prediction of Ligvanchai watershed precipitation. Eng Appl Artif Intell 22:466–472
49. Nourani V, Baghanam AH, Adamowski J, Kisi O (2014) Applications of hybrid wavelet-artificial intelligence models in hydrology: a review. J Hydrol 514:358–377
50. Oubeidillah AA, Tootle G, Anderson SR (2012) Atlantic Ocean sea-surface temperatures and regional stream discharge variability in the Adour-Garonne basin, France. Hydrol Sci J 57:496–506
51. Partal T, Cigoghlu K (2009) Prediction of daily precipitation using wavelet—neural networks. Hydrol Sci J 54:234–246
52. Polikar R (1996) Fundamental concepts and an overview of the wavelet theory, 2nd edn. Rowan University College of Engineering Web Servers, Glassboro
53. Quraishi MZ, Mouazen AM (2013) Development of a methodology for in situassessment of topsoil dry bulk density. Soil till Res 126:229–237
54. Rathinasamy M, Adamowski J, Khosha R (2014) Multiscale streamflow forecasting using a new Bayesian model average based ensemble multi-wavelet Volterra nonlinear method. J Hydrol 507:186–200
55. Rezaebanafsheh M, Jahanbakhsh S, Bayati M, Zeynali B (2011) Forecas autumn and winter precipitation of west of Iran applying Mediterranean SSTs in summer and autumn. Phys Geogr Res Quart 74:47–62 (In Persian)
56. Ruigar H, Golian S (2016) Prediction of precipitation in Golestan dam watershed using climate signals. Theoret Appl Climatol 123:671–682
57. Song P, Liu W, Sun J, Wang C, Kong L, Nong Z, Lei X, Wang H (2020) Annual runoff forecasting based on multi-model information fusion and residual error correction in the Ganjiang River Basin. Water 12:2086. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12082086
58. Soukup TL, AzizOA TGA, Piechota TC, Wulff S (2009) Long lead-timestreamdischarge forecasting of the North Platte River incorporating ocean-atmospheric climate variability. J Hydrol 368:131–142
59. Sudheer KP (2005) Knowledge extraction from trained neural network river flow models. J Hydrol Eng 10(4):264–269
60. Sudheer KP, Jain A (2004) Explaining the internal behaviour of artificial neural network river flow models. Hydrol Process 18(4):833–844
61. Sudheer KP, Gosain AK, Ramasastri KS (2002) A data-driven algorithm for constructing artificial neural network rainfall-runoff models. Hydrol Process 16(6):1325–1330
62. Tabari H, Abghari H, Talaee PH (2014) Impact of the North Atlantic Oscillation on streamdischarge in Western Iran. Hydrol Process 28(15):4411–4418
63. Tiwari M, Adamowski J (2015) Medium-term urban water demand forecasting with limited data using an ensemble wavelet-bootstrap machine-learning approach. J Water Resour Plan Manag 141:2
64. Tushar M, Patel BMN (2013) ANN and MLR model for shear stress prediction of Eicher 11.10 chassis frame. Int J Mech Sci 4:216–223
65. Wang W, Ding J (2003) Wavelet network model and its application to the prediction of hydrology. Nat Sci 1(1):67–71
66. Wang WC, Xu DM, Chau KW, Chen S (2013) Improved annual rainfall-runoff forecasting using PSO–SVM model based on EEMD. J Hydroinform 15(4):1377–2139
67. Wang WC, Chau KW, Xu DM, Chen XY (2015a) Improving forecasting accuracy of annual runoff time series using ARIMA based on EEMD decomposition. Water Resour Manage 29(8):2655–2675. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-015-0962-6
68. Wang WC, Chau KW, Qiu L, Chen YB (2015b) Improving forecasting accuracy of medium and long-term runoff using artificial neural network based on EEMD decomposition. Environ Res 139:46–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2015.02.002
69. Wei S, Song J, Khan NI (2012) Simulating and predicting river discharge time series using a wavelet-neural network hybrid modelling approach. Hydrol Process 26(2):281–296
70. Wei S, Yang H, Song J, Abbaspour K, Xu Z (2013) A wavelet-neural network hybrid modelling approach for estimating and predicting river monthly discharges. Hydrol Sci J 58:374–389
71. Wu CL, Chau KW (2011) Rainfall–runoff modeling using artificial neural network coupled with singular spectrum analysis. J Hydrol 399(3–4):394–409
72. Wu A, Hsieh WW, Tang B (2006) Neural network forecasts of the tropical Pacific sea surface temperatures. Neural Netw 19:145–154
73. Zhang J, Li H, Bin S, Fang H (2020) Multi-time scale co-integration forecast of annual runoff in the source area of the Yellow River. J Wat Clim Change 12(1):101–115
74. Zhao Z, Chen X, Xu Y, Xi D, Zhang Y, Zheng Z (2017) An EMD-based chaotic least squares support vector machine hybrid model for annual runoff forecasting. Water 9:153. https://doi.org/10.3390/w9030153
75. Zhu S, Zhou J, Ye L et al (2016) Streamflow estimation by support vector machine coupled with different methods of time series decomposition in the upper reaches of Yangtze River, China. Environ Earth Sci 75:531. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-016-5337-7

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.baztech-65fb01e2-334f-42d4-90a5-73f950dbfb3a