Investigation on the statistical characteristics of geoelectric field seismic anomalies in the North–South seismic belt of Chinese mainland

Ze-Yu, Hou; Zhang-Hui, An; Ying-Ying, Fan; Da-Cheng, Tan; A-Long, Fu; Lei, Wei

doi:10.1007/s11600-021-00661-y

Artykuł - szczegóły

Tytuł artykułu

Investigation on the statistical characteristics of geoelectric field seismic anomalies in the North–South seismic belt of Chinese mainland

Autorzy

Ze-Yu Hou , Zhang-Hui An , Ying-Ying Fan , Da-Cheng Tan , A-Long Fu , Lei Wei

Wybrane pełne teksty z tego czasopisma

https://www.springer.com/journal/11600

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.1007/s11600-021-00661-y

Warianty tytułu

Języki publikacji

Abstrakty

Geoelectric field (GEF) measurements have documented many pre-earthquake electromagnetic anomalies over the past few decades. However, the statistical characteristics between earthquakes and GEF are still unclear. In this paper, we use the shifting correlation method to analyze the statistical features of earthquake precursory information in GEF data recorded in the North–South seismic belt of Chinese mainland during 2010–2019. Three factors, seismic energy, epicentral distance (D), and the fault, were used to select the seismic events. In the analysis section, the results of two significance test methods were used as the anomaly standard. The results show that the GEF anomalies associated with seismic events appear about 30 days before the earthquakes, and the anomalies appear earlier at stations farther away from the epicenter. In addition, the selective characteristics of the GEF are strongly correlated with the location of stations and the geological-tectonic environment in which the epicenter is located. Moreover, the results approved the empirical conclusion that the larger the seismic energy is, the larger the impact area is. The statistical characteristics of the seismic GEF anomalies in the North–South seismic belt of Chinese mainland may provide technical support for exploring the phenomenon and mechanism of seismic GEF.

Słowa kluczowe

geoelectric field statistical characteristics North–South seismic belt seismic anomalies shifting correlation method

pole geoelektryczne charakterystyka statystyczna pas sejsmiczny północ-południe anomalie sejsmiczne

Wydawca

Instytut Geofizyki PAN
Springer

Czasopismo

Acta Geophysica

Rocznik

2021

Tom

Vol. 69, no. 6

Strony

2085--2097

Opis fizyczny

Bibliogr. 56 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Ze-Yu Hou

Lanzhou Institute of Seismology, China Earthquake Administration, Lanzhou 730000, China
Gansu Lanzhou Geophysics National Observation and Research Station, Lanzhou 730000, China
Earthquake Administration of Gansu Province, Lanzhou 730000, Gansu, China

autor

Zhang-Hui An

anzhanghui5@hotmail.com

Lanzhou Institute of Seismology, China Earthquake Administration, Lanzhou 730000, China
Gansu Lanzhou Geophysics National Observation and Research Station, Lanzhou 730000, China
Earthquake Administration of Gansu Province, Lanzhou 730000, Gansu, China

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9513-3222

autor

Ying-Ying Fan

Lanzhou Institute of Seismology, China Earthquake Administration, Lanzhou 730000, China
Gansu Lanzhou Geophysics National Observation and Research Station, Lanzhou 730000, China
Earthquake Administration of Gansu Province, Lanzhou 730000, Gansu, China

autor

Da-Cheng Tan

Lanzhou Institute of Seismology, China Earthquake Administration, Lanzhou 730000, China
Gansu Lanzhou Geophysics National Observation and Research Station, Lanzhou 730000, China
Earthquake Administration of Gansu Province, Lanzhou 730000, Gansu, China

autor

A-Long Fu

Lanzhou Institute of Seismology, China Earthquake Administration, Lanzhou 730000, China
Gansu Lanzhou Geophysics National Observation and Research Station, Lanzhou 730000, China
Earthquake Administration of Gansu Province, Lanzhou 730000, Gansu, China

autor

Lei Wei

Lanzhou Institute of Seismology, China Earthquake Administration, Lanzhou 730000, China
Gansu Lanzhou Geophysics National Observation and Research Station, Lanzhou 730000, China
Earthquake Administration of Gansu Province, Lanzhou 730000, Gansu, China

Bibliografia

1. An ZH, Du XB, Fan YY et al (2015) Characteristics of Geo-electric Field Changes before the 2013 Lushan MS7.0 Earthquake (in Chinese). Earthquake 35(1):91–99
2. Chen L, Liu J, Chen O et al (1998) Aftershock deletion in seismicity analysis. Chin J Geophys 41(S1):244–252
3. Chen Q, An ZH, Fan YY (2019) Statistical evidence of tidal triggered earthquake in north and south seismic belt. Progress in Geophysics (in Chinese) 34(5):1714–1720
4. Console R, Gasparini C, De Simoni B et al (1979) Preambolo al Catalogo Sismico Nazionale (CSN). I criteri di informazione del Catalogo Sismico Nazionale (CSN)[J]. Annal Geophys 32(1):37–77. https://doi.org/10.4401/ag-4729
5. Cui TF, Du XB, Ye Q et al (2013) The diurnal variation of geo-electric field along the longitude and latitude chains in China mainland. Chin J Geophys 56(7):2358–2368. https://doi.org/10.1002/cjg2.20039
6. Deng QD, Zhang PZ, Ran YK et al (2003) Active tectonics and earthquake activities in China. Earth Sci Front 10(S1):66–73
7. Eftaxias K, Kapiris P, Polygiannakis J et al (2001) Signature of pending earthquake from electromagnetic anomalies. Geophys Res Lett 28(17):3321–3324. https://doi.org/10.1029/2001GL013124
8. Eftaxias K, Balasis G, Contoyiannis Y et al (2010) Unfolding the procedure of characterizing recorded ultra low frequency, kHZ and MHz electromagnetic anomalies prior to the L’Aquila earthquake as pre-seismic ones - Part 2. Natural Hazards and Earth System Science 10(2):275–294. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-10-275-2010
9. Enomoto Y (2012) Coupled interaction of earthquake nucleation with deep Earth gases: a possible mechanism for seismo-electromagnetic phenomena. Geophys J Int 191(3):1210–1214. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2012.05702.x
10. Fan YY, Du XB, Zlotnicki Jacques et al (2010) The electromagnetic phenomena before the MS8.0 Wenchuan earthquake. Chin J Geophys 53(12):2887–2898. https://doi.org/10.1002/cjg2.1570
11. Freud FT (2007) Pre-earthquake signals-Part I: deviatoric stresses turn rocks into a source of electric currents[J]. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 7(5):535–541. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-7-535-2007
12. Fujinawa Y, Takahashi K (1998) Electromagnetic radiations associated with major earthquakes. Phys Earth Planet Inter 105(3–4):249–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9201(97)00117-9
13. Gao YX, Hu HS (2010) Seismoelectromagnetic waves radiated by a double couple source in a saturated porous medium. Geophys J Int 181(2):873–896. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2010.04526.x
14. Gao YX, Chen XF, Hu HS et al (2013a) Early electromagnetic waves from earthquake rupturing: I. Theoretical Formulations. Geophys J Int 192(3):1288–1307. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggs096
15. Gao YX, Chen XF, Hu HS et al (2013) Early electromagnetic waves from earthquake rupturing: II. Validation and numerical experiments. Geophys J Int 192(3):1308–1323. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggs097
16. Geller RJ (1996) Debate on evaluation of the VAN method: Editor’s introduction. Geophys Res Lett 23(11):1291–1293. https://doi.org/10.1029/96GL00742
17. Gutenberg B, Richter CF (1956) Magnitude and energy of earthquakes. Ann Geophys 9:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1144/GSL.JGS.1956.112.01-04.02
18. Guzmán-Vargas L, Ramírez-Rojas A, Angulo-Brown F (2008) Multiscale entropy analysis of electroseismic time series. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 8(4):855–860. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-8-855-2008
19. Han P (2009) Principal component analysis of geomagnetic diurnal variation associated with earthquakes: case study of the M 6.1 Iwateken Nairiku Hokubu earthquake[J]. Chin J Geophys 52:1556–1563
20. Han P, Hattori K, Hirokawa M et al (2014) Statistical analysis of ULF seismomagnetic phenomena at Kakioka, Japan, during 2001–2010. J Geophys Res: Space Phys 119:4998–5011. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JA019789
21. Han P, Hattori K, Xu G et al (2015) Further investigations of geomagnetic diurnal variations associated with 2011 off the Pacific coast of Tohoku earthquake (Mw 9.0). J Asian Earth Sci 114:321–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2015.02.022
22. Han P, Hattori K, Huang QH, Hirooka S, Yoshino C (2016a) Spatiotemporal characteristics of the geomagnetic diurnal variation anomalies prior to the 2011 Tohoku earthquake (Mw 9.0) and the possible coupling of multiple pre-earthquake phenomena. J Asian Earth Sci 129:13–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2016.07.011
23. Han P, Hattori K, Zhuang J et al (2016b) Evaluation of ULF seismo-magnetic phenomena in Kakioka, Japan by using Molchan’s error diagram. Geophys J Int 208:482–490. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggw404
24. Hattori K, Serita A, Gotoh K et al (2004) ULF geomagnetic anomaly associated with 2000 Izu Islands earthquake swarm, Japan[J]. Phys Chem Earth 29(4/9):425–435
25. Hattori K, Serita A, Yoshino C, Hayakawa M, Isezaki N (2006) Singular spectral analysis and principal component analysis for signal discrimination of ULF geomagnetic data associated with 2000 Izu Island Earthquake Swarm. Phys Chem Earth 31(4–9):281–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2006.02.034
26. Huang QH, Ikeya M (1998) Seismic electromagnetic signals (SEMS) explained by a simulation experiment using electromagnetic waves. Phys Earth Planet Inter 109(3):107–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9201(98)00135-6
27. Huang QH, Lin Y (2010) Selectivity of seismic electric signal (SES) of the 2000 Izu earthquake swarm: a 3D FEM numerical simulation model. Proc Jpn Acad Ser B Phys Biol Sci 86(3):257–264. https://doi.org/10.2183/pjab.86.257
28. Ida Y, Hayakawa M (2006) Fractal analysis for the ULF data during the 1993 Guam earthquake to study prefracture criticality. Nonlinear Process Geophys 13(4):409–412. https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-13-409-2006
29. Ida Y, Yang D, Li H et al (2012) Fractal analysis of ULF electromagnetic emissions in possible association with earthquakes in China. Nonlinear Process Geophys 19:577–583. https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-19-577-2012
30. Ifantis A, Economou G, Despotopoulos S et al (1997) Exploratory analysis of electrotelluric field data for earthquake prediction. DSP 1997:973–976. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDSP.1997.628526
31. Ifantis A (2002) A New approach to investigate the correlation between periodicity of geoelectric field and earthquakes. In: International Conference on Digital Signal Processing, DSP (Vol. 2, pp. 905–910). Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDSP.2002.1028237
32. Jiang F, Chen X, Zhan Y, Zhao G, Yang H, Zhao L, Qiao L, Wang L (2016) Shifting correlation between earthquakes and electromagnetic signals: a case study of the 2013 Minxian-Zhangxian M L 6.5 (M W 6.1) earthquake in Gansu, China. Pure Appl Geophys 173(1):269–284. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-015-1055-4
33. Kotsarenko A, Molchanov O, Hayakawa M et al (2005) Investigation of ULF magnetic anomaly during Izu earthquake swarm and Miyakejima volcano eruption at summer 2000, Japan. Nat Hazard 5:63–69. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-5-63-2005
34. Nitsan U (1977) Electromagnetic emission accompanying fracture of quartz-bearing rocks[J]. Geophys Res Lett 4(8):333–336. https://doi.org/10.1029/GL004i008p00333
35. Orihara Y, Noda Y, Nagao T et al (2002) A possible case of SES selectivity at Kozu-shima Island Japan. J Geodyn 33(4–5):425–432. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0264-3707(02)00005-4
36. Orihara Y, Kamogawa M, Nagao T, Uyeda S (2012) Preseismic anomalous telluric current signals observed in Kozushima Island, Japan. Proc Natl Acad Sci 109(47):19125–19128. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1215669109
37. Panfilov AA (2014) The results of experimental studies of VLF-ULF electromagnetic emission by rock samples due to mechanical action[J]. Nat Hazard 14(6):1383. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-14-1383-2014
38. Potirakis SM, Minadakis G, Eftaxias K (2012) Relation between seismicity and pre-earthquake electromagnetic emissions in terms of energy, information and entropy content. Nat Hazard 12:1179–1183. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-12-1179-2012
39. RamírezRojas A, FloresMárquez E. L, GuzmánVargas L, GálvezCoyt G, Telesca L, Angulobrown F (2008) Statistical features of seismoelectric signals prior to m7.4 guerrero-oaxaca earthquake (méxico). Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 8(5), 1001-1007. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-8-1001-2008
40. Sarlis NV (2018) Statistical significance of earth’s electric and magnetic field variations preceding earthquakes in Greece and Japan revisited. Entropy. https://doi.org/10.3390/e20080561
41. Sarlis N, Lazaridou M, Kapiris P et al (1999) Numerical model of the selectivity effect and the ΔV/L criterion. Geophys Res Lett 26(21):3245–3248. https://doi.org/10.1029/1998GL005265
42. Sobolev GA (1975) Application of Electric Method to the Tentative Short-Term Forecast of Kamchatka Earthquakes. In: Wyss M (ed) Earthquake Prediction and Rock Mechanics. Contributions to Current Research in Geophysics (CCRG), Birkhäuser, Basel
43. Tan DC, Zhao JL, Xi JL et al (2010) (2010) A study on feature and mechanism of the tidal geoelectrical field. Chin J Geophys (in Chinese) 53(3):544–555. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.0001-5733.2010.03.008
44. Uyeda S (2000) In defense of VAN’s earthquake predictions. EOS Trans Am Geophys Union 81:3–3. https://doi.org/10.1029/00EO00005
45. Uyeda S, Kumamoto A (2004) Evaluation of the Kushida Method of short-term earthquake prediction. Proc Jpn Acad Ser B 80(3):140–147. https://doi.org/10.2183/pjab.80.140
46. Uyeda S, Nagao T, Orihara Y et al (2000) Geoelectric potential changes: possible precursors to earthquakes in Japan. Proc Natl Acad Sci 97(9):4561–4566. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.97.9.4561
47. Uyeda S, Hayakawa M, Nagao T et al (2002) Electric and magnetic phenomena observed before the volcano-seismic activity in 2000 in the Izu Island Region, Japan. Proc Natl Acad Sci 99(11):7352–7355. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.072208499
48. Vallianatos F, Triantis D (2008) Scaling in Pressure Stimulated Currents related with rock fracture. Physica A 387(19–20):4940–4946. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2008.03.028
49. Varotsos P, Alexopoulos K (1984a) Physical properties of the variations of the electric field of the earth preceding earthquakes, I. Tectonophysics 110(1–2):73–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1951(84)90059-3
50. Varotsos P, Alexopoulos K (1984) Physical properties of the variations of the electric field of the earth preceding earthquakes. II. Determination of epicenter and magnitude. Tectonophysics 110(1–2):99–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1951(84)90060-X
51. Varotsos PA, Alexopoulous K, Nomicos K (1981) Seismic electric currents. Praktica Athens Acad 56:277–286
52. Varotsos P, Alexopoulos K, Lazaridou M (1993) Latest aspects of earthquake prediction in Greece based on seismic electric signals II. Tectonophysics 224(1):1–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1951(93)90055-O
53. Varotsos P, Sarlis N, Lazaridou M, Kapiris P (1998) Transmission of stress induced electric signals in dielectric media. J Appl Phys 83(1):60–70. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.366702
54. Varotsos P, Sarlis N, Skordas E et al (2005) Additional evidence on some relationship between Seismic Electric Signals (SES) and earthquake focal mechanism. Tectonophysics 412(3):279–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2005.10.037
55. Wang XS, Lü J, Xie ZJ et al (2015) Focal mechanisms and tectonic stress field in the North-South Seismic Belt of China. Chin J Geophys 58(11):4149–4162. https://doi.org/10.6038/cjg20151122
56. Zhang JG, Jiao LG, Liu XC et al (2013) A study on the characteristics of ULF electromagnetic spectrum before and after the Wenchuan MS8.0 earthquake. Chin J Geophys 56(4):1253–1261. https://doi.org/10.6038/cjg20130420

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.baztech-65e5524c-354b-4ac1-9b7b-56a63c96becb