PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

Assessment of Two Methods for Predicting Soil Retention Relationship from Basic Soil Properties

Treść / Zawartość
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
The purpose of this study was to develop the best transfer functions for estimating the soil water retention curve (SWRC) for Iraqi soils using multiple regression methods. Soil samples were collected from 30 different sites in Iraq at two depths (0–0.3 m and 0.3–0.6 m) to create a database for the development of predictive transfer functions. The database included information on soil particle size distribution, carbonate minerals, mass density, particle density, organic matter, saturated hydraulic conductivity, capillary height, and available water limits. Explanatory variables (EV) were the measured characteristics, while response variables (RV) were the volumetric water content measured at different potentials (0, 5, 10, 33, 500, 1000, 1500 kPa). Two methods were used to develop predictive transfer functions: the logit model and beta model. Prediction accuracy was assessed using mean bias error (MBE), mean absolute error (MAE), root mean square error (RMSE), and coefficient of determination (R2). The results showed that the variables included in the derivation of the two models for predicting θ(Ψ) were similar, except at θ(0). The variables w1 (w1 = 2Psand° − Psilt° − Pcaly° − Pcarbonate), capillary height, available water, and porosity were found to be included in most of the logit and beta models. Additionally, there were no statistically significant differences between the MAE, RMSE, and R2 values of the two models. However, the beta model performed better in terms of MBE compared to the logit model. The models also demonstrated highly significant R2 values (0.9819–1.00) for a linear relationship between the measured and predicted water content values.
Twórcy
  • Department of Soil Sciences and Water Resources, College of Agricultural Engineering Sciences, University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Iraq
  • Department of Soil Sciences and Water Resources, College of Agricultural Engineering Sciences, University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Iraq
Bibliografia
  • 1. Al-Hasani, L.N.H., Salim, S.B., Musa, A.J. 2021. The Spatial Variability of Upper and Lower Limits of Available Moisture Contentas Affected by Different Tillage Systems. Annals of the Romanian Society for Cell Biology, 25(4), 14063–14077. https://www.annalsofrscb.ro/index.php/journal/article/view/4554
  • 2. Ati, A.S., Ibrahim, A., Jubair, A.R. 2014. Relationship between the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) and Some Soil Characteristics in the North of Iraq. (IOSR-JAVS), 7(10), 39–45. www.iosrjournals.orgwww.iosrjournals.org
  • 3. Botula, Y.D., Van Ranst, E., Cornelis, W.M. 2014. Pedotransfer functions to predict water retention for soils of the humid tropics: a review. RevistaBrasileira de Ciência Do Solo, 38(3), 679–698. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-06832014000300001
  • 4. Castellini, M., Iovino, M. 2019. Pedotransfer functions for estimating soil water retention curve of Sicilian soils. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science, 65(10), 1401–1416. https://doi.org/10.1080/03650340.2019.1566710
  • 5. Chung, D.T. 2021. Developing pedotransfere functions to predict soil hydraulic properties of Belgian soils. In 2021‏. https://libstore.ugent.be/fulltxt/RUG01/003/013/019/RUG01-003013019_2021_0001_AC.pdf
  • 6. Cornell, J. 1981. Experiments with mixtures. John Wiley and Sons. New York. In 2011. https://books.google.com/books?hl=arandlr=andid=piWpe3yEAjYCandoi=fndandpg=PR5anddq=Cornell
  • 7. Dobarco, M.R., Cousin, I., Le Bas, C., Martin, M.P. 2019. Pedotransfer functions for predicting available water capacity in French soils, their applicability domain and associated uncertainty. Geoderma, 336, 81–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.GEODERMA.2018.08.022
  • 8. Ferrari, S.L.P., Cribari-Neto, F. 2004. Beta regression for modelling rates and proportions. Journal of Applied Statistics, 31(7), 799–815. https://doi.org/10.1080/0266476042000214501
  • 9. Kudayr, L.S., Salim, B.S. 2019. View A Prediction o the Main Wetting Curve (MWC) of the Soil Cahracteristic Curve Based on Its Main Drying Curve (MDC)by Using the Two Points Methodsarticle. Plant Archives, 1009–1016. https://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=view_citationandhl=enanduser=xOHt6esAAAAJandcitation_for_view=xOHt6esAAAAJ:_Qo2XoVZTnwC
  • 10. Mahdi, N.T. 2008. Effect of Gypsum Content on Soil - Water Characteristic Curve and Unsaturated Hydraulic Conductivity in Soil. Iraqi Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 39(3), 10–23.
  • 11. Mahdi, N.T., Naji, H.S. 2016. Soil Pore Size Distribution at Different Carbonate Minerals Content. Iraqi Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 47(5), 1312–1320. https://doi.org/10.36103/IJAS.V47I5.511
  • 12. McNeill, S.J., Lilburne, L.R., Carrick, S., Webb, T.H., Cuthill, T. 2018. Pedotransfer functions for the soil water characteristics of New Zealand soils using S-map information. Geoderma, 326, 96–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.GEODERMA.2018.04.011
  • 13. Medeiros, J.C., Cooper, M., Dalla Rosa, J., Grimaldi, M., Coquet, Y. 2014. Assessment of pedotransfer functions for estimating soil water retention curves for the amazon region. RevistaBrasileira de Ciência Do Solo, 38(3), 730–743. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-06832014000300005
  • 14. Pachepsky, Y., Hill, R.L. 2017. Scale and scaling in soils. Geoderma, 287, 4–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.GEODERMA.2016.08.017
  • 15. Paraiba, C.C.M., Diniz, C.A., Maiam, A., Rodrigues, L.N. 2013. Truncated beta nonlinear regression models for soil-water characteristic curves estimation.
  • 16. R Core Team. (2020). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.r-project.org/
  • 17. Salim, S.B., Atee, A.S. 2007. Building and Assessment of Mathematical Models for Predicting Sorptivity of Iraqi Soils from some Physical and Chemical Properties. Iraqi Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 38(4), 83–93.
  • 18. Salim, S.B., Salih, A.M. 2008. assessment of gravity-drainage unsaturated flow under ffield condition for a silty clay loam soil: I. Predicting unsaturated hudraulic conductivity andwater content profiles. Journal of Engineering, 13(3), 459–477.
  • 19. SAS. 2023. Statistical Analysis Software. Users’ Guide Statistics Version 9.4. SAS Institute Inc., Cary.
  • 20. Seki, K. 2023. SWRC Fit and unsatfit for parameter determination of unsaturated soil properties. https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.00472v1
  • 21. Sisson, J.B., Klittich, W.M., Salem, S.B. 1988. Comparison of two methods for summarizing hydraulic conductivities of a layered soil. Water Resources Research, 24(8), 1271–1276. https://doi.org/10.1029/WR024I008P01271
  • 22. Vereecken, H., Schnepf, A., Hopmans, J.W., Javaux, M., Or, D., Roose, T., Vanderborght, J., Young, M.H., Amelung, W., Aitkenhead, M., Allison, S.D., Assouline, S., Baveye, P., Berli, M., Brüggemann, N., Finke, P., Flury, M., Gaiser, T., Govers, G.,Young, I.M. 2016. Modeling Soil Processes: Review, Key Challenges, and New Perspectives. Vadose Zone Journal, 15(5), 1–57. https://doi.org/10.2136/VZJ2015.09.0131
  • 23. Yan, T., Kremenetska, Y., Zhang, B., He, S., Wang, X., Yu, Z., Hu, Q., Liang, X., Fu, M., Wang, Z. 2022. The Relationship between Soil Particle Size Fractions, Associated Carbon Distribution and Physicochemical Properties of Historical Land-Use Types in Newly Formed Reservoir Buffer Strips. Sustainability, 14(14), 8448. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU14148448
  • 24. Zeng, L., Li, F., Liu, J., Gao, Q., Bian, H. 2019. Effect of initial gravimetric water content and cyclic wetting-drying on soil-water characteristic curves of disintegrated carbonaceous mudstone. Transporta tion Safety and Environment, 1(3), 230–240. https://doi.org/10.1093/TSE/TDZ018
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-65dec6ff-96b6-4014-98c3-3dfa5fce7a22
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.