Sustainable Development and Sustainable Science. Where We Came From, Where We Are Now and Where We Are Heading? Part II: An In-Depth Analysis of the Concept of Sustainable Development

Drastichová, Magdaléna

doi:10.35784/pe.2023.1.02

Artykuł - szczegóły

Tytuł artykułu

Sustainable Development and Sustainable Science. Where We Came From, Where We Are Now and Where We Are Heading? Part II: An In-Depth Analysis of the Concept of Sustainable Development

Autorzy

Drastichová Magdaléna

Treść / Zawartość

Pełne teksty:

4046-Article Text-18282-1-10-20230709.pdf

Pobierz

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.35784/pe.2023.1.02

Warianty tytułu

Zrównoważony rozwój i zrównoważona nauka. Skąd przyszliśmy, gdzie jesteśmy i dokąd zmierzamy? Część II: Dogłębna analiza koncepcji zrównoważonego rozwoju

Języki publikacji

Abstrakty

The concept of sustainable development (SD) is broad and moreover, it is often interchangeably used with the more general, but sometimes also more specific, concept of sustainability. The concept of SD is analysed on the basis on its development (analysed in the first part: Drastichová, 2022) and relationships with sustainability and related scientific (theoretical) and practical concepts. The rationale behind this work lies in clarifying the meaning of SD, including the concept of sustainability, and, on the basis of this, identifying the main ways of moving closer towards the aims of SD, including quality of life and wellbeing. The limitations of the concept are identified and summarized, as are the alternatives to SD and sustainability. The rationale behind this work lies not only in the clarifying of the SD concept, but also in the normative evaluation of this concept in relation to the wellbeing and quality of life of the Earth’s population for an infinite time period, while maintaining the supply of ecosystem services which the planet provides, taking into account that these resources are not only a source of people’s wellbeing, but are essential for people’s survival in general. Hence, this work includes an in-depth sophisticated consideration of the SD concept based on its historical development, as well as normative assessments of the concept resulting from this knowledge. Alternative concepts and the possibilities of sustain-ability science are also summarized. A significant effort has been made to identify the relationships of the SD concept with sustainability and to the main related scientific (theoretical) and practical concepts, as well as to the alternative concepts to them. These outcomes were again obtained from a detailed analysis of history and relevant scientific works. Finally, a possible design of the SD concept is outlined on the basis of the analysis and synthesis of the knowledge.

Pojęcie zrównoważonego rozwoju (SD) jest szerokie i często stosowane zamiennie z bardziej ogólnym, ale czasem także bardziej szczegółowym pojęciem zrównoważoności. Pojęcie SD jest analizowane na podstawie jego rozwoju (analizowane w pierwszej części: Drastichová, 2022) oraz związków ze zrównoważonością i powiązanymi koncepcjami naukowymi (teoretycznymi) i praktycznymi. Celem tej pracy jest wyjaśnienie znaczenia ZR, w tym pojęcia zrównoważoności, i na tej podstawie wskazanie głównych dróg przybliżania się do celów ZR, w tym jakości życia i dobrostanu. Zidentyfikowano i podsumowano ograniczenia tej koncepcji, podobnie jak alternatywy dla zrównoważonego rozwoju i zrównoważoności. Przesłanką tej pracy jest nie tylko doprecyzowanie koncepcji ZR, ale także normatywna ocena tej koncepcji w odniesieniu do dobrostanu i jakości życia ludności Ziemi w nieskończonym okresie czasu, przy zachowaniu podaży ekosystemów usług świadczonych na planecie, biorąc pod uwagę fakt, że zasoby te są nie tylko źródłem dobrobytu ludzi, ale są ogólnie niezbędne do przetrwania ludzkości. Dlatego też niniejsza praca zawiera dogłębne i rozważania koncepcji ZR w oparciu o jej historyczny rozwój, a także oceny normatywne koncepcji wynikające z tej wiedzy. Podsumowano również alternatywne koncepcje i możliwości nauki o zrównoważoności. Podjęto znaczny wysiłek, aby zidentyfikować związki koncepcji zrównoważonego rozwoju ze zrównoważonością oraz z głównymi powiązanymi koncepcjami naukowymi (teoretycznymi) i praktycznymi, a także z koncepcjami alternatywnymi do nich. Wyniki te ponownie uzyskano ze szczegółowej analizy historycznej i odpowiednich prac naukowych. Na koniec nakreślono możliwy projekt koncepcji ZR na podstawie analizy i syntezy wiedzy.

Słowa kluczowe

quality of life sustainable development sustainability sustainability science wellbeing

jakość życia zrównoważony rozwój zrównoważoność zrównoważona nauka dobrostan

Wydawca

Lublin University of Technology

Czasopismo

Problemy Ekorozwoju

Rocznik

2023

Tom

Vol. 18, nr 1

Strony

9--27

Opis fizyczny

Bibliogr. 135 poz., fig., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Drastichová Magdaléna

magdalena.drastichova@vsb.cz

Technical University of Ostrava, Czechia

Bibliografia

1. ANDERSON D.A., 2013, Environmental Economics and Natural Resource Management, Taylor & Francis, New York.
2. ANDERSON D.A., 2010, Environmental Economics and Natural Resource Management, Routledge, Abingdon, Oxon.
3. ARUSHANYAN Y., EKENER E, MOBERG Ǻ, 2017, Sustainability assessment framework for scenarios – SAFS, Environmental Impact Assessment Review 63: 23-34, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2016.11.001.
4. AXELSSON R., ANGELSTAM P., ELBAKIDZE M., STRYAMETS N., JOHANSSON K. E., 2011, Sustaina-ble Development and Sustainability: Landscape Approach as a Practical Interpretation of Principles and Implementa-tion Concepts, Journal of Landscape Ecology, 4(3): 5-30, https://doi.org/10.2478/v10285-012-0040-1.
5. AYRES R.U., SIMONIS U.E. (eds), 1994, Industrial Metabolism. Restructuring for Sustainable Development, United Nations University Press, Tokyo, New York, Paris.
6. BAKER S., 2006, Sustainable development, Routledge, London, New York.
7. BARBIER E., 2012, The green economy post Rio+20, Science 338 (6109): 887-888.
8. BARBIER E., 1987, The Concept of Sustainable Economic Development, Environmental Conservation, 14(2): 101-110, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892900011449.
9. BEEKS J. C., 2016, Which of the current diverse ideas on alternative Economics are the best for adequately and Comprehensively addressing the great Transition to climate, energy, and biodiversity Sustainability?, California Institute of Integral Studies, San Francisco, CA.
10. BINA O., LA CAMERA F., 2011, Promise and shortcomings of a green turn in recent policy responses to the double crisis, Ecological Economics 70 (12): 2308-2316.
11. BOSSEL H., 1996, Deriving indicators of sustainable development, Environmental Modelling and Assessment 1(4): 193-218.
12. BOSSEL H., 1998, Earth at a Crossroads. Paths to a Sustainable Future, Cambridge University Press, Cam-bridge, UK.
13. BERKES F., FOLKE C., COLDING J., 2000, Linking Social and Ecological Systems: Management Practices and Social Mechanisms for Building Resilience, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
14. BOYER R., PETERSON N., ARORA P., CALDWELL K., 2016, Five approaches to social sustainability and an integrated way forward, Sustainability 8:1-18, https://doi.org/10.3390/su8090878.
15. BROWN E., CLOKE J., GENT D., JOHNSON P.H., HILL C., 2014. Green growth or ecological commodifica-tion: debating the green economy in the global south, Geografiska Annaler. Series B, Human Geography, 96 (3): 245-259.
16. BROWN B. J., HANSON M. E., LIVERMAN D. M., MERIDETH R.W., 1987, Global sustainability: towards definition, Environmental Management, 11: 713-719, DOI: 10.1007/BF01867238.
17. CARLOWITZ H. C. von, 1713, Sylvicultura oeconomica – Anweisung zur wilden Baumzucht, Leipzig, (Reprint, Freiberg, 2000: 84).
18. CARTER K., MOIR, S., 2012, Diagrammatic representations of sustainability – a review and synthesis, Proceed-ings of the 28th annual ARCOM conference, ed. Smith S.D., 3-5 September, UK, Edinburgh: 1479-1489.
19. CATO M. S., 2009, Green economics: An introduction to theory, policy and practice, Earthscan, London.
20. CLARK W.C., 2007, Sustainability science: a room of its own, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 104(6): 1737–38.
21. CLARK T.W., 2002, The policy process: A practical guide for natural resource professionals, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.
22. CLARK W.C., DICKSON N.M., 2003. Sustainability science: the emerging research program, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 100(14): 8059.
23. COMMON M., PERRINGS C., 1992, Towards an ecological economics of sustainability, Ecological Economics 6(1): 7-34.
24. CUSACK C., 2019, Sustainable Development and Quality of Life, Multidimensional Approach to Quality of Life Issues, ed. Sinha B., Springer, Singapore.
25. DALY H. E., 1991, Steady-State Economics, Second Edition with new Essays, Island Press, Covelo, Washington.
26. DALY H. E., 2008. A steady-state economy. Opinion Piece for Redefining Prosperity, Sustainable Development Commission, UK, http://www.sd-commission.org.uk/publications.php?id=775.
27. DALY H. E., COBB, J., 1989, For the Common Good: Redirecting the Economy Towards the Community, the Environment and a Sustainable Future, Beacon Press, Boston.
28. DANIELS S. E., WALKER G. B., 2001, Working through environmental conflict – the collaborative learning ap-proach, Praeger, Westport, London.
29. DAWE N. K, RYAN K.L, 2003, The faulty three-legged-stool of sustainable development, Conservation Biology 17: 1458-1460, https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.2003.02471.x.
30. DEATH C., 2015, Four discourses of the green economy in the global South, Third World Quarterly, 36:12, 2207-2224, https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2015.1068110.
31. DOVERS S., HANDMER J., 1992, Uncertainty, sustainability and change, Global Environmental Change, 2(4): 262-276.
32. DRASTICHOVÁ M., 2022, Sustainable Development and Sustainable Science. Where We Came From, Where We Are Now and Where We Are Heading? Part I: The History of the Concept, Problemy Ekorozwoju/ Problems of Sustainable Development 17(2): 7-18, https://doi.org/10.35784/pe.2022.2.01.
33. DRASTICHOVA M., 2018, The Theory and Measurement of Sustainable Development, SAEI, 52, VSB-TU Os-trava, Ostrava.
34. DRASTICHOVÁ M., FILZMOSER, P. 2019, Assessment of Sustainable Development Using Cluster Analysis and Principal Component Analysis, Problemy Ekorozwoju/ Problems of Sustainable Development, 14(2): 7-24.
35. DU PISANI J. A., 2006, Sustainable development – historical roots of the concept, Environmental Sciences, 3: 83-96, https://doi.org/10.1080/15693430600688831.
36. EKINS P., SIMON S., DEUTSCH L., FOLKE C., GROOT R. De, 2003, A Framework for the practical applica-tion of the concepts of critical natural capital and strong sustainability, Ecological Economics, 44 (2-3): 165-185, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-3428009(02)00272-0.
37. EUROPEAN COMMISSION, 2011, Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Coun-cil, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, COM(2011) 571 final, Roadmap to a Resource Efficient Europe, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX: 52011DC0571&from=EN.
38. FERGUSON P., 2014, The green economy agenda: business as usual or transformational discourse?, Environmen-tal Politics, https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2014.919748.
39. FELCE D., 1997, Defining and applying the concept of quality of life, Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 41: 126-135.
40. FELCE D., PERRY J., 1995, Quality of life: Its definition and measurement, Research in Developmental Disabili-ties, 16(1): 51-74.
41. FELCE D., PERRY J., 1996, Adaptive behaviour gains in ordinary housing for people with intellectual disabilities, Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 9(2): 101-114.
42. FISCHER-KOWALSKI M., 1996, Society’s metabolism: on the childhood and adolescence of a rising conceptual star, International Handbook of Environmental Sociology, eds Redclift M., Woodgate G., Cheltenham, Edward El-gar Publishing, UK: 119-137.
43. FRITZ M., KOCH M., 2016, Economic development and prosperity patterns around the world: Structural challeng-es for a global steady-state economy, Global Environmental Change, 38(38): 41-48.
44. GINSBERG E., 1980, Man and his work, Managing people at work, ed. Beach D.S., Macmillan Publishing Co., New York.
45. GEORGESON L. MASLIN M., POESSINOUW M., 2017, Geography and Environment, 4(1), https://doi.org/10.1002/geo2.36.
46. GOODLAND R. 1995, The concept of environmental sustainability, Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 26: 1-24.
47. GROBER U., 2007, Deep roots: A conceptual history of 'sustainable development' (Nachhaltigkeit), WZB Discussion Paper, No. P 2007-002, Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung (WZB), Berlin.
48. GREENWOOD D. T., HOLT R. P. F., 2010, Local economic development in the 21st century: Quality of life and sustainability, M.E. Sharpe Inc., Armonk, New York.
49. HARTIG G., 1804: Anweisung zur taxation und beschreibung der forste. zweyte, ganz umgearbeitete und stark vermehrte auflage. Georg Friedrich von Heyer, Giessen und Darmstadt.
50. HEDIGER W., 2000, Sustainable development and social welfare, Ecological Economics 32(3): 481-492.
51. HEDIGER W., 1999, Reconciling ‘weak’ and ‘strong’ sustainability,. International Journal of Social Economics 26(7/8/9): 1120-1144.
52. HOWARTH R.B., NORGAARD R. B., 1990, Intergenerational resource rights, efficiency, and social optimality, Land Economics, 66(1): 1-11.
53. HUNTER M.L., 1996, Fundamentals of conservation biology, Blackwell Science, Cambridge, MA.
54. IISD International Institute for Sustainable Development, 2002, Summary of the World Summit on Sustainable De-velopment, Earth Negotiations Bulletin, 22(51): 1-18.
55. IPCC, 2007, Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability, Working Group II Contribution to the IPCC Fourth Assessment Report, IPCC Switzerland, Geneva.
56. JACKSON T., 2012, Prosperity without growth: Economics for a finite planet, Routledge, New York.
57. JACOBS M., 2012, Green Growth: Economic Theory and Political Discourse, GRI Working Papers 92, Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment.
58. JERNECK A., OLSSON L., NESS B., ANDERBERG S., BAIER M., CLARK E., HICKLER T., HORNBORG A., KRONSELL A., LÖVBRAND E., 2011, Structuring sustainability science, Sustainability Science 6(1): 1-14.
59. JEVONS W.S., 1866, The Coal Question. An Inquiry Concerning the Progress of the Nation, and the Probable Exhaustion of Our Coal-Mines by William Stanley Jevons, second revised edition, Macmillan and Co., London.
60. LEE K.N., 1993, Compass and Gyroscope: Integrating Science and Politics for the Environment. Island Press, Washington D.C.
61. KAJIKAWA Y., OHNO J., TAKEDA Y., MATSUSHIMA K., KOMIYAMA H., 2007, Creating an academic landscape of sustainability science: an analysis of the citation network, Sustainability Science 2(2): 221-31.
62. KASTENHOFER K., BECHTOLD U., WILFING H., 2011, Sustaining sustainability science: the role of estab-lished inter-disciplines, Ecological Economics, 70(4): 835-843.
63. KALLIS G., 2011, In defence of degrowth, Ecological Economics, 70(5): 873-880, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.12.007.
64. KATES R. W., CLARK W. C., CORELL R., HALL J.M., JAEGER C. C., LOWE I., MCCARTHY J. J., SCHELLNHUBER H.J., BOLIN B., DICKSON N.M., FAUCHEUX S., GALLOPIN G.C., GRÜBLER A., UNTLEY B., JÄGER J., JODHA N.S., KASPERSON R.E., MABOGUNJE A., MATSON P., MOONEY H., MOORE III B., O’RIORDAN T., SVEDIN U., 2001, Sustainability science, Science 292(5517): 641-2.
65. KAUFFMAN J., 2009, Advancing sustainability science: report on the International Conference on Sustainability Science (ICSS) 2009, Sustainability Science 4(2): 233-42.
66. KEEN M., BROWN V., DYBALL R., 2005, Social Learning in Environmental Management: Towards a sustain-able future, James & James/Earthscan, London.
67. KERSCHNER CH., 2010, Economic de-growth vs. steady-state economy, Journal of Cleaner Production 18: 544-551.
68. KIDD C.V., 1992, The evolution of sustainability, Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 5(1): 1-26.
69. KOMIYAMA H., TAKEUCHI K., 2006, Sustainability science: building a new discipline, Sustainability Science, 1(1): 1-6.
70. KOTHARI A., DEMARIA F., ACOSTA, A., 2014, Buen Vivir, Degrowth and Ecological Swaraj: Alternatives to sustainable development and the Green Economy, Development 57: 362-375, https://doi.org/10.1057/dev.2015.24.
71. KUHN T.S., 1962, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, University of Chicago Press, Chicago IL, USA.
72. LOTFI S., FARAJI A., HATAMINEJAD H., AHMAD P., 2011. A study of urban quality of life in a developing country, Journal of Social Sciences, 7(2): 232-240.
73. LOZANO R., 2008, Envisioning sustainability three-dimensionally, Journal of Cleaner Production 16(17): 1838=1846, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.02.008.
74. MILLENNIUM ECOSYSTEM ASSESSMENT, 2005, Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis, Island Press, Washington, D.C.
75. MORI K,. CHRISTODOULOU A. 2012, Review of sustainability indices and indicators: towards a new city sus-tainability index (CSI).
76. MARTÍNEZ-ALIER J., PASCUAL U., VIVIEN F., ZACCAI E., 2010, Sustainable degrowth: Mapping the con-text, criticisms, and future prospects of an emergent paradigm, Ecological Economics, 69(9): 1741-1747, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.04.017.
77. MARTENS P., 2006, Sustainability: science or fiction?, Sustainability: Science, Practice & Policy, 2(1): 36-41.
78. NEUMAYER E., 1999, Weak versus Strong Sustainability: Exploring the Limits of Two Opposing Paradigms, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK, Northampton, MA, USA.
79. NORTON B.G., 2005, Sustainability: A philosophy of adaptive ecosystem management, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
80. NOWOTNY H., SCOTT P., GIBBONS M., 2001, Re-thinking science: knowledge and the public in an age of un-certainty, Polity Press, Cambridge, UK.
81. NUSSBAUM M., SEN A., 1993, The Quality of Life, Oxford University Press, https://doi.org/10.1093/0198287976.001.0001.
82. O’NEILL D. W., FANNING A. L., LAMB W. F. et al., 2018, A good life for all within planetary boundaries, Nat Sustain, 1: 88-95, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-018-0021-4.
83. O'NEILL D. W., 2012, Measuring progress in the degrowth transition to a steady state economy, Ecological Eco-nomics, Elsevier, 84(C): 221-231.
84. OECD, 2011, Towards Green Growth. A Summary for Policy Makers, OECD, Paris, France.
85. OECD, 2009, Declaration on Green Growth Adopted at the Meeting of the Council at Ministerial Level on 25 June 2009, C/MIN(2009)5/ADD1/FINAL.
86. OLAWUMI T.O., CHAN D.W. M., 2018, A scientometric review of global research on sustainability and sustain-able development, Journal of Cleaner Production, 183: 231-250.
87. OPSCHOOR J. B., 1996, Institutional change and development towards sustainability, Getting Down to Earth: Practical Applications of Ecological Economics, eds. Costanza R., Segura O. Martinez-Alier J., Island Press, Washington D.C., Covelo, CA.
88. OSTROM E., 1990, Governing the commons: the evolution of institutions for collective action, Cambridge Univer-sity Press, Cambridge.
89. PETERS B.G., 2000, Governance and comparative politics, Debating governance: Authority. steering, and democ-racy, ed. Pierre J., Oxford University Press, Oxford.
90. PIERRE J., 2000, Introduction: Understanding governance, Debating governance: Authority. steering, and democ-racy, ed. Pierre J., Oxford University Press, Oxford.
91. PURVIS B., MAO Y., ROBINSON D., 2019, Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins, Sus-tainability Science, 14: 681-695, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-018-0627-5.
92. PAULI G., 2010, The blue economy, Our Planet, 1: 24-26.
93. PAROTTA J., AGNOLETTI M., JOHAN E., 2006, Cultural heritage and sustainable forest management: the role of traditional knowledge, Ministerial Conference on the Protection of Forests in Europe, Liaison Unit Warsaw.
94. PEARCE D. W, MARKANDYA A., BARBIER E. B, 1989, Blueprint for a green economy, Earthscan, London.
95. PEARCE D.W., ATKINSON G.D., DUBOURG W.R., 1994, The economics of sustainable development, Annual Review of Energy and the Environment, 19(1): 457-474.
96. PRETTY J., 2003, Social capital and the collective management of resources, Science, 302: 1912-1914.
97. RAMAKRISHNAN P.S., 2001, Ecology and Sustainable Development, National Book Trust of India, New Delhi.
98. RAPPORT D. J., 2007, Sustainability science: an ecohealth perspective, Sustainability Science, 2(1): 77-84.
99. RASKIN P.D., 2008, World lines: a framework for exploring global pathways, Ecological Economics 65(3): 461-70.
100. REBORATTI C.E., 1999, Territory, scale and sustainable development, Sustainability and the social sciences: A cross-disciplinary approach to integrating environmental considerations into theoretical considerations, eds. Becker E., Jahn T., Zed Books, London: 207-222.
101. RUZZENENTI F., VIVANCO D., GALVIN R., SORRELL S., WAGNER A., WALNUM H. J., 2019, The Re-bound Effect and the Jevons' Paradox: Beyond the Conventional Wisdom, Frontiers in Energy Research,7: 90, https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2019.00090.
102. SARTORI S., LATRÔNICO F., CAMPOS L. M. S., 2014, Sustainability and sustainable development: a taxono-my in the field of literature, Ambiente & Sociedade, 17(1): 01-22, https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-44220003491.
103. SEN A., 1999, Commodities and capabilities, OUP Catalogue.
104. SEN A., 1985, Well-Being Agency and Freedom: The Dewey Lectures 1984, Journal of Philosophy, 82(4): 169-221.
105. SLIMANE M., 2012, Role and relationship between leadership and sustainable development to release social, hu-man, and cultural dimension, Social and Behavioral Sciences, 41: 92-99.
106. SOLOW R.M., 1986, On the intergenerational allocation of natural resources, The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 88(1): 141-149.
107. SOLOW R.M., 1974, Intergenerational equity and exhaustible resources, The Review of Economic Studies, 41: 29-45.
108. SORRELL S., 2009, Jevons’ Paradox revisited: The evidence for backfire from improved energy efficiency, Energy Policy, 37(4): 1456-1469, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421508007428.
109. SÖDERBAUM P., 2000, Ecological Economics, Earthscan, London, UK.
110. SPANGENBERG J., 2011, Sustainability science: A review, an analysis and some empirical lessons, Environmen-tal Conservation, 38(3): 275-287, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892911000270.
111. SPANGENBERG J., 2002, Environmental space and the prism of sustainability: frameworks for indicators meas-uring sustainable development, Ecological Indicators, 2(3): 295-309.
112. SPANGENBERG J. H., O'CONNOR M., 2010, Sustainability science: a new mode of science, another step in the evolution of science paradigms, Global Responsibility, 61: 13-16.
113. STRANGE, T., BAYLEY, A., 2008, Sustainable development linking economy, society, environment, OECD In-sights, OECD.
114. TANGUAY G. A., RAJAONSON J., LEFEBVRE J.-F., LANOIE P., 2010, Measuring the sustainability of cit-ies: an analysis of the use of local indicators, Ecological Indicators, 10(2): 407-418, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2009.07.013.
115. ten BRINK P., MAZZA L., BADURA T., KWTTUNEN M., WITHANA S.. 2012, Nature and its role in the tran-sition to a green economy, The Economics of Ecosystems & Biodiversity and the Institute for European Environ-mental Policy, Geneva and London.
116. THOMPSON P. B., 2017, The spirit of the soil: agriculture and environmental ethics, 2nd edition, Routlege, New York.
117. TRAINER T., 2011, The radical implications of zero growth economy, Real-World Economics Review, 57(1): 71-82.
118. TURNER R.K., 1992. Speculations on weak and strong sustainability, CSERGE Working Papers, GEC: 92-26.
119. UNITED NATIONS, EUROPEAN COMMISSION, INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND, OECD, WORLD BANK, 2003, Handbook of national accounting. Integrated environmental and economic accounting, Studies in Methods, F(61), Rev.1.
120. UNDP, 2022, United Nations Development Programme, Human Development Reports, http://hdr.undp.org/en/humandev.
121. UNEP, 2016, Rio Declaration on Environment and Development, http://www.unep.org/Documents. multilin-gual/Default.asp?DocumentID=78&ArticleID=1163.
122. UNEP, 2011, Towards a Green Economy: Pathways to Sustainable Development and Poverty Eradication, Nairo-bi, United Nations Environment Programme, Nairobi.
123. UNEP, 2007, GEO 4 Global Environment Outlook. Environment for Development. Valletta, Malta, Progress Press.
124. UNITED NATIONS, EUROPEAN COMMISSION, INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND, OECD, WORLD BANK, 2003, Handbook of National Accounting. Integrated Environmental and Economic Accounting 2003, Studies in Methods, F(61), Rev.1.
125. VAN DEN BERGH J. C. J. M., 2011, Environment versus growth e a criticism of ‘degrowth’ and a plea for ‘a-growth’, Ecological Economics, 70: 881-890.
126. VAN DEN BERGH J. C. J. M., KALLIS G., 2012, Growth, A-Growth or Degrowth to Stay within Planetary Boundaries?, Journal of Economic Issues, 46:4: 909-920, DOI: 10.2753/JEI0021-3624460404.
127. VAN DEN HOVE S., 2007, A rationale for science-policy interfaces, Futures 39(7): 807-26.
128. WALS A. E. J., 2009, Social learning towards a sustainable world, Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wa-geningen.
129. WEAVER P. M., ROTMANS J., 2006, Integrated sustainability assessment: what is it, why do it and how?, Inter-national Journal of Innovation and Sustainable Development, 1(4): 284-303.
130. WEINSTEIN M.P., 2010, Sustainability science: the emerging paradigm and the ecology of cities, Sustainability: Science, Practice, & Policy 6(1): 1-5.
131. WCED, 1987, Our common future, Oxford University Press, New York.
132. VICTOR P.A., 1991, Indicators of sustainable development: Some lessons from capital theory, Ecological Eco-nomics, 4(3): 191-213.
133. VOS R. O., 2007, Defining sustainability: a conceptual orientation, J Chem Technol Biotechnol, 82: 334-339, https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.1675.
134. WOOLCOCK M., 1998, Social capital and economic development: Towards a theorethical synthesis and policy framework, Theory and society, 27(2): 151-208.
135. ZIJP M. C, HEIJUNGS R., VAN DER VOET E. et al., 2015, An identification key for selecting methods for sus-tainability assessments, Sustainability, 7: 2490-2512, https://doi.org/10.3390/su7032490.

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.baztech-65d4d578-6de7-4569-a986-f05b3037f5b8