SIMURG: A new model for the integrated assessment of sustainability

• Autorzy: Kanoglu Alaattin , Yazicioglu Deniz , Ozcevik Ozlem , Erkovan Nisa , Softaoglu Hidayet , Ulker Burcu , Varlier Nazli , Yazicioglu Ediz

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.35784/bud-arch.2902

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Sustainability assessment is one of the basic issues in the agenda of public authorities and it requires practical tools to measure performance in terms of sustainable development goals. Most studies in literature deal with only one dimension of the problem of environmental components of sustainability. These studies discuss entities at only one level (cities, buildings, etc.), and one layer (green, smart, etc.) in selected dimensions. The literature includes no models that claim to provide an integrated assessment of entities’ performance in the 3D Cartesian system. The presently available models do not offer solutions that would be applicable in practice. SIMURG (A performance-based and Sustainability-Oriented Integration Model Using Relational database architecture to increase Global competitiveness of construction industry) proposes using layers and their KPI sets in the assessment process. In addition to philosophical, organisational, integrational, and computational models, this study aims to develop a lean architecture of a relational database model by eliminating ineffective solutions in the practical dimension, i.e. in the computer model. The model can be used by individuals to help them choose built environment whose characteristics match their expectations. Public authorities can utilise the model to increase the level of accountability, transparency, and legitimacy in their decision-making processes.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

sustainability assessment; 3D Cartesian System; philosophical model; frame model; organizational model; computational model

• Wydawca: Wydawnictwo Politechniki Lubelskiej
• Czasopismo: Budownictwo i Architektura
• Rocznik: 2022
• Tom: Vol. 21, no 1
• Strony: 31--57
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 49 poz., fig., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Kanoglu Alaattin

• Department of Architecture; Faculty of Art, Design and Architecture; Alanya Alaaddin Keykubat University; Turkey

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4917-5309

autor

Yazicioglu Deniz

• Department of Architecture; Faculty of Art, Design and Architecture; Alanya Alaaddin Keykubat University; Turkey

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5970-5422

autor

Ozcevik Ozlem

• Department of Urban and Region Planning; Faculty of Architecture; Istanbul Technical University; Turkey

autor

Erkovan Nisa

• Department of Architecture; Faculty of Art, Design and Architecture; Alanya Alaaddin Keykubat ; Turkey

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7473-7131

autor

Softaoglu Hidayet

• Department of Architecture; Faculty of Art, Design and Architecture; Alanya Alaaddin Keykubat ; Turkey

• https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3011-5071

autor

Ulker Burcu

• Department of Architecture; Faculty of Architecture; Kirklareli University; Turkey

• https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3011-5071

autor

Varlier Nazli

• Istanbul Technical University; Turkey

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9505-0881

autor

Yazicioglu Ediz

• Istanbul Technical University; Turkey

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4724-2758

Bibliografia

• 1. Fiksel J., “Sustainability and Resilience: Toward a Systems Approach”, Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy, vol. 2, no. 2, (2006), pp. 14-21. https://10.1080/15487733.2006.11907980
• 2. Ulker B., Kanoglu A., Ozcevik O., “SIMURG_CITIES: Meta-Analysis for KPIs of Layer-Based Approach in Sustainability Assessment”, Journal of Contemporary Urban Affairs, vol.5, no.1, (2021). https://10.25034/ijcua.2021.v5n1-5
• 3. Lam P.T.I. and Yang W., “Factors Influencing the Consideration of Public-Private Partnerships (PPP) for Smart City Projects: Evidence from Hong Kong”, Cities, vol. 99, no. 102606, (2020), pp. 1-16. https://10.1016/j.cities.2020.102606
• 4. Walnum H.T., Hauge A.L., Lindberg K.B., Mysen M., Nielsen B.F. and Sørnes K., “Developing a Scenario Calculator for Smart Energy Communities in Norway: Identifying Gaps Between Vision and Practice”, Sustainable Cities and Society, vol. 46, No: 101418, (2019), pp. 1-11. https://10.1016/j.scs.2019.01.003
• 5. Shmelev S. E. and Shmeleva I. A., “Multidimensional Sustainability Benchmarking for Smart Megacities”, Cities, vol. 92, (2019), pp. 134-163. https://10.1016/j.cities.2019.03.015
• 6. Ahvenniemi H., Huovila A., Pinto-Seppä I. and Airaksinen M. “What are the Differences Between Sustainable and Smart Cities?”, Cities, vol. 60, (2017), pp. 234-245. https://10.1016/j.cities.2016.09.009
• 7. Sáez L., Heras-Saizarbitoria I. and Rodríguez-Núñez E., “Sustainable City Rankings, Benchmarking and Indexes: Looking into the Black Box”, Sustainable Cities and Society, vol. 53, no. 101938, (2020), pp. 1-9. https://10.1016/j.scs.2019. 101938
• 8. Gok M. and Yigit S. “The Evaluation of the Metropolitan Cities in Turkey According to the Sustainability Criteria”, Journal of Administrative Sciences, vol. 15, no. 30, (2017), pp. 253-273. Available online: https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/661482 [Access: 15 Mar 2022]
• 9. Zhang X., Zhang Q., Sun T., Zoua Y. and Chena H., “Evaluation of Urban Public Transport Priority Performance Based on the Improved TOPSIS Method: A Case Study of Wuhan”, Sustainable Cities and Society, vol. 43, (2018), pp. 357-365. https://10.1016/j.scs.2018.08.013
• 10. Manupati V.K., Ramkumar M. and Digjoy S.D., “A Multi-criteria Decision-making Approach for the Urban Renewal in Southern India”, Sustainable Cities and Society, vol. 42, (2018), pp. 471-481. https://10.1016/j.scs.2018.08.011
• 11. Ahmad T. and Chen H., “Utility Companies’ Strategy for Short-term Energy Demand Forecasting Using Machine Learning-Based models”, Sustainable Cities and Society, vol. 39, (2018), pp. 401– 417. https://10.1016/j.scs.2018.03.002
• 12. Hassan O.A.B., “An Integrated Approach to Assessing the Sustainability of Buildings”, Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, vol. 14, no. 4, (2016), pp. 835-850. https://10.1108/ JEDT-12-2014-0077
• 13. Elyamany A., Basha I. and Zayed T., “Performance Evaluating Model for Construction Companies: Egyptian Case Study”, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, vol. 133, no. 8, (2007), pp. 574-581. https://10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2007)133:8(574)
• 14. Upstill-Goddard J., Glass J., Dainty A. and Nicholson I., “Implementing Sustainability in Small and Medium-sized Construction Firms: The Role of Absorptive Capacity”, Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, vol. 23, no. 4, (2016), pp. 407-427. https://10.1108/ECAM-01-2015-0015
• 15. Yang X., Zhang J. and Zhao X., “Factors Affecting Green Residential Building Development: Social Network Analysis”, Sustainability, vol. 10, no. 1389, (2018). https://doi.org/10.3390/su10051389
• 16. Myeong S., Jung Y. and Lee E., “A Study on Determinant Factors in Smart City Development: An Analytic Hierarchy Process Analysis”, Sustainability, vol. 10, no. 8, (2018), pp. 1-17. https://10.3390/su10082606
• 17. Sepasgozar S.M.E., Hawken S., Sargolzaei S. and Foroozanfa M., “Implementing Citizen-centric Technology in Developing Smart Cities: A Model for Predicting the Acceptance of Urban Technologies”, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol. 42, (2018), pp. 105-116. https://10.1016/j.techfore.2018.09.012
• 18. Fatourehchi D. and Zarghami E., “Social Sustainability Assessment Framework for Managing Sustainable Construction in Residential Buildings”, Journal of Building Engineering, vol. 32, (2020), pp. 1-10. https://10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101761
• 19. Novelo R.A.A., Romero S.O.A., Suarez G.A.C. and Ramirez J.D.M., “Social Sustainability in the Planning, Design and Construction in Developing Countries: Guidelines and Feasibility for Mexico”, Civil Engineering and Architecture, vol. 9, no. 4, (2021), pp. 1075-1083. https://10.13189/cea.2021.090410
• 20. Anthopoulos L., Janssen M. and Weerakkody V., “A Unified Smart City Model (USCM) for Smart City Conceptualization and Benchmarking”, International Journal of Electronic Government Research, vol. 12, no. 2, (2016), pp. 77-93. https://10.4018/IJEGR.2016040105.
• 21. Castelnovo W., Misuraca G. and Savoldelli A., “Smart Cities Governance: The Need for Holistic Approach to Assessing Urban Participatory Policy Making”, Social Science Computer Review, vol. 34, no. 6, (2015), pp. 724-739. https://10.1177/0894439315611103
• 22. Erdogan, B.G. and Polatoglu, C., “Building Performance Evaluation for Adaptive Reuse: A Multi-Criteria Approach”, Civil Engineering and Architecture, vol. 9, no.7, (2021), pp. 2427-2440. https://10.13189/cea.2021.090728
• 23. Akkoyun I., İnşaat Sektöründe Enformasyon Teknolojilerinin Stratejik Yönetimi (Strategic management of information technologies in construction sector). PhD Dissertation, ITU Graduate School, 2010. Available online: https://tez.yok. gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/ [Accessed: 15 Mar 2022]
• 24. Uddin M.N., Selvam A.M., Shahoonda J. and Prasanth R., “Optimization of Green Building for Low-income People at Pondicherry”, Civil Engineering and Architecture, vol. 6, no. 6, (2018), pp. 283-292. https://10.13189/cea.2018.060602
• 25. Achour N., Pantzartsis E., Pascale F. and Price A.D.F., “Integration of Resilience and Sustainability: From Theory to Application”, International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, vol. 6, no. 3, (2015), pp. 347-362. https://10.1108/IJDRBE-05-2013-0016
• 26. Ahmad T. and Thaheem M.J., “A Decision-Making Model Synthesis for Sustainable Building Development,” in: Eighth International Conference on Construction in the 21st Century (CITC-8), ‘Changing the Field: Recent Developments for the Future of Engineering and Construction’, May 27-30, Thessaloniki, Greece, 2015, pp. 733-741. Available: https://researchgate.net/ publication/290360731_A_Decision-Making_Model_Synthesis_for_Sustainable_Building Development [Accessed: 15 Mar 2022]
• 27. Ahmad T., Thaheem M.J. and Azhar S., “Turning BIM into a Holistic Sustainability Tool”, in: Eighth International Conference on Construction in the 21st Century (CITC-8), ‘Changing the Field: Recent Developments for the Future of Engineering and Construction’, May 27-30, Thessaloniki, Greece, 2015, pp. 790-797. Available: https://researchgate.net/publication/290360738_ Turning_BIM_into_a_Holistic_Sustainability_Assessment_Tool [Accessed: 15 Mar 2022]
• 28. Ahmad T. and Thaheem M.J., “Economic Sustainability Assessment of Residential Buildings: A Dedicated Assessment Framework and Implications for BIM”, Sustainable Cities and Society, vol. 38, (2018), pp. 476-491. https://10.1016/j.scs.2018.01.035
• 29. Ahmad T. and Thaheem, M.J., “Developing a Residential Building-related Social Sustainability Assessment Framework and Its Implications for BIM”, Sustainable Cities and Society, vol. 26, (2016), pp. 1-15. https://10.1016/j.scs.2016.08.002
• 30. Ahmad T., Thaheem M.J. and Anwar A., “Developing a Green-building Design Approach by Selective Use of Systems and Techniques”, Architectural Engineering and Design Management, vol. 12, no. 1, (2016), pp. 29-50. https://10.1080/17452007.2015.1095709
• 31. Garau C. and Pavan V.M., “Evaluating Urban Quality: Indicators and Assessment Tools for Smart Sustainable Cities”, Sustainability, vol. 10, no. 575, (2018), pp.1-18. https://10.3390/ su10030575
• 32. Leach J.M., Lee S.E., Hunt D.V.I. and Rogers C.D.F., (2017) “Improving City-Scale Measures of Liveable Sustainability: A Study of Urban Measurement and Assessment Through Application to the City of Birmingham, UK”, Cities, vol. 71, (2017), pp. 80-87. https://10.1016/j.cities.2017.06.016
• 33. Arslan S. and Kanoglu A., “Performance-Based Building: Key Concepts, Opportunities, Barriers and Paradigm of Proposed Solution”, Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal (ASSRJ), vol. 5, no. 3, (2018), pp. 407-417. https://10.14738/ assrj.53.4214
• 34. Arslan S. and Kanoglu A., “Performance-Based Building: Architecture of an Integrated Model at Conceptual and Practical Dimensions”, Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal (ASSRJ), vol. 5, no. 3, (2018), pp. 418-432. https://10.14738/assrj.53.4215
• 35. Yazicioglu D.A. and Kanoglu A., “Enhancement of the Designer Performance in Kitchen Interior Design”, Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, vol. 2, no. 6, (2015), pp. 1-8. https://10.14738/assrj.26.1222
• 36. Yazicioglu D.A. and Kanoglu A., “Determining Effects of Kitchen Design Rules on Kitchen Functionality in A Comparative Way”, Academic Research International (ARInt), vol. 7, no. 3, (2016), pp. 25-44. Available online: http://www.savap.org.pk/journals/ARInt./Vol.7(3)/2016 (7.3-03).pdf [Accessed: 15 Mar 2022]
• 37. Yazicioglu D.A. and Kanoglu A., “A Systematic Approach for Increasing the Success of Kitchen Interior Design within the Context of Spatial User Requirements”, Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal (ASSRJ), vol. 3, no. 1, (2016), pp. 155-166. https://10.14738/assrj.31.1804
• 38. Yazicioglu D.A. and Kanoglu A., “Improving the Project Service Performance of Companies Producing and Marketing Kitchen Systems to Provide Sectoral Competitiveness”, International Journal of Sciences: Basic and Applied Research (IJSBAR), vol. 26, no. 2, (2016), pp. 18-27. Available online: https://www.gssrr.org/index.php/JournalOfBasicAndApplied/ article/download/5532/2808/ [Accessed: 15 Mar 2022]
• 39. Yazicioglu D.A. and Kanoglu A., “Performance-Based Automation System for Kitchen Interior Design”, Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal (ASSRJ), vol. 3, no. 13., (2016), pp. 27-45. https://10.14738/assrj.313.2476
• 40. Yazicioglu D.A. and Kanoglu A., “Improving the Project Service Performance of Companies Producing and Marketing Kitchen Systems: Stage of Survey and Analysis of the Space”, International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences (IJAAS), vol. 4, no. 2, (2017), pp. 139-146. https://10.21833/ijaas.2017.02.023
• 41. Konuk S., Banyo Sistemlerinin Tasarım Başarımının Artırılmasına Yönelik Sertifika Tabanlı Bütünleşik Bir Süreç Yönetim Modeli (An Integrated Process Management Model for Increasing the Performance of Bathroom System Design). ITU Graduate School, Unpublished Master Thesis, December, 2019. Available online: https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTez Merkezi/ [Accessed: 15 Mar 2022]
• 42. Varlier N., Ozcevik O. and Kanoglu A., “SIMURG_ PROJECTS: A Performance-Based Integrated Model for Design and Evaluation of Sustainable and Sophisticated Solutions at Projects Level of Built Environment: Search for the Lean Architecture of Relational Database”, in: Proceedings of 5th International Project and Construction Management Conference (IPCMC2018), Organized by Cyprus International University, Girne, North Cyprus, pp. 759-766, 2018.
• 43. Ulker B., Kanoglu A. and Ozcevik O., “SIMURG_CITIES: A Performance-Based Integrated Model for Design and Evaluation of Sustainable and Sophisticated Solutions at Cities Level: Determination of KPIs and Principles of Model at Conceptual Dimension”, in: Proceedings of 5th International Project and Construction Management Conference (IPCMC2018), Organized by Cyprus International University, Girne, North Cyprus, pp. 282-289, 2018.
• 44. Erdogan B. and Kanoglu A., “SIMURG_HELMET: An Integrated Solution for the Departments of Health of Laborers and Safety of Work in Construction Firms and a Relational Database Model for the Evaluation and Tracking the Performance of Department”, in: Proceedings of 5th International Project and Construction Management Conference (IPCMC2018), Organized by Cyprus International University, Girne, North Cyprus, pp. 382-389, 2018.
• 45. Akturk S. and Kanoglu A., “SIMURG_ARCADIA: A Performance-Based Integrated Relational Database Model for the Assessment Processes of Architectural Design Competitions in Professional Practice and Architectural Design Studios in Academia”, in: Proceedings of 5th International Project and Construction Management Conference (IPCMC2018), Organized by Cyprus International University, Girne, North Cyprus, pp. 324-331, 2018.
• 46. Serifoglu C., Mevcut Yapı Denetim Sisteminin Eleştirisi ve Sertifika Esaslı - Başarım Tabanlı Bir Bütünleşik Değerlendirme ve Denetim Modeli Önerisi (Critisizm of Current Construction Inspection System and Proposal of a Performance-based and Certification-based Integrated Inspection System). ITU Graduate School, Unpublished Master Thesis, 2019. Available: https://tez.yok.gov.tr/ UlusalTezMerkezi/ [Accessed: 15 Mar 2022]
• 47. Altindag M., and Kanoglu A., “A Performance-Based Integrated System for the Assessment of Project Procurement Departments of Construction Companies”, Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal (ASSRJ), vol. 5, no. 12, (2019), pp. 335-344. https://10.14738/assrj.512.5805
• 48. Prokop A., Nazarko P. and Ziemiański L., “Digitalization of historic buildings using modern technologies and tools”, Budownictwo i Architektura, 20(2), 2021, pp. 083-094. https://doi.org/10.35784/bud-arch.2444
• 49. Kysil O., Kosarevska R. and Levchenko O., “The innovation of accounting and certification of historic architectural monuments using BIM technology”, Budownictwo i Architektura, 19(2), 2020, pp. 005-018. https://doi.org/10.35784/bud-arch.888