Applying the expert method to determine a company’s strategic goals

• Autorzy: Satybaldiyeva Dinara , Mukhanova Gulmira , Tymbayeva Zhazira , Tyshkanbayeva Mansiya , Bolatkyzy Saltanat

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.20858/tp.2023.18.2.11

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The most important factor for the success of a company in today’s competitive environment is to have clearly defined goals. Objectives define what a company strives for, what it wants to achieve, and what it wants to realize in its activities. Clearly defined goals are necessary to ensure the sustainability and effectiveness of a company’s operations and the successful achievement of its desired results. This paper proposes an expert method for determining the strategic goals of a company. The experts ranked 24 strategic goals in terms of importance, and variance and coefficient of variation were then used to determine the consistency of the experts. As a result, 15 important strategic goals were identified of the 24 goals of the assessed transport company.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

strategic goals; expert assessment; dispersion; variance

PL

cele strategiczne; ocena ekspercka; dyspersja; zmienność

• Wydawca: Wydawnictwo Politechniki Śląskiej
• Czasopismo: Transport Problems
• Rocznik: 2023
• Tom: T. 18, z. 2
• Strony: 123--132
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 22 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Satybaldiyeva Dinara

• Satbayev University; Satbayev 22A, Almaty, Kazakhstan

• https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6494-0681

autor

Mukhanova Gulmira

• Satbayev University; Satbayev 22A, Almaty, Kazakhstan

• https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4985-4018

autor

Tymbayeva Zhazira

• Satbayev University; Satbayev 22A, Almaty, Kazakhstan

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7705-9874

autor

Tyshkanbayeva Mansiya

• Satbayev University; Satbayev 22A, Almaty, Kazakhstan

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4700-934X

autor

Bolatkyzy Saltanat

• Satbayev University; Satbayev 22A, Almaty, Kazakhstan

• https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3725-6627

Bibliografia

• 1. Chungyalpa, W. & Bora, B. Towards Conceptualizing Business Strategies. 2015. Vol. 2. No. 1. P. 73-83.
• 2. A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK Guide) - Seventh Edition and The Standard for Project Management. Newtown Square, Pennsylvania. Project Management Institute. Inc. 2021. 370 p.
• 3. Bora, B. & Borah, S. & Chungyalpa, W. Crafting strategic objectives: examining the role of business vision and mission statements. Journal of Entrepreneurship & Organization Management. 2017. Vol. 6. No. 1. P. 1-6.
• 4. de Oliveira Albergarias Lopes, R. & de Oliveira Dias, M. & Qualharini, E. Competitive strategies with BSC and project portfolio management: a conceptual model. Global Scientific. 2021. Vol. 9. No. 8. P. 1-9.
• 5. Satybaldiyeva, D. & Mukhanova, G. & Satybaldiyev, O. & Dossova, S. & Shaldarbekova, K. Determination of effective balanced indicators in the airline company using a modified fuzzy analytical hierarchy process approach. Journal of Advanced Research in Low and Economics. Fall 2018. Vol. IX. No. 8(38). P. 2798-2810.
• 6. Drucker, P.F. & Maciariello, J.A. Management. Harper Collins e-books. 2008. 551 p.
• 7. Kaplan, R.S. & Norton, D.P. Strategy Oriented Organization. How organizations that use a balanced scorecard succeed in the new business environment. Harvard Business School Press. 2000. 400 p.
• 8. Szwed, P.S. Expert Judgment in Project Management: Narrowing the Theory-Practice Gap. Project Management Institute. Inc. 2016. 140 р.
• 9. Aleksander, J. & Begičević Ređep, N. & Kadoić, N. Differences in prioritization of the BSC’s strategic goals using AHP and ANP Methods. Journal and Organizational Sciences. 2018. Vol. 42. No. 2. P. 193-217.
• 10. Saaty, T.L. Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Services Sciences. 2008. Vol. 1(1). P. 83-98.
• 11. Satybaldiyeva, D. & Mukhanova, G. & Satybaldiyev, O. & Yelemessov, K. & Baskanbayeva, D. One of the way to identify the weights of indicators of the fuzzy analytical hierarchy process for determining BSC of an airline company. Transport Problems. 2021. Vol. 16. No. 4. P. 83-94.
• 12. Barić, D. & Džambo, A. An application of the AHP method for evaluation of level crossing design in a congested urban area: Case study LC Sokolska in Zagreb, Croatia. Transport Problems. 2021. Vol. 16. No. 4. P. 95-106.
• 13. Brownstein, N.C. & Louis, T.A. & etс. The role of expert judgment in statistical inference and evidence-based decision-making. The American Statistician. 2019. Vol. 73. P. 56-68.
• 14. Zondervan-Zwijnenburg, M. & van de Schoot-Hubeek, W. & Lek, K. & Hoijtink, H. & van de Schoot, R. Application and evaluation of an expert judgment elicitation procedure for correlations. Frontiers in Psychology. 2017. Vol 8. P. 1-15.
• 15. Mario, P. Brito & Ian, G.J. Dawson. Predicting the validity of expert judgments in assessing the impact of risk mitigation through failure prevention and correction. Risk Analysis. Vol. 40. No. 10. P. 1928-1945.
• 16. Belanova, N. & Ershova, N. & Pyatkova, N. & Alpackaya, I. Assessment of the risks of construction of transport infrastructure facilities. Transport Research Procedia. 2022. Vol. 63. P. 1660-1667.
• 17. Belokurov, V.P. & Belokurov, S.V. & Korablev, R.A. & Shtepa, A.A. Models of expert assessments and their study in problems of choice and decision-making in management of motor transport processes. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2018. Vol. 1015. No. 322.
• 18. Rogov, A. & Kublitskii, A. & Kopylov, O. Ensuring reliability and safety of the continuous passenger transport technical systems. Proceeding of the 2021 IEEE International Conference “Quality Management. Transport and Information Security, Information Technologies”. 2021. P. 102-105.
• 19. Griskeviciene, D. & Griskevicius, A. & Griskeviciute-Geciene, A. A new approach to assessment of infrastructure projects on urban transport systems. Transport and Telecommunication. 2012. Vol. 13. No. 2. P. 108-122.
• 20. Benini, A.P. & Chataigner, N. & Noumri, N. & Parham, N. & Sweeney, J. & Tax, L. The Use of Expert Judgment in Humanitarian Analysis - Theory, Methods. Applications: Geneva. Assessment Capacities Project - ACAPS. 2017. 218 р.
• 21. Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng & Jih-Jeng Huang. Multiple Attribute Decision Making Methods and applications. New-York. CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group. 2011. 333 р.
• 22. AirAstana JSC. The annual report 2021. Available at: http://www.airastana.com.