New Methods for Air Traffic Controller Main Solution Taking Dominant Determination Concerning Their Attitude to Risk

• Autorzy: Borsuk S. P.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Taking into account the influence of human factor on flight safety one may say that ICAO flight safety main concept components mutually influence each other. This is based on the perspective of “aviation personnel attitude to safe actions and conditions” as the main factor of flight safety. This attitude may be found with help estimate usefulness functions construction and analysis for aircraft flight norms values based on air traffic controllers indexes in decision taking tasks. One way to find the main solution is taking dominant that defines air traffic controller attitude to flight level norms violation as to risk (tending, indifferent, non-tending to risk) is with the help of a “risk premium” criterion. Historically, the criterion included a single variable point in estimate usefulness function. Two improved criteria that include several characteristic points of usefulness function are proposed. As a result of new criteria appliance the main solution taking dominant determination efficiency increased up to 18%.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

air traffic; flight safety; controlled flight; human factor; risk; norms violations

• Wydawca: Międzynarodowa Wyższa Szkoła Logistyki i Transportu we Wrocławiu
• Czasopismo: Logistics and Transport
• Rocznik: 2017
• Tom: Vol. 33, No. 1
• Strony: 25--30
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 15 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Borsuk S. P.

• National Aviation University, Ukraine

Bibliografia

• [1] Edwards W. Solution taking/ Human factor. In 6 vol. - vol. 3. Activity modelling, professional education and operators selection. – Part І. – psychological activity models. Mir, Moscow (1991)
• [2] Reva A.N., Tymishev K.M., Bekmuhambetov A.A: human factor and flight safety: (proactive research of influences): monograph. Almaty (2006)
• [3] Karapetyan G.S., Mihaylik N.F., Pichko S.P., Prokofyev A.I.: unfavorable events caused by crew action inflight provision. Mir, Moscow (1989)
• [4] Human factors digest no 11. Human Factors in CNS/ATM systems. Circular 249-AN/149. ICAO. Montreal (1994).
• [5] Doc 9806 AN/763 “Human factors guidelines for safety audits manual. ICAO, Montreal (2002).
• [6] Leychenko S.D., Malyshevsky A.V., Mihaylik M.F.: Human factor in aviation: monograph in two books. SPb, Kirovohrad (2006).
• [7] Doc 9859 AN/474 ICAO Safety management manual (SMM). ICAO, Montreal (2013).
• [8] Reva O.M.. Human factor: paradox of pilot activity psychological dominant in stochastic risk conditions. Airnavigation problems. #3, 40-49 (1997).
• [9] Bekmuhambetov A.A. Operator activity improvement on the basis of risk control theory and practice during flight safety provision. SPb. (2005).
• [10] Muhtarov P.S. Main dominants in air traffic controller solution taking at estimating usefulness-safety of flight air space level norm. Aviation-space technique and technology. # 116, 143-150 (2014).
• [11] Reva O.M., Muhtarov P.S., Mirzoev B.M.. Main solution taking dominant stability in conditions of risk. Aviation-space technique and technology # 117, 147-153 (2014).
• [12] Borsuk S.P. Air traffic controllers main behaviour dominant determination in conditions of flight level norm violation. Science-based technologies. #27, 261-265 (2015).
• [13] Human Factors Module - A Business Case for Human Factors Investment : Doc. EUROCONTROL HUM.ET1.ST.13.4000-REP-02 / 13.12.1999.
• [14] Kini R.L., Raypha H.. Taking solutions at many preferences and substitution criteria. Radio I svyaz, Moscow (1981).
• [15] Reliability and efficiency in technique. Handbook in 10 volumes. Vol. 3 efficiency of technical systems. Mashinostroenie, Moscow, (1988).

Uwagi

Opracowanie ze środków MNiSW w ramach umowy 812/P-DUN/2016 na działalność upowszechniającą naukę (zadania 2017).