Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
Abstrakty
Purpose: The aim of the article is to describe and forecast possible difficulties related to the development of cognitive technologies and the progressing of algorithmization of HRM processes as a part of Industry 4.0. Design/methodology/approach: While most of the studies to date related to the phenomenon of Industry 4.0 and Big Data are concerned with the level of efficiency of cyber-physical systems and the improvement of algorithmic tools, this study proposes a different perspective. It is an attempt to foresee the possible difficulties connected with algorithmization HRM processes, which understanding could help to "prepare" or even eliminate the harmful effects we may face which will affect decisions made in the field of the managing organizations, especially regarding human resources management, in era of Industry 4.0. Findings: The research of cognitive technologies in the broadest sense is primarily associated with a focus of thinking on their effectiveness, which can result in a one-sided view and ultimately a lack of objective assessment of that effectiveness. Therefore, conducting a parallel critical reflection seems even necessary. This reflection has the potential to lead to a more balanced assessment of what is undoubtedly "for", but also of what may be "against". The proposed point of view may contribute to a more informed use of algorithm-based cognitive technologies in the human resource management process, and thus to improve their real-world effectiveness. Social implications: The article can have an educational function, helps to develop critical thinking about cognitive technologies, and directs attention to areas of knowledge by which future skills should be extended. Originality/value: This article is addressed to all those who use algorithms and data-driven decision-making processes in HRM. Crucial in these considerations is the to draw attention to the dangers of unreflective use of technical solutions supporting HRM processes. The novelty of the proposed approach is the identification of three potential risk areas that may result in faulty HR decisions. These include the risk of "technological proof of equity", overconfidence in the objective character of algorithms and the existence of a real danger resulting from the so-called algorithm overfitting. Recognition of these difficulties ultimately contributed to real improvements in productivity by combining human performance with technology effectiveness.
Rocznik
Tom
Strony
431--450
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 75 poz.
Twórcy
autor
- Silesian University of Technology, Zabrze
Bibliografia
- 1. Alcacer, V., and Cruz-Machado, V. (2019). Scanning the Industry 4.0: A Literature Review on Technologies for Manufacturing System. Engineering Science and Technology, an International Journal, 22, pp. 899-919, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jestch.2019.01.006.
- 2. Amstrong, M. (2016). Amstrong’s Handbook of Strategic Human Resource Management. London: Kogan Page.
- 3. Angrave, D. et al. (2016). HR and analytics: Why HR is set to fail the big data challenge. Human Resource Management Journal, 26(1), pp. 1-11.
- 4. Aronson, E. et al. (2014). Pearson New International Edition. Social Psychology. London: Pearson.
- 5. Berlson, B. (1952). Content Analysis in Communication Research. New York: Hafner.
- 6. Bondaruk, T., and Brewster, C. (2016). Conceptualizing the future of HRM and technology research. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 27, 21, pp. 2652- 2671, https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2015.1091980.
- 7. Bondaruk, T., and Ruël, H. (2013). The Strategic Value of e-HRM: Results from an exploratory study in a governmental organization. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24(2), pp. 1-24, https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2012.675142.
- 8. Boxall, P. (2007). The Goals of HRM. In: P. Boxall, J. Purcell and P. Wright (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Human Resource Management (pp. 48-67). Oxford-New York: Oxford University Press, DOI:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199547029.001.0001.
- 9. Boxall, P. and Prucell, J. (2016). Strategy and Human Resource Management. London: Palgrve Macmillian (e-book).
- 10. Boxall, P., Purcell, J. and Wright, P. (eds.) (2007). The Oxford Handbook of Human Resource Management. Oxford-New York: Oxford University Press.
- 11. Brynjolfsson, E., and McAfee, A. (2014). The Second Machine Age. Work. Progress, and Prosperity in a Time of Brillant Technologies. London-New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
- 12. Bunse, B. et al. (2014). Industrie 4.0: Smart Manufacturing for Future. Berlin: Germany Trade&Invest.
- 13. Cheng, M.M., and Hackett, D.R. (2019). The critical review of algorithms in HRM: Definition, theory, and practice. Human Resource Management Review, 31, p.100698, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2019.100698.
- 14. Christian, B., and, Griffiths, T. (2016). Algorithms to Live By: The computer Science of Human Decisions. New York: Henry Holt and Company.
- 15. Collings, D.G. et al. (2019). Human Resource Management: A Critical Approach. In: D.G. Collings, G.T. Wood, L.T. Szamosi (eds.), Human Resource Management: A Critical Approach (pp. 1-24). New York: Routledge.
- 16. Collings, D.G., Wood, G.T., and Szamosi, L.T. (ed.) (2019). Human Resource Management: A Critical Approach. New York: Routledge.
- 17. Cowling, A. (2011). Developing a strategy for Human resources. In: A. Cowling and C. Mailer (eds.), Managing Human Resources (pp. 5-20). New York: Routledge.
- 18. Cowling, A., and Mailer, C. (ed.) (2011). Managing Human Resources. New York: Routledge.
- 19. Domingos, P. (2015). Master Algorithm: How the Quest for the Ultimate Learning Machine will Remake Our World. New York: Basic Books.
- 20. Eneizan, B. et al. (2018). Effect of technical support and trust on the adaption of electronic human resource management: Evidence from developing countries. International Journal of Applied Research, 4(7), pp. 31-40.
- 21. Flick, U. (2010) An Introduction To Qualitative Research. London-Thousand Oaks-New Delhi-Singapore: SAGE Publications.
- 22. Gajdzik, B., and Wolniak, R. (2021). Digitalization and Innovation in the Steel Industry in Poland-Selected Tools of ICT in an Analysis of Statistical Data and a Case Study. Energies, 14(11), 3034, https://doi.org/10.3390/en14113034.
- 23. Gandomi, A., and Haider, M. (2015). Beyond the hype: Big data concepts, methods, and analytics. International Journal of Information Management, 35, pp. 137-144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2014.10.007.
- 24. Han, J., Kamber, M., and Pei, J. (2012). Data Mining: Concepts and Techniques. Amsterdam-Boston-Heidelberg-London-New York-Oxford-Paris-San Diego-San Francisco-Singapore-Sydney-Tokyo: Elsevier.
- 25. Harari, Y.N. (2018). 21 Lessons for the 21st Century. London Jonatan: Cape.
- 26. Henke, N. et al. (2016). The Age of Analytics. Competing in a Data-Driven World. Brussels- San Francisco-Shanghai: McKinsey & Company.
- 27. Jaakkola, E. (2020). Designing conceptual articles: four approaches. AMS Review,10, pp. 18-26.
- 28. Johnson, P., and Szamosi, L.T. (2019). HRM in Changing Organizational Context. In: D.G. Collings, G.T. Wood, L.T. Szamosi (eds.), Human Resource Management: A Critical Approach (pp. 27-48). New York: Routledge.
- 29. Kagerman, H. et al. (2013). Recommendation for implementing the strategic initiative Industrie 4.0. Final report of the Industries 4.0 Working Group. Frankfurt: National Academy and Science and Engineering.
- 30. Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
- 31. Kaufman, B. (2007). The Development of HRM in Historical and International Perspective. In: P. Boxall, J. Purcell and P. Wright (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Human Resource Management (pp. 19-47). New York: Oxford University Press.
- 32. Kenrick, D. et al. (2014). Social Psychology: Goals in Interaction. London: Pearson Education.
- 33. Kleppman, M. (2017). Designing Data-Intensive Applications: The Big Ideas Behind Reliable, Scalable and Maintainable Systems. Beijng-Boston-Farnham-Sebastopol-Tokyo: O’REILLY.
- 34. Krauss, L.M. (2015). What Me Worry. In: J. Brockman (ed.), What to Think About Machines That Think. New York: Harper Perennial (e-book).
- 35. Kuzior, A. et al. (2019). Sustainable Development of Organizations Based on The Combinatorial Model of Artificial Intelligence. Entrepreneurship and Sustainably Issues, 7(2), pp. 1353-1376.
- 36. Kwiliński, W. et al. (2019). Transparent cognitive technologies to ensure sustainable society development. Journal of Security and Sustainability Issues, 9(2), pp. 561-570. DOI: 10.9770/jssi.2019.9.2(15).
- 37. Lee, J., and Kao, H-A. (2014). Servis Innovation and Smart Analytics for Industry 4.0 and Big Data Environment. Product Services Systems and Value Creation. Proceedings of the 6th CIRP Conference on Industrial Product-Service Systems, DOI: 10.1016/j.procir.2014.02.001.
- 38. MacDougall, W. (2014). Industry 4.0. Smart Manufacturing for the Future. Berlin: Germany Trade&Invest. 39. Manyika, J. et al. (2011). Big Data: The next frontier for innovation, competition, and productivity. McKinsey Global Institute.
- 40. Manyika, J. et al. (2013). Disruptive technologies: Advences that will transform life, business and the global economy. McKinsey Global Institute.
- 41. Manyika, J. et al. (2017). A Future That Works: Automation, Employment and Productivity. McKinsey & Company.
- 42. Marler, J.H., and Parry, E. (2016). Human Resource management, strategic involvement and e-HRM technology. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 27, pp. 2233-2255, https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2015.1091980.
- 43. Marr, B. (2018). The 4th Industrial Revolution Is Here – Are You Ready. Forbs, 13.08. 2018.
- 44. Mauboussin, M.J. (2012). The True Measures of Success. Harvard Business Review, October.
- 45. Mayer-Schönberger, V., and Cukier, K. (2013). Big Data: A Revolution That Will Transform How We Live, Work, and Think. London: John Murray.
- 46. Mayring, P. (2013). Qualitative Content Analysis. Theoretical Foundation, Basic Procedure and Software Solution, Klagenfurt, p. 10. Retrieved from: https://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/bitstream/handle/document/39517/ssoar-2014-mayring-Qualitative_content_analysis_theoretical_foundation.pdf?sequence=1, 28.11.2021.
- 47. McAfee, A., and Brynjolfsson, E. (2013). Big Data: The Management Revolution. Harvard Business Review, October.
- 48. Medina, R.G. (2006). Personnel and Human Resources Management. Manila: Rex Book Store.
- 49. Miśkiewicz, R., and Wolniak, R. (2020). Practical Application of the Industry 4.0 Concept in a Steel Company. Sustainability, 12, 5776, pp. 1-21.
- 50. Morrar, R. et al. (2017). The Fourth Industrial Revolution (Industry 4.0): A Social Innovation Perspective. Technology Innovation Management Review, 7/11, pp. 12-20.
- 51. Mwaniki, R., and Gathenya, J. (2015). Role of Human Resource Management Functions On Organizational Rerformance with reference to Kenya Power & Lighting Company – Nairobi West Region. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Science, 5/4, pp 432-448.
- 52. Nussbaum, M. (2010). Not for Profit. Why Democracy Needs the Humanities. Princeton-Oxford: Princeton University Press.
- 53. O’Neil, C. (2016). Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy. New York: Penguin Random House LLC.
- 54. O’Neil, C., and Schutt, R. (2014). Doing Data Science: Straight Talk From the Frontline. Sebastopol: O’Reilly Media.
- 55. O’Riordan, J. (2017). The Practice of Human Resource Management. IPA, An Foras Riarachain Institute of Public Administration.
- 56. Osika, G. (2019). Algorytmiczne narzędzia analizy zawartości mediów. Metametodologiczne refleksje. In: I. Hofman, D. Kępa-Figura (Eds.), Współczesne media. Problemy i metody badań nad mediami, tom 2 (pp. 181-194). Lublin: Wydawnictwo UMCS.
- 57. Osika, G. (2019). Social Innovation as Support for Industry 4.0. Scientific Papers of Silesian University of Technology, Organization and Management Series, 141, pp. 289-301.
- 58. Osika, G. (2020). Datafikacja środowiska pracy a prawa człowieka. In: A. Kuzior (Eds.), Globalne konteksty poszanowania praw i wolności człowieka. Współczesne problemy i dylematy, tom 12, (pp. 235-248). Gliwice: Wydawnictwo Politechniki Śląskiej.
- 59. Osika, G. (2021). Dilemmas of Social Live Algorithmization – Technological proof of Equity. Scientific Papers of Silesian University of Technology, Organization and Management Series, 151, pp. 525-538.
- 60. Parry, E., and Battista, V. (2019). The impact of emerging technologies on work: a review of the evidence and implications for the human resource function. Emerald Open Research, published 28, Jan, pp. 1-13.
- 61. Piccarozzi, M., Aquilani, B., Gatti, C. (2018). Industry 4.0 in Management Studies: A Systematic Literature Review. Sustinability, 10/10, 3821, https://doi.org/10.3390/su10103821.
- 62. Rifkin, J. (2015). The Zero Marginal Cost Society. The Internet of Things, The Collaborative Commons, and The Eclipse of Capitalism. New York: Martin’s Press.
- 63. Schwab, K. (2016). The Fourth Industrial Revolution. Cologny-Geneva: World Economic Forum.
- 64. Sharma, F.C. (2016). Human Resource Management. SBPD Publications.
- 65. Silva, M.S.A., and Silva Lima, C.G. (2018). The Role of Information Systems in Human Resource Management. In: M. Pomffyova (ed.), Management of Information System (pp.113-126). IntechOpen, http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.79294.
- 66. Stock, T., and Seliger, G. (2019). Opportunities of Sustainable Manufacturiong in Industry 4.0, The Changing Nature of Work. World Development Report. Washington: International Bank for Reconstruction and Development.
- 67. Stone, D. et al. (2015). The influence of technology on the future of human resources management. Human Resources Management Review, vol. 25, pp. 216-231.
- 68. Strohmeier, S. (2007). Research in e-HRM: Review and implications. Human Resource Management Review, 17(1), pp. 19-37, DOI: 10.1016/j.hrmr,2006.11.002.
- 69. Structural transformation, Industry 4.0 and inequality: Science, technology and innovation policy challenges (2019). United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, Trade and Development Board, Investment, Enterprise and Development Commission, Geneva, 11-15 November 2019.
- 70. Volini, E. et al. (2019). Global Human Capital Trends 2019 Deloitte. New York: Deloitte Insights (pdf).
- 71. Wang, L., and Wang, G. (2016). Big Data in Cyber-Physical System, Digital Manufacturing. I.J. Engineering and Manufacturing, 4, pp. 1-8, DOI: 10.5815/ijem.2016.04.01.
- 72. Withers, M. et al. (2010). Transforming HR. Creating Value Through People. Oxford: Elsevier.
- 73. Yin, S., and Kaynak, O. (2015). Big Data for Modern Industry: Challenges and Trends. Proceedings of The IEEE, 103/2, pp. 143-146.
- 74. Ying, X. (2018). An Overview of Overfitting and its Solutions. Journal of Phisics: Conf. Series, 1168, pp. 1-6. DOI: 101088/1742-6596/1168/2/022022.
- 75. Zysman, J., and Kenney, M. (2018). The Next Phase in the Digital Revolution: Intelligent Tools, Platforms. Growth, Employment, Communication of The ACM, 61, pp. 54-63.
Uwagi
PL
Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MEiN, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2022-2023).
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-6543569a-9b27-43b5-b32b-003072db29a9