Investigated Serious Occupational Accidents in The Netherlands, 1998–2009

• Autorzy: Bellamy L. J. , Manuel H. J. , Oh J. I. H.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Since 2003, a project has been underway to analyse the most serious occupational accidents in The Netherlands.All the serious occupational accidents investigated by the Dutch Labour Inspectorate for the 12 years of 1998−2009 inclusive have been entered into a database, a total of 20 030 investigations. This database uses a model of safety barriers supported by barrier tasks and management delivery systems such that, when combined with sector and year information, trends in the data can be analysed for their underlying causes. The trend analyses show that while the number of victims of serious reportable accidents is significantly decreasing, this is due to specific sectors, hazards and underlying causes. The significant results could not easily be directly associated with any specific regulation or action undertaken in The Netherlands although there have been many different approaches to reducing accidents during the period analysed, which could be contributing to the effect.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

accident analysis; trends; safety barriers

PL

wypadki przy pracy; Holandia; badanie wypadków; bariery bezpieczeństwa

• Wydawca: Taylor & Francis
• Czasopismo: International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics
• Rocznik: 2014
• Tom: Vol. 20, No. 1
• Strony: 19--32
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 22 poz., rys., tab., wykr.

Twórcy

autor

Bellamy L. J.

• White Queen Safety Strategies, Hoofddorp, The Netherlands

autor

Manuel H. J.

• National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Centre for Safety, Bilthoven, The Netherlands

autor

Oh J. I. H.

• Health & Safety Directorate, Ministry of Social Affairs and Employment, Den Haag, The Netherlands

Bibliografia

• 1.Hamalainen P, Saarela KL, Takala J. Global trend according to estimated number of occupational accidents and fatal workrelated diseases at region and country level. J Safety Res. 2009;40(2):125–39.
• 2.Boone J, van Ours JC, Wuellrich JP, Zweimüller J. Recessions are bad for workplace safety. J Health Econ. 2011;30(4):764–73.
• 3.Damen M, Berkhout P, Wouters R. Risks to young people at work: experience or exposure? Safety Science Monitor. 2013:17 (1):1–11. Retrieved January 13, 2014, from: http://ssmon.chb.kth.se/vol17/6_Damen.pdf.
• 4.European Agency for Safety and Health at Work. A review and analysis of a selection of OSH monitoring systems. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities; 2003. Retrieved January 13, 2014, from: https://osha.europa.eu/en/publications/reports/406.
• 5.Sklet S. Safety barriers: definition, classification, and performance. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries. 2006;19(5):494–506.
• 6.Hollnagel E. Barriers and accident prevention. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate; 2004.
• 7.National Institute for Public Health and Environment (RIVM). The quantification of occupational risk. The development of a risk assessment model and software (Report 620801001/2008). Bilthoven, The Netherlands: RIVM; 2008. Retrieved January 13, 2014, from: http://www.rivm.nl/bibliotheek/rapporten/620801001.pdf.
• 8.Bellamy LJ, Ale BJM, Geyer TAW, Goossens LHJ, Hale AR, Oh J, et al. Storybuilder—a tool for the analysis of accident reports. Reliability Engineering & System Safety. 2007;92(6):735–44.
• 9.Statistics Netherlands. Labour accounts; employment, economic activity, sex. Den Haag/Heerleen: Statistics Netherlands; 2013. Retrieved January 13, 2014, from: http://statline.cbs.nl/StatWeb/publication/?DM=SLEN&PA=81108eng&D1=2&D2=0&D3=0&D4=0&D5=29-40&LA=EN&HDR=G2,G1,G3,T&STB=G4&VW=T.
• 10.Hooftman W, van der Klauw M, Hesselink JK, Terwoert J, Jongen M, Kraan K, et al. Arbobalans 2011 [Occupational safety and health balance 2011]. Hoofddorp, The Netherlands: TNO; 2012. Retrieved January 13, 2014, from: http://www.monitorarbeid.tno.nl/dynamics//modules/SPUB0102/view.php?pub_Id=100059&att_Id=4911.
• 11.Roozeboom MB, Hengel KO, van der Klauw M, de Weerd M, Stam C, Nijman S, et al. Sector profielen. Bijlagen bij de Monitor Arbeidesongevallen 2009 [Sector profiles of occupational accidents. Annex to the occupational accident monitor 2009]. Hoofddorp, The Netherlands: TNO; 2011. Retrieved January 13, 2014, from: http://www.monitorarbeid.tno.nl/dynamics//modules/SPUB0102/view.php?pub_Id=100127&att_Id=4911.
• 12.Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek (CBS). Standaard Bedrijfs Indeling 2008 [Standard business classification 2008]. Den Haag, The Netherlands: CBS; 2013. Retrieved January 13, 2014, from: http://www.cbs.nl/nl-NL/menu/methoden/classificaties/overzicht/sbi/sbi-2008/default.htm.
• 13.Damen M, Sol VM, Wouters R. Blootstelling aan risicovolle situaties op het werk in 2006 en 2011 [Exposure to occupational hazards in 2006 and 2011 ] (Report 620060001/2012). Bilthoven, The Netherlands: RIVM; 2012. Retrieved January 13, 2014, from: http://www.rivm.nl/bibliotheek/rapporten/620060001.pdf.
• 14.National Institute for Public Health and the Environment. Storybuilder (ENG) Causes per type of accident. 2013. Retrieved January 13, 2014, from: http://www.rivm.nl/en/Topics/S/Storybuilder/Causes_per_type_of_accident.
• 15.Bellamy LJ. Exploring the relationship between major hazard, fatal and non-fatal accidents through outcomes and causes. Saf Sci. In press.
• 16.Hesselink JK, Houtman I, Hooftman W, Roozeboom MB. Arbobalans 2009 [Occupational safety and health balance 2009]. Hoofddorp, The Netherlands: TNO; 2009. Retrieved January 13, 2014, from: http://www.inspectieszw.nl/images/arbobalans%202009%5B1%5D_tcm335-327444.pdf.
• 17.Arbeidsinspectie. Heftrucks. Resultaten van een inspectieproject 2004−2005 [Forklift trucks. Results of an inspection project 2004−2005]. Den Haag, The Netherlands: Arbeidsinspectie; 2005. Retrieved January 13, 2014, from: http://www.inspectieszw.nl/Images/Heftrucks%2C%20resultaten%20van%20een%20inspectieproject%202004-2005_tcm335-312501.pdf.
• 18.De praktijk van arbeidsveiligheid [Occupational safety in practice].Den Haag, The Netherlands: Ministery of Social Affairs and Employment; 2006. Retrieved January 13, 2014, from: http://www.arboportaal.nl/types/brochure/brochure-verbetertrajecten.html.
• 19.Arbobalans 2002 [Occupational safety and health balance 2002]. Den Haag, The Netherlands: Ministery of Social Affairs and Employment; 2002. Retrieved January 13, 2014, from: http://www.preact.nl/downloads/preact_arbo-balans-2002.pdf.
• 20.Houtman I, Smulders P, van den Bossche S. Arbobalans 2005 [Occupational safety and health balance 2005]. Hoofddorp, The Netherlands: TNO; 2006. Retrieved January 13, 2014, from: http://www.monitorarbeid.tno.nl/publicaties/arbobalans-2005.
• 21.Jorgensen K, Duijm NJ, Troen H. Message maps for safety barrier awareness. Safety Science Monitor. 2001;15(2):1–9. Retrieved January 13, 2014, from: http://ssmon.chb.kth.se/vol15/issue2/4_Jorgensen.pdf.
• 22.European Commission. Non-binding guide to good practice for implementing Directive 2001/45/EC (Work at a height). Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities; 2007. Retrieved January 13, 2014, from: http://bookshop.europa.eu/en/how-to-choosethe-most-appropriate-work-equipment-forperforming-temporary-work-at-a-height-pbKE7807305/?CatalogCategoryID=Ke4KABstjN4AAAEj8pAY4e5L.