A comparative study of power circuit topologies for two-wing armature electromagnetic launcher

Prasad, Gajja; Srichandan, Kondamudi

doi:10.12913/22998624/199736

Artykuł - szczegóły

Tytuł artykułu

A comparative study of power circuit topologies for two-wing armature electromagnetic launcher

Autorzy

Prasad Gajja , Srichandan Kondamudi

Treść / Zawartość

Pełne teksty:

Pobierz

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.12913/22998624/199736

Warianty tytułu

Języki publikacji

Abstrakty

This study investigates the performance characteristics of a Two-Wing Armature Electromagnetic Launcher under various power circuit configurations. The TWAEL model able to enhances magnetic flux density, a maximum of 2.3383 T, significantly outperforming traditional quadrupole railguns. This increased magnetic flux density contributes to superior acceleration and velocity capabilities. The study reveals that the SCR-controlled inductive energy storage circuit offers over 100 times the force output compared to a switched RC circuit, highlighting its potential for optimizing projectile performance. The paper provides critical insights for different power circuit configuration for electromagnetic launchers. The findings emphasize the integration of power circuit designs to enhance the efficiency, acceleration, and overall effectiveness of electromagnetic propulsion systems. This work lays the groundwork for future advancements in electromagnetic launcher technology, aiming to improve military, aerospace, and industrial applications.

Słowa kluczowe

electromagnetic launcher power circuit performance metric magnetic field strength efficiency

Wydawca

Lublin University of Technology
Polish Society of Ecological Engineering (PTIE), Branch of PTIE in Lublin

Czasopismo

Advances in Science and Technology. Research Journal

Rocznik

2025

Tom

Vol. 19, no. 4

Strony

32--41

Opis fizyczny

Bibliogr. 32 poz., fig., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Prasad Gajja

pgajja@gitam.edu

GITAM deemed to be University, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, India

autor

Srichandan Kondamudi

skondamu@gitam.edu

GITAM deemed to be University, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, India

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8047-5625

Bibliografia

1. Petrescu, R.V.V., Aversa, R., Apicella, A., and Petrescu, F.I.T. Modern propulsions for the aerospace industry. American Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences 2018; 11(2): 715–755. https://doi.org/10.3844/ajeassp.2018.715.755.
2. Rovey, J., Lyne, C.T., Mundahl A.J., et al. Review of chemical-electric multimode space propulsion. AIAA Propulsion and Energy 2019 Forum. 2019. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2019-4169.
3. Powell, J., and Maise, G. StarTram: The Magnetic Launch Path to Very Low Cost, Very High Volume Launch to Space. 2008 14th Symposium on Electromagnetic Launch Technology. 2008. https://doi.org/10.1109/elt.2008.76.
4. Praneeth, S.R.N., Chaudhuri, D., Chatterjee, S., et al. Department of Electrical Engineering, IIT Delhi, New Delhi, India. A novel electromagnetic launcher configuration with improved system and barrel efficiencies. IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science 2020; 48(10): 3429–3434. https://doi.org/10.1109/tps.2020.3018746.
5. Felber, F. Centrifugal projectile launchers. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics 1982; 18(1): 209–212. https://doi.org/10.1109/tmag.1982.1061770.
6. Engel, T.G., and Timpson, E.J. A general theory of DC electromagnetic launchers. Journal of Applied Physics 2015; 118(8). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4928809.
7. Engel, T.G., Neri, J.M. and Veracka, M.J. Solid-projectile helical coil electromagnetic launcher. 2007 16th IEEE International Pulsed Power Conference. 2008; 2. IEEE, https://doi.org/10.1109/ppps.2007.4346319.
8. Lv, Qing-ao, Li, Z.-Y., Xie, S.-S., et al. A practical electromagnetic launcher concept-part I: Primary structure design and armature optimal simulation. 2012 16th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Launch Technology. IEEE, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1109/eml.2012.6325092.
9. Cowan, M., et al. Exploratory development of the reconnection launcher 1986–90. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics 1991; 27(1): 563–567. https://doi.org/10.1109/20.101095.
10. Chun, Z., Jiyan, Z., Xiaopeng, L., et al. Study of a three-stage reconnection electromagnetic launcher using triggered vacuum switches. IEEE transactions on magnetics 2006; 43(1): 219–222. https://doi.org/10.1109/tmag.2006.887717.
11. Lv, Q.-a., Li, Z.-Y., Lei, B., et al. Primary structural design and optimal armature simulation for a practical electromagnetic launcher. IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science 2013; 41(5): 1403–1409. https://doi.org/10.1109/tps.2013.2251679.
12. Shi-Cao, Z., Song Z.-F., and Zhoa X.-P. A potential approach to launch hypervelocity projectiles up to 10 km/s based on two-stage gas gun facilities. Procedia Engineering 2013; 58: 98–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2013.05.013.
13. Guangcheng, F., Wang, Y., Xu, Q., et al. Design and analysis of a novel three-coil reconnection electromagnetic launcher. IEEE transactions on plasma science 2018; 47(1): 814–820. https://doi.org/10.1109/tps.2018.2874287.
14. Daldaban, F., and Vekil S. The optimization of a projectile from a three-coil reluctance launcher. Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences 2016; 24(4): 2771–2788. https://doi.org/10.3906/elk-1404-18.
15. Cnare, E.C., Widner, M.M. and Duggin, B.W. A 10-stage reconnection demonstration launcher. IEEE transactions on magnetics 1991; 27(1): 644–646. https://doi.org/10.1109/20.101110.
16. Liyi, L., Li X., and Hu Y. New application of reconnection electromagnetic launch (RCEML) with plate projectile: space application. International Conference on Recent Advances in Space Technologies, 2003. RAST’03. Proceedings of. IEEE, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1109/rast.2003.1303954.
17. Zhu, Y., Wang, Y., Yan, Z., et al. Multipole field electromagnetic launcher. IEEE transactions on magnetics 2010; 46(7): 2622–2627. https://doi.org/10.1109/tmag.2010.2044416.
18. Yan, Z., Long, X., Lu, F., et al. Study of single-stage double-armature multipole field electromagnetic launcher. IEEE Transactions On Plasma Science 2017; 45(8): 2381–2386. https://doi.org/10.1109/tps.2017.2716421.
19. Liu, S., Miao, H., Guan, J., Ciu, M. Investigation of electromagnetic characteristic in series-connected augmented quadrupole rail launcher. IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science 2020; 48(1): 299–304. https://doi.org/10.1109/tps.2019.2960023.
20. Yadong, Z., Gang, X., Yujia, G., et al. Armature structure research of a synchronous induction coil launcher. IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science 2017; 45(7): 1574–1578. https://doi.org/10.1109/tps.2017.2706270.
21. Musolino, A., Raugi, M., Rizzo, R., Tripodi, E. Modeling of the gyroscopic stabilization in a traveling-wave multipole field electromagnetic launcher via an analytical approach. IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science 2015; 43(5): 1236–1241. https://doi.org/10.1109/tps.2015.2403774.
22. Musolino, A., Rocco R., and Ernesto T. The double-sided tubular linear induction motor and its possible use in the electromagnetic aircraft launch system. IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science 2013; 41(5): 1193–1200. https://doi.org/10.1109/tps.2013.2244915.
23. Musolino, A., Rocco R., and Ernesto T. Analytical model of a travelling wave multipole field electromagnetic launcher. 2012 16th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Launch Technology. IEEE, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1109/eml.2012.6325051.
24. ANSYS. (2023), ANSYS sys. Accessed: 2023.
25. Srichandan, K., and Pasumarthi, M.R. Computations of magnetic forces in multipole field electromagnetic launcher. 1 Jun. 2019; 4(3), 761. https://doi.org/10.33889//ijmems.2019.4.3-059.
26. Srichandan, K., Thotakura, S., Pasumarthi, M.R., et al. A novel type coil-multipole field hybrid electromagnetic launching system. 1 Dec. 2019; 15: 102786. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2019.102786.
27. Manohar, K., and Srichandan, K. Analysis of quadrupole magnetic field reluctance-based launcher with different coil switching patterns. 1 May. 2023; 51(5): 1370–1376. https://doi.org/10.1109/tps.2023.3266515.
28. Manohar, K., Srichandan, K. A Comprehensive design and simulation of quadrupole electromagnetic linear systems for precise positioning in aerospace. 11 Jun. 2024; 19(6): https://doi.org/10.26782/jmcms.2024.06.00006.
29. Kondamudi, S., and Thotakura, S. Design of multi-stage dodecapole electrical propelling system (DEPS) and its possible use in the hyperloop transportation. In Smart and Intelligent Systems: Proceedings of SIS 2021, 2022; 499–511. Springer Singapore.
30. Thotakura, S., Srichandan, K., and Rao, P.M. A novel configuration of multi-stage outrunner electromagnetic launching for aircraft catapult system. In Advances in Decision Sciences, Image Processing, Security and Computer Vision: International Conference on Emerging Trends in Engineering (ICETE), 2020; 2: 364–372. Springer International Publishing.
31. Kolm, H., Mongeau, P. and Williams, F. Electromagnetic launchers. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 1980; 16(5): 719–721.
32. McNab, I.R., Stefani, F., Crawford, M., Erengil, M., Persad, C., Satapathy, S., Vanicek, H., Watt, T. and Dampier, C. Development of a naval railgun. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 2005; 41(1), 206–210.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa nr POPUL/SP/0154/2024/02 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki II" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki (2025).

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.baztech-65017891-18cf-425e-ae81-54b710a1e9f9