Technological and market aspects of meat production

• Autorzy: Tucki Karol , Wielewska Izabela , Zuzek Dagmara K. , Nowakowski Tomasz

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.29119/1641-3466.2024.203.32

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Purpose: The article presents a detailed analysis of the development of the European meat market. Based on statistical data for 2007-2023, a forecast of the sector's development until 2030 was prepared. The production of pork, poultry, beef, mutton and goat meat in all European Union countries was analyzed in detail. Based on statistical data, a forecast of carbon dioxide emissions and water consumption in the production process was prepared. The case study presents the characteristics of a selected meat plant from the point of view of the technological process implemented there and the impact of the meat plant on the environment. The main factors affecting the environment were also analyzed, i.e. the amount of air pollution emissions, the amount of waste generated and the amount of sewage discharged. The concentrations of pollutants released into the air were calculated for the installations operating in the plant. Design/methodology/approach: The subject of observation and assessment were industry reports, technology block diagrams and calculations based on those provided by the examined business entity. The presentation and detailed analysis of available data took the form of tables and bar charts, which were justified descriptively. The source of information for this study was the literature on the subject, statistical data and numerous studies by the Central Statistical Office and Eurostat, reports in the industry section, an interview with the owner of the meat plant, analysis of source documents provided by the examined business entity as well as the authors' own observations. The characteristics and sales market of the company were examined. The machinery of the examined company and the level of investments made over the years were also analyzed. Findings: The examined production plant produces goods for 12 months a year. It processes 2500 tons of raw material annually, or ca. 48 tons of livestock per week. The specific nature of the plant requires continuity of production. The article presents the characteristics of the production plant, the production process and the plant's technological and production facilities. The impact of the production process at the plant on the environment was analyzed in terms of applicable legal aspects and emission limits. Research limitations/implications: The analysis of the meat production sector and development forecasts was carried out for all European Union countries. The impact of the meat production plant was analyzed for a selected entity located in Poland.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

production; technology; production plant; forecast

PL

produkcja; technologia; zakład produkcyjny; prognoza

• Wydawca: Wydawnictwo Politechniki Śląskiej
• Czasopismo: Zeszyty Naukowe. Organizacja i Zarządzanie / Politechnika Śląska
• Rocznik: 2024
• Tom: z. 203
• Strony: 575--598
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 29 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Tucki Karol

• Warsaw University of Life Sciences

• https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7340-4100

autor

Wielewska Izabela

• Bydgoszcz University of Science and Technology

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1721-6890

autor

Zuzek Dagmara K.

• University of Agriculture in Krakow

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7620-1621

autor

Nowakowski Tomasz

• Warsaw University of Life Sciences

• https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2376-4284

Bibliografia

• 1. Agri-Food Markets (2024). Browse by Topic. European Commission. Available online: https://agridata.ec.europa.eu/extensions/DataPortal/agricultural_markets.html, 19 September 2024.
• 2. Augère-Granier, M.L. (2020). The EU pig meat sector. Available online: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2020/652044/EPRS_BRI(2020)652044_EN.pdf, 19 September 2024.
• 3. Caputo, V., Sun, J., Staples, A.J., Taylor, H. (2024). Market outlook for meat alternatives: Challenges, opportunities, and new developments. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 148, p. 104474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2024.104474.
• 4. Carlberg, C. (2010). Statistical analysis. Microsoft Excel. Gliwice: Helion, pp. 193-377.
• 5. Eurostat (2022). Agricultural production - livestock and meat. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Agricultural_ production_-_livestock_and_meat, 19 September 2024.
• 6. Eurostat (2024). Decline in EU livestock population in 2023. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-eurostat-news/w/ddn-20240521-2, 19 September 2024.
• 7. Farmer. Eurostat: EU livestock population to decline in 2023. Available online: https://www.farmer.pl/produkcja-zwierzeca/eurostat-spadek-poglowia-zwierzat-gospodarskich-w-ue-w-2023-r,146639.html, 19 September 2024.
• 8. Fathollahzadeh, K., Saeedi, M., Khalili-Fard, A., Rabbani, M., Aghsami, A. (2024). Multi-objective optimization for a green forward-reverse meat supply chain network design under uncertainty: Utilizing waste and by-products. Computers & Industrial Engineering, pp. 110578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2024.110578.
• 9. Flaibam, B., Silva, M.F., Mélo, A.H.F., Carvalho, P.C., Galland, F., Pacheco, M.T.B., Goldbeck, R. (2024). Non-animal protein hydrolysates from agro-industrial wastes: A prospect of alternative inputs for cultured meat. Food Chemistry, 443, pp. 138515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2024.138515.
• 10. Gardenlux (2024). Broiler chicken breeds with photos and descriptions. Available online: https://gardenlux-en.decorexpro.com/hozyajstvo/ptitsevodstvo/porody-brojlernyh-kur-s-foto-i-opisaniem.html, 19 September 2024.
• 11. Gilland, B. (2002). World population and food supply: can food production keep pace with population growth in the next half-century? Food Policy, 27, pp. 47-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0306-9192(02)00002-7.
• 12. Kaul, K., Rajauria, G., Singh, R. (2024). Valorization of agro-industrial waste for pectinase production and its influence on circular economy. Food and Bioproducts Processing, 148, pp. 141-153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fbp.2024.09.008.
• 13. Manika, D., Iacovidou, E., Canhoto, A., Pei, E., Mach, K. (2022). Capabilities, opportunities and motivations that drive food waste disposal practices: A case study of young adults in England. Journal of Cleaner Production, 370, pp. 133449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133449.
• 14. Mavai, S., Bains, A., Sridhar, K., Chawla, P., Sharma, M. (2025). Emerging deep eutectic solvents for food waste valorization to achieve sustainable development goals: Bioactive extractions and food applications. Food Chemistry, 462, pp. 141000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2024.141000.
• 15. Michna, W. (2012). Development Forecasts for Global Agricultural Production and its Consumption as Well as Use for Non-Food Purposes in 2011-2020. Zagadnienia Ekonomiki Rolnej, 3, pp. 104-113.
• 16. Olszewski, A. (2018). Meat processing technology. Warszawa: WNT, pp. 46-313.
• 17. Opio, C., Gerber, P., Mottet, A., Falcucci, A., Tempio, G., MacLeod, M., Vellinga, T., Henderson, B., Steinfeld, H. (2013). Greenhouse gas emissions from ruminant supply chains - A global life cycle assessment. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Available online: https://www.fao.org/4/i3461e/i3461e.pdf, 19 September 2024.
• 18. Pethick, D.W., Hocquette, J.F., Scollan, N.D., Dunshea, F.R. (2021). Review: Improving the nutritional, sensory and market value of meat products from sheep and cattle. Animal, 15, pp. 100356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.animal.2021.100356.
• 19. Santos, R.A., Costa, J.S., Maranduba, H.L., Neto, J.A., Rodrigues, L.B. (2023). Reducing the environmental impacts of Brazilian chicken meat production using different waste recovery strategies. Journal of Environmental Management, 341, p. 118021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118021.
• 20. Sigala, E.G., Chroni, C., Boikou, K., Abeliotis, K., Panagiotakos, D., Lasaridi, K. (2024). Quantification of household food waste in Greece to establish the 2021 national baseline and methodological implications. Waste Management, 190, pp. 102-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2024.09.012.
• 21. Sobczak, A., Błyszczek, E. (2009). Ways of management of by-products from meat industry. Czasopismo Techniczne. Chemia, 106, pp. 141-151.
• 22. Szymańska, E. (2006). Influence of the EU enlargement on the pork market in Poland. Zeszyty Naukowe SGGW w Warszawie - Problemy Rolnictwa Światowego, 15, pp. 377-386.
• 23. The Guardian (2024). How much water is needed to produce food and how much do we waste? Available online: https://www.theguardian.com/news/datablog/2013/jan/10/how-much-water-food-production-waste, 19 September 2024.
• 24. Topagrar (2024). Beef Market 2023 - Decrease in headcount, production and exports. Who is pushing elbows in the EU and wants to take our place? Available online: https://www.topagrar.pl/articles/bydlo-miesne/rynek-wolowiny-2023-spadek-poglowia- produkcji-i-eksportu-kto-rozpycha-sie-lokciami-w-ue-i-chce-zajac-nasze-miejsce-2496994, 19 September 2024.
• 25. Vinci, C. (2022). European Union beef sector. Main features, challenges and prospects. Available online: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2022/733676/ EPRS_BRI(2022)733676_EN.pdf, 19 September 2024.
• 26. Vinci, G., Prencipe, S.A., Ruggieri, R., Ruggeri, M. (2024). How much does overnutrition weigh? The environmental and social impacts of Metabolic Food Waste in Italy. Science of The Total Environment, 947, p. 174420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.174420.
• 27. Wanassi, O.K., Torres, D.F.M. (2023). An integral boundary fractional model to the world population growth. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 168, pp. 113151. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.chaos.2023.113151.
• 28. Wojdalski, J., Dróżdż, B. (2004). Podstawy analizy oddziaływania zakładów przetwórstwa rolno-spożywczego na środowisko. Inżynieria Rolnicza, 5, pp. 363-371.
• 29. Wojdalski, J., Dróżdż, B. (2006). Podstawy analizy energochłonności produkcji zakładów przemysłu rolno-spożywczego. MOTROL, Motoryzacja i Energetyka Rolnictwa, 8A, pp. 294-304.