Ethical or unethical HRM? The story of two cooperative inquiry projects with HRM professionals

• Autorzy: Csillag S.

Warianty tytułu

PL

Etyczne czy nieetyczne ZZL? Historia dwóch wspólnych projektów poznawczych realizowanych wśród specjalistów ZZL

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Ethical or unethical HRM? What does "being ethical" mean in relation to the human resources function? In my paper I would like draw attention to the emerging significance of HRM ethics. I wish to demonstrate how the democratic methodology of co-operative inquiry (based on participatory paradigms and practice) relates to HRM research. My intention is twofold: first, I wish to share some interpretations of the participants concerning their own definition of ethics, their interpretations of role morality and moral muteness. Second, I want to show that a co-operative methodology can be a novel way of exploring ethical dilemmas and it can also facilitate more ethical action.

PL

Etyczne lub nieetyczne ZZL? Co oznacza "bycie etycznym" w odniesieniu do zarządzania zasobami ludzkimi? W niniejszej pracy zwracam uwagę na coraz większą rolę i znaczenie etyki w zarządzaniu zasobami ludzkimi. Chciałabym pokazać, jak demokratyczna metodologia wspólnych badań poznawczych (opartych na paradygmatach uczestniczących i praktyce) odnosi się do badań w zakresie ZZL. Moja intencja jest dwojaka: po pierwsze, pragnę podzielić się interpretacją uczestników badań dotyczącą ich własnej definicji etyki, ich interpretacją na temat roli moralności i moralnego milczenia. Po drugie, chcę pokazać, że metodologia wspólnych badań poznawczych może być nowym sposobem odkrywania dylematów etycznych i może również ułatwić bardziej etyczne działania.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

human resource management; HRM ethics; cooperative inquiry

PL

zarządzanie zasobami ludzkimi; etyka w ZZL; wspólne badania poznawcze

• Wydawca: Wydawnictwo Politechniki Śląskiej
• Czasopismo: Organizacja i Zarządzanie : kwartalnik naukowy
• Rocznik: 2014
• Tom: nr 4
• Strony: 51--74
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 62 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Csillag S.

• Budapest Business School

Bibliografia

• 1. Alford H.J., Naughton M.J.: Menedzsment, ha számít a hit. Keresztény társadalmi elvek a modern korban [Managing as if Faith Matters]. Kairosz, Budapest 2004.
• 2. Balázs B.: Kooperativ kutatás a hazai élelmiszer-hálózatok elősegítésére [Co-operative inquiry aiming to facilitate alternative agro food-networks]. In Részvétel – akció – kutatás, ed. Gy. Pataki and A.Vári. MTA Szociológiai Intézet, Budapest 2011.
• 3. Bauman Z.: Postmodern ethics. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford 1993.
• 4. Bird F.B.: Moral muteness. In The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Management. Business Ethics, Werhane P.H., Freeman R.E (eds.), Blackwell Publishing, Oxford 2005, p. 360-363.
• 5. Bokor A., Bíró K., Kováts G., Takács S., Toarniczky A.: Humán tükör – körkép a hazai szervezetekben a HR tevékenységre vonatkozó elvárásokról és annak megítéléséről I. (HR Mirror – picture of definitions and expectations towards HR activity in Hungary I.) “Vezetéstudomány”, No. 36(1), 2005, p. 33-47.
• 6. Bokor A.: HR Tükör Kutatási eredmények (HR Mirror Research results). Kézirat, Budapest 2010.
• 7. Bolton S.C., Houlihan M.: Searching for the Human in Human Resource Management. Palgrave Macmillan, New York 2007.
• 8. Bowie N.: The Kantian theory of meaningful work. “Journal of Business Ethics”, No. 17(9-10), New York 2007, p. 1083-1092.
• 9. Brinkmann J.: Putting ethics on the agenda for real estate agents. “Journal of Business Ethics”, No. 88(1), 2009, p. 65-82.
• 10. Crane A., Matten D.: Business Ethics. Oxford University Press, Oxford 2007.
• 11. Deckop J.: Human Resource Management Ethics. Information Age Publishing, Greenwich, Connecticut 2006.
• 12. Delbridge R., Keenoy T.: Beyond managerism? “International Journal of Human Resource Management”, No. 21(6), 2010, p. 799-817.
• 13. Freire P.: Creating alternative research methods: Learning to do by doing it. In Creating knowledge: a monopoly? Hall B. (ed.). Society for Participatory Research in Asia, New Delhi 1982, p. 29-37.
• 14. Gelei A.: A szervezeti tanulás interpretatív megközelítése: a szervezetfejlesztés esete [An interpretive approach to organizational learning: the case of organization development]. PhD dissertation, Corvinus University, Budapest 2002.
• 15. Ghoshal S.: Bad management theories are destroying good management practices. Academy of Management Learning and Education, No. 4(1), 2005, p. 75-91.
• 16. Goodpaster K.E.: Conscience and corporate culture. Blackwell Publishing, USA 2007.
• 17. Greenwood M.R.: Ethics and HRM: A review and conceptual analysis. “Journal of Business Ethics”, No. 36(3), 2002, p. 261-278.
• 18. Greenwood M.R.: Ethics and Human Resource Management. In Human Resource Management in Australia, De Cieri H., Kramar R. (eds.). McGraw-Hill, Australia 2007.
• 19. Greenwood M.R.: Ethical Analyses of HRM: A Review and Research Agenda. “Journal of Business Ethics”, Doi: 10.1007/s10551-012-1354-y, 2012.
• 20. Grey C., Willmott H.: Critical Management Studies. A reader. Oxford University Press, Oxford 2005.
• 21. Jones T., Ryan L.: The effect of organizational forces on individual morality: judgement, moral approbation and behavior. “Business Ethics Quarterly”, No. 8(3), 1998, p. 431-445.
• 22. Habermas J.: A kommunikatív etika [Theorie des kommunkativen Handelns]. Új Mandátum Kiadó, Budapest 2001.
• 23. Heron J.: Impressions on the other reality: a co-operative inquiry into altered states of consciousness. In Human Inquiry in Action, Reason P. (ed.), Sage, London 1988, p. 182-198.
• 24. Heron J.: Co-operative inquiry. Research into the Human Condition. Sage, London 1996.
• 25. Heron J., Reason P.: A participatory action paradigm. “Qualitative Inquiry”, No. 3(3), 1997, p. 274-294.
• 26. Heron J., Reason P.: The practice of co-operative inquiry: research with rather than on people. In Handbook of Action Research, Reason P., Bradbury H. (eds.). Sage, London 2001, p. 179-188.
• 27. Johnson C.: Meeting the ethical challenges of leadership. Sage, London 2007.
• 28. Kolb D.: Experiential learning. Experience as a source of learning and development. Prentice Hall, London 1984.
• 29. Kvale S.: InterViews. An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Sage, Thousand Oaks, California 1996.
• 30. Legge K.: Is HRM ethical? Can HRM be ethical? In Ethics and organisations, Parker M. (ed.). Sage, London 1998, p. 150-172.
• 31. Legge K.: Representing People at Work. “Organisation”, No. 6(2), 1999, p. 247-264.
• 32. Legge K.: Human Resource Management. Rhetorics and Realities. Palgrave, New York 2005.
• 33. Lepak D., Colakoglu S.: Ethics and strategic human resource management. In Human Resource Management Ethics, Deckop J. (ed.). Information Age Publishing, Greenwich, CT 2006, p. 27-45.
• 34. Levinas E.: Alterity and transcendence. Columbia University Press, New York 1999.
• 35. Lewin K.: Action research and minority problems. “Journal of Social Issues”, No. 2(4), 1946, p. 34-46.
• 36. Maslow A.: A lét pszichológiája felé [Toward a Psychology of Being]. Ursus Libris, Budapest 2003.
• 37. Maxwell J.A.: Qualitative research design: An interactive approach. Sage, London 2005.
• 38. Orlitzky M., Swanson D.: Socially Responsible Human Resource Management, [in:] Deckop J. (ed): Human Resource Management Ethics. Information Age Publishing, Greenwich, Connecticut 2006, p. 3-24.
• 39. Palazzo B.: U.S.-American and German Business Ethics: An Intercultural Comparison. “Journal of Business Ethics”, No. 41(3), 2002, p. 195-216.
• 40. Parker: Ethics and organisations. Sage, London1998.
• 41. Pataki Gy., Bodorkós B., Balázs B., Bela Gy., Kelemen E., Kohlheb N.: A vidékfejlesztés demokratizálásának lehetősége: részvételi akciókutatás a Mezőcsáti kistérségben [The possibility of democratization of rural development]. In Részvétel – akció – kutatás [Participation – action – research], Pataki Gy., Vári A. (eds.). MTA Szociológiai Intézet, Budapest 2011.
• 42. Pinnington A., Macklin R., Cambell T. (eds.): Introduction. In Human Resource Management. Ethics and Employment. Oxford University Press, Oxford 2007, p. 1-22.
• 43. Radácsi L.: Szervezeti etika és etikai intézményesedés [Corporate ethics and institutionalization]. PhD értekezés. Corvinus University, Budapest 2000.
• 44. Reason P.: Human inquiry in Action. Sage, London 1988.
• 45. Reason P.: Three approaches to participative inquiry. In Handbook of Qualitative Research. Denzin, Lincoln (eds.). Sage, London 1994, p. 324-338.
• 46. Reason P.: Integrating action and reflexion through co-operative inquiry. Management Learning. Special Issue: The Action Dimension in Management. “Diverse Approaches to Research, Teaching and Development”, No. 30(2), 1999, p. 207-227.
• 47. Reason P.: Choice and quality in action research practice. “Journal of Management Inquiry”, No. 15(2), 2006, p. 187-208.
• 48. Reason P., Bradbury H.: Inquiry & participation in searching of a world of worthy of human aspiration. In Handbook of Action Research. Reason P., Bradbury H. (eds.). Sage, London 2001, p. 1-14.
• 49. Reason P., Marshall J.: On working with graduate research students. In Handbook of Action Research. Reason P., Bradbury H. (eds.). Sage, London 2001, p. 315-320.
• 50. Rest J.R.: Moral development. Advances in theory and practice. Praeger Publishers, New York 1986.
• 51. Rogers R.: Valakivé válni – A személyiség születése [A Way of Being]. Edge 2000 Kft, Budapest 2004.
• 52. Saint-Exupéry A.: A kis herceg [Le Petit Prince]). Móra Ferenc Kiadó, Budapest 2011.
• 53. Toffler B.L.: Managers talk ethics. Making tough choices in a competitive business world. John Wiley, New York 1986.
• 54. Towney B.: Foucault, Power/Knowledge and Its Relevance for Human Resource Management. “Academy of Management Review”, No. 18(3), 1993, p. 518-545.
• 55. Trevino L.K., Weaver G.R.: Managing ethics in Business Organizations. Social Scientific perspectives. Stanford University Press, Stanford 2003.
• 56. Ulrich D., Beatty D.: From partners to players: extending the HR playing field. “Human Resource Management”, No. 40(4), 2001, p. 293-307.
• 57. Waters J., Bird F., Chant P.: Everyday Moral Issues Experienced by Managers. “Journal of Business Ethics” No. 5(5), 1986, p. 373-384.
• 58. Werhane P.H., Radin T., Bowie N.E.: Employment and Employee Rights. Foundation of Business Ethics. Blackwell Publishing, UK 2004.
• 59. White R.D.: Do employees act like they? Exploring the dichotomy between moral judgement and ethical behaviour. “Public Administration Quarterly”, No. 25(4), 2002, p. 391-410.
• 60. Wiley C.: Reexamining perceived ethics issues and ethics roles among employment managers. “Journal of Business Ethics”, No. 17(2), 1998, p. 147-161.
• 61. Wooten K.: Ethical dilemmas in human resource management: an application of a multidimensional framework, a unifying taxonomy, and applicable codes. “Human Resource Management Review”, No. 11(1-2), 2001, p. 159-175.
• 62. Wray-Bliss E.: Ethics at work, [in:] Knights D., Willmott H. (eds.): Introducing Organisational Behaviour management. Thompson Learning, UK 2007, p. 506-533.