PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

The seeds of leadership : from the experiences of senior Malaysian women leaders

Treść / Zawartość
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
PL
Korzenie przywództwa : z doświadczeń starszych malajskich liderek kobiet
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
The scarcity of women holding top leadership positions in organisations not only reflects the gender equity issue, which is faced globally including Malaysia, but also indicates it as a phenomenon for the women leaders who managed to climb to the top as head of business organisations. This paper attempts to identify the ‘seeds of leadership’ that contributed towards women’s success as head of business organisations. The lived leadership journeys of seven Malaysian women from the technology, private university, manufacturing, hospitality, and legal industry were examined. A hermeneutical phenomenological approach was used, and a purposive sampling technique was carried out. In-depth interviews were utilised, and data were analysed using the Atlas.ti qualitative data analysis software. The leadership identity construction theory (LICT) was employed in this study. Early personal developmental relationships and experiences contribute as antecedents to the leadership identity construction (LIC) of the senior women leaders. These formative relationships and experiences are concluded as being the ‘seeds of leadership’ that contributed to the development of the women’s future LIC. While this study may not be generalised for profiling other women leaders in Malaysia, its novelty lies in the unique insights.
PL
Niedobór kobiet zajmujących najwyższe stanowiska kierownicze w organizacjach nie tylko odzwierciedla problem równości płci, z którym boryka się na całym świecie, w tym Malezja, ale także wskazuje, że jest to zjawisko dla kobiet liderów, którym udało się wspiąć na szczyt jako szefowa organizacji biznesowych. W artykule podjęto próbę zidentyfikowania „zalążków przywództwa”, które przyczyniły się do sukcesu kobiet jako szefów organizacji biznesowych. Przeanalizowano życiowe podróże przywódcze siedmiu malezyjskich kobiet z branży technologicznej, prywatnego uniwersytetu, produkcji, hotelarstwa i branży prawniczej. Zastosowano hermeneutyczne podejście fenomenologiczne i zastosowano celową technikę próbkowania. Wykorzystano pogłębione wywiady, a dane przeanalizowano za pomocą oprogramowania do jakościowej analizy danych Atlas.ti. W badaniu wykorzystano teorię konstrukcji tożsamości przywódców (LICT). Wczesne relacje i doświadczenia związane z rozwojem osobistym przyczyniają się do tworzenia tożsamości przywódczej (LIC) starszych kobiet liderów. Te formujące relacje i doświadczenia są uważane za „zalążki przywództwa”, które przyczyniły się do rozwoju przyszłej LIC kobiet. Chociaż badanie to może nie być uogólnione w celu profilowania innych liderek w Malezji, jego nowość polega na unikalnych spostrzeżeniach.
Rocznik
Strony
200--216
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 43 poz., rys., tab.
Twórcy
  • ITD World, Malaysia
  • Graduate School of Business, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Malaysia
Bibliografia
  • 1. Archard, N., (2013). Female leadership framework: Developing adolescent girls as future women leaders through the formation of a female leadership identity. Leading and Managing, 19(1), 51.
  • 2. Ashford, S. J., DeRue, D. S., (2012). Developing as a leader: The power of mindful engagement. Organizational Dynamics, 41(2), 146-154.
  • 3. Bartone, P. T., Snook, S. A., Forsythe, G. B., Lewis, P. and Bullis, R. C., (2007). Psychosocial development and leader performance of military officer cadets. The Leadership Quarterly, 18(5), 490-504.
  • 4. Bouckaert, L. & Zsolnai, L., (2011). Spirituality and business. In Handbook of Spirituality and Business (pp. 3-8). Palgrave Macmillan, London.
  • 5. Braun, V., Clarke, V., (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
  • 6. Brewer, M. B., Gardner, W., (1996). Who is this “We”? Levels of collective identity and self-representation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(1), 83-93.
  • 7. Carli, L. L., Eagly, A. H., (2016). Women face a labyrinth: an examination of metaphors for women leaders. Gender in Management, 31(8), 514-527.
  • 8. Clerkin, C., & Wilson, M. S., (2017). Gender differences in developmental experiences. In S. R. Madsen (Ed.), Handbook of research on gender and leadership (pp. 378-394). Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • 9. Day, D. V., Harrison, M. M., (2007). A multilevel, identity-based approach to leadership development. Human Resource Management Review, 17(4), 360-373.
  • 10. DeRue, D. S., Ashford, S. J., (2010). Who will lead and who will follow? A social process of leadership identity construction in organisations. Academy of Management Review, 35(4), 627-647.
  • 11. DeRue, D. S., Wellman, N., (2009). Developing leaders via experience: the role of developmental challenge, learning orientation, and feedback availability. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(4), 859.
  • 12. Eagly, A. H., Karau, S., (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109(3), 573-598.
  • 13. Ely, R. J., Ibarra, H. and Kolb, D. M., (2011). Taking gender into account: Theory and design for women’s leadership development programs. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 10(3), 474-493.
  • 14. Fox-Kirk, W., Campbell, C. and Egan, C., (2017). Women’s leadership identity: exploring person and context in theory. In S. R. Madsen (Ed.), Handbook of research on gender and leadership (pp. 193-203). Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • 15. Guillén, L., Mayo, M. and Korotov, K., (2015). Is leadership a part of me? A leader identity approach to understanding the motivation to lead. The Leadership Quarterly, 26(5), 802-820.
  • 16. Hammond, M., Clapp-Smith, R. and Palanski, M., (2017). Beyond (just) the workplace: A theory of leader development across multiple domains. Academy of Management Review, 42(3), 481-498.
  • 17. Hogg, M. A., (2001). A social identity theory of leadership. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5(3), 184-200.
  • 18. Hogg, M. A., Terry, D. I., (2000). Social identity and self-categorisation processes in organisational contexts. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 121-140.
  • 19. Hoobler, J. M., Masterson, C. R., Nkomo, S. M. and Michel, E. J., (2018). The business case for women leaders: Meta-analysis, research critique, and path forward. Journal of Management, 44(6), 2473-2499.
  • 20. Hoyt, M. A., Kennedy, C. L., (2008). Leadership and adolescent girls: A qualitative study of leadership development. American Journal of Community Psychology, 42(3-4), 203-219.
  • 21. Ibarra, H., Ely, R. and Kolb, D., (2013). Women rising: The unseen barriers. Harvard Business Review, 91(9), 60-66.
  • 22. Ibarra, H., Wittman, S., Petriglieri, G. and Day, D., (2014). Leadership and identity: An examination of three theories and new research directions. In D. V. Day (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of leadership and organisations (pp. 285-301). Oxford University Press.
  • 23. Kot, S., Meyer, N. and Broniszewska, A., (2016), A Cross-Country Comparison of the Characteristics of Polish and South African Women Entrepreneurs, Economics and Sociology, 9(4), 207-221.
  • 24. Kim, D., Starks, L. T., (2016). Gender diversity on corporate boards: Do women contribute unique skills? American Economic Review, 106(5), 267-71.
  • 25. Kurdek, L. A., Lillie, R., (1985). The relation between classroom social status and classmate likability, compromising skill, temperament, and neighborhood social interactions. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 6(1), 31-41.
  • 26. Lanka, E., Topakas, A., and Patterson, M., (2020). Becoming a leader: Catalysts and barriers to leader identity construction. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 29(3), 377-390.
  • 27. Laverty, S. M., (2003). Hermeneutic phenomenology and phenomenology: A comparison of historical and methodological considerations. International journal of qualitative methods, 2(3), 21-35.
  • 28. Marchiondo, L. A., Myers, C. G. and Kopelman, S., (2015). The relational nature of leadership identity construction: How and when it influences perceived leadership and decision-making. The Leadership Quarterly, 26(5), 892-908.
  • 29. Mariano, J. M., (2014). Introduction to special section: Understanding paths to youth purpose - Why content and contexts matter. Applied Developmental Science, 18(3), 139-147.
  • 30. Miscenko, D., Guenter, H., and Day, D. V., (2017). Am I a leader? Examining leader identity development over time. The Leadership Quarterly, 28(5), 605-620.
  • 31. Moustakas, C., (1994). Phenomenological research methods. Sage publications.
  • 32. Moxley, R. S. & Pulley, M. L., (2004). Hardships. In CD Mc Cauley, R.S. Moxley & E. VanVelsor (Eds.), The center for creative leadership handbook of leadership development (pp. 183-203). Jossey-Bass.
  • 33. Murphy, S. E., Johnson, S. K., (2011). The benefits of a long-lens approach to leader development: Understanding the seeds of leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 22(3), 459-470.
  • 34. Popper, M., Mayseless, O., (2003). Back to basics: Applying a parenting perspective to transformational leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 14(1), 41-65.
  • 35. Reese, E., Jack, F. and White, N., (2010). Origins of adolescents’ autobiographical memories. Cognitive Development, 25(4), 352-367.
  • 36. Van Manen, M., (2016). Researching lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy. Routledge.
  • 37. Werner, E. E., (1993). Risk, resilience, and recovery: Perspectives from the Kauai Longitudinal Study. Development and Psychopathology, 5(4), 503-515.
  • 38. White, B., Cox, C. & Cooper, C. L., (1992). Women’s career development: A study of highflyers. Blackwell Publishing.
  • 39. Wilson, M. S. & Van, Velsor, E., (2011). A new terrain of leadership development: an Indian perspective. In S. Verma (Ed.), Towards the next orbit: Corporate odyssey (pp. 267-284). Sage Publication.
  • 40. Goh, M. L., (2017, December 20). 2018 Women empowerment year: Enabling women to give their best. The Star. https://www.thestar.com.my/lifestyle/family/2017/12/20/2018-women-empowerment-year.
  • 41. Ibarra, H. & Petriglieri, J., (2016). Impossible Selves: Image strategies and identity threat in professional women’s career transitions. INSEAD Working Paper No. 2016/12/OBH. Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=2742061
  • 42. Woetzel, J., Madgavkar, A. & Sneader, K., (2018). The power of parity: advancing women’s equality in Asia pacific. Shanghai: The McKinsey Global Institute Report. https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/gender-equality/the-power-of-parity-advancing-womens-equality-in-asia-pacific#
  • 43. World Economic Forum. (2020). The Global Gender Gap Report 2020. Retrieved from https://reports.weforum.org/global-gender-gap-report-2020/.
Uwagi
Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa Nr 461252 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2021).
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-6496882d-0546-4817-a726-01bd43f1245c
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.